Why Grand Seiko SBGX261 is the perfect Rolex Explorer Alternative

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 апр 2024
  • Why Grand Seiko SBGX261 is the perfect Rolex Explorer Alternative. In this video I will review the Grand Seiko SBGX261. It is the perfect watch in almost every way in my opinion. This simple yet brillian Grand Seiko can be your only watch and literally serve you for any occasion. And I think it will do it even better than the Rolex Explorer.
    Now thanks to Karan Mnoyan from @wristtimeco I had this Grand Seiko for a week. If are thinking of purchasing this Grand Seiko or any other luxury watches contact Karan on instagram or website www.wristtimeco.com/collectio.... The special price is available with the promo code OneMan24.
    I hope this video will be helpful for those who is on the fence about the Grand Seiko SBGX261.
    Follow me on Instagram @onemanreviews
    Watch my other videos about Grand Seiko watches:
    Grand Seiko SBGA407 Spring Drive “Skyflake” Review • The Coolest Grand Seik...
    The Grand Seiko SBGW231G - I found my Grail Classic Watch! • The Grand Seiko SBGW23...
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 77

  • @lamkevinp
    @lamkevinp 3 месяца назад +7

    I wanted one of these SBGX for some of the very same reasons, but thought the Casio Oceanus S100 captured the spirit of Japanese quartz for a lot less money. More accurate than GS, no battery changes every 3 yrs, hands also hit all markers, lume, microadjust, and is finished exceptionally... money saved went to the Explorer.

    • @jwillwork3683
      @jwillwork3683 3 месяца назад

      You win!!!! Not get this too just to flex 😂

    • @ProtomanZ
      @ProtomanZ 3 месяца назад

      And we've come full circle.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад +2

      The Oceanus is a very good watch. If you want the Explorer the GS probably wouldn't scratch that itch.

    • @shaohuadong9860
      @shaohuadong9860 3 месяца назад +3

      I'd say Citizen's top end quartz watches are better than the 9f series. They have the same temperature control and Zaratsu polishing as GS, but Citizen's movements offer +/- 5 seconds per year accuracy, perpetual calendar and some even have titanium cases .

  • @1000lightyrs
    @1000lightyrs 3 месяца назад +5

    Yep, I can attest to this watch being a great one-and-done watch. I've had 3 Explorer's and 4 of these GS's (2 blacks and 2 champagne's). The Explorer's are long gone, but I still proudly wear my SBGX261. Fun fact - the watch is 4g heavier than my DJ 116200 (modern 6 digit heavy Oyster Rolex), they're bloody solid little watches!

    • @cbret5350
      @cbret5350 3 месяца назад +1

      It's going to be my personal grail watch. Good to see positive feedback from someone who owns it.

  • @stevocaspo7414
    @stevocaspo7414 2 месяца назад

    Very useful review. One question: Does it pick up smudges on the crystal easily? My black dial SARB033 does constantly, but they are not so apparent on my cream dial 035.

  • @edenamar5887
    @edenamar5887 3 месяца назад

    Have been wearing the 40mm version with 20mm lugwidth as my daily for a year now. The end goal is explorer but this is beyond alternative. I am thinking of having both when the day comes.

  • @jesse-martinmanufor6248
    @jesse-martinmanufor6248 3 месяца назад +4

    Its a fantastic watch, I have the white dial version and I am super happy with my purchase.

  • @oceanzu6585
    @oceanzu6585 3 месяца назад

    have a sbgx263. I was surprised by the bracelet wabble compared to my Citizen Chronometer aq4000. They look similar from the outside but what holds the link together on GS bracelet are floating pins with two screws on each side. Citizen use genuine large screw links on their chronometer bracelet and the gap between the lock section and the clasp is way smaller than the one on GS.
    Case finish, dial finish, hands finish are basically identical, but Citizen comes with a perpetual calendar.🧐

  • @Anirossa
    @Anirossa 3 месяца назад +1

    My seiko prospex solardiver does about +5s/6month when I adjust it for DTS, when it was brand new, it did +1s/6month, but I assume the GS does much better than it's tolerance, just like my prospex :)

  • @walaarostom
    @walaarostom 3 месяца назад +2

    Quartz Intolerance. Brilliant 😂😂. Thanks for the great review as always. Cheers Neighbour.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      😁 Thank you!!! Glad you enjoyed it.

  • @allanbergsma3256
    @allanbergsma3256 3 месяца назад +1

    Nice review, thanks!

