THE MAP: dev.militarysummary.com Store: www.militarysummary.store/ Google doc: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18WfJv1_DOlFOzvjh6iT1N8ltDvaCeWu1cPK_eaHKCR4/edit?usp=sharing Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-1613003 Telegram channel: t.me/militarysummary Twitter: twitter.com/MilitarySummary Email: military.summary.info@gmail.com Patreon: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true Help the channel: www.donationalerts.com/r/military_summary Help the channel: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true
As an American, I am sorry that my government caused this terrible conflict in Ukraine. Nothing good has come from “protecting our interests “ when we staged and managed the coup d’etat in 2014. Nuland herself said it took 6 years and $5 billion to destabilize the constitutional government of Ukraine and replace leadership of our choosing in this land so far from the borders of the U.S.
Boomers with the "St.Petersburg comment" is so funny. The US has been quite open with the strategic interest in Ukraine for decades. In western main stream press.
@@teatime6597 Yes it was also admitted by Merkel and Hollande that the Minsk accords were simply to buy time and never meant to be respected by the west. Some morons prefer to ignore the events held on Maidan in 2013 (there is video footage) at which certain of our inglorious western politicians were encouraging the anti-Russia nationalist uprising.
Y'all always back these nazis coups and wars and then just say "it was all the government" when it all goes south for you. A government you voted in given that the decisions are bipartisan.
Russia absolutely have the responsibility to defend their homeland at home against NATO. Defending themselves from stolen land is very difficult to justify. When China invade Australia and say they have the right to defend their homeland against NATO.
The conflict has raged too long. Who are the ones refusing peace talks? Who are the ones that also failed their counter offensive? Zelensky must go. Give peace a chance
Both the west and the Russians are so incompetant its painful. US being a shadow of what it was in the 90s and the Russians being a shadow of the Soviets.
This isn't "Europe's war" it's an American-.driven proxy war (with Kiev as a willing accomplice (and battleground), but without the US they would never have provoked it). NATO/EU are basically tools here. Ideally, European leaders should have refused to have anything to do with this mess from day one, they should even have told Kiev in advance around 2020: "we're not going to put European peace, safety and energy supplies n the line for your sake. If you pitch a war with Russia, then you're on your own except for possibly help from the US, whatever they might offer!". That would have poured some cold water on it in advance. But it was obviously hard to say that, when they're all part of or closely tied to NATO, with the US as their top dog. Plus they are more or less brainwashed into accepting whatever America does on the world stage. It seems the EU and their elites can only learn something from this through a resounding defeat for Ukraine that would taint their own credibility. That kind of defeat has happened many times before in European history.
It is an European war as the US will not be able to act on any important scale now it is clear that Trump winning or losing the november elections will create a totally devided country that will give enormous riots that paralysis the economy and ends its foreign polices. The EU is on its own and that's even better.
@@LehmannMr if anybody is responsible for economic situation in Serbia is NATO and our government from 2000s till now because they are pro west puppets! Thats why they have power now. Why ukraina is not neutral? They would cooperate with west and east and live better..
Rising costs is Shell Production in the US has made the cost of 155mm shells increase by 7 times since the start of the Russian military operation in the former Ukraine. The US was producing 14,000 shells per month in 2022 - New York Times. Now it is only 28,000 per month at many times the cost. Russia on the other hand produce 4-5 million per year at the cost of $600 per shell. Before Ukraine's failed Summer Offensive, it was firing 5-10,000 per day. Antimony is a semi-metal used in Shell Production, the US is almost out of this essential metal, and Russia and China are the biggest manufacturers of it in the world. Europe produces 4,000 shells per month - Financial Times The British have sent a whopping 20% of their entire National Army's Equipment to Ukraine alone. NATO wouldn't last a War with Russia for longer then 1 week.
I think that nato probebly could win. That said I think they would take insane losses due to Russian defenses, immidiate air superiority and immidiate artillery superiority. Plus logistic lines being much shorter for Russia. NATO strategy’s seem to not really work on developed nations very well where as the Russians had this whole war to adapt tactics. If china or joined or something like that then I think Russia could win but in then end bigger manpower pools and more production abilities would win nato the war
@@wombatuserHow could NATO win when it has dismantled the industry that could help it win? They don’t have the industry, the machine tools, the supply chaines, etc., etc. You can’t just conjure these things up out of thin air, which is exactly why throwing money at the problem has increased the cost per unit seven fold but only doubled the amount.
It is not the cost, it is the price that has increased. Capitalism 101. So pumping more money into it, does not change the number of sheets produced, only the price they are sealed to the highest bidder.
@@trumpforever6706 RUclips has some weird censorship moves. Recently I made a comment "Democracy vs socialism" and that was censored. I have no idea what triggers youtube to censor comments but they suck...
It is significant that we have not seen the Abrams tank in action, nor a reappearance of the Challenger 2 Political pressure, probably. Neither the US nor the UK wishes to see their tanks destroyed, and even less to see them captured. Bad for business, and business is all they believe in.
It's been 20 years since there was a Challenger producing business. The CIII, when that happens, is merely an upgraded CII. There won't be many tanks to upgrade without them getting blown up in Ukraine. The UK might have to buy Abrams at this rate. 😢
@@arostwocentsThe Germans must be a little bit unhappy having the only western tank on active service on the front line. How many hits to their reputation, economy, industry will they take before they pull out of this proxy war?
I wonder why Russia never seems to use the creeping barrage to advance, which was the most effective strategy in ww1 before tanks. Whenever we see advances, there does not seem to be artillery hitting the Ukie positions at the same time?
