“He’s not too keen on being told he has problems.” Ma’am, you deliberately went against your partner’s wishes and got an additional dog that requires medical care. You are the problem.
I looked them up and found the Pug Village Forum thread from when this aired. People who know them personally confirmed he had to approve the foster. "On our foster contract all people who live in the home have to sign the foster agreement and Scott did this."
REAL!!! I clocked onto that instantly and wished someone could’ve called her out for it. It’s the most insane thing someone could’ve said in the face a very serious issue. Unfortunately, I can only assume Victoria didn’t comment on it because she’s only there to help the animals. Those people need a damn marriage counselor tho. Get a professional to be an unbiased force that sets thing right. Also it gets a rational 3rd party to advocate for Scott.
I'm sure Deena was involved in animal rescue and fostering before their marriage. People get married and then act shocked by the behavior that was present the entire time. If Scott hates the relationship so much he can just leave.
the way that man talked to victoria was incredibly disrespectful to a woman you’ve invited into your home to help your dogs… all because of some vindictiveness he has over a foster dog that he ultimately has responsibility for. that poor dog has been rescued from a horrible life and shunning the defenseless animal to make a point is cruel.
Do you feel the woman was right to keep bringing dogs home, let alone expecting her partner to be responsible for them, when she knew he did not want any more dogs? Would it be okay with you if your partner adopted or fostered a child (and then another, and then another) each time without any regard for your wants, needs and feelings? And if you were angry, even furious, and hurt, and felt disrespected by that, what would you do about it? Would you feel they your partner was right in expecting you to do half the work of raising those children? Supporting them? Giving up going out with your friends to stay home and babysit? Take a second job to give them the material things your partner wanted from them? At what point would you draw the line...and if you refused to, e.g., take that second job, do you believe that would be an expression of vindictiveness on your part? p.s. I don't recall his having said anything that seemed to me at all disrespectful to Victoria, let alone "extremely" so. My take on it was that he was merely expressing the fact that he was frustrated with his partner, and was presenting his point of view on his situation-- emphatically and without dishonestly folding/kowtowing to Victoria, but with no disrespect.
@@Alice-xy3fi maybe their communication was off but Victoria did nothing wrong! For him to speak to her like that is incredibly rude and disrespectful. He invited her into their home to help them train the dog, so for him to treat her like that is incredibly cruel. She was right to walk out!
@@Alice-xy3fiShe's an adoption coordinator, this is her job. Scott would probably ignore a foster child and only feed his own biological children. "I feed the dogs I own." Or he'd marry someone with kids but since he didn't choose to have those kids he wouldn't do anything for them.
@@thedeviouspanda "Hey I can't help that you're gullible" as a response to him saying "She brought dogs in this house by manipulating me". That's literally her admitting to it. Doesn't bloody matter what her job is, they're both in the wrong.
'look at you with your hands on your hips' omg can't believe he just talked to vic like that lol you get some real arses on this show eh deena is deff manipulative tho thinks she can do what she likes hope shes learned her lesson. vic's expression watch huggy growl and bark at the other was hilarious
I agree they shouldn't have brought the last in the house since she expected him to do the work... but it nearly cancels out with the way he talks to Victoria!
It's wrong to starve a animal but he should not be forced to foster a animal against his will. his wife should of talked about it with her husband instead of bringing in a foster animal without telling him she should have asked him first . Even though he does not want to foster a animal he should still feed the foster animal like all animals he has in the household. If 1 person in the household does not want to foster any animals, then she should respect his or her decision. have the person that does foster animals have most of the responsibility and ask the person that does not want to foster to at least feed the foster animal and help with meds . He is in the wrong for refusing to feed the dog but his wife is also in the wrong for forcing him to foster a dog .
