For Pearson Chi-Square, I was reporting the chi-squared value and the p-value. Why doesn't Fisher's exact test have anything under the 'Value' column? Which value would we report in a table if we use Fisher's exact test? Thank you
Hi and thanks for a good video! You mention in the tutorial that you follow the recommendations from a couple of stats books. Could you please add the full references (including page numbers) to these in the description text? In Andy Field's book "Discovering statistics using SPSS" (3rd ed) I assume you looked at the pages 690-692 (sections 18.3.2. "Fisher's exact test", 18.3.3. "The likelihood ratio" and 18.4. "Assumptions of the chi-square test")?
Can you pls tell as you said expected count 60% is less than 5 so we will violate the assumption because 60% is greater from 20% from how i will know about the 20% i'm not getting it pls tell?
![Chi-Square Test [Simply explained]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rpKzq64GA9Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you so much for this video!!!! You saved me! I spent hours and hours trying to figure this out and this truly is a life-saver!!!
Thank you so much. I don't want to cry anymore xxxx.
Thank you! I've been looking everywhere for someone to explain this in a way I could understand - and you did it!
HI PLZ TELL ME STEPS TO DO FURTHER IF ASSUMPTION IS VIOLATED
thank you, but what exactly means that the assumption has been violated? that we should reject the null hypothesis?
Hello, why should the expected value be more than 10? Thank you
Thank you very much for your article please I have a question how can you help me
For Pearson Chi-Square, I was reporting the chi-squared value and the p-value. Why doesn't Fisher's exact test have anything under the 'Value' column? Which value would we report in a table if we use Fisher's exact test? Thank you
So you don´t look at Cramer´s V if the assumption has been violated? Just a follow up question.
Hi and thanks for a good video!
You mention in the tutorial that you follow the recommendations from a couple of stats books. Could you please add the full references (including page numbers) to these in the description text?
In Andy Field's book "Discovering statistics using SPSS" (3rd ed) I assume you looked at the pages 690-692 (sections 18.3.2. "Fisher's exact test", 18.3.3. "The likelihood ratio" and 18.4. "Assumptions of the chi-square test")?
How to predicted if there are one object more significant than others
Can you pls tell as you said expected count 60% is less than 5 so we will violate the assumption because 60% is greater from 20% from how i will know about the 20% i'm not getting it pls tell?
same here , its not making sense
what if the likelihood ratio is
Hye i have the same exact question. did you find out any solution for this?
Same question here, did you @@bettaenthusiastb339 ?
Tell the value of chi-square/likelihood ratio to be written
1.22 I don't understand the assumption for the expected count is '10'. Why 10? ...it is a rule?
Same here! Did you get it clarified ?
Very bad quality