LEGO Star Wars T-6 JEDI SHUTTLE COMPARISON! (7931 vs 75362 | 2011 vs 2023)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
  • I never thought I'd see a remake of the LEGO Star Wars 7931 Jedi T-6 Shuttle but with the Ahsoka show LEGO Star Wars has created the 75362 Ahsoka Tano's T-6 Jedi Shuttle and while it's smaller, it's got a better design, easier to use play functions, and a shockingly good Minifigure line-up.
    - - - - - - - - - -
    Join Whatnot & get $15 off your first purchase! (Affiliate) - whatnot.com/in...
    Buy NEW & OFFICIAL LEGO sets from ZAVVI & save 10% with CODE MandR10 - tidd.ly/3EBV7qd
    Business Inquiries - mandrproductions@algebramedia.com
    Fan E-mail - MandRprod34@gmail.com
    mandrshop.com/
    Best of MandRproductions: • Best of MandRproductions
    - - - - - - - - - -
    #LEGOStarWars #LEGO #StarWars
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 384

  • @CanadaBricks
    @CanadaBricks Год назад +719

    The cockpit undoubtedly took the biggest hit in the downsizing of the new set. Feels a little sad to only squeeze one fig in compared to almost 3 on the old one

    • @Daddy-Hundavar
      @Daddy-Hundavar Год назад +11

      Hello there again I really do see you everywhere

    • @Yurio
      @Yurio Год назад +26

      Definitely, especially considering this is a shuttle

    • @TiagoDdA
      @TiagoDdA Год назад +6

      But the size looks more accurate I'm the small version

    • @ZoomerUnion
      @ZoomerUnion Год назад +25

      ​@@TiagoDdAit's not. This is a fairly large ship. About five times larger than an X-wing in universe.

    • @ShizzySupra
      @ShizzySupra Год назад +17

      The Bad Batch “shuttle” was super small but still managed to fit 4 figures plus gear and was $80… being blinded by the figures in this Ahsoka set, its not a great set…

  • @xtentasticx
    @xtentasticx Год назад +160

    What I hate about Lego is so many ships that have interiors are downsized to single pilot interiors 😢

    • @espguitarz1
      @espguitarz1 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@IntergalacticDustBunnywhy would the collector still support things like that to happen? Collectors are the worst. It's making all our set smallers. Thanks to collectors dumbness by feeding them so they can keep doing shitty products.

    • @gelatinguy
      @gelatinguy 10 месяцев назад +3

      @@espguitarz1 I don't think this is the case. As mentioned above, the main reason is the shelf display tends to be most important for builders, and without making the ship to minifig scale (neither T-6 is minifig scale), they chose to shrink the cockpit/interior so the exterior looks nice. With a ship of that scale, you can't have both a minifig scale interior and proportional exterior. You have to choose. The only solution to this, of course, is to have a full model, which is why the more famous ships (like Luke's X-Wing) have a smaller playset ship and the full minifig scale ship.
      It may not be what you want, but that's the reality of the scale they are marketing toward. Or do you want all the sets to either be larger interiors with bad proportions, or do you want them to be 3x as expensive to be full minifig scale?

    • @Rievax17
      @Rievax17 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@gelatinguyyeah exactly. With this ship I don’t think you could even get to minifig scale without going full UCS, and even then Lego isn’t strong enough as a material to both incorporate the interior and look good on the outside at that sizd

    • @gelatinguy
      @gelatinguy 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@Rievax17 One thing I'd like to see Lego do more often is to "Polly Pocket" a ship, which is what I call it when the interior doesn't match the exterior, but it's a fun playset inside. So make the outside look like a nice ship, then crack open the ship like a clam shell and have the interior be the cockpit or whatever is most interesting.

  • @michellerahe4853
    @michellerahe4853 Год назад +208

    I love and miss the OG clone wars line. Just seeing the old clone wars sets is kinda nostalgic now. I miss when they paid more attention to that series. But maybe that's just me

    • @berenwelter8835
      @berenwelter8835 Год назад +3

      Yeah same here

    • @elephant_stone82
      @elephant_stone82 Год назад +1

      🥲🥲🥹

    • @spargsyrebooted
      @spargsyrebooted Год назад +8

      Yo be fair, the reason they paid so much attention to TCW is because it was the only new Star Wars thing at the time.
      Now we have all these D+ shows to make sets for. Couldn’t just be Clone Wars forever aha.

