FIVE days ago Flig Avia was saying something completely different about the same 777 aircraft. They have zero credibility as another poster has said and they just post SHOCK in the headlines for every post. I’ve lost interest and I won’t be following Flig avia anymore.
Wait, wait, wait wait ! Why did BOEING says "GOODBYE" to 777 ? And why not only BOEING 747, 757 and 767 that already get older than before ? This video would probably were likely wrong if BOEING says "GOODBYE" to 777 that shocked the entire industry in my thinking. Because BOEING 777 is the only one type plane replacing BOEING 747 that getting older than before as I know just like Garuda Indonesia that still have BOEING 777 for replacing BOEING 747 that already retirement when BOEING 777 has already came along.
As an airline pilot since 2000 I flew all airbus typed and currently flying B777-300ER let me tell you the best aircraft by far is B777 with no dought what so ever
The 777 x could be the next milestone, but Boeing cannot seem to get it off the ground. By the time they do get it, flying air bus will have developed something probably better than the 777X. Time will tell, The 787 and the 777 have had a very good long run. By the time the 777 x is certified, it will probably be around five years delayed. That is unforgivable. Boeing used to be much better than that.
Airbus doesn’t have anything flying right now that can match 777x in both range and capacity. Emirates has said when theiy start replacing their huge fleet of A380’s and 777s they will get the 777X. The A350 is not big enough
the only game changer was the original 747........ this changed everything because before this wide bodies didn't exist, the 777X might be ok but will never be as successful as the original 777 because the A350 has one this battle........... in fact; the 777X might totally fail if Airbus decide to build an A350 2000 but i don't think they will; they've sold too many of the A350-1000 already....... my guess is Airbus will maybe try a twin jet A380 but who knows..........i would be very suspicious of a 777X because it looks like a very ``dodgy`` aircraft..........obviously !!!!!!........... i would feel much safer buying A350s......... or a A380 twin neo........... the smart money lies with Emirates and Etihad because they want a twin jet A380............ total 5 star luxury.......... because when you want something 5 star only the A380 is good enough............ there was nothing original in the 777; it was just a much bigger A300 which came out when i was about 14..........lol................the game changer that totally failed was of course Concorde !!!!!!!!!!
A380 was, not for a this time. patching its unique design capacity and characteristics. was an innovation that required special airport facilities and space, that limits A380 usage. This is yet another overboard propaganda, for a nation that is in downhill dive, morally humanly and Huge machine of lies.
You clearly don’t know anything about airplanes and where the market is heading to. Airbus failed with the A380 and will fail with the A321XLR when it comes to transatlantic flights. Boeing is its own worst enemy but if they get the 777X certified the A350-1000 won’t come even close to it and the 787 already is a better plane than the A350-900, airbus lies on what the airplane does on paper and has many problems with hydraulics. I’m in the aviation industry believe me.
@@marccoro2819 this post is from a silly fan boy..... i think you'll find airlines know a lot more about aircraft than you and have thus chosen the Airbus instead of the 777X, simply because the 777X looks like a ``dog of an aircraft``..........because it looks like there's other things are wrong with the 777X that aren't showing yet but will in two years time and this is what airlines are worried about, this is because Boeing have become so bad in the last 5 to ten years but weren't when the original 777 came out.................the A380 failed because it was too expensive to operate/maintain and but is still a very good aircraft, in my opinion it failed because it had 4 engines when everyone nowadays prefers two ......... the A380 therefore came out thirty years too late...........the only A380 that will work is a twin jet...........why do people prefer smaller aircraft?............ they don't; the A380 is loved by passengers and pilots but is too expensive to operate with 4 engines............ the A380 failed in a similar way to Concorde..........too expensive; not cost effective, yet still a brilliant aircraft.......... so unfortunately Concorde was a disaster, but then again; nothing looked as awesome as a Concorde when it was taking off.........God it was a fantastic aircraft !!!!!!!!!........you had to be there to see it; especially at night with afterburners.