@theannoyinghistorian1812 As an artillerist I would say that the main reason is the high probability of compromising the positions of artillery pieces and counter-artillery fires. For a creeping barrage, where the fire must cover a huge piece of land with a satisfactory density of fire in multiple rows, you need at least 3-4 artillery battalions (6-8 batteries) firing simultaneously. This is 36-48 artillery pieces that fire the mission during the advance of the infantry. That is slow - for dismounted infantry around 3-5 minutes/100 meters. The infantry dismounts around 600-800 meters from the enemy positions, so it means that the barrage has to be upheld for around 700 meters x 4 minutes/100 meters = 28 minutes. The artillery has to manouver with the fire everytime the infantry closes in at 400 meters (this is the safety distance). Half an hour artillery barrage with 48 pieces means around 1500 shells fired. This means plenty-plenty of time for the enemy reconaissance for measuring the positions, establish coordinates and arrange counter-artillery fires. It would be death for the artillery. That is why they do not use this method in this environment.
С этими ФПВ дронами нужно срочно что то делать, они реально останавливают любое наступление, и наносят большие потери. Нужно что то разработать против них или как то искать операторов дронов и быстро их уничтожать, а то любое наступление гарантирует большие потери
Это очень просто. Если у них тысяча дронов, вы даете им три тысячи целей; что-то дешевле дрона; палатка, куча пустых деревянных ящиков, яма в земле. Они вынуждены уничтожать очень много, просто на случай, если они что-то скрывают, но если они попытаются уничтожить каждую цель, у них скоро закончатся дроны - без причинения потерь. It's so easy. If they've got a thousand drones, you give them three thousand targets; something cheaper than a drone; a tent, a pile of empty wooden crates, a hole in the ground. They are forced to destroy a great many, just in case they're concealing something, but if they try to destroy every target, they'll soon run out of drones - without inflicting loses.
You are correct they need effective electronic warfare defence against drones.. i am surprised this was not the priority of Russia military development 11:36
Simple un tir de filé de 10 mètre de diamètre pour attraper ..... Un peu comme on attrape du poisson. Une arme qui peut lancer un filé de 10 mètres de diamètre à 4 mètres. C.est à dire chaque déplacement d'un groupe de militaires doit être suivi avec un chasseur de drones qui peut repérer le drone qui s'approche et lancer le filé. En ce qui concerne le drone avec Grenade il faut que chaque groupe puisse avoir un drone capable de détecter et de détruire
I sometimes wonder if Dima ever was in the army. In the army I was in a recon battalion and we exercised moving (no big wars back then, luckily) beyond the line of contact. Seeing a single tank doesn't mean the area is under control
His show is all about painting map - what you expect him to do? But he mentions from time to time that dozens of sabotage groups operate behind the lines, even inside mainland Russia.
I think that the seeing of the tank is the confirmation of the different mappers claiming it under Russian control . When all the mappers there are about 7 , and then the two official ones . Russia and Ukraine Military . The other mappers are getting information via telegram . Dima sensibly waits for a visual to confirm control .
with the availability of lancet drones, no Ukrainian tank should escape an engagement as we see north of Stepove. Russia not support its infantry properly i dont know, im sure there is more to it. Glory to Russia and may God protect.
@@Ray-555 yes im not sure. Russia knows what to expect and has Ariel view of the battlefield, to let APV get destroyed by a tank as such a close range is odd
Because it is not supposed to end anytime soon. If the goal of either side was to achieve victory, it would have been over a long tome ago. With Russia as the victor.
When you mix sport with politics you will get politics. *** Karma caught up with idiotic politicization of sport by self-righteous Western democracies. Three tennis players representing "authoritarian/ totalitarian regimes" - archenemies of so called collective West (America and it's geopolitical European vassals) play in the final of the lucrative sport. AO organisers and administrators and ATP/WTA bureaucrats dreaded that scenario. Now with the fake smiles and insincere congratulatory speeches they have to hand over the prestigious trophies and... fat cheques to the Russian and Chinese players.
3:07 contested is not the same as full control - it is more like “grey” area, although you one side can occupy terrain that is actively contested- so you can have both Russian infantry defending and Ukrainian armor attacking in the same area. Similarly being able to interdict traffic on a road does not automatically mean you control the road.
Update for the conflict in Ukraine for January 28, 2024… - The collective West is grappling with critical shortages of artillery ammunition Ukraine requires to continue fighting against Russian forces; - The Western media admits that US-European attempts to expand production will take years and still fall short of even current Russian production numbers; - Conflicts elsewhere are placing additional strain on NATO artillery shell stockpiles; - Western analysts and commentators are contemplating increasingly desperate measures to speed up production increases, including sacrificing quality and safety, something they’ve all recently criticized Russia for doing as it expands munition production; - Ukrainian “activists” complain about their difficulty in selling continued Western support for Ukraine to the Western public; - There is an attempt to portray the conflict in Ukraine as “existential” for the West, claiming that Russia will end up moving further west if it wins in Ukraine; - This dismisses the reality surrounding the current conflict in Ukraine, the preceding decades of aggressive NATO expansion up to Russia’s borders, and NATO’s use of proxies to attack Russia on its borders; - The New Atlas
The yankees have realised that they have bitten off more than they can chew. The EU is for the most part done, as is nato. Without what's left of the usa's money( 34 trillion in debt) Ukraine and Europe will not last past 2025. The moral of the story: Never follow the Yankee's into one of their proxy wars.
It looks like the Russians have stopped using armored fists. Seeing as it's too costly and doesn't yield much. Instead, adapting and focusing on small unit penetrations in conjuction with FPV and artillery... Wagner style. Likely holding back armor for major operations, and for maneuvering soldiers behind or to the line of contact. I'm surprised it took them this long to figure this out seeing as this is the conclusion Ukranians came to by the end of their counter-offensive, and how they got most of their gains in Robotyne.
Russia using what they can replace e.g 30 tanks destroyed they will send those numbers expecting them not to return while they make that ammount of tanks to replace the ones destroyed war of attrition I think the term thats used.
Your jumping to conclusions about what the Russians know or don't know but your not alone thatsvwhy the collective west is in this can't win situation...again.