    • @michellerahe4853
      @michellerahe4853 Год назад +2

      @@spargsyrebooted ik haha. Just sucks

    • @Gabe0mazing
      @Gabe0mazing Год назад +2

      ​@spargsyrebooted and we are getting a $650 UCS Venator in a month so I don't think it's been completely forgotten

  • @aidens4669
    @aidens4669 Год назад +161

    That box size difference is wild

    • @justinmcare814
      @justinmcare814 11 месяцев назад +2

      Well everyone keeps buying these sets no matter how overpriced they've been so it's no wonder the new sets are always noticeably worse in ways that make zero sense.

  • @darthjarjar911
    @darthjarjar911 Год назад +110

    I prefer the original clone wars shuttle with the 4 jedi but the new one still looks great

  • @caidenstudios6881
    @caidenstudios6881 Год назад +141

    He’s still pumpin out peak content every day
    Honestly I think each set is equally good in their own ways
    Keep it up Ryan!

  • @HumbleTrooper
    @HumbleTrooper 11 месяцев назад +20

    I honestly prefer the rigid wing spin motion, it is really hard to get the Ahsoka shuttle to stay in one position, and the wing lock on the old one solves this issue perfectly

  • @kstudioz8871
    @kstudioz8871 Год назад +44

    Lego really should've added a extra stud to make it a rounded 600 pieces! 😅

  • @estebanlabulle649
    @estebanlabulle649 11 месяцев назад +2

    the underbelly does really matter if u want to display while it's spinning or somthing. I like the vertical look

  • @stannypk5k9
    @stannypk5k9 Год назад +33

    I think the downsized cockpit is a deal breaker for me. Major issue, and it really gives the ship a "small-scale" vibe. The immersion is broken, so to speak. Even though overall the new ship's design is nicer and the storage is good, the 1-minifigure space for the cockpit is just plain bad/inaccurate. This lack of space in the ships is a terrible trend recently - from Boba Fett's ship to this. What happened to creativity, like the one used for design of Razor Crest or Transport Scythe? I'd rather this ship to be $30-$40 more expensive but nail the interior space. It would be perfect then.

    • @brennanhickey9156
      @brennanhickey9156 Год назад +2

      100% see where your are coming from here, but I will say with the scale they went the small cockpit does look good and a bigger cockpit wouldn’t look right. That being said I agree they should have made a bigger set entirely so more figures could fit in a larger scaled cockpit.

    • @ShizzySupra
      @ShizzySupra Год назад +2

      @@brennanhickey9156 scale is arbitrary… they could have scaled it up or down however they wanted. It could have gone Mando Gauntlet design and had two figures fit length wise too.

  • @kanjiklubskywalker4951
    @kanjiklubskywalker4951 Год назад +11

    i actually prefer the simpler design of the older model. it's way more clean and displayable, plus the new one has so many tiny little pieces that create a cluttered look

  • @AlessTricer
    @AlessTricer Год назад +54

    The 2011 Jedi Shuttle can spin just as well as the 2023, just by moving ahead that little piece that creates the friction.

    • @Vor1ki
      @Vor1ki Год назад +13

      That’s not what lego intended though. I do prefer the more froction though

    • @wowitsnicify
      @wowitsnicify Год назад +2

      @@Vor1ki same.

  • @genappithy
    @genappithy Год назад +34

    For $80 I’d want them to address the under side of the wings. It’s otherwise a great looking model. Might wait to see if I ends up on sale.

    • @tompatchak8706
      @tompatchak8706 Год назад +3

      I hear that.
      I was all excited to get one, then saw the bland as shit under carriage.
      I’ll wait

    • @EriJ100
      @EriJ100 11 месяцев назад +4

      Same, I was thinking it would be neat to display this ship in "flight mode" with the wings vertical like we see most of the time on screen. But lego ignoring the underwings basically kill that option.

  • @MB-vg7uu
    @MB-vg7uu Год назад +8

    For the record: u can indeed fit all four figs in there 😮‍💨

  • @Iceman._
    @Iceman._ Год назад +6

    Thanks for the comparison. Never got the old one but I'm excited to get the new one. $80 is a great value for this set. I can see any or all of these minifigures being valuable years in the future. Getting this on sale for an investment seems like a good idea. Best ashoka minifig ever, remake of a classic rebels character, first ever version of a clone wars character, and a mysterious character whose revealed identity could increase its value. Seems like a win especially on sale.

  • @colewagner6623
    @colewagner6623 Год назад +26

    I’m a really big fan of the dark grey and red of the new one. It just looks so modern and satisfying. To bad it’s just a little to small, banger mini figs tho.