He's right! I got a German Shepherd that my partner didn't really want and I don't expect him to do ANYTHING with her because she's MY responsibility! He loves her to pieces and does way more than I expect bc he's a saint but it's not fair for me to bring in an extra responsibility he didn't ask for or want and expect 50%. It's so wrong to force dogs onto people because those dogs won't get the love they deserve
Although i think this is right, i can only agree partly. When you’re in a committed relationship, you share responsibilities. Your partner is doing what he should do… yes it’s extremely nice and helpful but it’s his job to be nice and helpful to you. I wouldn’t get a pet against my partners wishes either, but even if i did i would expect him to help me if i absolutely needed help. That’s part of being in a relationship…. Being able to depend on your partner for help shouldn’t be situational.
@@kinley.-.a dog is like a child. You shouldn’t make a person have a child they don’t want, especially with special needs. She’s dismissing her husband and the dog because of her good intentions. While good intentions she’s still doing wrong. And he’s wrong for being rude to Victoria and being a sassy brat but that dog wasn’t his choice.
@@kinley.-. On the other hand, if you're in a committed relationship you should respect your partner's boundaries. Pets are a HUGE amount of responsibility, and if someone does not want it, then it is plain wrong to force them into it. Not to mention that unwanted responsibilities can build up into resentment towards you or the pet (something that did kinda happen here as well), or loss of trust after clearly disregarding his explicit wishes. It's his job to be nice and helpful to you, but it's your job to be nice and helpful to him.
You have no idea how much this show helps me heal through the loss of my beloved Charlie. Sounds weird, but it actually helped me alot through the worst grief.
As much as I don’t think it’s okay to bring dogs in the home without consent from the other house members it’s not fair to the dogs to let your ego get the best of you and only do “20%” the dogs didn’t ask to be brought into the home
Everyone complaining out here about Scott and Deena, meanwhile I'm watching that diarrhea poop and going "you sure that diet has everything they need?" O.o
Honestly, I agree with him! When you are in a relationship you work with the other person. HE DIDN'T WANT THE DOG. Why is it his responsibility to take of it, too? Especially when she didn't discuss it with her partner before she made the decision?? And he is right, if he did help more she would probably take advantage of it and bring another dog into the house.
He doesn't even seem to like his wife, so why is he even there in the first place if he doesn't help her take care of the dogs? Her happiness is through helping the dogs obviously, and it feels like him refusing to help and just sitting around mocking her and being proud of his uselessness is him trying to hurt her because he doesn't have anything else.
@MarcieFoster No, it's not. That's why Deena needs to apologize to Scott for dismissing his desire (four.....I mean five dogs with one special needs is more than a handful) and try to tell him sometimes that she appreciates the help. She's disregarding the pup's well-being as much as she's dismissing Scott. It feels good to her, but how does it feel to Scott and the pup. What if Scott got sick or admitted to the hospital tomorrow?
but there’s two sides to that coin. she should’ve consulted with her husband before bringing a foster dog in. and he should not be getting revenge or trying to punish her by just ignoring and not taking care of that dog. neither one of them is treating their relationship in a healthy way.
I'm sorry Victoria, in this instance you're wrong. He didn't want the dog! He knows his wife better than anyone, if he says she'll just use that to bring another dog in, then that's what'll happen. He has a right to put his foot down. She wanted that amount of dogs, so she should do most of the work! It's perfectly simple. Victoria's rant about the fact that it's a puppy mill dog, has health issues, and she's seen the worst etc has NOTHING to do with it!
I understand Victoria's point of view as well - it's really unfair to the dog that he's not treated as nicely as the others just because of the wife's decision. Of course the whole situation is unfair to the husband. You should never push the responsibility of a pet on someone who doesn't want it. The person who needed the scolding was the wife, honestly. He put the husband into a lose-lose situation and ended up indirectly contributing to the mistreatment of the puppy.
