The Actual Russian Navy Su-33 Carrier Landing Procedure

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 66

  • @CommandT
    @CommandT  2 года назад +5

    Folks, the reciprocal heading here for downwind is 180, not 270 like I said. BRC is 000 :)

  • @PrezDCS
    @PrezDCS 2 года назад +27

    Finally someone does it, and thankfully it's from a great creator like you. Thanks for the information video :D

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад +3

      Glad you enjoyed! :)

  • @CommanderSteinsch
    @CommanderSteinsch 2 года назад +11

    Man, I've been looking for this procedure for ages. Gave up in frustration. Thanks for this!

  • @AGenericAccount
    @AGenericAccount 8 месяцев назад +2

    wow its so chilled out compared to the US pattern, nice long oval. thanks for sharing!

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  7 месяцев назад

      No problem! Although there’s some debate as to whether this is actually the right one. The Russians are usually very secretive when it comes to SOPs even if they are fairly mundane

    • @AGenericAccount
      @AGenericAccount 7 месяцев назад

      @@CommandT I mean they only have 1 carrier and they barely ever get it working to begin with, so it makes sense why information is so sparse from the Russian side of operations 🤣

  • @ELcinegatto87
    @ELcinegatto87 2 года назад +4

    I'm not into DCS at all but this was fantastic. Awesome flying. Really impressive how well done the physics, graphics and modeling is in DCS. Fascinating stuff and great video! Real neat to be able to play around virtually with "toys" like this.

  • @irohnick
    @irohnick Год назад +2

    I thank you for this piece of art. needed it.

  • @lankypilot778
    @lankypilot778 2 года назад +3

    Never disappoint with something new, will have to try this. I've yet to do a russian trap.

  • @nooneno12
    @nooneno12 2 года назад +2

    Thank you! Спасибо!

  • @jmzalazar
    @jmzalazar 2 года назад +2

    Suave como la seda ... Excelente como siempre, señor! Gracias! Buen fin de semana!! // Smooth as silk... Excellent as always, sir! Thanks! Good weekend!! 🖖

  • @richskinns
    @richskinns 2 года назад +3

    Top airmanship as usual Sir

  • @GhG76562
    @GhG76562 2 года назад +4

    You always make great content. Good work.

  • @ComdrStew
    @ComdrStew Год назад

    At least you can see the deck. ED really needs to fix the deck color on the US carriers. So many real pilots that try it say they can not see the deck lines.

  • @MultiWarbird
    @MultiWarbird 2 года назад

    This channel is absolutely amazing.

  • @TheKid9678
    @TheKid9678 2 года назад

    I have an X-Plane 10, and have attempted land an Su-30 on an American Carrier as there isn't an Admiral Kuznetsov Carrier on it, and Twitchy is a Nice way to put it. An F-18 carrier landing is Easy by Comparison.

  • @CocoQTpie4u
    @CocoQTpie4u 5 месяцев назад

    If only landing like this was possible.

    • @andrealves2630
      @andrealves2630 3 месяца назад

      I have tried many times to perform it and have done it. Its difficult, since the Su-33 isnt as easy to control as the Hornet or Tomcat, but its definetely possible

  • @adraen5942
    @adraen5942 2 года назад

    Hey ! Amazing video, it really helps in trying to align that pesky aircraft. Just a quick question though : What's the music at the beginning ? The cinematic intro one

  • @seancolvin8545
    @seancolvin8545 2 года назад

    Good Video I SU -33 love the content for SU-33.

  • @berserker6341
    @berserker6341 2 года назад

    Great! thanks for share your work!

  • @hawkertyphoon4537
    @hawkertyphoon4537 2 года назад

    Gonna be useful! hve the Jet but never flown really

  • @tac-cobserver3788
    @tac-cobserver3788 Год назад

    Awesome, as always simple but clear explaination, thanks T 🤙
    Well then, stay healthy for all of us & Safety First!✌😉
    Hehe anyway, may i know what is the opening soundtrack, it sounds Solid 🤙

  • @ytdlder
    @ytdlder Год назад

    Do you have that procedure-picture (seen in the top right) somewhere to download or a link to that? Thanks!

  • @EagleSQN
    @EagleSQN 2 года назад +1

    may i get the procedure document? its nice to try

  • @叶忘川
    @叶忘川 Год назад

    How did you find out about the standard procedure for landing the Su33? I searched many places and asked many people, but no one knows.

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  Год назад +1

      This is from a Russian book. It might not be the real procedure but clearly it must have come from somewhere.

