Glock 17 vs Glock 34 Recoil Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии • 13

  • @bryanoliver5550
    @bryanoliver5550 Год назад +17

    You summed it up very well , Glock 34 it is .

  • @thomasbourn9340
    @thomasbourn9340 6 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for the vid man. I'm a glock 34 believer now as well lol.

  • @Gieszkanne
    @Gieszkanne 9 месяцев назад +4

    Why "even it has more mass" More mass has more mass intertia. The recoil doesnt come from the moving slide. Otherwise a revolver would have less recoil. The moving barrel and slide rather take away of some recoil. Or take a 308 and shoot it from semi auto und after that from a bolt action rifle. Or pump gun vs auto loader.

    • @peterkukolik8402
      @peterkukolik8402 5 месяцев назад +1

      Amen.

    • @RickDeckard2049
      @RickDeckard2049 2 месяца назад

      thank you. with this logic a sub compact would have less recoil than a full size. it doesnt make any sense.

  • @mikem.2078
    @mikem.2078 10 месяцев назад +2

    Do you generally find that 115 grain has more kick than say 147? Or usually less recoil?

    • @Gieszkanne
      @Gieszkanne 9 месяцев назад +1

      It depends on the load. In general most 147 are subsonnic and loaded weaker, with less pressure. Also the blast is less.

  • @unclerenatch3388
    @unclerenatch3388 7 месяцев назад +1

    What is that magazine you have in the gen 3 Glock 34? Can’t seem to find a 19 round mag that will fit It

    • @memedealer171
      @memedealer171 2 месяца назад

      I think it's an OEM mag with a +5 baseplate extension on it.

  • @pauldvorsky1969
    @pauldvorsky1969 Год назад +7

    I only buy Gen 5 G34's

  • @bighat291
    @bighat291 Месяц назад

    Not a fair test. One has a dual recoil spring and the other doesn’t.

  • @johnsellers9623
    @johnsellers9623 3 месяца назад +1

    Your hand was very close to the slide , looks like your skin is going to get pinched.