@@malcolmmacdougall I agree but in terms of performance and tech boeing is better. The 787 has electrical systems while the A350 still uses bleed, that’s why it’s performance is not as good as they say in paper. The performance of the 777X is way better than the A350-1000’s and emirates already said it. Boeing is just better in engineering but they’re their worst enemy. Airbus makes crap but they’re just better at hiding it because their aircraft don’t fall or lose doors. Airbus makes shitty planes that are safe and Boeing makes good planes that are not safe nowadays because they chose to cut costs. What’s cheap comes expensive.
@@marccoro2819 this is for you ruclips.net/video/l7mt6AKKhq4/видео.html............. i agree the 777X is a better aircraft just appears ``worrying``........... the A350-1000 has no personality or attitude, it looks boring and bland............Airbus makes safe aircraft but with no excitement.............. in my opinion when we lost Concorde we lost it all, we lost the romance of flying... the sheer excitement............. my dad flew the Tristar for BA but this was in the ``good old days``............... but what we have now is :- global warming, the green party, fuel efficiency.....save the planet, so you'll never see another Concorde...... only these boring twin jets, but yes i agree the 777X does look awesome.......... it's like a modern version of the old 707.......... but will it fall apart in two years time like the DC10 or the Comet, because this is what worries everyone.............. lets face it, they only buy the A350-1000 because there's nothing else at that size...........we all know that........LOL................. The DC10 turned out to be a very very good aircraft but was dreadful at the start, now the 777X might be ok now...... we just don't know...............the A350- 1000 is a safe choice but doesn't look as awesome as the 777X.......... no way. ............... one could say it was a mistake to totally redesign the 777-300ER, it might've been better to slightly modernize it......... who knows !!!!!!!!!!!!............... the A350-1000 looks great as a model but no so good in real life......it looks soft......has no attitude......... it has a downturned ugly squishy nose...........lol........... the 777 looks far more like the old 707....... tougher !!!!
FIVE days ago Flig Avia was saying something completely different about the same 777 aircraft. They have zero credibility as another poster has said and they just post SHOCK in the headlines for every post. I’ve lost interest and I won’t be following Flig avia anymore.
Click Bait gives ZERO Credibility to "FLIG AVIA"
Clickbait title. Reported
Wait, wait, wait wait ! Why did BOEING says "GOODBYE" to 777 ? And why not only BOEING 747, 757 and 767 that already get older than before ? This video would probably were likely wrong if BOEING says "GOODBYE" to 777 that shocked the entire industry in my thinking. Because BOEING 777 is the only one type plane replacing BOEING 747 that getting older than before as I know just like Garuda Indonesia that still have BOEING 777 for replacing BOEING 747 that already retirement when BOEING 777 has already came along.
Note it is only the end for the passenger 777, to make way for the updated 777x.
777x. if it will not be another 737 max flying coffin
Go Boeing
🎉
@@robertStone-hq1by go bye bye...
As an airline pilot since 2000 I flew all airbus typed and currently flying B777-300ER let me tell you the best aircraft by far is B777 with no dought what so ever
Tipycal yellow pages title!
The 777 x could be the next milestone, but Boeing cannot seem to get it off the ground. By the time they do get it, flying air bus will have developed something probably better than the 777X. Time will tell, The 787 and the 777 have had a very good long run. By the time the 777 x is certified, it will probably be around five years delayed. That is unforgivable. Boeing used to be much better than that.
Airbus doesn’t have anything flying right now that can match 777x in both range and capacity. Emirates has said when theiy start replacing their huge fleet of A380’s and 777s they will get the 777X. The A350 is not big enough
Click bait bullshit.
?
This channel is for "Boeing only" fan boys
What an utter bullshit you are spreading. Keep quiet and stop talking about crap you don’t know.
Thanks for your feedback.
Bullshit Bingo. Seamless,Nonstop etc...
the only game changer was the original 747........ this changed everything because before this wide bodies didn't exist, the 777X might be ok but will never be as successful as the original 777 because the A350 has one this battle........... in fact; the 777X might totally fail if Airbus decide to build an A350 2000 but i don't think they will; they've sold too many of the A350-1000 already....... my guess is Airbus will maybe try a twin jet A380 but who knows..........i would be very suspicious of a 777X because it looks like a very ``dodgy`` aircraft..........obviously !!!!!!........... i would feel much safer buying A350s......... or a A380 twin neo........... the smart money lies with Emirates and Etihad because they want a twin jet A380............ total 5 star luxury.......... because when you want something 5 star only the A380 is good enough............ there was nothing original in the 777; it was just a much bigger A300 which came out when i was about 14..........lol................the game changer that totally failed was of course Concorde !!!!!!!!!!