That’s the only thing I disagree with Victoria with how she tries to force the other person to be responsible for a dog that they didn’t want I also wanna say that Deena is just as bad as Scott i still can’t believe when Scott said that Deena is very manipulative all she said back was “not my fault your gullible” & did anyone else notice when huggy attacks Scott dog she barely tries to stop the fight & she kinda smiles when the dog gets attacked & hurt like she can get up & walk away with the dog in her arms but she stays im not sure im explaining it good but that just makes her look really bad
My sister in law had 2 pugs Kobo Sue and Kim Sue they were both very sweet girls but I learned I didn’t want a pug due to the health issues Kobo and Kimmy had 😢 both were obese and had horrible breathing issues 😢
Watching two pugs fight when they can't actually bite properly is so extremely goofy. Their muzzles are literally so messed up that they can't bite each other correctly. Sad.
I love your videos and from your videos I have been able to train my grandparents dog better than they did🤨🤨 Proof that this is real and not bad training because I see a lot of people get so mad at their new puppies for not understanding human, and honestly what I would say to them would be: speaking human to us humans is like we’re able to translate and understand it but to dogs and other animals it’s essentially just sounds that we as humans have learned to translate but dogs and animals haven’t so before getting mad at your dog remember that if your dog isn’t listening you have not trained them enough/well
Honestly, I think it's wrong that Scott is taking his frustration out on the foster dog and not feeding him. It's not the pug's fault Outside of that, she's just really horrible to him, and ignores everything he says even when on camera, she's a manipulator and uses that to get Victoria on her side ( not my fault you're gullible)
The US version of ""It's me or the dog" is soo much different from the British version, and not in a positive way. Whereas the UK version is about dogs and their issues, the US version is about broken relationships. The people in the US version are mostly extreme acting in a bizzare manner whereas the people in the UK version are generally friendly people recognizing their mistakes and eager to learn. I don't know if that is due to the scripting of the US version to appeal to a more soap-opera saturated audience, or whether people with dogs in the US are so much more insane than Britons generally are. Whatever the reasons, I just can't make it through this series.
Force him to take up additional responsibility that he distinctly did not want, but she just ignored him. And, she sometimes travel, so he has them all alone. Why the surprise that he's resentful? It's like deliberately becoming pregnant after your boyfriend said he didn't want the responsibility of another totally dependent being because the four you already have is overwhelming, but they're here already. And, he's right. If he's not prepared to take care of even more, why reward Deena bringing additional furbabies into the picture. Plus, she's a nag.
i was about to use that same analogy in responding to Luffy's comment, but then I realized, what this woman did is actually worse than saying "Who cares that you don't want to be a father yet/ever; I do, so I'm getting pregnant and screw you (no pun intended)." The reason I think it's worse, at least in one way, is that in the pregnancy analogy, he at least has SOME control-- after she does it the first time, say, he can refuse to have intercourse so as to avoid becoming a father again. And not only does he then have control, but at least then she presumably is also experiencing some consequences for her horrible selfishness and disrespect toward him, instead of her doing whatever the hell she wants and all the consequences falling on him. I love dogs as much as the next person, and I love people, too...and if my boyfriend started "fostering" homeless people or other needful humans in the teeth of my having made clear I didn't want to share my home with strangers, I'd be pissed. If he then insisted I cook for them, do their laundry, take them to the doctor and give them their medicine, I'd think he was nuts. And if Victoria came in and told me off in that morally superior way (I LOVE Victoria, and this is the first time I've ever disagreed with her, but I do, love or no love), and totally took my side with a token nod to my boyfriend's being "over controlling" in the he was supervising this stuff that I was doing for these people in my home who I had repeatedly made clear I did NOT want there, I'd think she was nuts. I think that man deserves a medal for taking care of the dogs as much as he did, and not only that-- did anyone notice, let alone comment on, how tenderly he touched he cared for them, when he was caring them, as shown in the show before V. even mentioned that woman's control issues (totally ignoring the woman's issues of selfishness and disregard of her parner's feelings, and her living her life, at least when it came to the dogs, as if the man didn't exist (exept as the hired help to care for the dogs)? Sorry, I got carried away. This really got to me, as might possibly be a teensy bit evident from my ranting. I guess that woman is not the only one with control issues, lol...only mine are the opposite of hers.