2:53 Dima strictly requiring visual confirmations before marking control on the map is one reason I trust this channel. However cases like a single tank having crossed a field should not indicate total control of the entire treeline. Just mark it grey zone.
Typically if there is a tank there is intelligence from the area radioed from infantry commanders. So usually (but not always) the tank is going to either be supporting infantry directly or clearing a area so infantry and light vehicles can flood the area after.
At first it was 7 Ukrainians to 1 Russians losses, now with these untrained + no experience "soldiers" it is 20 to 1 for the Russians - the collapse is programmed. What a military genius this actor is!
7 to 1 its been like that from different analyst. 20 to 1 i highly doubt unless your talking about what artillery, drones, and airstrikes cause. Which then its not directly soldier on soldier
@@nercoG col douglas mcgregor is the one off the top of my head. Its western military analyst. Theres about 3 ive seen but cant remember the names of the others. They are around youtube. They are getting those numbers from them. Col mcgregor says he gets that number from US intelligence reports.
@@LehmannMr yes I've seen some, but the vast majority don't have. Western armour just as targetable when it's not hiding in the rear. Just seems bleedin obvious to use it. Can't see how it detracts much. Similar for all those Ukraine boats that were hit in Kherson recently.
6:34 This is something i can't understand. How is it even possible that a personal carrier faces an enemy tank alone? Where was the recon? I would understand it when its a supply line and kind of advanced ambush, but this is the attack direction, why there was no escort? Like in a computer game when you order your unit to move and forget about it until it gets destroyed when it goes too far. Can somebody explain the situation there a bit more in detail as i don't understand it how this could even possibly happen that way.
Personal carrier is the recon, Russia side have lots of mercenary soldiers came from all around the world, they don't mind sending some of them forward as tank bait. If the tank was slow on the retreat, it would be 2 destroyed vehicles in that road instead of one (the chance that it already got destroyed is very high...). Sending someone or something forward to discover enemy positions is not a new tactic in this war, both sides actively using it. And yeah, many Personal carriers can easily turn a tank into a fireball nowadays.
Thanks for your answers, i think its something in between your both proposals, then it makes sense. As for Personal carriers turning easily tanks into fireballs, i have to strongly disagree. F.e. the 25mm autocannon "Bushmaster" of the Bradleys can't penetrate the armor of tanks with ablative armor, its physically not possible. It can damage the optics and could possibly destroy the smoke launchers, but nothing more, no fireballs. .
@@FabiusPolis Many personal carriers can be equipped with ATGM, Bradley or Soviet BTR series included. Their auto cannons may only damage the surface of a tank, but TOW or 9M113 would be the real threats to any tank.
@@PeacefulRallyCar-pw3cs Umm yes, and whats your point after those many random statements? Not clear what you finally want to say. Beside, i disagree with the "many culture"-argument. Multi-ethnic nations as Russia or in my case Switzerland USE the military for cultural binding, you grow together when you serve in a mutual duty in the army. Anyway, whats your very point?
UkrArmy loved the javelins so much they effectively used up the supplies given to them. This kind of hand missile had gone off the production lines years ago, and since the Ukrainians found it easy to use, they took to it with enthusiasm and soon used up most of the US and NATO stockpiles of it. To get production going again to scale would take years, so the US stopped sending any more of it already a year ago.
Everyday you add a little red square here or there. As we get to the end of January 2024, is it possible to compare the Russian position on the 1st January to 1st February and work out how much territory Russia has added under its control?
Weeb gives the total number of advances of each side each month. Last month was 99 for Russia and 2 for Ukraine. Ukies obviously have made more this month
Would it differ if was underway? Nope. For the same reason soldiers and trucks does - they don´t see it before its too late. Even harder in a tank than in the open.
Been hearing about Robotino ground operation for almost two weeks now. Stop these speculations. Makes you sound like the Ukrainians with their spring counter offensive.
The Krynky trap is paying large amount of dividends. The Avdiivka trap is paying enormous dividends. I trade stocks in NYSE, NASDAQ and SnP Avdiivka and Krynky are the best money makers while others like surrounding Bakhmut, Kupyansk, and many others to a lesser extent. High frequency trades are very profitable.
How about the losses of the Russians? 40 or 400 Tanks? 40'000 casualties ? and no recognisable front line change. More information about losses would show the facts of the stalemate.
I am wondering about a young Russian soldier wondering if he is alive? At the beginning months he was enlisted by his country to go fight. There was an interview of this young man. He was studying music a musician he was procuring for his life. He was not happy to be conscripted like most young men however he answered his call like thousands. I do know he was an only child and his dad was emotionally about his soon departure for the front. His father lost his wife the year before to cancer and this young man was the last of his family. It was heartbreaking to see. Just throwing it out wondering if he died wounded and or reunited back with his father after his duty. Does anyone out there know?
Most don't want to go to war but the west is trying to take over Russia and if they were to succeed, this young man wouldn't have a future. Notice how the west is talking about conscription daily? The big war is coming!
Senseless war, the most senseless war in recent memory. How can this people with so much in common engage in such carnage? What's all these for? Whoever sowed this discord among brothers will get his due recompense. Schooled in Ukraine between 2011- 2012, although their was frictions among groups which is normal, never in my wildest dream would I have believe it will come to this; the government in Kyiv is very much controlled by other interest and it's working against the interest of it's citizens. The Kremlin is just a vicious bully like all great powers. This is just sad.
@@Daniel-vw7mw zelensky is not in charge, at least not anymore. Decisions about the direction of this conflict are made in Washington, Brussel and Moscow; this is why this war is a hard drug to swallow. The people of Ukraine voted for zelensky who ran on a peace platform, only for them to be plunged into war by forces bent on using their men to settle geopolitical scores.
I have long stopped my support for Russia military bcos of the Leadership foolishness so far demonstrated in the handling and prosecution of the war, the Russians blew up the advantages and gains and is seriously haemorrhaging in all aspects and there by putting those supporters in a very difficult position, it is a shame Russia military is still trying to liberate Dombass after almost two years, it's a shame to the leadership in Moscow and the war planners, it's completely show their weaknesses and they risk loosing the war if the west decides to re equip Ukraine again, Russia will probably loose all the little gains including Crimea, let it be on record.
