Can't STAND the hypocrisy of islamic women, who wear a head covering to appear not too attractive and modest. But subsequently wears tons of make-up to achieve the opposite.
For the question number 13, we can use another strategy too. They eliminate the letter between B and D, the letter between D and F, and finally, the letter between F and H. So the answer is H.
The last which I figured out is diferent. In the 1st rowbetween the last 2 letters has 1 alphabet missing and comes on the 1st two boxes in the 2nd row and same goes on with the 3 row as well and "H" pops out. Hope its simplier....
I also calculated H in the last question but my pattern was slightly different. Let's begin with the 2nd row: I observed that: 1. the first letter of the row (starting from 2nd row) is actually the middle letter (B). 2. the second letter is the remaining one: D 3. for the third letter we have to skip one (so in place of E select F). That's why the 2nd row is: B D F (not E) and if I apply this to 3rd row, then I'll get D F H (not G)
At 37:55, you used the conversion to numbers, but instead of adding them horizontally, I noticed the pattern diagonally. Don't know why but that's how I saw them.
At the last number my answer was correct but I had a different solution. We skip 1 letter everytime. So at the first row we skip the letter C. Then at the second row we skip the letter E. And then at the last row we skip the letter G. So, the answer is letter A.H
Hello, for the match stick problem, where the original was 1+5=7, could you not move the match stick from the 5 to make it a 6? Or do you have to take a match stick from another number everytime?
Can't wait to get this test again to get the proof that I am too stupid. I can't believe these tests are used for software engineers. Being able to add 4 2digit numbers in my head is a skill not a proof of intelligence or relevant ability. I believe a random cashier would do better on that one than me, because guess what, I don't need to have such skill to be a good software developer. This is just stupid.
I have had lots of answers right, and I'm a non native speaker. However, it is ridiculous to use Maths to analyse a person's value. Maths is nothing more than language, and language is also code, and language is also an idiom, or being able to read music, to identify sounds, etc. So it is ridiculous because only people who are really good in Maths can pass this. It is like to say that if you're not really good at Chinese, you're dumb. If they want to work with people highly intelligent because they know Maths or have studied lots of years, perfect. If they want to work with people highly intelligent because they really solve problems, they would be contracting millionaires. Just a thought of mine.
thanks. the video was helpful and I could solve all except matchstick problem, but you need to keep the video short. It should be 15 min max. not almost 3x of 15 min
Great point! Glad you succeeded on your test! Will definitely make improvements in the new videos so please continue to watch. And consider subscribing she will get notified about the latest updated videos. Thanks.
"The answer might be easier than you might think" and then proceed doing math shit on numbers which is quite impossible to do without a calculator in 13 seconds given per question. Unless you know those patterns beforehand obviously which does not show any reasoning abilities, but only monkey math abilities. Even first two problems would have at least two more reasonable solutions which will be perfectly aligned with the data provided in those tiny problems, yet CCAT only had one "correct" answer, LOL
First one is easier by using the modulus(%), formula would be -> big(3rd) number % first(1st) number = lower(2nd) number 1) 31 % 7 = 3 2) (answer) % 8 = 2, so the answer is 26 3) 29 % 5 = 4 PS : The 3rd one is the poorest question I ever saw..no one should not think that much beyond in their lives.😂
the "math" looking questions are the most annoying, what is wrong with giving real math questions?! these video are essential for such stupid questions.
Practice Crossover Assessment Test: www.howtoanalyzedata.net/how-to-pass-crossover-cognitive-aptitude-test/
Prepare for an Assessment Test: www.howtoanalyzedata.net/assessment-test-practice-and-preparation-resources/
Download FREE Sample Hiring Assessment Test Questions (PDF eBook): www.howtoanalyzedata.net/0fyb
Are you working in crossover? After selection the protected version test is the same!
Can't STAND the hypocrisy of islamic women, who wear a head covering to appear not too attractive and modest. But subsequently wears tons of make-up to achieve the opposite.
Thank you! This was helpful, particularly for the mathematical puzzles. Please note that strategic and tactical are synonyms.
Interesting perspective! Really appreciate for bringing this up!
I sincerely appreciate your videos but there is so much fluff in between the actual questions that the video is way way way too long.
Just wrote the same thing. Disliked it so much, that I stopped watching after the second question.
Too much time wasting
Indexes and Indices are both correct plural forms, with indices being the irregular plural form.
Wow! Thank you for the feedback! I really appreciate it. Learn something new every day 😉
This has been very helpful and informative! Thanks for sharing this!
For the question number 13, we can use another strategy too. They eliminate the letter between B and D, the letter between D and F, and finally, the letter between F and H. So the answer is H.