@Alice-xy3fi you didn't get carried away. You did a thorough analysis, just like, if both people were weighing the pros and cons. She's fine with meeting her need for affection by being needed by pets. What about his need for intimacy. He's feeling isolated and unloved. I totally agree with you. Maybe Victoria's producer had her play being offended for sensation, but she should refuse next time. It makes her seem obsessive to those who don't know her and lacking compassion, even though she knows animals. She is quite aware of the responsibilities and the possible accompanying frustrations of having more than one or two emotionally and physically demanding dependents. Like a tired mother of special needs babies. 🙂
I have a female pug Chloe she's very sweet to kids and other dogs she meets , Pug get obese only if you over feed them , my pug Chloe she's only 16 pounds she's truen 3 years old on October 26 , ❤
OK so it’s just like a baby if you bring home a foster child I don’t have to take care of it it’s not my responsibility it’s your responsibility because I never want that you have to take care of the child right both of the parents so both of the parents have to take care of the dog because it’s their responsibilityit’s not fair to the dog it’s not fair to the parent either
Who in their right mind would house five pugs in an average size suburban house? This woman is devious and manipulative; Scott didn't want the other dog.
Is it wrong to expect more from fosters...or is the 'reality' tv illusion kicking in? PSA maybe about responsibility of fosters? The math ain't mathin.
Sorry but I have to agree with Scott on this one. His wife is irritating af for getting all of these damn dogs without talking to him about it and then she tries to push the responsibilities of taking care of them onto him. He never wanted all of those dogs so it's not his responsibility to take care of them.
Kelly was very emotional when she was singing tears in heaven because it was a truble for her dog Stormy I 🫂 when she sang tears in heaven Kelly 😭 was in tears crying I wish I was there Saturday night to comfort Kelly and tell her it's ok hun don't 😭 cry about Stormy I'm here hun I love you 🫂 hun I will not leave you hun 😭
I love how the other pugs try to break up the fighting.
It’s definitely a pack thing that’s why you see the mounting/humping it’s even more prominent when there’s a million dogs in one house lol
Pugs see amazing
“He’s not too keen on being told he has problems.”
Ma’am, you deliberately went against your partner’s wishes and got an additional dog that requires medical care. You are the problem.
Exactly
I looked them up and found the Pug Village Forum thread from when this aired. People who know them personally confirmed he had to approve the foster.
"On our foster contract all people who live in the home have to sign the foster agreement and Scott did this."
'I can't help that you're gullable' if someone victum blames you after they've manipulated you like that, LEAVE.
Especially when it's your partner taking advantage of your faith in them. Should he have treated her with suspicion and doubt instead????
@@saddlerrye6725 she's basically said 'you shouldn't trust me, and it's your fault that you did'
REAL!!! I clocked onto that instantly and wished someone could’ve called her out for it. It’s the most insane thing someone could’ve said in the face a very serious issue.
Unfortunately, I can only assume Victoria didn’t comment on it because she’s only there to help the animals. Those people need a damn marriage counselor tho. Get a professional to be an unbiased force that sets thing right. Also it gets a rational 3rd party to advocate for Scott.
@@_indigo_inkedA marriage counselor is an unbiased 3rd party. Scott does not need multiple advocates. He needs to have a better personality.
Both of them are so childish.
I'm sure Deena was involved in animal rescue and fostering before their marriage. People get married and then act shocked by the behavior that was present the entire time. If Scott hates the relationship so much he can just leave.
The way he talked to Victoria..
im sorry but i can't take pugs seriously with the screaming
😂
same honestly
its gross
ok
@@oOKitty86Oo ok to you??
at 7:05 am I the only one that thinks it sounds like the pug in the ladys arms is saying "come on" lol
I can't believe how much progress they've made! Those pugs are adorable, even with their quirky habits!
the way that man talked to victoria was incredibly disrespectful to a woman you’ve invited into your home to help your dogs… all because of some vindictiveness he has over a foster dog that he ultimately has responsibility for. that poor dog has been rescued from a horrible life and shunning the defenseless animal to make a point is cruel.