@@fred4687yeah I know. It’s amazing how naive people are when it comes to war. They think they know everything because they are so used to The West hanging up and bullying poor countries with flip flop Toyota armies for the last 60 years. America has not won any war since 1945. Every conflict they were involved in was a massive coalition of North American. And European countries. And look who did they struggle with? Vietnam? Iraq? Afghanistan? Somalia? And many more.
@@jibril2473 Of course, it is absolutely comparable when you have to fight a war 10,000 km away across the ocean, or when you fight your small neighbour for two years and get a bloody nose.
I’ll keep you to that. Crimea? No way my friend will that go back to Ukraine. Remember that king before Ukraine, the Russian Navy have been based there since the 1700’s. A little history, Khrushchev handed Crimea to the Ukraine SSR in the 50’s. My tip, Zelenskyy has no upper hand. I’m his option is to keep thrashing his people and foreign equipment, or surrender. Trump will win the US Elections and he will unroll a map of Ukraine and ask Putin “What do you want to end this SMO?’. Putin will say ‘to the Dniper.’ And Trump will make Zelenskyy sign it and that will be that.
@@fred4687 That's very correct but beautiful Russia military has become an embarrassment to it's people and millions of supporters, in any case I wish them good luck but the avoidable haemorrhage of men and equipments is taking a serious toll, watch it and I hope the war planners wake up and stand up to their responsibility before America starts to weapons support again plus the arrival of F16 jets that could be a very serious threat to Russia, this is just my concern for almighty Russia, good morning
THE MAP: dev.militarysummary.com
Store: www.militarysummary.store/
Google doc: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18WfJv1_DOlFOzvjh6iT1N8ltDvaCeWu1cPK_eaHKCR4/edit?usp=sharing
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-1613003
Telegram channel: t.me/militarysummary
Twitter: twitter.com/MilitarySummary
Email: military.summary.info@gmail.com
Patreon: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true
Help the channel: www.donationalerts.com/r/military_summary
Help the channel: www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=true
So no electric cars for Ukrops in Kupiansk.
Excellent , again.
I pray for the young man on either side of the contact line… They should not be fighting each other they are brothers
That goes for all native Europeans.
Slavs are not native to europe.@@aaaaaa2206
I agree with that point. I believe that the remnant of Ukrainians will accept this and will blame the West for manipulating them into a needless war.
As an American, I am sorry that my government caused this terrible conflict in Ukraine. Nothing good has come from “protecting our interests “ when we staged and managed the coup d’etat in 2014. Nuland herself said it took 6 years and $5 billion to destabilize the constitutional government of Ukraine and replace leadership of our choosing in this land so far from the borders of the U.S.
@@LehmannMr «Victoria Nuland's Admits Washington Has Spent $5 Billion to "Subvert Ukraine"»
Search on YT if you think it's trivial Russian propaganda.
Boomers with the "St.Petersburg comment" is so funny. The US has been quite open with the strategic interest in Ukraine for decades. In western main stream press.
@@teatime6597 Yes it was also admitted by Merkel and Hollande that the Minsk accords were simply to buy time and never meant to be respected by the west. Some morons prefer to ignore the events held on Maidan in 2013 (there is video footage) at which certain of our inglorious western politicians were encouraging the anti-Russia nationalist uprising.
As a fellow American, I fully agree!
Y'all always back these nazis coups and wars and then just say "it was all the government" when it all goes south for you. A government you voted in given that the decisions are bipartisan.
Thanks again for your work.
Thank You Military Summary Channel
🦌
Russia has a right to defend itself From nato expansion 🇪🇺
They're doing a pretty bad job at it.
Thanks to Putin's war , NATO has expanded and they're increasing their military spending.
An own goal by Russia.
of course puttin tried to expand nato from moscow to vladivostok when he asked clinton if russia could join lol
@@blengi😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@LehmannMr Russia have never said they want to conquer Ukraine tho.. where do you get this waffle??
Russia absolutely have the responsibility to defend their homeland at home against NATO. Defending themselves from stolen land is very difficult to justify. When China invade Australia and say they have the right to defend their homeland against NATO.
The conflict has raged too long. Who are the ones refusing peace talks?
Who are the ones that also failed their counter offensive?
Zelensky must go. Give peace a chance
Both the west and the Russians are so incompetant its painful. US being a shadow of what it was in the 90s and the Russians being a shadow of the Soviets.
War makes too much money for the people in charge of US foreign policy... that's it.
This isn't "Europe's war" it's an American-.driven proxy war (with Kiev as a willing accomplice (and battleground), but without the US they would never have provoked it).
NATO/EU are basically tools here. Ideally, European leaders should have refused to have anything to do with this mess from day one, they should even have told Kiev in advance around 2020: "we're not going to put European peace, safety and energy supplies n the line for your sake. If you pitch a war with Russia, then you're on your own except for possibly help from the US, whatever they might offer!". That would have poured some cold water on it in advance.
But it was obviously hard to say that, when they're all part of or closely tied to NATO, with the US as their top dog. Plus they are more or less brainwashed into accepting whatever America does on the world stage.
It seems the EU and their elites can only learn something from this through a resounding defeat for Ukraine that would taint their own credibility. That kind of defeat has happened many times before in European history.
It is an European war as the US will not be able to act on any important scale now it is clear that Trump winning or losing the november elections will create a totally devided country that will give enormous riots that paralysis the economy and ends its foreign polices. The EU is on its own and that's even better.
zelenskiy's investors won't do any peace talks. You cannot imagine how much money they have got from this conflict.
Brilliant analysis 👍
Thanks Dima.
Thanks again for the update, well done!
