I love the redemption Christophe Waltz got from playing a very morale great character after playing Landa so evil and great...So glad he didnt get stuck as a guy who has to be a villian
@@MattMama-w2veven if you were a Nazi he’s the bad guy … he’s the only fully self serving character in the movie that you’re not just racist you’re an idiot too
OTOH, is there a movie he wasn't amazing in? I can't think of one. He was incredible in Gilbert Grape, for instance, and at such a young age, too! He's definitely one of our best.
@@sonakeshine Oh, I guess maybe we'll have to agree to disagree, lol. I don't see "himself" in most of his roles. Or maybe any, since HE seems like kind of a quiet, modest, introverted type in person. But few of his characters were like that. If I could think of titles of movies off the top of my head....Ok, just looked some up 😂. How about "Gilbert Grape"; "Once Upon A Time," "Django, Unchained"; "Catch Me If You Can," Revenant," "Wolf of Wall Street," "Shutter Island," "The Aviator," "Gangs of New York," and my fave "Blood Diamond," to name a few😂. VERY different characters ALL. Apparently he can DO it all. Yet HE isn't even anything like Jack in "The Titanic"! Seriously?! Maybe you are confusing his looks with his acting. He definitely LOOKS like himself in most of them!🤣🤣🤣
To be fair it’s because you can only have 1 nomination from the movie in that category, and it went to Christoph Waltz. All 3 had incredible performances
@Rob_M_8 you don't know what you're talking about... multiple actors from the same movie in the same category get nominated often... so try doing some research before you comment
Not only his performance, but in the way he carried himself and his appearance really reminded me of a classical movie star like Edward G Robinson. One of Leo’s best role for sure
I personally don't know Leanarde Decaprio. However, I have never been disappointed in any of the movies that he has been in. He makes every character he plays believable. Some actors, even though they are critically acclaimed, like George Clooney, always have what seems to be a little too much of themselves in their character they are portraying. Edward Norton is another great actor who makes his characters believable and different from each other.
Thank you for your infinite love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I'm forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change. Where are you watching from?
All three actors in this movie were fantastic. Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, and Dicaprio. Tarantino really knows how to draw out the actor’s best possible performance, it’s crazy.
Leo makes Tarantino a better written man. He’s already the goat alone but Leo elevates the stuff Quentin makes - the phrenology aspect in this movie, or the whole flubbed line plot in Hollywood. Leo and Quentin make it better together
Decaprio has some huge balls. It is one thing for some idiot in his grandma's basement to type the "N" word but that guy said it in Jamie Fox and Samuel Jackson's face. Also Samuel Jackson was cool enough to play an uncle Tom character. No one makes movies like Terintino.
Sam Jackson and Jamie Fox had to give DiCaprio the n word pass. He was feeling uncomfortable saying it and they were like "look motherfucker, it's just another Tuesday for us"
On the set, DiCaprio must have been overwhelming. Film robs a character of power. In person, it had to be stunning. Leonardo DiCaprio retreated, and Calvin Candy exploded on the set. He became this Antebellum racist monster.
its common knowledge to those who have studied that era in any depth past the high school level that a great deal of doctors and scientists back then who were just exceptionally racist went well out of their way to find various things that could prove the inferiority of blacks to whites, and came up with some of the most wild theories known to mankind, one of which involved the shape of the skull and different marks on it. I remember in one of my american history classes in college i got to see several museum kept diagrams of the "negro physiology" where they pointed out so many random weird ass things and said "there's our proof, look at that, inferior". It was absolute quack science, but back then people weren't as lucky to live in the age of information, let alone encouraged to act against societal norms, which at the time, were very fucking racist. Ignorance thrives when said ignorance is eager and willing to be so, and MAN were they willing. Plus, southerners back then HAD to prove it to themselves, as many pieces of literature and outspoken people viewed slavery and whatnot as barbaric and repulsive. No, the North weren't all "we think black people are neat", the north was by all accounts very, very racist. They were free states less because they cared about black people and more because they cared about themselves. They had a principle they referred to as "free labor" which ironically was the opposite of the actually completely free labor of slavery (besides, yknow, purchasing the slaves in the first place.) Free labor was in and of itself less free in terms of price and more free in terms of selection. You dont fuckin' compete with labor that is considered subhuman and treated as such, with disgusting hours and conditions, can be overworked to near death, and any disobedience harshly and sadistically punished. You just cant compete with people that are automatic tools, essentially. You gotta pay citizens and whatnot wages and fair pay and normal hours and good conditions and so on so forth, though some believed slaves to be more expensive than that, considering the price you paid to house, secure, and purchase them in the first place. The case was arguable, I guess. Idk, im not a racist shitstain who buys people because they are a different shade than me lmfao. BUT, the north subsisted off of and supported free labor, and tensions between the two believing the other was threatening the other's way of life were a key factor in both sides doubling down, and eventually hitting the civil war.