Do you feel the woman was right to keep bringing dogs home, let alone expecting her partner to be responsible for them, when she knew he did not want any more dogs?
Would it be okay with you if your partner adopted or fostered a child (and then another, and then another) each time without any regard for your wants, needs and feelings? And if you were angry, even furious, and hurt, and felt disrespected by that, what would you do about it?
Would you feel they your partner was right in expecting you to do half the work of raising those children? Supporting them? Giving up going out with your friends to stay home and babysit? Take a second job to give them the material things your partner wanted from them?
At what point would you draw the line...and if you refused to, e.g., take that second job, do you believe that would be an expression of vindictiveness on your part?
p.s. I don't recall his having said anything that seemed to me at all disrespectful to Victoria, let alone "extremely" so. My take on it was that he was merely expressing the fact that he was frustrated with his partner, and was presenting his point of view on his situation-- emphatically and without dishonestly folding/kowtowing to Victoria, but with no disrespect.
@@Alice-xy3fi maybe their communication was off but Victoria did nothing wrong! For him to speak to her like that is incredibly rude and disrespectful. He invited her into their home to help them train the dog, so for him to treat her like that is incredibly cruel. She was right to walk out!
@@Alice-xy3fiShe's an adoption coordinator, this is her job. Scott would probably ignore a foster child and only feed his own biological children. "I feed the dogs I own." Or he'd marry someone with kids but since he didn't choose to have those kids he wouldn't do anything for them.
@@thedeviouspanda "Hey I can't help that you're gullible" as a response to him saying "She brought dogs in this house by manipulating me". That's literally her admitting to it. Doesn't bloody matter what her job is, they're both in the wrong.
This is why in some places the amount of dogs your allowed to own is limited to 2
'look at you with your hands on your hips' omg can't believe he just talked to vic like that lol you get some real arses on this show eh deena is deff manipulative tho thinks she can do what she likes hope shes learned her lesson. vic's expression watch huggy growl and bark at the other was hilarious
I agree they shouldn't have brought the last in the house since she expected him to do the work... but it nearly cancels out with the way he talks to Victoria!
They are 2 completely different things. She shouldnt have brought all the dogs in and put the burden on him.
It's wrong to starve a animal but he should not be forced to foster a animal against his will. his wife should of talked about it with her husband instead of bringing in a foster animal without telling him she should have asked him first . Even though he does not want to foster a animal he should still feed the foster animal like all animals he has in the household. If 1 person in the household does not want to foster any animals, then she should respect his or her decision. have the person that does foster animals have most of the responsibility and ask the person that does not want to foster to at least feed the foster animal and help with meds . He is in the wrong for refusing to feed the dog but his wife is also in the wrong for forcing him to foster a dog .
The pugs are just to funny 😂
He's right! I got a German Shepherd that my partner didn't really want and I don't expect him to do ANYTHING with her because she's MY responsibility! He loves her to pieces and does way more than I expect bc he's a saint but it's not fair for me to bring in an extra responsibility he didn't ask for or want and expect 50%. It's so wrong to force dogs onto people because those dogs won't get the love they deserve
Although i think this is right, i can only agree partly. When you’re in a committed relationship, you share responsibilities. Your partner is doing what he should do… yes it’s extremely nice and helpful but it’s his job to be nice and helpful to you. I wouldn’t get a pet against my partners wishes either, but even if i did i would expect him to help me if i absolutely needed help. That’s part of being in a relationship…. Being able to depend on your partner for help shouldn’t be situational.
@@kinley.-.a dog is like a child. You shouldn’t make a person have a child they don’t want, especially with special needs. She’s dismissing her husband and the dog because of her good intentions. While good intentions she’s still doing wrong. And he’s wrong for being rude to Victoria and being a sassy brat but that dog wasn’t his choice.