Tobaevka is in a grey zone, Russians didn’t enter as it is a low land, Ukrainians abandoned this village for the same reason.
😂😂
Thanks for your work
I am from Serbia and its a pain to watch our slavic brothers fights each others because of one pro west puppet..
This is the result of the criminal dissolution of the ussr. This is the result of the western world order
Actually all, except Russia, Belarus and Serbia are west puppets.
@@LehmannMr if anybody is responsible for economic situation in Serbia is NATO and our government from 2000s till now because they are pro west puppets! Thats why they have power now. Why ukraina is not neutral? They would cooperate with west and east and live better..
Merci pour cette vidéo
Rising costs is Shell Production in the US has made the cost of 155mm shells increase by 7 times since the start of the Russian military operation in the former Ukraine. The US was producing 14,000 shells per month in 2022 - New York Times. Now it is only 28,000 per month at many times the cost. Russia on the other hand produce 4-5 million per year at the cost of $600 per shell. Before Ukraine's failed Summer Offensive, it was firing 5-10,000 per day.
Antimony is a semi-metal used in Shell Production, the US is almost out of this essential metal, and Russia and China are the biggest manufacturers of it in the world.
Europe produces 4,000 shells per month - Financial Times
The British have sent a whopping 20% of their entire National Army's Equipment to Ukraine alone. NATO wouldn't last a War with Russia for longer then 1 week.
I think that nato probebly could win. That said I think they would take insane losses due to Russian defenses, immidiate air superiority and immidiate artillery superiority. Plus logistic lines being much shorter for Russia. NATO strategy’s seem to not really work on developed nations very well where as the Russians had this whole war to adapt tactics.
If china or joined or something like that then I think Russia could win but in then end bigger manpower pools and more production abilities would win nato the war
Money is not the issue of producing 155mm shells. The countries that can, just dont want to. Plain and simple. @@wombatuser
Everything in this God forsaken country the US, is a gigantic fraud.
@@wombatuserHow could NATO win when it has dismantled the industry that could help it win? They don’t have the industry, the machine tools, the supply chaines, etc., etc. You can’t just conjure these things up out of thin air, which is exactly why throwing money at the problem has increased the cost per unit seven fold but only doubled the amount.
It is not the cost, it is the price that has increased. Capitalism 101. So pumping more money into it, does not change the number of sheets produced, only the price they are sealed to the highest bidder.
Always hang out for your updates
Excellent channel. my posts are randomly approved.
🐻
Russian propaganda channel.
@@ProcaviaCapensis-ts8ub I wouldn't say so, they also censor my pro-Russia posts. 🤣
@@trumpforever6706 RUclips has some weird censorship moves.
Recently I made a comment "Democracy vs socialism" and that was censored.
I have no idea what triggers youtube to censor comments but they suck...
It is significant that we have not seen the Abrams tank in action, nor a reappearance of the Challenger 2
Political pressure, probably. Neither the US nor the UK wishes to see their tanks destroyed, and even less to see them captured.
Bad for business, and business is all they believe in.
It's been 20 years since there was a Challenger producing business. The CIII, when that happens, is merely an upgraded CII. There won't be many tanks to upgrade without them getting blown up in Ukraine. The UK might have to buy Abrams at this rate. 😢
They have admitted it's due to political pressure. Once one challenger was knocked out, both UK and US banned their tanks from being used in contact
@@arostwocentsThe Germans must be a little bit unhappy having the only western tank on active service on the front line. How many hits to their reputation, economy, industry will they take before they pull out of this proxy war?
UK has only 40 operational tanks, so it's a little amusing how they think they're still a relevant military force.
Plus russia is grateful for not having to fight em even in small numbers... Ffs they can't even handle Ukraine 😂😂😂
I wonder why Russia never seems to use the creeping barrage to advance, which was the most effective strategy in ww1 before tanks. Whenever we see advances, there does not seem to be artillery hitting the Ukie positions at the same time?
Fear of friedly fire
The presence of drones in this war has changed how artillery is used, now resources can be targeted intelligently and carefully.
@theannoyinghistorian1812 As an artillerist I would say that the main reason is the high probability of compromising the positions of artillery pieces and counter-artillery fires. For a creeping barrage, where the fire must cover a huge piece of land with a satisfactory density of fire in multiple rows, you need at least 3-4 artillery battalions (6-8 batteries) firing simultaneously. This is 36-48 artillery pieces that fire the mission during the advance of the infantry. That is slow - for dismounted infantry around 3-5 minutes/100 meters. The infantry dismounts around 600-800 meters from the enemy positions, so it means that the barrage has to be upheld for around 700 meters x 4 minutes/100 meters = 28 minutes. The artillery has to manouver with the fire everytime the infantry closes in at 400 meters (this is the safety distance). Half an hour artillery barrage with 48 pieces means around 1500 shells fired. This means plenty-plenty of time for the enemy reconaissance for measuring the positions, establish coordinates and arrange counter-artillery fires. It would be death for the artillery. That is why they do not use this method in this environment.
Thank you.
In my opinion this channel is worth the time. Thumbs up. Subscribe.
Very tuff fight
Surely hitting a Leopard on its side armour will do weak damage, the rear must be weakest point?
Excellent , again.
С этими ФПВ дронами нужно срочно что то делать, они реально останавливают любое наступление, и наносят большие потери. Нужно что то разработать против них или как то искать операторов дронов и быстро их уничтожать, а то любое наступление гарантирует большие потери
Начали ставить на технику мини рэб
Это очень просто. Если у них тысяча дронов, вы даете им три тысячи целей; что-то дешевле дрона; палатка, куча пустых деревянных ящиков, яма в земле. Они вынуждены уничтожать очень много, просто на случай, если они что-то скрывают, но если они попытаются уничтожить каждую цель, у них скоро закончатся дроны - без причинения потерь.