Yeah, why not bring it up for a character that blitheringly racist? The only thing even _approximately_ interesting about it is the idea of a modern, big name Hollywood actor being the slightest bit educated on history. And even that's a stretch to call "Very interesting." What the hell are you talking about?
So he suggested the character has an interest in 19th century pseudoscience? I guess he did a cursory internet search on the beliefs of slave owning aristocrats.
This movie is simply great. Everyone did a spectacular job. I think the character I liked most, though, was Dr King Schultz. Christoph Waltz is a superb actor.
When I first watched this movie I was like “Sweet little pretty boy Leo is a racist… ok he’s a big racist… damn this guy is dark AF… he’s a GD murdering P.O.S.!” After just a few scenes I didnt even see Leo anymore
Thank you for your infinite love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I'm forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change. Where are you watching from?
Leo was attached to Inglorious Basterds as Hans Landa for a while too, seeing Waltz nab an Oscar for that might have spurred him too… watching Waltz nab a second Oscar for Django as well probably stung a bit lol
There was ONE shortfall in this interview... A failure to address the meat of what makes these character traits plausible as a model of success. Example: too much cruelty at sea on a ship, would lead to mutiny. He never had a true mutiny on his hands.
The "Phrenology thing - he sent it to me so I coukd get *boned* up on the whole thing" 😅 Only Quentin could put it that way. The genius of Tarantino. Truly, intelligent people are the ones who can actually take advice and accept ideas from other people.
Honestly I feel like the gang might still enjoy working on the show but they’re not passionate about it. Even when they seem like they understand what makes the show great it lacks the energy of the early seasons
I either want to go drinking with Leo or Plan B. A coffee at a hot Starbucks in LA with all the hot chicks either one I’ll be good well maybe I’ll be bad but Leah will be the boss. I’ll follow his lead o… Get it lol have his people call my people peace
Leo had all this racist research material ready to go. I didn't ask for it, he just kept sending it to me. Still, to this day, keeps sending me stuff. Not sure why actually
This is the one movie I think would be sweet if Leo and Samual L changed roles with Waltz and Jamie Fox. I think it could be done... obvioulsy Christophe Walks would be a nasty nasty Calvin Candy
I love the redemption Christophe Waltz got from playing a very morale great character after playing Landa so evil and great...So glad he didnt get stuck as a guy who has to be a villian
Oddly enough he was the good guy in inglorious bastards and the bad guy in Django.
how@@MattMama-w2v
@@MattMama-w2vhow so?
@@MattMama-w2veven if you were a Nazi he’s the bad guy … he’s the only fully self serving character in the movie that you’re not just racist you’re an idiot too
@@CharnHorpeeHe negotiated an endgame in Inglorious Basterds, and sent Django back to get tortured after he didn't want to shake a hand
“True that” 😂😂
get it right atleast its true dat
@@paulelroy6650 sorry! I almost put that, but my whiteness really showed up. 😂😂
It's 1997 all over again
Right lol
@@paulelroy6650actually pay attention. It was that not dat. Watch out he starts the word with his mouth.
Leonardo DiCaprio was absolutely amazing in that movie
Absolutely, i think one of his best.