  • @pandurial
    @pandurial Год назад +5

    I like the new one better because the old one js had an UGH cockpit(it was oversized)

  • @JadenWeeks
    @JadenWeeks Год назад +3

    ive been waiting for this video for MONTHS! FINALLY!

  • @eitak12334
    @eitak12334 3 месяца назад

    wow this is an excellent video. camera work, script, and content were all top notch. good stuff

  • @vinceguy1464
    @vinceguy1464 Год назад +1

    So glad you displayed the T-6 with the wing angled down to touch the tabletop, that's the best look imo for display.

  • @ZackMuffinMan
    @ZackMuffinMan Год назад +3

    I still have my 2011 one and I will be getting this one!!

  • @lbricks7631
    @lbricks7631 Год назад +1

    I miss when we used to get different characters in the top of the box arts to indicate what was big in Star Wars at the time.

  • @rattlynanimations7694
    @rattlynanimations7694 Год назад +2

    I do wish they added detail to the underside of the wings. I would normally display it on the ceiling to make it look like its actively flying, however its more difficult where the ome side is too bland. I may just hang it on my wall instead

  • @Wingspan_5
    @Wingspan_5 11 месяцев назад +1

    I actually like the older lightsaber blades better. Maybe it's just nostalgia but if they didn't have bubbles I think they'd be perfect.

  • @hbtdawgz1688
    @hbtdawgz1688 Год назад +6

    Ahsoka show version of the T-6 features an extra engine and that rear turret. The Clone Wars and Rebels models didn’t have that.
    I like the new one’s body shaping more, the old one is super simple and round looking. I like the angles of the new one.
    A bigger cockpit would need a bigger set, the next appropriate cockpit would be one like the Falcon uses. And I think they’d have to scale up the wings and body for it to not look too funny.

  • @Brave_Sir_Robin
    @Brave_Sir_Robin Год назад +4

    I agree the newer one is objectively a better set but that white and red color scheme just looks so clean.

    • @hbtdawgz1688
      @hbtdawgz1688 Год назад +1

      I think it is a decent visual distinction between the eras. A clean Jedi Order era shuttle vs an older modded one post-Empire.
      They definitely designed it to look junkier in Ahsoka than it did in the animated shows.

  • @RandoMan07
    @RandoMan07 Год назад +2

    This is a perfect example of shrinkflation. It has more pieces and costs more but is smaller. Lego uses TONS of small pices to achieve detail that I'd rather have done with stickers. There's also thr cockpit. The new one looks like something somebody would actually sut in but the old one was bigger and when it comes to toys, bigger is better.

  • @MaxBricksYT
    @MaxBricksYT Год назад +1

    Your comparison series are always some of my favorite videos you make! Especially in this video, the quality is great and more importantly the video is timeless! Great work Ryan! I like both the sets and will get the new 1!

  • @viperson9818
    @viperson9818 Год назад +3

    The one thing I can say for sure about the two T-6 is that the builds are heavily limited due to their price point. Which makes me wonder ships like the Justifier gets $170 while a big ship like the T-6 is reduced to a star fighter sized set.

  • @herewegoagain...
    @herewegoagain... 11 месяцев назад +1

    The 2023 T-6 has a double layered win: they could have "simply" flipped that layer to make it less horrendous on the underside. Huge miss, but to be expected at the price point, as making such a flip stable would be more involved.

  • @stripedbandit5252
    @stripedbandit5252 Год назад +2

    this comparison reminded me how much we need a new Shaak Ti minifigure

  • @ceepally
    @ceepally Год назад +19

    The new one has better detailed figures, and I like that the center has some good bulk. The old one has it seems more correct colors, and it is larger. Not to mention that they used red on both sides for the old one.
    I still think I prefer the 2023

    • @hbtdawgz1688
      @hbtdawgz1688 Год назад +1

      The wings on the old one really are only meant to be seen from the top. The red panels on the underside are only there to accent the top side and give it a red trim around the edge from the top view. The bottom view of the old one is pretty bad.
      I wish they’d done like the Mandalorian fighter and paneled the bottom of the new one.

  • @fritz404
    @fritz404 Год назад +27

    I kind of liked the new one before but man it's so much worse than the original. Maybe the next UCS set will be an Ahsoka t6 shuttle!

