For Your Eyes Only (1981). Taking Bond into the 80's
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- #JamesBond #JamesBond007 #007
Stam Fine Reviews looks at the first Bond film of the 1980's: For Your Eyes Only starring Roger Moore as James Bond 007. For Your Eyes Only was an attempt to reset the franchise after Moonraker went into space. As a soft reboot, and am attempt to make things slightly more grounded, it sort of works, but....
For Your Eyes Only also stars Carole Bouquet as Melina Havelock, Topol, and Julian Glover.
As far as I'm concerned this and "The Spy Who Loved Me" are the best Roger Moore James Bond movies. And I completely disagree with Stam about the music in this film! I think that its quasi-disco sound fits this early 80s Bond movie perfectly! I love it!
The Spy Who Loved Me is first rate!
Bill Conti’s score is bloody amazing
Amen brother! I totally agree! This film made Bond a bit more serious with not so much of the goofy stupid puns. And, the music, for someone other than John Barry, came the closest to sounding like an actual James Bond score than any other until David Arnold. Yes some of it sounds dated, but it still rocks!
It works.
I think Carole Bouquet is gorgeous. Daring, skilled and dangerous, too. All very appealing. The red Lotus was cool as well.
I agree she is beautiful.
I agree as well. Watching the film, I wouldn't have guessed she was dubbed (meaning the dubbing therefore didn't bother me at all). Her "stare" (as the reviewer calls it) likewise didn't bother me at all.
Far and away, this was the one time that Roger Moore played the role of Ian Fleming’s James Bond! Thanks to a good director, and a superior script - which left out the juvenile quips for which he had become famous - Moore came across as a credible hero. His visible maturity and world-weariness added an edge to his performance. (Too bad he stayed on for those two more films!) Add to that an excellent supporting cast, thrilling action, and a fabulous score by Bill Conti, and you have Moore at his peak as 007!
I can accept Octopussy and given Connery returning for NSNA Eon had no choice, they couldn't start their new Bond off with a direct comparison to the "original and still the best" as most of the world's less creative critics, sub-editors and moaning movie-goers demand it be.
But, yeah, Dalton should have been brought in two years earlier than he was. The shift from FYEO to Octopussy to AVTAK is incremental, but the shift back in tone for TLD is jarring. If Moore's last film had been Octopussy then Bond would have remained relatively consistent tonally and there wouldn't have been that whole mess with Brosnan and MTM to muddy the waters.
Somebody fire up the DeLorean and see what unintended consequences we can make from fixing the Bond timeline.
Actually when he took the role and he left it Moore as good as he was, was Too old to play bond. Bond is written in the novels to be in his mid thirties to early forties
If For Your Eyes Only was his final film Moore would’ve gone out on a bang.
@@AngrySonicBros I think it should have Dalton's first or Moore's last.
I agree.
This one's easily my favorite Moore film. It was a bold choice to have Roger to play the character created by Ian Fleming for once. After a decade of using the novels as drink coasters, EON finally returns to something more akin to From Russia with Love and On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Plus, I love how Gogol is a villain in this film. And I seem to be in the minority in thinking that Julian Glover is a great Bond villain.
Couldn’t agree more! (“Using the novels as drink coasters . . . “ That’s excellent!) Old Man Broccoli turned up his nose at the novel of “Moonraker,” dismissing it as, “. . . a piddly little rocket aimed at London.” If only he had built upon the novel, he’d have made a genuinely thrilling film. But, the Saturday kiddie feature he conjured up made tons of money, so I guess that’s what mattered in the end.
For Yours Eyes Only is the best of the Roger Moore Bond film.
The best Roger Moore Bond movie IMO. The Spy Who Loved Me is a close runner-up. 😎
I still like "Moonraker", but I couldn't tell you why. Dreaded nostalgia, probably. Cool avatar, BTW. ✊🏻Alita Army!
@@thestorm99 Moonraker was really good until they took a wrong turn into a very cheap Star Wars wannabe.
I agree with you. I think this was his best Bond film.
An 'Atari 2600' at 2'45 😂 Lol and it brought back numerous Atari memories. 🤣
A great review as always !
For Your Eyes Only was my first Bond Film and remains one of my favourites. Carole Bouquet, Lyn Holly Johnson and Sheena's Easton were Gorgeous ( & i was 11 !! ). This was my bench-mark.
This is a top notch bond thriller
I agree.
Love this movie
Another note. The "countess", Lisl, was played by the wife of Pierce Brosnan, Cassandra Harris
Good to know.
Julian Glover has the distinction of playing villains in James Bond, Doctor Who, Star Wars, and Indiana Jones
iirc the Blofeld character was played by the actor who played Lobot
Top trivia.