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      Thanks Alan for your feedback.

    • @allanbergsma3256
      @allanbergsma3256 3 месяца назад +1

      @@OneManReviews keep up the consistent good work! Appreciate your hard work.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      Thanks a lot!

  • @skookumwatch
    @skookumwatch 2 месяца назад

    Solid commentary. I have 2 9F GS , I prefer them to their sometimes oddly chunky automatic counterparts.

  • @jesperandersson6143
    @jesperandersson6143 2 месяца назад

    Hi, witch model year are this?

  • @jonathanilagan7778
    @jonathanilagan7778 3 месяца назад +3

    Great watch!! I have The Citizen AQ1020, wc is similar to this, but both are reallt beautiful! I noticed you have a wise ad7, how would you say the finish of the two compare to each other?

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      I didn't have a chance to see that Citizen but it looks amazing. As for the Wise - I was very impressed by the overall quality of the watch and the finishing in particular. The dial is incredible. Planning to make a review of this watch soon.

  • @forgiga
    @forgiga 3 месяца назад +5

    Hello! Thank you for the straight-to-the-point review (as usual) with no marketing stories about Japanese craftsmanship and zaratsu polishing technique and bla-bla-bla...
    When I held the GS watch ( I do not remember the ref #, but some 39mm model) for the first time I was trying to find that exceptional "out-of-this-world" case polishing quality. But, to my disappointment, I didn't find it. The case was as good as most of the top-tier (and some mid-tier as well) watches would have. But the hands and the dial are executed really well. And, I'll be honest, it was really comfortable to wear it. The case shape was designed with a "comfort first" attitude in mind.
    In your video, you just shared the same thoughts.
    And about that specific model: not the quartz that makes me say "no", but the size. Too small.
    While respecting the GS watches, I would still prefer my 41mm Aquaterra which looks more proportional on my 17.5cm wrist. These watches are of similar quality and shapes, both could be "one watch collection" items.
    Good luck with your channel!

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад +3

      Thanks for your comment. Glad you liked the video. Yes. I handle quite a few GS watches and I don't find the case polishing something crazy extraordinary. But when it comes to markers and hands - the finishing is incredible. Aquaterra is an amazing choice.

    • @jwillwork3683
      @jwillwork3683 3 месяца назад +1

      I thought the snowflake was amazing. Seen it in person and I would definitely steal the dial and re-case it ( not actually but its a pretty dial ) The watch was sooo underwhelming and mediocre. The prx does nothing for me either like nothing.

    • @jwillwork3683
      @jwillwork3683 3 месяца назад +1

      @@OneManReviews2nd this!

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад +1

      @@jwillwork3683 I wasn't fascinated by the Snowflake either but I reviewed a Skyflake about a year ago and I found the Skyflake dial much more interesting and cool than Snowflake. Again the hands and markers polishing are outstanding.

    • @jwillwork3683
      @jwillwork3683 3 месяца назад

      @@OneManReviews Nice

  • @steve8510
    @steve8510 Месяц назад

    Wish it had Lume like the Rex and perpetual calendar like the Citizen Chronomaster (which is more accurate @5spy)

  • @patsmith3894
    @patsmith3894 3 месяца назад +10

    Nice watch. But your cat stole the show.

  • @cocoyc495
    @cocoyc495 2 месяца назад +2

    This is a great all around watch.

  • @philbooth5570
    @philbooth5570 3 месяца назад +1

    For me the question is not this vs the Explorer, but this vs the Longines Spirit 37. Both great GADAs, but I prefer the latter.

  • @alexxela3933
    @alexxela3933 18 дней назад +1

    I dont mind quartz but preferably solar powered, so no battery hassle... Therefore iwould lean towards the "the citizen".
    I have and actually wearing my gs sbga439, its midnight blue with a spring drive and 39,5 mm dia, i can relate to your assessment being a do it all but hey we live once so lets enjoy more watches 😂
    The crown is outdated and overrated, im leaving the crown for unsecured crowd haha

  • @MisterKnightly
    @MisterKnightly 3 месяца назад +1

    I do wish they'd make a version of this, Quartz and all, without that date window. I'd buy it in a second.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад +1

      That would be nice.

    • @mrjellow
      @mrjellow 2 месяца назад +1

      SBGX321

    • @MisterKnightly
      @MisterKnightly 2 месяца назад

      @@mrjellow I stand corrected, thank you, friend.