    • @Mr.HeisenbergTheCook
      @Mr.HeisenbergTheCook Год назад +5

      I'd say the chance of Lego making an UCS T6-shuttle is below 1% 😄

  • @Skycoat
    @Skycoat 11 месяцев назад +1

    Maybe I'm alone in this but I honestly prefer flick fire over stud shooters. Ideally I prefer a designed weapon over either but I understand that playability is an important feature. I personally feel that most sets incorporated flick fires into the design of sets in a more visually pleasing way than most stud shooters.

  • @AliKhan-sc2tn
    @AliKhan-sc2tn Год назад +1

    Bro i have Just seen this on my fyp i havent seen you in 4 years .Bro hope you do even better hope you get to 1million subs bro.

  • @princeofpeace2915
    @princeofpeace2915 Год назад +1

    This is probably my favorite Lego Star Wars set. I LOVE this ship.

  • @jbawesome5640
    @jbawesome5640 Год назад +1

    Love the comparisons man! Another daily upload let’s go!!!!!!

  • @HegeRoberto
    @HegeRoberto Год назад +1

    When it comes to display, for me its more important how accurate a model is than how detailed it is.
    Yes the old one isn't as detailed, but it's a multi-seater. It's a shuttle, not a fighter, it should be a multi-seater. I give display to the old one.

  • @cpafol
    @cpafol Год назад +4

    They're smaller. They're always...smaller 😕 inflation works both ways I guess 😪

  • @brogan2169
    @brogan2169 11 месяцев назад +1

    just got this set at a local convention for only $65, feels way more appropriate of a price

  • @TheFirstCurse1
    @TheFirstCurse1 Год назад

    I was thinking you'd upload this video tomorrow for the daily uploads but nope! You're killing it man!

  • @jims7044
    @jims7044 Год назад +1

    probably one of the best examples of how lego has changed over the years imo

  • @captaincool3329
    @captaincool3329 11 месяцев назад +1

    Personally, I prefer the original: the wing undersides and (to a lesser degree) the smaller cockpit are- to me- unforgiveable. I also have nostalgia for the original, as my brother has one and I love classic Clone Wars sets.

  • @brysonjohnwakefield9181
    @brysonjohnwakefield9181 Год назад +2

    Ask MNR. Do you think that we'll get a captain Rex in a less expensive set next year, and what set do you think that would be I think Rex's bomber would be awesome. Keep up the amazing work!

  • @areiosbleidd5139
    @areiosbleidd5139 Год назад +2

    Old seems more accurate on what we see in the media, i think also new one is overly detailed, i love bigger cockpit, and engines in old one looks better too. Minifigures wise i love both, but details in new one are way better and amazing! So old ship with new crew ;)

  • @Daddy-Hundavar
    @Daddy-Hundavar Год назад +1

    Mandr do we get an update on the guy who collects every single LEGO Star Wars set in prestine condition?
    (Don’t mind some spelling mistakes, English isn’t my first language)

  • @justprime
    @justprime Год назад

    Maybe the choice of light grey over white, was to show the wear and tear of the ship?

  • @ilyavekselman9341
    @ilyavekselman9341 Год назад +1

    It's really hard to choose in that competition, because both models have their own good sides.

  • @johndabot1804
    @johndabot1804 Год назад +3

    I think if they kept the size the same and made even the slightest attempt to color-match the underside of the ship to the front side than that $80 price point would make perfect sense.

  • @groovybricks
    @groovybricks Год назад +1

    I like the new design but white and dark red would have looked really sweet

  • @TilerTube
    @TilerTube Год назад +1

    Going to Brickfest Tampa tomorrow! Hope there’s some cool Lego stuff there!

  • @kieranraine342
    @kieranraine342 11 месяцев назад +1

    Erm I actually have a 2011 t6 in pieces somewhere. Was a kid who liked to take apart sets 😅😅😅

  • @fusedbymyst
    @fusedbymyst Год назад

    I just love comparisons

  • @Legofan18688
    @Legofan18688 Год назад +1

    Celui de 2011 est un des premier set que j’ai eu donc je l’aime particulièrement

  • @marcusphokou935
    @marcusphokou935 Год назад

    I think this is a great review. Some might disagree with the conclusions but they are clearly a matter of opinion. Even if you disagree with them, there is loads of information here to help you draw up your own. And there is no filler viewing the box from very angle or flicking through lots of instruction pages.

  • @ryanwilson-wilhite2343
    @ryanwilson-wilhite2343 11 месяцев назад

    I remember when the t-6 shuttle came out in 2011, it was the first and only set with Shaak Tii.

