@@CodeCraftersCorner Hello friend, could you make a workflow with flux. With inpaint adding flux Loras, I've been looking for a long time but I can't find it, I want to do inpaint with a Lora that trains for flux
Thank you for posting this, and right at the exact time I was interested in doing something similar. This is awesome! I'll certainly be following your vids. However, I find it difficult to follow your connections (noodles) when they are straight lines and hidden underneath node boxes or when they twist behind the node they come from leaving very little to visually follow. I realize I could just copy your workflow but I'm trying to learn the logical steps and reasons for creating and using each type of node. It is really your commentary that is the most helpful My biggest concern is that this is pointless. As I understand it, LoRAs are meant to enhance or add to what Checkpoints fail to do. By using an SD or SDXL LoRA before the FLUX model, anything the LoRA generates but is not in the training data of the FLUX model, will be washed away. If I use an SD LoRA of a specific artist's style the final image after FLUX will be nothing like that artist's style.
This is the similar concept of workflow I use currently. Use Flux for refining the image before upscale in the final step. SD1.5 or SDXL --> Flux --> Upscale as final step.😆
Thanks for sharing your efforts, I'll give it a try. I am stuck with my poor old GTX 1070, which can manage Flux fp8 but doesn't have the vram to handle a lora in a Flux workflow, so this may be the solution.
I feel compelled to ask why not use other models to achieve the result you want? You are literally trying to duplicate an image you have. And using 1.5 to gen it… If you want more details use a detailer and upscaler
That's right! If you're getting good results, that's what matters. As I mentioned, I'm integrating SD LoRAs with the Flux workflow since I no longer use the SD workflow. In the end, it comes down to preference and what works best for you. After all, detailers and upscalers can be used with Flux as well.
Flux Loras are best especially for person. It would be great to be able to use Flux Loras in SD1.5 or SDXL. I'm going to try your method backwards and see if it works. Edit: It didn't work, I got similar picture but with a different person.
Respect for consistent detail explanation as always, Thank You
Thank you for sharing your workflows!
My pleasure!
@@CodeCraftersCorner Hello friend, could you make a workflow with flux. With inpaint adding flux Loras, I've been looking for a long time but I can't find it, I want to do inpaint with a Lora that trains for flux
This is so far the best approach. Thanks!😁
Thank you!
Thank you for posting this, and right at the exact time I was interested in doing something similar. This is awesome! I'll certainly be following your vids.
However, I find it difficult to follow your connections (noodles) when they are straight lines and hidden underneath node boxes or when they twist behind the node they come from leaving very little to visually follow. I realize I could just copy your workflow but I'm trying to learn the logical steps and reasons for creating and using each type of node.
It is really your commentary that is the most helpful
My biggest concern is that this is pointless. As I understand it, LoRAs are meant to enhance or add to what Checkpoints fail to do.
By using an SD or SDXL LoRA before the FLUX model, anything the LoRA generates but is not in the training data of the FLUX model, will be washed away.
If I use an SD LoRA of a specific artist's style the final image after FLUX will be nothing like that artist's style.
Thank you for the amazingly detailed video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
thank you for the great explanation!! very clear!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Why are the lines connecting the nodes in your workflow so straight and neat? Normally the lines between nodes look like spaghetti strings.
you can change it in the settings, it's not hard to find
This is the similar concept of workflow I use currently. Use Flux for refining the image before upscale in the final step. SD1.5 or SDXL --> Flux --> Upscale as final step.😆
Thanks for sharing!
Great video!
😊
Glad you liked it!
Very interesting !!
Glad you think so!
Thanks for sharing your efforts, I'll give it a try.
I am stuck with my poor old GTX 1070, which can manage Flux fp8 but doesn't have the vram to handle a lora in a Flux workflow, so this may be the solution.
Glad to hear this could be a potential solution.
I feel compelled to ask why not use other models to achieve the result you want? You are literally trying to duplicate an image you have. And using 1.5 to gen it… If you want more details use a detailer and upscaler
That's right! If you're getting good results, that's what matters. As I mentioned, I'm integrating SD LoRAs with the Flux workflow since I no longer use the SD workflow. In the end, it comes down to preference and what works best for you. After all, detailers and upscalers can be used with Flux as well.
Flux Loras are best especially for person. It would be great to be able to use Flux Loras in SD1.5 or SDXL. I'm going to try your method backwards and see if it works.
Edit: It didn't work, I got similar picture but with a different person.
Thanks for sharing your results. Also agree on Flux loras for person.
watching at 1.5x
😊
Glad you're enjoying the video at 1.5x! I do the same-actually made my own Chrome extension for it too. 😀