It's so easy. If they've got a thousand drones, you give them three thousand targets; something cheaper than a drone; a tent, a pile of empty wooden crates, a hole in the ground. They are forced to destroy a great many, just in case they're concealing something, but if they try to destroy every target, they'll soon run out of drones - without inflicting loses.
You are correct they need effective electronic warfare defence against drones.. i am surprised this was not the priority of Russia military development 11:36
@@adamgordon3641 Just because you want something, doesn't mean you can have it. The laws of physics apply.
Simple un tir de filé de 10 mètre de diamètre pour attraper ..... Un peu comme on attrape du poisson.
Une arme qui peut lancer un filé de 10 mètres de diamètre à 4 mètres.
C.est à dire chaque déplacement d'un groupe de militaires doit être suivi avec un chasseur de drones qui peut repérer le drone qui s'approche et lancer le filé.
En ce qui concerne le drone avec Grenade il faut que chaque groupe puisse avoir un drone capable de détecter et de détruire
Merci beaucoup
The Russian breakthrough is intensifying.
Pro futuro mundo et humanitate, washington quasi carthago delenda est.
Pobeda Russia ❤❤❤❤
Da da da 100%
💪💪💪🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
I sometimes wonder if Dima ever was in the army. In the army I was in a recon battalion and we exercised moving (no big wars back then, luckily) beyond the line of contact. Seeing a single tank doesn't mean the area is under control
In this conflict single tank is suicide.
I was a navy seal. I was part of the team that took out Bin Laden
His show is all about painting map - what you expect him to do? But he mentions from time to time that dozens of sabotage groups operate behind the lines, even inside mainland Russia.
I think that the seeing of the tank is the confirmation of the different mappers claiming it under Russian control . When all the mappers there are about 7 , and then the two official ones . Russia and Ukraine Military .
The other mappers are getting information via telegram .
Dima sensibly waits for a visual to confirm control .
Yeah, he's obsessed with geolocation videos 😀
with the availability of lancet drones, no Ukrainian tank should escape an engagement as we see north of Stepove. Russia not support its infantry properly i dont know, im sure there is more to it. Glory to Russia and may God protect.
@@Ray-555 yes im not sure. Russia knows what to expect and has Ariel view of the battlefield, to let APV get destroyed by a tank as such a close range is odd
@@mrj3108 it's still may be abandoned one, stuck in mud, did not seen moving it so who knows.
Because it is not supposed to end anytime soon. If the goal of either side was to achieve victory, it would have been over a long tome ago. With Russia as the victor.
good point ! @@Sha-fz3il
When you mix sport with politics you will get politics.
***
Karma caught up with idiotic politicization of sport by self-righteous Western democracies.
Three tennis players representing "authoritarian/ totalitarian regimes" - archenemies of so called collective West (America and it's geopolitical European vassals) play in the final of the lucrative sport.
AO organisers and administrators and ATP/WTA bureaucrats dreaded that scenario.
Now with the fake smiles and insincere congratulatory speeches they have to hand over the prestigious trophies and... fat cheques to the Russian and Chinese players.
3:07 contested is not the same as full control - it is more like “grey” area, although you one side can occupy terrain that is actively contested- so you can have both Russian infantry defending and Ukrainian armor attacking in the same area. Similarly being able to interdict traffic on a road does not automatically mean you control the road.
Update for the conflict in Ukraine for January 28, 2024…
- The collective West is grappling with critical shortages of artillery ammunition Ukraine requires to continue fighting against Russian forces;
- The Western media admits that US-European attempts to expand production will take years and still fall short of even current Russian production numbers;
- Conflicts elsewhere are placing additional strain on NATO artillery shell stockpiles;
- Western analysts and commentators are contemplating increasingly desperate measures to speed up production increases, including sacrificing quality and safety, something they’ve all recently criticized Russia for doing as it expands munition production;
- Ukrainian “activists” complain about their difficulty in selling continued Western support for Ukraine to the Western public;
- There is an attempt to portray the conflict in Ukraine as “existential” for the West, claiming that Russia will end up moving further west if it wins in Ukraine;
- This dismisses the reality surrounding the current conflict in Ukraine, the preceding decades of aggressive NATO expansion up to Russia’s borders, and NATO’s use of proxies to attack Russia on its borders; - The New Atlas
The yankees have realised that they have bitten off more than they can chew. The EU is for the most part done, as is nato. Without what's left of the usa's money( 34 trillion in debt) Ukraine and Europe will not last past 2025. The moral of the story: Never follow the Yankee's into one of their proxy wars.
Nice. Thank you for the clear, informative and thoughtful points.
It looks like the Russians have stopped using armored fists. Seeing as it's too costly and doesn't yield much. Instead, adapting and focusing on small unit penetrations in conjuction with FPV and artillery... Wagner style. Likely holding back armor for major operations, and for maneuvering soldiers behind or to the line of contact. I'm surprised it took them this long to figure this out seeing as this is the conclusion Ukranians came to by the end of their counter-offensive, and how they got most of their gains in Robotyne.
Russia using what they can replace e.g 30 tanks destroyed they will send those numbers expecting them not to return while they make that ammount of tanks to replace the ones destroyed war of attrition I think the term thats used.
The armour helps keep the men alive, switching to small infantry groups is more expensive in men, guess this is why they held off.
Your jumping to conclusions about what the Russians know or don't know but your not alone thatsvwhy the collective west is in this can't win situation...again.
2:53 Dima strictly requiring visual confirmations before marking control on the map is one reason I trust this channel. However cases like a single tank having crossed a field should not indicate total control of the entire treeline. Just mark it grey zone.
Typically if there is a tank there is intelligence from the area radioed from infantry commanders. So usually (but not always) the tank is going to either be supporting infantry directly or clearing a area so infantry and light vehicles can flood the area after.
Dont condone any violence in the world .......
At first it was 7 Ukrainians to 1 Russians losses, now with these untrained + no experience "soldiers" it is 20 to 1 for the Russians - the collapse is programmed. What a military genius this actor is!
