ATHEIST BOOK CLUB: More Dawkins

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024

Комментарии • 29

  • @tonyl3762
    @tonyl3762 3 месяца назад +3

    I appreciate being able to get a taste of the book without having to waste more time and money than necessary. Appreciate the insightful commentary too.

  • @ecstaticallyeverafterwithc5904
    @ecstaticallyeverafterwithc5904 3 месяца назад +8

    Love you guys together! Dream team ❤

    • @RebeccaLynne2046
      @RebeccaLynne2046 3 месяца назад +2

      Aren't they? I hope they continue this collaboration.

  • @masonc9531
    @masonc9531 2 месяца назад +1

    yay more books

  • @ZTAudio
    @ZTAudio 2 месяца назад +1

    Nicely done.

  • @rickfilmmaker3934
    @rickfilmmaker3934 3 месяца назад +2

    Really great stuff guys! Keep doing this truly educational and fascinating episodes. Thank you both!

  • @richbozzi3148
    @richbozzi3148 3 месяца назад +2

    I miss Micheal Heiser but Jimmy is doing a great job on Catholicism and Mere Christianity through the natural and supernatural aspects. Jimmy had good debate vs Bart Ehrman and defended the New Testament . I’m reading the Resurrection of the Son of God by NT Wright for the second time and would be a good episode at looking at “Resurrection “ through the Old Testament, New Testament, mythology, post 70ad rabbinic thought and more.

  • @telephonebear21
    @telephonebear21 2 месяца назад

    1:10:52 I have to ask, do you know the numbers of every Mysterious World episode or do you have a quick reference before citing one? I hear it in Mysterious World itself, but that is somewhat scripted. This moment was quite off the fly though. I heard your interview on PWA so understand your above-average recall ability, but it still surprises me!

  • @mrman5066
    @mrman5066 3 месяца назад

    Glad I got to watch this so early! A fooler man would say first... welp guess I'm not too wise am I

  • @Aethelhart
    @Aethelhart 2 месяца назад

    2:18:05 why do you not consider the Council of Rome in the 4th century or at least Florence in the 15th century to infallibly define the canon?

  • @marinanguish9928
    @marinanguish9928 3 месяца назад +1

    You should review the second episode of the "Genius of Charles Darwin" documentary by Dawkins. He has a really tough time explaining morality there.

    • @Theo_Skeptomai
      @Theo_Skeptomai 3 месяца назад

      I am an atheist and can explain morality.
      Morality is the cognitive process of differentiating between human intentions, decisions, and actions that are morally appropriate (ought to occur in a certain dilemma) from those inappropriate (ought not to occur in a certain dilemma).
      Like all cognitive assessments, moral assessments always and necessarily involve the subject's perspective, understanding, experience, outlook and other personal considerations. Therefore, morality is _always and necessarily_ SUBJECTIVE.
      Each and every individual is the sole arbiter of his or her own morality. I, and I alone, determine which human behaviors are moral, amoral, or immoral, just as everyone else does.

    • @callummccormick86
      @callummccormick86 3 месяца назад +2

      ​@@Theo_Skeptomai
      If this is true, how would you explain the fact that we often feel constrained by our moral perceptions. Often we "want" to do something but don't because we know it is wrong or immoral. So if my, or your, morality is merely "subjective", why would we concoct moralities that stop us from doing what we "subjectively" wish to do?

    • @Theo_Skeptomai
      @Theo_Skeptomai 2 месяца назад

      @callummccormick86 Because I have the _capacity_ to determine morally appropriate behaviors. I haven't the need or desire to do that which is immoral.

    • @callummccormick86
      @callummccormick86 2 месяца назад +2

      @@Theo_Skeptomai But I was asking for your explanation as to why we "invent" moralities which conflict with our desires? Your explanation is that morality is purely a personal invention. So why don't all of us invent moralities which tell us that everything we do and want to do is moral and save ourselves any guilt of conscience?

    • @Theo_Skeptomai
      @Theo_Skeptomai 2 месяца назад

      @callummccormick86 I DON'T "invent" moralities. I can not speak for you. I make moral _assessments._

  • @RebeccaLynne2046
    @RebeccaLynne2046 3 месяца назад +2

    Jimmy, have you ever presented evidence from the miracle of Lanciano to an atheist? If so, what was their response?

    • @Theo_Skeptomai
      @Theo_Skeptomai 3 месяца назад +1

      If you would like to present this miracle to me, I will gladly provide a response.

    • @tonyl3762
      @tonyl3762 3 месяца назад +2

      Pretty sure Jimmy does not like to argue for theism from miracles.

    • @Theo_Skeptomai
      @Theo_Skeptomai 3 месяца назад

      @@tonyl3762 Would Jimmy consider arguing from evidence or sound argument?

    • @tonyl3762
      @tonyl3762 3 месяца назад +4

      @@Theo_Skeptomai Jimmy has formal philosophical training. Are you trying to be cheeky?

    • @Theo_Skeptomai
      @Theo_Skeptomai 3 месяца назад +1

      @tonyl3762 I have formal theological training.
      So, are you going to answer my question?

  • @Aethelhart
    @Aethelhart 2 месяца назад

    2:28:00 FEE has a really good video on Wakanda and why advanced civilizations like this would not likely exist because of economics not allowing it. Worth a watch for your episode, Jimmy.