A380 was, not for a this time. patching its unique design capacity and characteristics. was an innovation that required special airport facilities and space, that limits A380 usage.
This is yet another overboard propaganda, for a nation that is in downhill dive, morally humanly and Huge machine of lies.
You clearly don’t know anything about airplanes and where the market is heading to. Airbus failed with the A380 and will fail with the A321XLR when it comes to transatlantic flights. Boeing is its own worst enemy but if they get the 777X certified the A350-1000 won’t come even close to it and the 787 already is a better plane than the A350-900, airbus lies on what the airplane does on paper and has many problems with hydraulics. I’m in the aviation industry believe me.
@@marccoro2819 this post is from a silly fan boy..... i think you'll find airlines know a lot more about aircraft than you and have thus chosen the Airbus instead of the 777X, simply because the 777X looks like a ``dog of an aircraft``..........because it looks like there's other things are wrong with the 777X that aren't showing yet but will in two years time and this is what airlines are worried about, this is because Boeing have become so bad in the last 5 to ten years but weren't when the original 777 came out.................the A380 failed because it was too expensive to operate/maintain and but is still a very good aircraft, in my opinion it failed because it had 4 engines when everyone nowadays prefers two ......... the A380 therefore came out thirty years too late...........the only A380 that will work is a twin jet...........why do people prefer smaller aircraft?............ they don't; the A380 is loved by passengers and pilots but is too expensive to operate with 4 engines............ the A380 failed in a similar way to Concorde..........too expensive; not cost effective, yet still a brilliant aircraft.......... so unfortunately Concorde was a disaster, but then again; nothing looked as awesome as a Concorde when it was taking off.........God it was a fantastic aircraft !!!!!!!!!........you had to be there to see it; especially at night with afterburners.
@@malcolmmacdougall I agree but in terms of performance and tech boeing is better. The 787 has electrical systems while the A350 still uses bleed, that’s why it’s performance is not as good as they say in paper. The performance of the 777X is way better than the A350-1000’s and emirates already said it. Boeing is just better in engineering but they’re their worst enemy. Airbus makes crap but they’re just better at hiding it because their aircraft don’t fall or lose doors. Airbus makes shitty planes that are safe and Boeing makes good planes that are not safe nowadays because they chose to cut costs. What’s cheap comes expensive.
@@marccoro2819 this is for you ruclips.net/video/l7mt6AKKhq4/видео.html............. i agree the 777X is a better aircraft just appears ``worrying``........... the A350-1000 has no personality or attitude, it looks boring and bland............Airbus makes safe aircraft but with no excitement.............. in my opinion when we lost Concorde we lost it all, we lost the romance of flying... the sheer excitement............. my dad flew the Tristar for BA but this was in the ``good old days``............... but what we have now is :- global warming, the green party, fuel efficiency.....save the planet, so you'll never see another Concorde...... only these boring twin jets, but yes i agree the 777X does look awesome.......... it's like a modern version of the old 707.......... but will it fall apart in two years time like the DC10 or the Comet, because this is what worries everyone.............. lets face it, they only buy the A350-1000 because there's nothing else at that size...........we all know that........LOL................. The DC10 turned out to be a very very good aircraft but was dreadful at the start, now the 777X might be ok now...... we just don't know...............the A350- 1000 is a safe choice but doesn't look as awesome as the 777X.......... no way. ............... one could say it was a mistake to totally redesign the 777-300ER, it might've been better to slightly modernize it......... who knows !!!!!!!!!!!!............... the A350-1000 looks great as a model but no so good in real life......it looks soft......has no attitude......... it has a downturned ugly squishy nose...........lol........... the 777 looks far more like the old 707....... tougher !!!!
If it's Boeing I'm NOT going!
Then it was difficult for you to travel until the A350 came 😂. There was no airline that operated long haul flights that didn’t have a 777.
#fakenews
What a waste of time,