Should ALL Inmates Be Microchipped?

In this video, we delve into the controversial topic of microchipping inmates. The idea of implanting microchips in prisoners has been a topic of discussion for years, with some advocating for its implementation as a means of improving inmate tracking and security. However, this concept has been met with criticism and opposition from various quarters, with concerns over issues of privacy, ethics, and human rights.
One alternative to microchipping inmates is the use of inmate tracking technology, which is a more humane and effective way of monitoring prisoners. GUARDIAN RFID uses Inmate tracking technology with the use RFID, facial recognition, artificial intelligence, and machine learning, which can track everything an inmate does within the facility. This technology has proven to be an effective means of improving inmate security, and it has been adopted by many correctional facilities across the world.
In this video, we explore the key features of inmate tracking technology, and compare it to the practice of microchipping inmates. We examine the benefits of inmate tracking, including its ability to reduce the risk of escape and improve prisoner safety, while also preserving the privacy and autonomy of inmates.
Overall, inmate tracking technology offers a far more humane and effective alternative to the controversial practice of microchipping inmates. By embracing this technology, correctional facilities can enhance inmate security, while also upholding the principles of privacy and human rights. Join us as we explore this critical issue and provide insights on how we can best approach inmate tracking in the modern world.
Check out these helpful links to learn more about the Command & Control Platform:
►How to Deploy GUARDIAN RFID Article: bit.ly/2GRJb9a
►What's an officer experience platform? bit.ly/39Ul48W
►What's Command Cloud? bit.ly/3lKjI38
►Subscribe to our RUclips Channel: bit.ly/2AnDuKz
FOLLOW THE GUARDIAN RFID TEAM
►LinkedIn: bit.ly/2VsYnwM
►Facebook: bit.ly/2RtCr5n
►Twitter: bit.ly/2LOo7zc
If you have additional questions about GUARDIAN RFID or Android + Cloud-based platforms, comment below or contact our team here: guardianrfid.c...
GUARDIAN RFID provides education and opinion content as a public service, but it is neither a legal interpretation nor assumes the views of GUARDIAN RFID. Reference to any specific product or entity does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by GUARDIAN RFID. The views expressed by guests are their own and their appearance on the program does not imply an endorsement of them or any entity they represent. Views and opinions expressed by contributors are those of the employees or its third party contributors and do not necessarily reflect the view of GUARDIAN RFID or any of its officials. If you have any questions about this disclaimer, please contact our Office of General Counsel at [e-mail].

[@ERNESTORUIZ-hq4qg]

Yes i agree 👍 👍👍

[@grekau1481]

Here comes the mark of the beast

[@thej680]

I like the idea of tracking because it could potentially make logging easier, but it doesn't take into account the creativity of inmates. A microchip is an implant, and it is removable. An inmate could dig that out and just keep it in his/her pocket. You're trying to find the inmate? You're actually chasing a corrections officer.
Second, if we're logging items, they can be stolen. Although you might have an inmate logged to have an item in their possession, another inmate could just steal it, and you would have no idea who stole it. I know you're tracking their activity with security cameras, but there's only so much activity you can capture.
Has a long way to go, but it has potential.

[@tkay1239]

I need his shirt!! 😊