That's some statistic i haven't seen before. Where are your sources from? Can you please share? I honestly want to know.
😂😂😂😂
7 to 1 its been like that from different analyst. 20 to 1 i highly doubt unless your talking about what artillery, drones, and airstrikes cause. Which then its not directly soldier on soldier
@@brianfitch5469 who says it's 7 to 1? Literally, who is saying that? I don't see it anywhere but in YT comments
@@nercoG col douglas mcgregor is the one off the top of my head. Its western military analyst. Theres about 3 ive seen but cant remember the names of the others. They are around youtube. They are getting those numbers from them. Col mcgregor says he gets that number from US intelligence reports.
So after the regime unconditionally surrenders will you need geo location of it?
the flying nazi in the start of the video make my day
Damn Leeepert tanks
leotard
Why don't both sides use simple cage like structures on tanks and armoured vehicles to reduce the damage from drones?
@@LehmannMr yes I've seen some, but the vast majority don't have. Western armour just as targetable when it's not hiding in the rear. Just seems bleedin obvious to use it. Can't see how it detracts much. Similar for all those Ukraine boats that were hit in Kherson recently.
A drowning man is clinging to wreckage in the ocean. What can be the possible result?
Jaws!
A very interesting video north of Avdeevka.
With my naked eye I see a trajectory of 25-30° and the signature smoke of a HIMARS 🤔
Without the timecode, who's going to know what you're on about?
6:34 This is something i can't understand. How is it even possible that a personal carrier faces an enemy tank alone? Where was the recon? I would understand it when its a supply line and kind of advanced ambush, but this is the attack direction, why there was no escort? Like in a computer game when you order your unit to move and forget about it until it gets destroyed when it goes too far. Can somebody explain the situation there a bit more in detail as i don't understand it how this could even possibly happen that way.
Personal carrier is the recon, Russia side have lots of mercenary soldiers came from all around the world, they don't mind sending some of them forward as tank bait. If the tank was slow on the retreat, it would be 2 destroyed vehicles in that road instead of one (the chance that it already got destroyed is very high...). Sending someone or something forward to discover enemy positions is not a new tactic in this war, both sides actively using it.
And yeah, many Personal carriers can easily turn a tank into a fireball nowadays.
that IFV was probably abandoned, Ukrops like to show these kind of images and sell them as it was moving even in video it wasnt.
Thanks for your answers, i think its something in between your both proposals, then it makes sense. As for Personal carriers turning easily tanks into fireballs, i have to strongly disagree. F.e. the 25mm autocannon "Bushmaster" of the Bradleys can't penetrate the armor of tanks with ablative armor, its physically not possible. It can damage the optics and could possibly destroy the smoke launchers, but nothing more, no fireballs. .
@@FabiusPolis Many personal carriers can be equipped with ATGM, Bradley or Soviet BTR series included. Their auto cannons may only damage the surface of a tank, but TOW or 9M113 would be the real threats to any tank.
@@PeacefulRallyCar-pw3cs Umm yes, and whats your point after those many random statements? Not clear what you finally want to say. Beside, i disagree with the "many culture"-argument. Multi-ethnic nations as Russia or in my case Switzerland USE the military for cultural binding, you grow together when you serve in a mutual duty in the army. Anyway, whats your very point?
What's with Uday?
What break through, i saw your video yesterday and you did not mention this.
Correction needed!
This video describes the military situation in Ukraine on the 1st of January 2024
👏👏👏👏👏👏
Can't they interfere the drone communication with emp's, and other disruption devices or so? Those fpv things a a pain in the butt.
What happend with Zaluzhnyj? Know it somebody, please?
To raise temperature in trenches system use Red phosphorus that way you hide them in bunkers use little not a lot
Dima, a single ukranian tank don't mean they control an area😅
And seeing 3 russian tanks getting destroyed by drones (as shown in this video) is certainly not proof that russia controls the area
It was probably destroyed right after the video. Along with ten others!
where are javelins lansers? we dont hear about them anymore?
UkrArmy loved the javelins so much they effectively used up the supplies given to them. This kind of hand missile had gone off the production lines years ago, and since the Ukrainians found it easy to use, they took to it with enthusiasm and soon used up most of the US and NATO stockpiles of it. To get production going again to scale would take years, so the US stopped sending any more of it already a year ago.
They are very expensive, very short battery life that does worse in cold temps. Mainly price and we don't produce many....
Good question; interesting answers.
No snow in the video at 2:20 from ukraine???? yet snow on ground in next video of the exact area...from Russia
It snow in day and sun in night
Probably some months old video that Ukraine decided to public now since they need something to show.
Just like he tried to say the two strikes on the coal mine were the same strike, except one was during the day and the other at night.
Everyday you add a little red square here or there. As we get to the end of January 2024, is it possible to compare the Russian position on the 1st January to 1st February and work out how much territory Russia has added under its control?
I think Dima is busy enough already, without you finding more work for him.
Weeb gives the total number of advances of each side each month. Last month was 99 for Russia and 2 for Ukraine. Ukies obviously have made more this month
Russia? inches a day doesn't constitute advancement
Why did Leooard2 just sat there and let the drone hit it?
Would it differ if was underway? Nope. For the same reason soldiers and trucks does - they don´t see it before its too late. Even harder in a tank than in the open.
😎
UURRAA 🇷🇺🌹🇷🇺
Russia has send agency ind dnipro and lviv
Z 🇷🇺 🇷🇺
It’s 4 am 😐
It's 10pm in New Zealand
@@seanh4841 New Zealand isnt a real place
just after 9.00 am in the U.K. when Dima started
4pm here in Asia
Z
Zelensky's regime must go!
To hell in a hand basket!
The oil producing plant in kremenchug burnt down completely.
ZOV
Been hearing about Robotino ground operation for almost two weeks now. Stop these speculations. Makes you sound like the Ukrainians with their spring counter offensive.
Uciania ➡️ Aquí viene la calle Rusia rojas!!!