@@kinley.-. On the other hand, if you're in a committed relationship you should respect your partner's boundaries. Pets are a HUGE amount of responsibility, and if someone does not want it, then it is plain wrong to force them into it. Not to mention that unwanted responsibilities can build up into resentment towards you or the pet (something that did kinda happen here as well), or loss of trust after clearly disregarding his explicit wishes. It's his job to be nice and helpful to you, but it's your job to be nice and helpful to him.
why are they making the same face in the thumbnail lol
What do you mean?
My groomer said that my pug is actually very smart just stubborn.... Well she was right! My pug even brought packages in!
You have no idea how much this show helps me heal through the loss of my beloved Charlie. Sounds weird, but it actually helped me alot through the worst grief.
As much as I don’t think it’s okay to bring dogs in the home without consent from the other house members it’s not fair to the dogs to let your ego get the best of you and only do “20%” the dogs didn’t ask to be brought into the home
Everyone complaining out here about Scott and Deena, meanwhile I'm watching that diarrhea poop and going "you sure that diet has everything they need?" O.o
Honestly, I agree with him! When you are in a relationship you work with the other person. HE DIDN'T WANT THE DOG. Why is it his responsibility to take of it, too? Especially when she didn't discuss it with her partner before she made the decision?? And he is right, if he did help more she would probably take advantage of it and bring another dog into the house.
Not fair to the dog
He doesn't even seem to like his wife, so why is he even there in the first place if he doesn't help her take care of the dogs? Her happiness is through helping the dogs obviously, and it feels like him refusing to help and just sitting around mocking her and being proud of his uselessness is him trying to hurt her because he doesn't have anything else.
@MarcieFoster No, it's not. That's why Deena needs to apologize to Scott for dismissing his desire (four.....I mean five dogs with one special needs is more than a handful) and try to tell him sometimes that she appreciates the help. She's disregarding the pup's well-being as much as she's dismissing Scott. It feels good to her, but how does it feel to Scott and the pup. What if Scott got sick or admitted to the hospital tomorrow?
I agree! I would not stand for it! There is no way I’d participate if I said no we are not doing this or do that absolutely NOT!
but there’s two sides to that coin. she should’ve consulted with her husband before bringing a foster dog in. and he should not be getting revenge or trying to punish her by just ignoring and not taking care of that dog. neither one of them is treating their relationship in a healthy way.
I'm sorry Victoria, in this instance you're wrong. He didn't want the dog! He knows his wife better than anyone, if he says she'll just use that to bring another dog in, then that's what'll happen. He has a right to put his foot down.
She wanted that amount of dogs, so she should do most of the work! It's perfectly simple.
Victoria's rant about the fact that it's a puppy mill dog, has health issues, and she's seen the worst etc has NOTHING to do with it!
I understand Victoria's point of view as well - it's really unfair to the dog that he's not treated as nicely as the others just because of the wife's decision.
Of course the whole situation is unfair to the husband. You should never push the responsibility of a pet on someone who doesn't want it. The person who needed the scolding was the wife, honestly. He put the husband into a lose-lose situation and ended up indirectly contributing to the mistreatment of the puppy.
That’s the only thing I disagree with Victoria with how she tries to force the other person to be responsible for a dog that they didn’t want
I also wanna say that Deena is just as bad as Scott i still can’t believe when Scott said that Deena is very manipulative all she said back was “not my fault your gullible” & did anyone else notice when huggy attacks Scott dog she barely tries to stop the fight & she kinda smiles when the dog gets attacked & hurt like she can get up & walk away with the dog in her arms but she stays im not sure im explaining it good but that just makes her look really bad
My sister in law had 2 pugs Kobo Sue and Kim Sue they were both very sweet girls but I learned I didn’t want a pug due to the health issues Kobo and Kimmy had 😢 both were obese and had horrible breathing issues 😢
I love this episode
Watching two pugs fight when they can't actually bite properly is so extremely goofy. Their muzzles are literally so messed up that they can't bite each other correctly. Sad.