For my money, this is the quintessential Roger Moore bond film. Moore's usual mugging is discarded and the tone is less campy. For some it may be seen as a loss, but it works like gangbusters for me. And the Warren Zevon-lookalike henchman played by the late Michael Gothard (who sadly gets no shout-out here) adds some realistic menace, as opposed to the cartoonish Jaws, who couldn't even remain a baddie into the final act of Moonraker.
funny you mention Gothard, he was a heavy in another thing i happened to be watching the same day as this review was posted.
Spot on about the film and that look alike business. He does look like Zevon!
I know what was missing....Automan!
The music in this film is just horrible. Love the ascent to the monastery though, really brilliant.
Julian Glover should also be credited for Star Wars V: Empire Strikes Back.
9:10, yes, and it's just a coincidence, that Bond visits his wife's grave (killed by Blofeld) right after dispatching this Baddie who happens to have a white Persian cat.... riiiight.
Moore´s best Bond by far!
Conti's score way better than felt here and that movie is one of the best of the franchise.
It's so fascinating that roger Moore constantly pushed against the young bond girl. He was like, I'm old and proper and I shouldnt be going around with a teenager.
Connery's Bond would've fired one into her.
@@tcaudiobooks737 And he'd have shagged her fir- oh, I see what... yeah i get it now.
@@tcaudiobooks737 and then slapped her around
And for the next film they went back to beign silly
"So it was time to look at Ian Flemming's shorts"
* shows Ian Flemming wearing shorts *
This rivals THE SPOY WHO LOVED ME as Moore's best Bond as far as I am concerned and though some editing and a few jokes do not work, I think it looks great, has a smooth pace, the Conti music score is better and more classic (the skiing sequence music was used for the TV spin-off RUNAWAY WITH THE RICH AND FAMOUS (Moore appeared on both Robin Leech shows) and I would argue the score helped invent 1980s-style music. Glover is good and we don't know he is the villain at first. Bouquet and Moore apparently did not get along that well, but their pairing worked and it is the only time to date Bond has worked with a man who wanted revenge without anyone's help (though we get a scene of something like that in GIOLDFINGER, it is not the same) so when it comes to classy action films, they all want to be FOR YOUR EYES ONLY.
Carole Bouquet’s eyes completely mesmerized me. A combination of fierce determination and isolation, plus absolutely stunning. It’s too bad her voice was dubbed, but it would be difficult for a French actress to pull off a Greek accent speaking English! 😉
Yeah, I had to get rid of my petrol-powered smartphone PDQ ;-) Another great review -- thanks.
I love the slow puncture analogy so much. I have a deep appreciation for that. Great content as always 🙏🏻👍🏻👏🏻
You left out the actor played the villain as General Veers in Empire Strikes Back: You May start your landing.
No mention of Tula and her Groundbreaking Role in this film?
Hahahaha, laying by a pool with less than 2 seconds of screen time, is groundbreaking? That's some thin ground.
My first new one of these. Great review as always.
as a life long bond fan, this one is my favorite.
What always bugged me was Bond's line to Gogol at the end. He acted like it was some sort of tie, when destroying the ATAC was a perfectly acceptable option for the British. The fact that it wasn't destroyed was the whole point of Bond's mission. If the water had been deep enough to make it unable to be recovered, they'd have been fine with it.
ANother thing is the oxygen tank. For some reason Melina takes off her tank and leaves it at the bottom of the ocean when Bond arrives and they swim up to the ship. The only reason seems to be so that it's available when they escape from Kristatos and have to play dead by staying underwater
They didn’t fight knife wielding scuba henchmen? Did one cut her oxygen line? 😄
lol
No. the objective to make sure the baddies didn't get their hands on it. It was not the intent to destroy it, but it was better than baddies to get it. They did fine without so it didn't matter that it was trashed.
I was 12, this was my first Bond film I saw in the theater, though I had seen The Spy Who Loved Me but on TV.
Same for me, and I loved it! When Octopussy came out, I was so disappointed! 😧
The only reviews on the internet worth watching.
Brilliant job, Mr. Fine.
Dutch Bond Fan is the best
@@sandersson2813
Cheers for the heads up
@@danugo6742
He is head and shoulders above anyone else. Enjoy
Far better than Moonraker. More adult, serious (most of the time), better written, looks beautiful, the last good Moore Bond movie.
Saw Moonraker when I was a kid. Still one of my favorite Bond movies.
Octopussy and Moonraker would like a word with you.
Roger's contract was up after Moonraker, with his age and changing attitudes he should have left after that movie, new directions should have introduced a new actor to the role, Lewis Collins was the nation's favourite but after an unsuccessful audition was not to be
I really like “For your Eyes Only”-it bothers me that Mr. Fine and I seem to have opposing tastes in Bond movies.