The Krynky trap is paying large amount of dividends. The Avdiivka trap is paying enormous dividends. I trade stocks in NYSE, NASDAQ and SnP Avdiivka and Krynky are the best money makers while others like surrounding Bakhmut, Kupyansk, and many others to a lesser extent. High frequency trades are very profitable.
Hope you don't supporting the warmongers ?! Money over dead body's, the sickness of war profiteers.
You're saying words, but they don't mean anything.
Everything seems me to be so slow.
Nearly 45,000 Ukraine casualties per month is slow to you? This is a war of attrition!
@@josephvanwie6706 the frotline is still the same. Understand sence of Surovikin line, waiting till AFU
How about the losses of the Russians? 40 or 400 Tanks? 40'000 casualties ? and no recognisable front line change. More information about losses would show the facts of the stalemate.
😂 yes yes mr stoll
Interesting how detailed Mikael is compared to Weeb Union. Weeb generalizes more.
This strategy of Russia is to secure their planned buffer zone being and to be established this coming months.❤❤❤❤ Go Russia Go !!!
...не могу се ни гледати с' Турком, а камо ли бојак бити с' Турци.
Nebojse.
What your point
I am wondering about a young Russian soldier wondering if he is alive? At the beginning months he was enlisted by his country to go fight. There was an interview of this young man. He was studying music a musician he was procuring for his life. He was not happy to be conscripted like most young men however he answered his call like thousands. I do know he was an only child and his dad was emotionally about his soon departure for the front. His father lost his wife the year before to cancer and this young man was the last of his family. It was heartbreaking to see. Just throwing it out wondering if he died wounded and or reunited back with his father after his duty. Does anyone out there know?
Needle in a haystack...
Most don't want to go to war but the west is trying to take over Russia and if they were to succeed, this young man wouldn't have a future. Notice how the west is talking about conscription daily? The big war is coming!
H mmm
Tyibgifhkia use gernader women
Trust in AFU!
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
🦌🦌🐺🦌
💀💀💀💀💀💀
Deer deer fox deer???
@@gomahklawm4446 dah dah di dah = Q Stay tuned for further updates.
🦌🦇 🦇🦇
Senseless war, the most senseless war in recent memory. How can this people with so much in common engage in such carnage? What's all these for? Whoever sowed this discord among brothers will get his due recompense. Schooled in Ukraine between 2011- 2012, although their was frictions among groups which is normal, never in my wildest dream would I have believe it will come to this; the government in Kyiv is very much controlled by other interest and it's working against the interest of it's citizens. The Kremlin is just a vicious bully like all great powers. This is just sad.
Zelenski is a bully. And a warmonger he could of surrendered instead of trying to save Ukraine
The Kremlin wasn't the one building bases in Mexico and Canada.
@@Daniel-vw7mw zelensky is not in charge, at least not anymore. Decisions about the direction of this conflict are made in Washington, Brussel and Moscow; this is why this war is a hard drug to swallow. The people of Ukraine voted for zelensky who ran on a peace platform, only for them to be plunged into war by forces bent on using their men to settle geopolitical scores.
Putin has imperialistic ambition but he's not the only Russian leader to have them.
One of them wanted Alaska back.
Russia acted in self defence.
No way Jose, will they allow NATO to camp in their back yard threatening Sevastopol
Russia is not achieving anything, this weekend Russia alone is losing 80 armored vehicles + about 2000 soldiers, and that in just 2 days.
😂 sure couch analyst
@@calokraine5901 Maybe they should just do their own research instead of just consuming everything pre-chewed.
I have long stopped my support for Russia military bcos of the Leadership foolishness so far demonstrated in the handling and prosecution of the war, the Russians blew up the advantages and gains and is seriously haemorrhaging in all aspects and there by putting those supporters in a very difficult position, it is a shame Russia military is still trying to liberate Dombass after almost two years, it's a shame to the leadership in Moscow and the war planners, it's completely show their weaknesses and they risk loosing the war if the west decides to re equip Ukraine again, Russia will probably loose all the little gains including Crimea, let it be on record.
This isn't a spectator sport FFS !! They will continue operations without your "support".
@@fred4687yeah I know. It’s amazing how naive people are when it comes to war. They think they know everything because they are so used to The West hanging up and bullying poor countries with flip flop Toyota armies for the last 60 years. America has not won any war since 1945. Every conflict they were involved in was a massive coalition of North American. And European countries. And look who did they struggle with? Vietnam? Iraq? Afghanistan? Somalia? And many more.
@@jibril2473 Of course, it is absolutely comparable when you have to fight a war 10,000 km away across the ocean, or when you fight your small neighbour for two years and get a bloody nose.
I’ll keep you to that. Crimea? No way my friend will that go back to Ukraine. Remember that king before Ukraine, the Russian Navy have been based there since the 1700’s. A little history, Khrushchev handed Crimea to the Ukraine SSR in the 50’s.
My tip, Zelenskyy has no upper hand. I’m his option is to keep thrashing his people and foreign equipment, or surrender. Trump will win the US Elections and he will unroll a map of Ukraine and ask Putin “What do you want to end this SMO?’. Putin will say ‘to the Dniper.’ And Trump will make Zelenskyy sign it and that will be that.
@@fred4687 That's very correct but beautiful Russia military has become an embarrassment to it's people and millions of supporters, in any case I wish them good luck but the avoidable haemorrhage of men and equipments is taking a serious toll, watch it and I hope the war planners wake up and stand up to their responsibility before America starts to weapons support again plus the arrival of F16 jets that could be a very serious threat to Russia, this is just my concern for almighty Russia, good morning
Putin is losing the war but shoigu is afraid to tell him
Like you I was afraid to come out as gay to my family. But you got a friend in me my gay brother!!
😅 are u in virtual world?
How are they losing?
Sinkivka?????Stepove?????🤖🤡👾🤯😁😳😲😯😮😦😧😨
Z