Awesome Video.. Make more of them
Thank you for this
i like this video
thanks
The last which I figured out is diferent. In the 1st rowbetween the last 2 letters has 1 alphabet missing and comes on the 1st two boxes in the 2nd row and same goes on with the 3 row as well and "H" pops out. Hope its simplier....
That's my pattern too...seems simpler
Same here that was my pattern
Thank for your solution..nice
I also calculated H in the last question but my pattern was slightly different.
Let's begin with the 2nd row:
I observed that:
1. the first letter of the row (starting from 2nd row) is actually the middle letter (B).
2. the second letter is the remaining one: D
3. for the third letter we have to skip one (so in place of E select F).
That's why the 2nd row is: B D F (not E)
and if I apply this to 3rd row, then I'll get
D F H (not G)
Thank you so much. It is really helpful❤
At 37:55, you used the conversion to numbers, but instead of adding them horizontally, I noticed the pattern diagonally. Don't know why but that's how I saw them.
At the last number my answer was correct but I had a different solution.
We skip 1 letter everytime. So at the first row we skip the letter C.
Then at the second row we skip the letter E.
And then at the last row we skip the letter G.
So, the answer is letter A.H
Thank you
Hello, for the match stick problem, where the original was 1+5=7, could you not move the match stick from the 5 to make it a 6? Or do you have to take a match stick from another number everytime?
Thanks a lot for this helpful content ♥
Thank you for this insight😇
Can't wait to get this test again to get the proof that I am too stupid. I can't believe these tests are used for software engineers. Being able to add 4 2digit numbers in my head is a skill not a proof of intelligence or relevant ability. I believe a random cashier would do better on that one than me, because guess what, I don't need to have such skill to be a good software developer. This is just stupid.
I got the first 1 right
I have had lots of answers right, and I'm a non native speaker. However, it is ridiculous to use Maths to analyse a person's value. Maths is nothing more than language, and language is also code, and language is also an idiom, or being able to read music, to identify sounds, etc. So it is ridiculous because only people who are really good in Maths can pass this. It is like to say that if you're not really good at Chinese, you're dumb. If they want to work with people highly intelligent because they know Maths or have studied lots of years, perfect. If they want to work with people highly intelligent because they really solve problems, they would be contracting millionaires. Just a thought of mine.
Thank you very much sir.
i really appreciate sir🙏🙏🙏
For a hot minute I thought Creepy Dave was teaching me analytical skills.
The narration though 😳🤯
I sincerely appreciate your video, which book we need tonlearn to improve our skills
Hello, this section was very interesting and I learned a lot, please how do I contact you ?
1. c 26
a*b+(a+b)
Love it
The problem is the time limit .
In the exam
im confused about strategic & tacgtical meaning how is it became opposite? 😊
Should be random, tactical a synonym
unstable for stable?
I appreciate the questions and the answers but at some part some of them felt unrealistic.
thanks. the video was helpful and I could solve all except matchstick problem, but you need to keep the video short. It should be 15 min max. not almost 3x of 15 min
Great point! Glad you succeeded on your test! Will definitely make improvements in the new videos so please continue to watch. And consider subscribing she will get notified about the latest updated videos. Thanks.
The second problem:
"The answer probably isn't A, so we can eliminate it"
...
The answer is A
Wher in normal life is this kind of problem solving used. In other words why present such trickery. It disrups basic logic. Right
you can get all done, but you only have 18 seconds to solve in real test.
And 26
"The answer might be easier than you might think" and then proceed doing math shit on numbers which is quite impossible to do without a calculator in 13 seconds given per question. Unless you know those patterns beforehand obviously which does not show any reasoning abilities, but only monkey math abilities. Even first two problems would have at least two more reasonable solutions which will be perfectly aligned with the data provided in those tiny problems, yet CCAT only had one "correct" answer, LOL
26
👍
C
u make up a lot of different patterns. not sure how that will proof your cognitive skills
123
410
B
D
8
First one is easier by using the modulus(%), formula would be -> big(3rd) number % first(1st) number = lower(2nd) number
1) 31 % 7 = 3
2) (answer) % 8 = 2, so the answer is 26
3) 29 % 5 = 4
PS : The 3rd one is the poorest question I ever saw..no one should not think that much beyond in their lives.😂
Not a single question is even remotely similar to Crossover Aptitude test
Hey! tell me more about crossover aptitude test
Pleasee
E
the "math" looking questions are the most annoying, what is wrong with giving real math questions?! these video are essential for such stupid questions.
This video would have been nicer without the fillers and rehearsing in it taking at least 10 minutes of wasted time.
Talking to bloody much just get to the answer
you talk too much man
I enjoyed it and it helped my confidence
Можно поменьше словесного поноса?
Lack of questions and more talk 👎
no time for all these crap. they can have the damn
job
26
D
8
26
D
8
26
8
D
D