Misc Fortune, New Images

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 янв 2025

Комментарии • 76

  • @NerdblurbSteve
    @NerdblurbSteve 13 дней назад +36

    Yeah those are not components, they're windows to the 6 scu storage on the outside.

  • @gunslingerspartan
    @gunslingerspartan 13 дней назад +10

    when you're trying to stay positive but your ship is literally called the mis(c)fortune

    • @randlebrowne2048
      @randlebrowne2048 12 дней назад +1

      Too be fair, it's designed to take advantage of the misfortune of others (much like the Vulture).

  • @ivanpeso6280
    @ivanpeso6280 13 дней назад +8

    From the windows in corridor from inside you can see that “6 scu grid just from behind)

  • @simondolak6534
    @simondolak6534 13 дней назад +12

    vulture has 12/13 SCU + 13 in buffer
    fortune: 6 on each sides, but 2 buffers. Question is: how big is fortune buffer?
    CIG stated that vulture focuses on RMC so making second ship to focus CM makes sense
    but they missed the oportunity with medium sized salvage ship

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад +1

      @@simondolak6534 yup, If I had to guess it would be about 6-7 in buffers. I don’t think the buffer has been leaked. Then it could hold about the same in the buffers but less actual boxes. I would like to see it at our around 100 for that and I have a feeling they’ll try to just keep the prospector pricing. Not looking very good

    • @geladosolah
      @geladosolah 13 дней назад +1

      i can get in my vulture 36 + 13 lol i dont see that new misc ship being any good but we will see...
      maybe nerf vulture to sell the new ship is how CIG works now...

    • @simondolak6534
      @simondolak6534 13 дней назад +1

      @ I do not like off grid cargo
      + vulture wont fit in to ironclad

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@simondolak6534 yup, the height is looking too tall for the Ironclad, but this should fit.

    • @sebc8938
      @sebc8938 13 дней назад

      The size of the buffer is "software-based" so it can be changed. Expect some drama, a new meta at launch then a nerf ...
      Effectively, a medium size salvage ship would have been logical between the solo Vulture and the very large Reclaimer. But in fact, the Vulture has work for two crews if you take into account the cargo management and the components salvaging.

  • @drksideofthewal
    @drksideofthewal 13 дней назад +4

    The arrows on the cargo grid makes me think it does in fact have conveyer belt functionality that will follow those arrows

  • @Kayabis
    @Kayabis 13 дней назад +8

    if this thing is supposed to be a good choice it would need to be way cheaper than the vulture in my opinion

    • @gaymergirl6707
      @gaymergirl6707 13 дней назад +2

      With the Vulture being ~2.7 mil, if the Fortune is more than 1.5 mil it just won't make sense IMO. Even then, the Vulture will still be a better choice because you can do basic component scavenging with the extra space alongside the cargo grid.

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад +2

      @Kayabis I hope from a pledge prospective it’s in with the starters. Ideally 100 or less. But, they’ll mess it up and just keep the price the same as the Prospector.

    • @Kayabis
      @Kayabis 13 дней назад

      @@gaymergirl6707 i mean in game it is probably around 2.4k or so cause it is misc therefore you kinda also pay for the brand

    • @Kayabis
      @Kayabis 13 дней назад

      @@Guardian_Templar i realy think that the fortune could be a great ship to get into the salvage gameplay but i feel like they are just gonna give it a more previse scraper than the vulture and maybe a bit more cargo space on grid and say there you go for 150 bucks or more so yeah they are probably gonna mess up this oportunity

  • @Lockecole81
    @Lockecole81 12 дней назад +1

    I expect it to be on par with the Vulture. 6 scu on each side, and another 6 in each buffer.

  • @EdmundRobinson
    @EdmundRobinson 13 дней назад +1

    Those are not components at 3:20. That is a window look out to the SCU conveyor belt thing.