I really enjoyed this film. I think the film is subtly funny, and very well scripted. I have no problems at all that it is different in style from some of the other Bond films.
This is my favourite Bond-film, along with From Russia With Love. I disagree with so much in your review, but you do also make som good points. Especially about the bland villain. However, Topol makes up for it with being a charming villain helping out. And Carole Bouquet is just so amazingly beautiful, but I agree with you that the dubbing is awful.
My favorite is also FRWL. I think For Your Eyes Only is a decent, middle of the road Bond film. I think it could have used better villains and even a new Bond. Timothy Dalton, who was 35 at the time, would have been perfect.
The 80s TV style character titles was an absolute genius touch.
Another top drawer review peppered with the usual dose of imaginatively witty analogies. I always look forward to a new Stam Fine installment. They never disappoint.
Time hasn't been kind to this Bond film but it still has some stand out scenes. Bond contending with Bibi's advances is hilariously executed by Sir Roger and of course his booting the car over the edge of that cliff! I distinctly remember seeing that for the first time. I think if any other Bond actor had done that it wouldn't have had anywhere near the impact.
This is the Bond movie I Reface App'd myself into. Now I can't watch it without seeing, well, me, and it takes me right out of it. I may also remember me from such Refaced movies as Mission Impossible, Star Wars, Gladiator, Rocky, Dumb & Dumber, Back to the Future, and most recently, Braveheart. They may take my face, but they'll never take my freedom. And I'll never see those movies the same way again, sigh. It's never good to be your heroes
Can't wait for Octopussy.
Wait until you get crabs!
"Instagram model's bio" indeed
Best Bond ever. Period.
😂😂😂
I always thought the ATAC was clearly a desk calculator. Does seem like a severe security lapse that just *having* this device would be so crucial a win. But that's a MacGuffin for you--the precise mechanism that makes it a MacGuffin is not so important.
Er, Cubby Broccoli didn't decide that he didn't want to follow Moonraker with a bigger budget Bond movie. That decision was down to United Artists, who lost an absolute fortune on Heaven's Gate, verging on total bankruptcy, and who didn't have the money to splash on FYEO. I'm afraid you fell for the old 1981 PR spin from the producers and you've simply parroted as fact.
I'd say it's a little from column A and B. Bond went into outer space in the previous film, you simply have to switch gears. The same thing was done after You Only Live Twice. Yet on other hand, there was the matter of UA tightening the purse strings because of the Heaven's Gate debacle and the fact that EON did a lot over spending on Moonraker.
I was taking a drink during the Ian Flemming's shorts gag and nearly spit it all of the keyboard.
I wasn't so lucky while watching his Terminator review where he suddenly replaces the line "I'll be back". I spit all over my screen from laughing so hard. I am hoping the saliva doesn't hurt the screen.
Good one, Stam 👍
One of my favorites
For Your Eyes Only is my favourite Bond by far, then Moonraker, then Live and Let Die, then Die Another Day. The Connery ones are good but I saw them way into adulthood as compared to growing up with Roger Moore. Spy Who Loved Me was my first and bored me to death as a kid and not much inspiration as an adult. Moonraker is pure fun, all popcorn. FYEO I like as an actual Bond film.
1981 is For Your Eyes Only is The Sane Year when I Was Born in 1981 5th April 1981 & 1981 is When Maggie Thatcher Gave A lot of Trouble Aggrovation being a Milk Snatcher off all the Kids in School & Bob Marley Died of Cancer in 1981 / Got Recarnated as a Chronic Gunja Leaf
Can't remember one laugh out loud moment in FYEO. Octopussy had over 5. I was in the cinema!
There weren't any... because Bond was a badass in FYEO...in Octopussy he was a clown 🤡... literally.
@@lastguyminn2324 Octopussy had a good mixture of humour & tension.
This is one of the best Bond movies of all time. James Bond gets to travel to several exotic locations, exciting action especially that underwater scene where the bad buy tries to drill through the window on Bond's submarine, or when Bond and Melina is tied up and taken for a ride through the water, the opening song by Sheena Easton etc.
In my view it's the perfect Bond movie hitting all the spots.
You're right about some lack of chemistry between Roger Moore and Carole Bouquet, but since I had kinda of a crush on Carole I have to disregard your nonsense 😁
It was a one movie crush, never seen her in any other movie.
This movie kinda felt like North by Northwest except dialed up to 11. Both movies feature several distinct locations and sets, it feels like an adventure, or Indiana Jones movie. It even shows a darker side to Bond when he pushes the car over the side in a very satisfying way.
I may not be able to tell apart any of Dalton, Brosnan, or Craig's Bond movies but this one stands out just as much as Goldfinger and Dr. No.