  • @Ferien7
    @Ferien7 3 месяца назад +2

    Looks so much like my Seiko SARB033

  • @jwillwork3683
    @jwillwork3683 3 месяца назад +1

    It is A looker!

  • @antonbayda2571
    @antonbayda2571 3 месяца назад +1

    Good watch, but it's too plain for me (judging from pictures and videos). Maybe it looks better in person. Thanks for the gideo.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад +1

      Thanks.The simplicity is what I like about this watch but also yeah it looks better in person.

  • @micaljimenez7381
    @micaljimenez7381 3 месяца назад +1

    Sure the quality have to be great...but you can show an automatique model if you want to compete with rolex explorer...but nice watch

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      Funny because they have 2 watches that can compete with both Explorers and both are quartz.

    • @micaljimenez7381
      @micaljimenez7381 3 месяца назад +1

      @@OneManReviews yes,sure...but for a classical look vintage,automatique make it more "romantic"

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      @@micaljimenez7381 I do agree.

  • @_RJ_Z
    @_RJ_Z Месяц назад

    GS is their own thing.

  • @BosworthMcG
    @BosworthMcG 2 месяца назад

    I like that you took wrist shots while driving, at night, in the rain. 😮

  • @richardvanfrank8114
    @richardvanfrank8114 2 месяца назад

    But how does it compare to your Railmaster?

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  2 месяца назад

      They are somewhat similar by philosophy but very different by the design.

  • @Lewatchman
    @Lewatchman 3 месяца назад +1

    Lack of bracelet taper and microadjust makes it a pain. I sold my SBGX343 due to this reason, bracelet itself is lovely but could never find a perfect fit. For this reason, it will never be as good as Rolex.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      I think I was able to find a good fit with this GS but I see your point.

  • @cedarcanoe
    @cedarcanoe 2 месяца назад

    Ideal everyday watch?

  • @jP-nw7nm
    @jP-nw7nm Месяц назад

    Seiko SARBO33 GANG HOMIE WASSUP!

  • @ccooper8785
    @ccooper8785 2 месяца назад

    I would agree with you completely if the GS had a 3,6,9 dial.
    If it does not then IMHO it is not an explorer replacement.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  2 месяца назад +1

      The watch doesn't have to be exact copy of the Explorer to be an alternative.

    • @ccooper8785
      @ccooper8785 2 месяца назад

      @@OneManReviews Good point well made 🤔👍

  • @billcore6295
    @billcore6295 3 месяца назад +4

    I have a GS Winter and GS cannot be compared to the Rolex Explorer in which I am very familiar with 😊….. owning both Rolex and GS, GS is perfect, better quality and more refined, its much better than Rolex…no comparison. period!!! GS make 36K watches annually by hand compared to 1M made by Rolex, also by machine. mine is titanimum with springdrive which is NOT quartz

    • @mak52580
      @mak52580 3 месяца назад

      Which model is the t titanium spring drive that you have?

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      Thanks for the comment. I think that GS and Rolex are very similar and different watches at the same time. The both have the precision and quality as the priority. To me Rolex offers a better package overall: quality, movements, design, bracelets etc. Grand Seiko shines with craftsmanship.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      @@Bu-22 These both are amazing watches!

  • @MrNickMulgrave
    @MrNickMulgrave 3 месяца назад

    Shouldn't this be considered a Rolex Datejust alternative?
    The Explorer has Arabic numerals.

    • @OneManReviews
      @OneManReviews  3 месяца назад

      Sure it can. To me, it's more comparable to the Explorer.

    • @MrNickMulgrave
      @MrNickMulgrave 3 месяца назад

      @@OneManReviews The Explorer has Arabic numerals and no date function. The Grand Seiko SBGX261 with it's baton indices looks just like a Datejust without the cyclops window. So I'm curious as to why you think it is more comparable to an Explorer.

  • @NeoNyder
    @NeoNyder 3 месяца назад

    Quartz no lume? hard pass

  • @filou89
    @filou89 3 месяца назад

    Get a Sarb 033.... cheaper and basically the same look on your wrist

  • @virada630
    @virada630 3 месяца назад

    Why is it just rolex and what about grand seiko to go down as alternative? Bottom line? If u can afford get it if u don’t then stop making it a big deal. Its a human nature that it’s expensive and known? Ur something to their eyes.

  • @nathandallas4878
    @nathandallas4878 3 месяца назад

    No lume and a scratch magnet no thanks