  • @Storm-Cleaver
    @Storm-Cleaver 12 дней назад +1

    I'm excited for the Fortune. and hoping that it's slightly larger and more expensive than the vulture... just because my Vulture can't be melted and I want to swap it for the Fortune if at all possible. If it's cheaper, then I need to figure out what to melt, what else to upgrade to it, and what to do with my Vulture.
    If the theories that the cargo grids hold 12 SCU each win out, that's 24 externally plus whatever is held in the hopper. I'm assuming the cockpit and hab are one combined unit like the Propector. It'd be nice to have some cargo storage internally in-back but I suspect that door in the teaser just leads to engineering and component access.
    You were right about talking about the axis of the grid. For a ship, the x-axis is the width, y-axis is the height, z-axis is the length. When you corrected yourself in editing, you changed the POV to that of the viewer, looking from the side, rather than the ship.

  • @tomschuelke7955
    @tomschuelke7955 13 дней назад +1

    it gives me the impression that the side panels can be moved in some kind of mechanism... between the pads you can see foldable structures. but i have no idea how this can be equipped with the boxes, especially if it is to be automated.

  • @Perplexed000
    @Perplexed000 13 дней назад +5

    Might open (extend) like the Hull series so that it has more SCU storage than it looks. There’s no way you’re going to have to load this thing from the outside. Would be neat if the cargo fins rotate so that the printer can fill all of them up. Those ridges between the squares could also be conveyors that pull the boxes up onto the cargo area as they’re printed . We NEED a mid size salvage ship between Vulture and Reclaimer. Would be dumb just to make a MISC version of the Vulture.

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      Hopefully this will fill the need for a mid salvager but I don't think this will be it. We'll have to see

  • @sebc8938
    @sebc8938 13 дней назад +2

    It is a good example of why Star Citizen is taking so long to develop. They said previously that that were not planning a comveyor belt system and would stick to the manual/tractor beam cargo management that exist and is well developed. But suddenly, for one specific ships after tens of cargo and indutrial ships without it, TATA ! A conveyor belt system appears ! So they seem to have done the R&D investment anyway only for one ship knowing that means it will be asked by backers on old ships and future housing. Expect some frustration from backers who just had a Citizen Con without this feature announced.

  • @Thearmiktz
    @Thearmiktz 13 дней назад +1

    Great to see you bro. I was getting worried, it's great to see you are ok. Hope you get better quickly! o7. TY for the video. 🎉

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад +1

      @@Thearmiktz thanks man! Yeah, just been busy thanks as always for stopping by!

    • @Thearmiktz
      @Thearmiktz 13 дней назад

      @@Guardian_Templar you got it!

  • @synapticsqueeze3380
    @synapticsqueeze3380 13 дней назад +1

    I think a lot will depend on the hopper size and the price on the ship. At a glance it's very underwhelming when you consider the practical cargo size of the Vulture rather than the on-paper one. If it has a 12 SCU hopper, it would need to be priced accordingly in-game and as a pledge.
    I feel like they missed an opportunity to make the center part a 4-sided rotating spindle. With 4 x 6 SCU storage and 12 in the hopper, it's on par with the Vulture. You give up a bit of potential for convenience. If the grids can store 2 deep, that would work too. But that seems unlikely if this is intended to be a conveyor belt sort of deal.

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@synapticsqueeze3380 a rotation spinal would be very cool. I feel like they’ll keep the pledge the same as the Prospector and miss the mark. I look forward to being wrong but we’ll see.

  • @Raptorman386
    @Raptorman386 13 дней назад +1

    You won’t catch me carrying RMC externally. The pirates are gonna love you guys that get this one

  • @steinmayer2791
    @steinmayer2791 13 дней назад +2

    It is I bet a 6 SCU each grid for the printer. Full auto so no moving yourself. Middle are just windows to the grid. The elevator will be in the back for like 2 to 6 more SCU (in front of the main engine). Buffer will be 4 to 6 SCU shared or just one per printer.