  • @wit-grizzly2423
    @wit-grizzly2423 Год назад +1

    i like the red and grey because it looks more realistic, i mean these ships fly tru space and land on various planets. they will get dirty and gritty and the color will degrade so i think the grey is better then white.

  • @TigerstarRel
    @TigerstarRel 4 месяца назад

    I actually like the new manuals better because it just shows you the stuff that you are going to build with the manual, and not un needed box art, which I do still think looks good on the box

  • @1daysgrace
    @1daysgrace 11 месяцев назад +1

    Can't unsee the 2x3 inverted dark red slopes on the underbelly you put the wrong way on 2023's version :P

  • @randomandology
    @randomandology Год назад

    Nice new rating set up, Ryan, but i want the paper and pen version back!! lol
    Good job on the video 👍

  • @jettrooper101
    @jettrooper101 Год назад +1

    I struggle to love sets that are meant to be much bigger and hold much more people but don't. Biggest offender recently was the imperial shuttle, whole point of the shuttle is to hold dozens of people, yet this one crammed in 3, just barely. Same but less of an issue here because this ship really should fit more minifigs. Still like it, just can't love it.

    • @viperson9818
      @viperson9818 Год назад +1

      3 is the bare minimum for a super down scaled sized but only 1 that’s just straight up a star fighter.

  • @Piastowicc
    @Piastowicc Год назад +3

    I prefer the new one but the old set is still very nice.

  • @randomandology
    @randomandology Год назад

    "...Spinning is a good trick..." should've seen that line coming lol

  • @pickledotaku
    @pickledotaku Год назад +2

    I 100% prefer flick missiles over studs. Personally I like the look of flick fire missiles and they’re nice to play with, you can’t lose them because they don’t shoot far and they can be used for other builds. Stud shooters look ugly and they’re a pain to play with because they get lost easily, can’t do much with green studs.

    • @SelvesteSand
      @SelvesteSand Год назад

      Agree. I don't like the flick-fire function either, but it's better than stud shooters. They're less easily activated on accident and don't get lost as easily. When I play, not that I do it often anymore, but even when I was a child, if I'm firing a missile, I want to have the missile in my hand so I can guide its path and savor every second of its slow-motion flight, then control its impact. Swooshability doesn't only apply to ships. I remember some Hoth battle set from probably 15-20 years ago where you could press somewhere and send a minifigure flying as if being blown away by an explosion, and I wondered if anyone would actually find that fun compared to just picking up the minifigure and acting out his being-blown-away manually, even wondered if the adults designing it had forgotten how to play. Even back then, I remember picking up on -- and being bothered by -- a move towards automatisation.
      Jango's Slave I had missiles sitting on studs so that you would take them off manually and "swoosh" with them. That was great. Now it's all stud shooters everywhere.

  • @kingb6427
    @kingb6427 Год назад

    Yay more daily uploads thank you 🎉. Although I was expecting him to make a comparison of this set I wasn’t expecting it to be so soon thank you Ryan. 👍

  • @Darkstar-qb3dh
    @Darkstar-qb3dh Год назад

    i remember when the old set came out and i miss those sets id happily buy both for $80

  • @jaywilliams1289
    @jaywilliams1289 Год назад

    Man your content is always on point bro! keep up the great work!!!

  • @Zoobels
    @Zoobels 26 дней назад

    8:13 the two slope pieces on the 2023 version behind the cockpit are backwards

  • @crazydog1750
    @crazydog1750 Год назад

    2:05 As a kid I always just called that lightsaber yellow.

  • @nathonso_edits
    @nathonso_edits Год назад +1

    Gonna have to give it to the old set personally, it's supposed to be a shuttle and the new one only fits 1 minifig

  • @BakedBeanGaming
    @BakedBeanGaming Год назад +1

    I love the newer mini figures. Even though the inquisitor has a black head, I feel like he’s one of, if not the best mini figure in this wave.

  • @droideka9857
    @droideka9857 Год назад

    bro i was gonna take a break from buying legos but as soon as i saw this i was like i gotta have this

  • @Kelpwoud
    @Kelpwoud Год назад +1

    So what does Marrok look like underneath the helmet?