@@isailwind3471 o agree
OTOH, is there a movie he wasn't amazing in? I can't think of one. He was incredible in Gilbert Grape, for instance, and at such a young age, too! He's definitely one of our best.
@@cherylh4688
Leo looks like he's playing himself in all movies.
@@sonakeshine Oh, I guess maybe we'll have to agree to disagree, lol. I don't see "himself" in most of his roles. Or maybe any, since HE seems like kind of a quiet, modest, introverted type in person. But few of his characters were like that.
If I could think of titles of movies off the top of my head....Ok, just looked some up 😂. How about "Gilbert Grape"; "Once Upon A Time," "Django, Unchained"; "Catch Me If You Can," Revenant," "Wolf of Wall Street," "Shutter Island," "The Aviator," "Gangs of New York," and my fave "Blood Diamond," to name a few😂. VERY different characters ALL. Apparently he can DO it all. Yet HE isn't even anything like Jack in "The Titanic"! Seriously?!
Maybe you are confusing his looks with his acting. He definitely LOOKS like himself in most of them!🤣🤣🤣
The way Jamie Fox complimentd Leo in his comment, expresses the greatness in both of them. Massive respect 🙏
Imagine getting to have hours of intense conversation with Tarantino. That would be a fan’s dream.
I think I’d feel like I just had an exhausting workout afterwards though 😂
I’m thinking the same about Leonardo, working with so many amazing directors, I’d have so many questions plus his environmental work.
The guy is a “repellent gargoyle” - True that!
Can’t believe he didn’t win anything for that - he was the best at being the WORST; that Stephen/Calvin duo is just despicable.
To be fair it’s because you can only have 1 nomination from the movie in that category, and it went to Christoph Waltz. All 3 had incredible performances
@@Rob_M_8that's not true at all. It's because the other nominees were better. Philip Seymour Hoffman should've won for The Master though.
@Rob_M_8 you don't know what you're talking about... multiple actors from the same movie in the same category get nominated often... so try doing some research before you comment
@@TysonGraham-gu7ckLeo should've been nominated
Not only his performance, but in the way he carried himself and his appearance really reminded me of a classical movie star like Edward G Robinson. One of Leo’s best role for sure
I personally don't know Leanarde Decaprio. However, I have never been disappointed in any of the movies that he has been in. He makes every character he plays believable. Some actors, even though they are critically acclaimed, like George Clooney, always have what seems to be a little too much of themselves in their character they are portraying. Edward Norton is another great actor who makes his characters believable and different from each other.
Nah Norton is too banal, but yes leo, Clooney, Tom cruise and will Smith are extremely versatile
Yeah, Norton was good in The Score.
@@ktolwal where the Hardy at?
@@ktolwalthat's your opinion
@ktolwal it's insane of you to include will smith in that line up 💀
"i got boned up on it" lmao
Thank you for your infinite love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I'm forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change. Where are you watching from?
Leo would only talk to you if you were a 19 year old model, FOH 🤡
All three actors in this movie were fantastic.
Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, and Dicaprio.
Tarantino really knows how to draw out the actor’s best possible performance, it’s crazy.
All Jamie Foxx does is rave about his co-stars. What a humble artist.
As GREAT as this movie is and how good everyone did but Leo was top tier in this movie...
It shows incredible a writer he is when he can get mega stars like bruce willis, robert de niro and leo dicaprio and have them as the 3rd billing
Leo makes Tarantino a better written man. He’s already the goat alone but Leo elevates the stuff Quentin makes - the phrenology aspect in this movie, or the whole flubbed line plot in Hollywood. Leo and Quentin make it better together
Every actor in that movie was perfect
I love all if any Tarantino videos
I could listen to him all day!!!
One of the best things, was when Leo said, he had to bring it because of Samuel L. Jackson! He had too match his greatness.
Source? :)
Didn't happen.