I love your videos and from your videos I have been able to train my grandparents dog better than they did🤨🤨
Proof that this is real and not bad training because I see a lot of people get so mad at their new puppies for not understanding human, and honestly what I would say to them would be: speaking human to us humans is like we’re able to translate and understand it but to dogs and other animals it’s essentially just sounds that we as humans have learned to translate but dogs and animals haven’t so before getting mad at your dog remember that if your dog isn’t listening you have not trained them enough/well
Most of american episodes makes me feel ashamed... ppl out there read! Learn good manners for God's sake!
Cute Pugs!! 🐾🐶
Honestly, I think it's wrong that Scott is taking his frustration out on the foster dog and not feeding him. It's not the pug's fault
Outside of that, she's just really horrible to him, and ignores everything he says even when on camera, she's a manipulator and uses that to get Victoria on her side ( not my fault you're gullible)
They have a grumble of pugs!!!!!
I loved this! Very interesting!
Hugly: mela, u shut up🤬🤬 mela: no, u shut up🤬🤬
Is no one talking about the car victoria was driving in😮 thats a corvette
Oha! From a VW Beetle to a Mustang?! 😮
I love Joey
Omg 0:35 like damn
Deena, sis. Dump him. You and Scott both deserve to find men who are on the same page.
Its not an environment for a foster
Could’ve sworn I already watched this?
Ya they're recycling episodes. I hope Victoria is ok.
@@morganelzey well they’re all old videos anyway. I’m sure she is retired!
I want a pug
And there's lily 😊 and melog😊 and huggi😊 and apple 😊 and then there's joe 🙄
The US version of ""It's me or the dog" is soo much different from the British version, and not in a positive way. Whereas the UK version is about dogs and their issues, the US version is about broken relationships. The people in the US version are mostly extreme acting in a bizzare manner whereas the people in the UK version are generally friendly people recognizing their mistakes and eager to learn. I don't know if that is due to the scripting of the US version to appeal to a more soap-opera saturated audience, or whether people with dogs in the US are so much more insane than Britons generally are. Whatever the reasons, I just can't make it through this series.
Force him to take up additional responsibility that he distinctly did not want, but she just ignored him. And, she sometimes travel, so he has them all alone. Why the surprise that he's resentful? It's like deliberately becoming pregnant after your boyfriend said he didn't want the responsibility of another totally dependent being because the four you already have is overwhelming, but they're here already. And, he's right. If he's not prepared to take care of even more, why reward Deena bringing additional furbabies into the picture. Plus, she's a nag.
i was about to use that same analogy in responding to Luffy's comment, but then I realized, what this woman did is actually worse than saying "Who cares that you don't want to be a father yet/ever; I do, so I'm getting pregnant and screw you (no pun intended)."
The reason I think it's worse, at least in one way, is that in the pregnancy analogy, he at least has SOME control-- after she does it the first time, say, he can refuse to have intercourse so as to avoid becoming a father again.
And not only does he then have control, but at least then she presumably is also experiencing some consequences for her horrible selfishness and disrespect toward him, instead of her doing whatever the hell she wants and all the consequences falling on him.
I love dogs as much as the next person, and I love people, too...and if my boyfriend started "fostering" homeless people or other needful humans in the teeth of my having made clear I didn't want to share my home with strangers, I'd be pissed.
If he then insisted I cook for them, do their laundry, take them to the doctor and give them their medicine, I'd think he was nuts.
And if Victoria came in and told me off in that morally superior way (I LOVE Victoria, and this is the first time I've ever disagreed with her, but I do, love or no love), and totally took my side with a token nod to my boyfriend's being "over controlling" in the he was supervising this stuff that I was doing for these people in my home who I had repeatedly made clear I did NOT want there, I'd think she was nuts.