    • @adam3574
      @adam3574 Год назад

      It's just a plain black face

  • @EinfachNoah
    @EinfachNoah 11 месяцев назад +2

    saving money by not printing the box art on the instructions is such a cheap move

  • @drabkebab
    @drabkebab 7 месяцев назад +1

    Lego has obviously gotten more technologically advanced and so is able to make their sets more movie accurate in terms of design, but apart from that I'd say the 2011 set trumps the 2023 set in every way. The 2011 set had more play features, it was bigger, it looked cooler (even if less accurate) and while the minifigures were obviously less detailed back then, the variety of minifigures is significantly better than the 2023 set. I'd also personally set the big engines of the older set look way better than the newer ones, and I've always preferred the flick-fire missiles to the stud shooters. In fact this is the first time I've heard anyone say they disliked flick-fire missiles or liked stud shooters lol. The smooth spinning of the new set can be a plus but it can also be a nuisance as it turns by itself when there is a slight bit of uneven weight distribution, I don't know about the old set's turning.
    This is coming from someone who owns the 2023 set but not the 2011 set.

  • @paulmastone6886
    @paulmastone6886 Год назад +1

    Old one hands down. Hate size difference. Like older minis too.

  • @crazydog1750
    @crazydog1750 Год назад

    10:40 They SET it apart from the old one? 😂😂😂 Nice, Ryan.

  • @ElPsyKongroo
    @ElPsyKongroo Год назад

    Haven't bought a set since at te but the figs in this might have sold me

  • @Chewyybricks
    @Chewyybricks Год назад

    Very nice comparison peak quality and easy to understand

  • @juliowalker6380
    @juliowalker6380 Год назад +1

    We’re definitely in the era of downsizing starting from the downsized tie fighter

  • @rbleisem
    @rbleisem 11 месяцев назад +1

    With one old & two new, would a UCP version be possible?

  • @GhostRider-pm7ns
    @GhostRider-pm7ns Год назад

    this is the most positive ive ever seen ryan

  • @Rogue_Tiger
    @Rogue_Tiger Год назад

    Atleast you could find the flick firer after shooting it

  • @silentone3357
    @silentone3357 9 месяцев назад

    i'd love to see a MOC instructions where the end result has best of both worlds(in that case ships).

  • @clapsifyy
    @clapsifyy Год назад

    Great comparison vid, nice to see!

  • @BOT2-D2
    @BOT2-D2 Год назад

    “The stud shooter…bañg” - Ryan 2023

  • @BrickTsar
    @BrickTsar Год назад

    Thanks for sharing another QR code 😊

  • @freakkit
    @freakkit Год назад

    Surprised you didn’t mention the black disc on the wing

  • @JesusReigns-fg8pf
    @JesusReigns-fg8pf Год назад

    I like that the 2023 one is only about 1 stud smaller in each direction.

    • @SelvesteSand
      @SelvesteSand Год назад

      44 wide VS 38 wide, so that's a width of 3 on each side.

  • @JangoSkett
    @JangoSkett Год назад

    Bro I also did not think lego would re visit this ship but hey here we are

  • @obvious_owl7206
    @obvious_owl7206 Год назад

    “Would rather forget” ?!
    Don’t insult my boy the flick fire missile like that 😭😂

  • @mrsnipergaming7323
    @mrsnipergaming7323 Год назад +3

    when are you making more hoth moc videos

  • @AmethystPlays1999
    @AmethystPlays1999 11 месяцев назад +1

    I want someone to colorswap the old set with the new set colors

  • @ALFYsk8
    @ALFYsk8 Год назад

    Dat spinning Anakin reference. :D :D

  • @Comett778
    @Comett778 Год назад +1

    These two remind me of the mandalorion Star fighter in a lot of ways

  • @cdecid5420
    @cdecid5420 Год назад

    You should compare the weight of the set instead of number of pieces.

  • @TheSentientsix
    @TheSentientsix Год назад

    Great video, def gonna grab this set. Out of curiousity why does everyone on the lego subreddit hate this guy? He seems like a nice dude that has some valid criticism on different sets he reviews. Why is it so bad to nitpick sets when lego is charging an extraordinary amount of money for it when its essentially just a bunch of plastic.

  • @platypusponderings1378
    @platypusponderings1378 Год назад

    Great review. Can’t wait to get this one. Thanks 😊

  • @AddisonHartmann-cy8di
    @AddisonHartmann-cy8di Год назад

    2011 set had a bad sticker placement on the engine too where two stickers had to line up for the logos

  • @philbofettiArchive
    @philbofettiArchive Год назад

    Honestly I'm actually quite happy to see that the t6 shuttle and gunship are downsized. I'm running out of room to display my lego, and having smaller variations of ships I love is a win for me given my situation.