What are they talking about he played a bad guy in the Man in the Iron Mask
Google unequivocal
@@CasperHarris950😂😂😂
Come on he played dual roles in that movie. More so he played the good guy. Yeah he played the twin king but mostly he played the good role more
@@NoName-cq7gy he doesn't know what unequivocal means
@@NoName-cq7gy no he literally played the evil twin more. He had like 3 lines as the good brother
Leonardo made the character very believable
“True that”😂
Gotta love him lol
His swamp Southern accent was also impeccable!
Decaprio has some huge balls. It is one thing for some idiot in his grandma's basement to type the "N" word but that guy said it in Jamie Fox and Samuel Jackson's face. Also Samuel Jackson was cool enough to play an uncle Tom character. No one makes movies like Terintino.
Sam Jackson and Jamie Fox had to give DiCaprio the n word pass. He was feeling uncomfortable saying it and they were like "look motherfucker, it's just another Tuesday for us"
On the set, DiCaprio must have been overwhelming. Film robs a character of power. In person, it had to be stunning. Leonardo DiCaprio retreated, and Calvin Candy exploded on the set. He became this Antebellum racist monster.
QT could be a damn good animated character design
Actually his best performance.
No, his best is Rick Dalton in OUATIH IMO
Calvin Candy one of my favorite characters of all time
Oh, _he_ brought up the phrenology? Interesting. Very interesting.
Lol. And did Quentin say “so I could get boned up on it myself”?? He’s rock hard for phrenology.
its common knowledge to those who have studied that era in any depth past the high school level that a great deal of doctors and scientists back then who were just exceptionally racist went well out of their way to find various things that could prove the inferiority of blacks to whites, and came up with some of the most wild theories known to mankind, one of which involved the shape of the skull and different marks on it. I remember in one of my american history classes in college i got to see several museum kept diagrams of the "negro physiology" where they pointed out so many random weird ass things and said "there's our proof, look at that, inferior". It was absolute quack science, but back then people weren't as lucky to live in the age of information, let alone encouraged to act against societal norms, which at the time, were very fucking racist. Ignorance thrives when said ignorance is eager and willing to be so, and MAN were they willing.
Plus, southerners back then HAD to prove it to themselves, as many pieces of literature and outspoken people viewed slavery and whatnot as barbaric and repulsive. No, the North weren't all "we think black people are neat", the north was by all accounts very, very racist. They were free states less because they cared about black people and more because they cared about themselves. They had a principle they referred to as "free labor" which ironically was the opposite of the actually completely free labor of slavery (besides, yknow, purchasing the slaves in the first place.)
Free labor was in and of itself less free in terms of price and more free in terms of selection. You dont fuckin' compete with labor that is considered subhuman and treated as such, with disgusting hours and conditions, can be overworked to near death, and any disobedience harshly and sadistically punished. You just cant compete with people that are automatic tools, essentially. You gotta pay citizens and whatnot wages and fair pay and normal hours and good conditions and so on so forth, though some believed slaves to be more expensive than that, considering the price you paid to house, secure, and purchase them in the first place. The case was arguable, I guess. Idk, im not a racist shitstain who buys people because they are a different shade than me lmfao. BUT, the north subsisted off of and supported free labor, and tensions between the two believing the other was threatening the other's way of life were a key factor in both sides doubling down, and eventually hitting the civil war.
What are you implying? That Leo does research for his roles?
Yeah, why not bring it up for a character that blitheringly racist? The only thing even _approximately_ interesting about it is the idea of a modern, big name Hollywood actor being the slightest bit educated on history. And even that's a stretch to call "Very interesting." What the hell are you talking about?
So he suggested the character has an interest in 19th century pseudoscience? I guess he did a cursory internet search on the beliefs of slave owning aristocrats.
This movie is simply great.
Everyone did a spectacular job. I think the character I liked most, though, was Dr King Schultz. Christoph Waltz is a superb actor.
When I first watched this movie I was like “Sweet little pretty boy Leo is a racist… ok he’s a big racist… damn this guy is dark AF… he’s a GD murdering P.O.S.!” After just a few scenes I didnt even see Leo anymore
😂underrated
“True dat”
He dates young girls flies around in jets and tries to protect the environment. He is straight up! A Bad Guy!!!