I think that man deserves a medal for taking care of the dogs as much as he did, and not only that-- did anyone notice, let alone comment on, how tenderly he touched he cared for them, when he was caring them, as shown in the show before V. even mentioned that woman's control issues (totally ignoring the woman's issues of selfishness and disregard of her parner's feelings, and her living her life, at least when it came to the dogs, as if the man didn't exist (exept as the hired help to care for the dogs)?
Sorry, I got carried away. This really got to me, as might possibly be a teensy bit evident from my ranting. I guess that woman is not the only one with control issues, lol...only mine are the opposite of hers.
@Alice-xy3fi you didn't get carried away. You did a thorough analysis, just like, if both people were weighing the pros and cons. She's fine with meeting her need for affection by being needed by pets. What about his need for intimacy. He's feeling isolated and unloved.
I totally agree with you. Maybe Victoria's producer had her play being offended for sensation, but she should refuse next time. It makes her seem obsessive to those who don't know her and lacking compassion, even though she knows animals. She is quite aware of the responsibilities and the possible accompanying frustrations of having more than one or two emotionally and physically demanding dependents. Like a tired mother of special needs babies. 🙂
@@Alice-xy3fiwho hurt you?
khaaakhaaaa! - pug lol
I have a female pug Chloe she's very sweet to kids and other dogs she meets ,
Pug get obese only if you over feed them , my pug Chloe she's only 16 pounds she's truen 3 years old on October 26 , ❤
difference is you actually care about her wellbeing, not just wanting to own animals but wanting to love her
He is quite something!
Is Victoria ok? I've seen the same episode, this one for the 3rd time..
So? She's fine.
My friend Cooper has a pug called milo.
VICTORIA NOO
Its cruel just to own a pug. These creatures are not meant to be on this planet and suffer their whole life just for existing.
OK so it’s just like a baby if you bring home a foster child I don’t have to take care of it it’s not my responsibility it’s your responsibility because I never want that you have to take care of the child right both of the parents so both of the parents have to take care of the dog because it’s their responsibilityit’s not fair to the dog it’s not fair to the parent either
She's a control freak
Robert Irwin he has a fawn colored pug named Stella 😃
This is the most supernanny thing I can imagine
Who in their right mind would house five pugs in an average size suburban house? This woman is devious and manipulative; Scott didn't want the other dog.
I love pugs seriously but come on you clearly can tell they needed training ..
Aaron Carter he had a fawn colored pug😢💔
Nick Carter he had a fawn colored pug 😃
Is it wrong to expect more from fosters...or is the 'reality' tv illusion kicking in?
PSA maybe about responsibility of fosters?
The math ain't mathin.
I don't get why people carrying their small dog around. They have legs for a reason
I love Pugs they are so cute
That's what I thought, until I got one.
@@Jen.K right?? the worst
I can't get over how feminine Deenah looks. It's like she's the Goddess of Femininity.
Was becoming a dog expert just Victoria's way of becoming a very roundabout marriage counselor? 😊
Sorry but I have to agree with Scott on this one. His wife is irritating af for getting all of these damn dogs without talking to him about it and then she tries to push the responsibilities of taking care of them onto him. He never wanted all of those dogs so it's not his responsibility to take care of them.
Pugs are very intelligent, but I don't like their personality.
Yikes
😮❤
Why are pug people always so weird?
I think a problem with the flag system might be thaþ dogs can't decipher colors as well, so the flags might not be visible against the grass
Flags are for the humans. Dogs can see certain colours.
Not my pug my pug is not intelligent he thinks he is a lap dog
Your pug is intelligent.
Kelly was very emotional when she was singing tears in heaven because it was a truble for her dog Stormy I 🫂 when she sang tears in heaven Kelly 😭 was in tears crying I wish I was there Saturday night to comfort Kelly and tell her it's ok hun don't 😭 cry about Stormy I'm here hun I love you 🫂 hun I will not leave you hun 😭
All small dogs are annoying. Especially old grumpy pugs
No they're not.