  • @TheeKevlarDucky
    @TheeKevlarDucky 13 дней назад +2

    HE'S BACK!! Oh buddy I'm excited for this one.
    Those look more like windows and we're seeing the backside of those storage racks. Interesting ship. Would be super surprised (pleasantly) if this did slot in cheaper than the Vulture. Interesting that those little conveyor belts really do look conveniently placed to move boxes...I mean there's even one of those little belts that butts up against that printer door. Unique for sure. Can't wait to see more.

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@TheeKevlarDucky indeed thanks, I’m thinking they’ll try to keep prospector pricing but not sure I see that value here. I think it will be overpriced, but I’m probably going to get it eitherway. I know not the best way to go about it but this could be a big win at our around 100.

    • @TheeKevlarDucky
      @TheeKevlarDucky 13 дней назад

      @Guardian_Templar oh, if they kept it under 125 that would be HUGE. I'm not holding my breath after what they ended up pricing the Intrepid.

  • @valkyrie1689
    @valkyrie1689 13 дней назад +1

    Thanks for the video, get well stay awesome

  • @foreverrgamer8759
    @foreverrgamer8759 12 дней назад +1

    So I have a LTI Vulture from
    A CCU chain.I hope this is priced right above the vulture so I can consider if I want to switch.

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  11 дней назад

      @@foreverrgamer8759 I’m thinking this may not compete on price with the Vulture but with inflation still going up, who knows for sure. I suspect it will be the same as the current Prospector

  • @alexanderdooley5833
    @alexanderdooley5833 13 дней назад

    the door for ejection boxes will dictate this, if the door slides open into the inside of the fortune (this is where the interior shows a tunnel so prob not.) the door would then open for 2scu. My bet is the door opens towards the outside of the ship (slides away from the center, not a folding door), with just enough room for 1scu's, 12 scu total, with a rear room in the back for crafting.

  • @MrDangerUXO
    @MrDangerUXO 13 дней назад +1

    Hopefully, we are getting closer to getting enough MISC assets for the Expanse to come out with base building

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@MrDangerUXO it would be nice to see a refinery ship.

  • @qutatron
    @qutatron 13 дней назад +2

    Hmm.. only external storage in salvage ship? Weir decision. Definitely Vulture is better if we talk about solo gameplay.
    Thank's for great video. I hope you recover quickly. Cheers!

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@qutatron thanks, and I agree. It seems this will become the new Salvage starter but folks are still looking for a better medium salvager. Maybe an Argo raft sized salvager.

    • @sebc8938
      @sebc8938 13 дней назад

      @@Guardian_Templar Yes this would duplicate the team Solo MISC Prospector/Crewed ARGO MOLE.

  • @biolazer
    @biolazer 13 дней назад +1

    I wonder if this is a salvage shop how much storage does it have and would it be the vulture killer

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@biolazer I’m thinking 6/7 per buffer. I think it’s only a vulture killer if it can carry the same amount of SCU in each buffer about 12. I feel like it’s meant to be more of a starter than the Vulture so let’s see if it comes in lower too, it should by a fair amount.

    • @biolazer
      @biolazer 13 дней назад +1

      @@Guardian_Templar for me if it's like thr prospector and carries 32 scu in the buffer plus has cargo to store some scu than it is the vulture killer but if it has 32 scu in the buffer and no storage than with a iron clad it'll be the move for pair ship but you should still do the reclaimer if that's the case only thing that would change it if you can do more than 1 scu at a time it would help like the reclaimer

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @ yeah, I like the Reclaimer and it’s generally the better ship. I like the ability to move around and scrape with the Vulture. The polaris combo is really good because of the automated turret defense and medical beds. Even for a solo player I like those benefits. I need to check out more of your vids. I’ve watched a few recently.

  • @charliemcawesome5012
    @charliemcawesome5012 13 дней назад

    My guess is this is 2 ships….. I may be wrong. But the lack of detail and the larger component bays let me think the red door is the StarLancer TAC. Recently combat ships from Mirai had the red interior. Maybe that’s a Misc thing?? Also, CIG may be using 2 different ship pics to cause confusion.