Leo saw Christopher as Landa and said BET
loved this one ❤
Where does that question come from?.I would like to watch that interview
Hahaha. I just watched it. Where's my troublemaker?
Thank you for your infinite love and support you have consistently shown me in such difficult moments. I'm forever grateful. I really appreciate your unconditional love to me and every effort exerted by you to cause a change. Where are you watching from?
He had been the initial frontrunner for Hans Landa after all
Leo was attached to Inglorious Basterds as Hans Landa for a while too, seeing Waltz nab an Oscar for that might have spurred him too… watching Waltz nab a second Oscar for Django as well probably stung a bit lol
"...so I could get boned up on it." Haha, nice one.
Leo sending Quentin materials to read 🫠
So many favs in this clip
True That hahaha
There was ONE shortfall in this interview... A failure to address the meat of what makes these character traits plausible as a model of success. Example: too much cruelty at sea on a ship, would lead to mutiny. He never had a true mutiny on his hands.
Tarantino needs another ‘T’ in his name
Seen it maybe 2 times and it’s one of the best movies I’ve seen in a long ass time
SCORPIO HAS DARKNESS . MANSON . EVOLVED OR NOT ?
He was pretty dark in Don's Plum
Sold 🔨
they’re playing dress-up. as much as I love film & cinema, it’s all just Mister Roger’s trolley trip
The "Phrenology thing - he sent it to me so I coukd get *boned* up on the whole thing" 😅
Only Quentin could put it that way. The genius of Tarantino. Truly, intelligent people are the ones who can actually take advice and accept ideas from other people.
True dat
The best actor of all time!
true dat
❤Leonardo has a worm eyes❤
Honestly I feel like the gang might still enjoy working on the show but they’re not passionate about it. Even when they seem like they understand what makes the show great it lacks the energy of the early seasons
True Dat
He scared me in that movie true horror
“It was from going and talking to him. Went over to his house and he just kept dropping N bombs it was crazy”
A lot of people are Leo fans....I wasn't too, much hype. After this movie I really got it
"It was actually his idea to bring in the whole phrenology aspect."...Just had that up your sleeve? JK. Love you Leo ;P
this movie is so great
Candy seemed historical. Betch people just like him were real.
There, but for the grace of God, go we.
Tru dat! 😂😂😂
Did he just say “tru dat”..?? What huh??
Alright? True dat 😭😭
Leonardo deserved the Oscar for best supporting instead of Christoph waltz.
Tell Leo to come home 😂😂😂
And, of course, the amazing#JamieFoxx 🎬 came into the film🏆🏆
Candie was the bad guy?
More like the Hate Gatsby
True dat hahaha
Lmao at the idea of him sending a bunch of phrenology stuff
I bet Republicans loved his character, but would be confused by the gargoyle comment.
They are all Stephan!s.
I never thought he was a good actor
Quit your nitpicking and do some homework.
Why do you come back to nitpick? Bro you're not a critic. Can you act? Let's see it.
He is just very average. Get over it.
Stayed up for hrs eh... i wonder why that was 👃
I either want to go drinking with Leo or Plan B. A coffee at a hot Starbucks in LA with all the hot chicks either one I’ll be good well maybe I’ll be bad but Leah will be the boss. I’ll follow his lead o… Get it lol have his people call my people peace
“And then he gave me some books on phrenology from his personal collection.”
What movie is this?
Serious? Django Unchained
His best role and should’ve been giving the Oscar for it. Even though I despise the film.
Leo had all this racist research material ready to go. I didn't ask for it, he just kept sending it to me. Still, to this day, keeps sending me stuff. Not sure why actually
This is the one movie I think would be sweet if Leo and Samual L changed roles with Waltz and Jamie Fox. I think it could be done... obvioulsy Christophe Walks would be a nasty nasty Calvin Candy
Someone like Christian Bale would have done it better.
Leo = Based Chad