    • @叶忘川
      @叶忘川 Год назад

      Could you tell me which book please?@@CommandT

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  Год назад

      @@叶忘川 I'm afraid I have no idea which book it is. The extract from the book with the diagram is floating about on the internet and DCS forums somewhere

  • @CatWarThunder
    @CatWarThunder Год назад

    W camera man for flying in formation with the jet to get those shots 👍👍

  • @BBCRF
    @BBCRF 2 года назад +1

    Это Схема Абсолютна неверна

    • @tasadar96
      @tasadar96 2 года назад

      Можете дать ссылку на правильную или описать ее?

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      А есть правильная? Может есть ссылка?

    • @BBCRF
      @BBCRF 2 года назад

      @@CommandT есть правильная,но пока публиковать не буду

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      @@BBCRF Obidno :(

  • @dman9238
    @dman9238 Год назад

    And yet it blows my mind that Egregious Dynamics (ED) refuses to add Russian Navy deck crew for the Kuznetsov😑🙄😒

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  Год назад

      Probably not worth the reward for them. Amount of players flying an Su-33 of a carrier doesn't justify the cost of implementing deck crew :(

  • @cherifbar
    @cherifbar 2 года назад +2

    The carrier is not nuclear powered?

  • @jonny1789
    @jonny1789 2 года назад +1

    Great video! Could you link the source for the "Carrier Break" (or whatever the Russians call it...)?

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      It's somewhere in the depths of the Russian side of the ED forums. Original source is from a book, not an online source. And thanks!

  • @yootoob22
    @yootoob22 2 года назад +1

    I think the real technique is to do FCLP at a land base, seeing as they don’t have an operative carrier. 🤓

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      Hahaha. Yep!!

    • @yootoob22
      @yootoob22 2 года назад

      @@CommandT all jokes aside, great channel man. Cool mix of things.
      I’m an airline guy in Canada. Also into aerobatics and glider flying and DCS for fun

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      @@yootoob22 Cool! I'm jealous... I wish I was flying in Canada... you guys got plenty of water bomber jobs which is my dream. Can't really do that in the UK :(

    • @yootoob22
      @yootoob22 2 года назад +1

      @@CommandT Dude, I was offered a job at a big aerial fire suppression outfit out west during my Covid layoff on the Q400. I had to make the heartbreaking decision to turn it down due to family concerns. It’s still a dream job. But I got to do some great international ferry work during that time. And I’m back at work with a fantastic airline again and soon heading off for new type training in the spring. In any case, it’s a great place to fly.

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад +1

      @@yootoob22 Ah, I'm jealous! Glad to hear you kept busy through the pandemic though! Let me know if they have an opening for someone with a UK passport willing to convert his ATPL to a Canadian license haha I'd be over in a heartbeat!

  • @tkeuvelaar9689
    @tkeuvelaar9689 2 года назад +1

    Meatball, line up, angle of attack?

    • @Mp57navy
      @Mp57navy 2 года назад

      45 degrees.

    • @dullonion797
      @dullonion797 2 года назад

      No ‘meatball’, it seems. Another example of how unsophisticated Russian carrier aviation is. Plus chevron on AOA indicator..one at top means ‘slow’…

  • @tonymcflattie2450
    @tonymcflattie2450 2 года назад

    Which is the better hud, western or Russian? And why is the western better?

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      Strange question. HUDs have evolved in the last 30 years... which ones are you referring to?

    • @tonymcflattie2450
      @tonymcflattie2450 2 года назад

      @@CommandTmy bad, let me elaborate. I meant the symbology, of how it displays aircraft attitude.

  • @davido1953
    @davido1953 2 года назад

    AoA indicates you are slow, doesn't it?

    • @CommandT
      @CommandT  2 года назад

      The yellow arrow facing down = too fast. Red arrow facing up = too slow.

    • @davido1953
      @davido1953 2 года назад

      @@CommandT totally opposite...weird

    • @BBCRF
      @BBCRF 2 года назад

      @@CommandT не верно.Это огни показывают глиссаду, а не скорость

    • @milenko8bradanov
      @milenko8bradanov 11 месяцев назад

      @@BBCRF Вы ошибаетесь, он показывает угол атаки, который может быть скорректирован скоростью

  • @tonymcflattie2450
    @tonymcflattie2450 2 года назад

    In Russia the carrier traps you!

  • @105blwalker
    @105blwalker 2 года назад +1

    Well…..this is perhaps the biggest advantage we could hope for in a real world sea conflict. That is the most ineffective use of aircraft carrier airspace I have ever seen. We can land 3 planes to their 1. Unless the Russians have a full autopilot autoland system light years better than ours (highly doubtful!), they will be putting planes into the sea with regularity, especially with a pitching deck. Combine that with a twitchy, low-speed-handling jet and sketchy pilot training and we have nothing to worry about.