Dr. No has one of the best death scenes in movie history.
Julian Glover isn't very smart. You have to be pretty dumb to think you can outwit James Bond AND Indiana Jones.
This is where dalton should’ve been casted and he could’ve led the franchise with much better results than Moore did. As good as sir Roger was I’m not hating but he was DEFINITELY getting too old and his films were becoming a full on parody of themselves plus his version of bond was becoming very passé in the 80s with action stars like Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger and Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones and many More. He simply didn’t stand a chance going against those action heroes he would’ve if it was the 70s which he definitely fit but not the 80s
Trifecta of TSWLOM, MR, FYEO.... Fucking awesome!
Sorry; but, this, by far, was Moore's best Bond. It was the only time I could take him seriously, in the role,. Few stupid jokes, few sight gags, few idiotic gadgets, a good cast, a serious story and excellent action sequences. Prior to this Moore had basically played Simon Templar, masquerading as James Bond. For those of us who were fans of the novels, it was nice to actually see some Fleming material on screen. I agree about the score, which was terrible and hopelessly out of date even then, in 1981, when New Wave hadn't fully ascended in music, but Disco was well dead. Bernard Lee was greatly missed, but, Geoffrey Keen was back for a third time, which brought some continuity and it was the first time they tried to use Bill Tanner, M's Chief of Staff.
By the way, that is not keelhauling. Keelhauling consists of being tied and suspended under a ship and dragged either laterally, across the keel (from port to starboard or vice versa) or down the centerline (bow to stern), scraping across the barnacles. What is in the film is just a nautical version of being dragged behind a horse.
Should have replaced Moore with Dalton for this film as Moore said he wanted leave it would have given Dalton a decent run at Bond (though Octopussy was a Moore bond film). Dalton was busy making Flash Gordon & Brenda Starr at the time.
I can see what you mean about the score. I think that in '81, it wasn't fully the 80s yet ('83 is the year the 80s fully became the 80s imho). In '81, the culture at large hadn't quite figured out yet if it wanted to carry on with what it had been doing in the 70s or if it wanted to commit to something new.
Awesome work dude.
I really liked the Topol character in the film. Hell I'd watch a spinoff movie featuring him.
You're wrong this's great.
What's idiotic about the battle of the Bonds? it simply was and Connery deservedly lost.
This was the first Bond movie I watched at the cinema, it’s not my favorite but I still like it and enjoy Bond kicking the car off the cliff
I always thought the lead lady with Bond was badly acting but now i learn she was dubbed in either all along or after when they ran the edit and saw how bad she was? She has beautiful face but seems a bit wooden when being serious. Glover is always brilliant but here sort of well.... That leaves the sweet Holly adding some much needed "fun" to this film and the rest as dangerous killers all over the place and i think thats why this film seems a bit heavy handed. Great skiing and snow brought in as not enough and a stuntman falling on that rope by accident but captured and used ? Very grounded and serious and gritty and hard this film is but add the monastery and token KGB guy and stolen widget and it gets 6.59/10 i think
I thought Bill Conti's music score was nice 😎. I didn't find anything wrong with it.
There’s a big handful of reasons why this is one of the very best of all the Bond films.
Bzzzt*"By your command Miss Moneypenny."Bzzzt*
Crossbow BOLT. You're welcome.
I always thought Molina had a fine moustache
I think the song is more memorable than the movie.
More like a Philips video pak
I actually enjoyed this. I found it refreshing to get away from the silliness if previous Moore Bonds.
Thought I'd check out more about Sir Roger. What a charming man. A real English gentleman. Researching his biography he was not a well man and had suffered a lot of illness since childhood.
A little trivia. Nexttime you eat a Magnum ice cream give thanks to Sir Roger. It seems he was at a function and got talking to the CEO of Walls. He,Sir Roger,mentioned an ice-cream he and his friends used to enjoy as kids. The CEO went away and came up with Wall's Magnum.
ruclips.net/video/Qs_HN3EIDuQ/видео.html
y a w n
👌
One of my least favourite Bonds. A complete bore fest
My favourite Moore Bonds are this and Live and Let Die.
I grew up going to see Roger Moore 007 films in the movie theater but can barely stand to watch them, now.
The lotus submarine is about the only redeeming quality about this movie. It's not bad but it's just not great.
Actually the score was up to date.
This is definitely one of my least favorite 'Bond Films' starring Roger Moore.
Wow, I'd say it's the best Moore 007 by a landslide, and only one of two Moore films in my Bond Top 10 (along with Spy Who Loved Me).
I suppose they had to tone things down after Moonraker with a more down to Earth Bond.
2:23 ‘pizniss’