  • @RavingNut
    @RavingNut 13 дней назад

    That doesn't seem very MSIC with tedium of having to do that outside management. Hoping that is a conveyer grid.
    On top of that, it will need to have more SCU ability then a Vulture (especially if it only has 1 scraping head), or it will be a step back/down from the Vulture.
    P.S other than that, I don't mind the external cargo.
    P.P.S I can fit 18 SCU in the cargo area of a Vulture, and if you want to be "risky" you can fit around 21SCU. So, the fortune needs to deliver is a decent way to be the "medium" salvager to justify a higher price and its size grade. Cargo is the main thing, as it is already on the back foot with 1 (friggin' 1) scraping head.

    • @RavingNut
      @RavingNut 13 дней назад

      Had to add this as a reply.
      It could make up for the cargo grid by having a REALLY decent internal hopper. That would sell it for me and give a pass to the small outside grid.

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  12 дней назад +1

      @@RavingNut I’m starting to have the feeling this will slot in as the new entry to salvage. Still leaving a void where many want a bigger salvager between the Vulture and Reclaimer.

  • @Tainted-Soul
    @Tainted-Soul 13 дней назад +1

    Get better soon , this could be a good thing or a bad thing . like you say if your running it with a cargo ship cough... Polaris cough .. then having it on the out side will help loads even if it is a smaller amount, 12 SCU is about the same as the Vulture's grid if we didnt stack up the walk way LOL

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад +1

      @@Tainted-Soul yup and thank you. Compared to the Vulture the external storage leaves almost no room for more boxes. It’s hard to tell how wide that other pictures hallway is but perhaps there maybe some storage in the back.

    • @Tainted-Soul
      @Tainted-Soul 13 дней назад

      @@Guardian_Templar yes but then the question is how do you get the box's inside ? if the extractor is on the outside too?. the display panel inside I bet is for crafting the small items like salvage gun parts etc.
      So I dont think you will be putting anything inside and also think its a small gangway like the prospector and would be in the way of you getting in and out of the ship

  • @Ryecrash617
    @Ryecrash617 13 дней назад

    The “MISC Fortune” sounds too much like “misfortune” for me to want to buy ut

  • @sanctred
    @sanctred 13 дней назад

    It will be slightly better than the vulture obviously so people with a vulture buy it.

  • @h3llofademon
    @h3llofademon 13 дней назад

    6 scu each side wouldnt be good for a medium ship.

  • @Hellhawk
    @Hellhawk 13 дней назад

    shoulda been called the Misfortune. Looks like a trash design if they force you to EVA to cycle through your buffer...

  • @mateoemanuel3517
    @mateoemanuel3517 13 дней назад

    copy paste ship like a lot of thing in star citizen

    • @rooster1012
      @rooster1012 13 дней назад +1

      Hardly a copy and paste ship.

  • @blakk7
    @blakk7 13 дней назад +1

    Are you fn serious. The tech demo is a broken mess and you are excited about more jpeg ships. Good lord

  • @SpearHead1011
    @SpearHead1011 13 дней назад

    Stop speculating you scrub White Knight....I bet you cant wait to give them more money. You people are the reason that we dont have a game yet

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад +8

      @@SpearHead1011 if you think I’m a white knight then you haven’t been watching my vids. Thanks for the view though keyboard warrior!

  • @bovdoyle2942
    @bovdoyle2942 13 дней назад +3

    it looks inferior to the vulture

    • @Guardian_Templar
      @Guardian_Templar  13 дней назад

      @@bovdoyle2942 yup, looks to be the new Salvage starter so not the medium salvager folks have been looking for

    • @sebc8938
      @sebc8938 13 дней назад +1

      I think the idea is to have a smaller salvage ship with smaller cargo but also without the need to manage it. An optimized Vulture needs in fact a crew of two to parallelize work. So the Vulture could be seen as a medium salvage ship that can be operated solo.

    • @drksideofthewal
      @drksideofthewal 13 дней назад

      @@sebc8938
      Good theory. I was just saying that it actually does look like a conveyer on the SCU grid