We also did a lap with the Polo on the Nürburgring! ruclips.net/video/Q1KfgLVg0c4/видео.html Let me know if you like this kind of video as I might be doing a similar video with the Audi RS6 later this year!
I combined stage1 with EGR software delete, and indeed it is funny to keep up with many other cars 😎. Fuel consumption depends on how much power you take, between 1L:26km (80km max. relaxed driving) and 1L:20km (many accelerations and speeding). Seat Ibiza ST 1.2TDI.
Great video that presents the difference between stock und tuned. I am looking for a video like that for my polo 6c 1.4 tdi 75 hp, tuned to 115 hp saddly cannot find anywhere....
That makes me wonder about the factory power figures, could it be they consider that number as a hot engine in less then ideal atmospheric conditions? As seeing your stock map numbers it seems plausible being as they noticed it is common across the groups engines
@@AutoAddictionMedia yeah thats what i mean, drive the car in high altitude for 8 hours non stop except for fuel so the engine is really hot and not able to breathe and you get the factory number, Nice vid buddy, the rs6 will be a treat to see 👍
Seems this doenst fix the real problem, no power below 2000rpm. 900- 100km in fifth on my st makes the car buzz and vibrate. Anything to tune the turbo to come on earlier? Dont care about the higher power numbers really
Dat is bij het gebruik van een Dragy niet relevant. De Dragy houd namelijk ook rekening met een eventuele helling. In beide tests is te zien dat er geen sprake is van een helling (bergop of bergaf)
@@AutoAddictionMedia Dat is zeker wel relevant. Het is simpelweg een betere vergelijking als je het op dezelfde weg vergelijkt, vooral als je op het dezelfde dag onder dezelfde (droge) omstandigheden de metingen uitvoerd. Zo heb ik vaak zat 50-120km/h gemeten met mijn eigen auto. Overal bijna 0,00% slope en toch deed ie er op dag 1 7 seconden over en een week erna deed ie er bijna 8 seconden over. Dit was nochtans precies op dezelfde locatie, met dezelfde hellingspercentage. Buiten temperatuur en wind kunnen best een verschil maken, vooral als je 100-200kmh zou meten.
Sinds de chip erop zit rijd ik er een stuk pittiger mee dus geen idee over verbruik. Het ging mij er meer om dat hij voor de chip niet vooruit te branden was
Did you deliberately choose no power increase below 2200 rpm ? I use mine everyday 45 mins on highway 90 to 135 kph. But thats 1500rpm to 2200 rpm. So this engine tune does not help much. How come your 20% gain is not available from 1400 rpm and up ? That would be very usefull for anyone on the highway that has to slow down for trucks and accelerate back to cruising speed again. If you can make the car stronger in the 90 to 150 kph speed range that is helpful for most people.
That doesnt work for cars with manual gearbox. It would make the clutch suffer alot. It does work for cars with an automatic gearbox, with a torque convertor.
@@ThenameisOskar wifey had a 1.6tdi Fabia 104hp. We did a full emission delete to unblock the filters and remove the egr. Then remap. With unblocked filters (cat dpf) hollowed out the turbo spools up about 400rpm lower. So i asked the tuner engineer to focus on low down punch. From 1400 rpm there was good turbo boost pressure. We maxed out what we could. 104hp became 152hp. And 184 lbs torque became 240lbs. The performance was much better. And the fuel economy transformed. On the highway at 65 to 70 mph we used to get 75 to 80 mpg. After tunning over 100 mpg. I never got a chance to test the top speed. There was no trouble with the clutch. But there are upgraded clutches available if needed. So next time it needs replacing i would use a stronger clutch. But we upgraded to a much higher spec Octavia 1.6tdi SEL. So i dont know about longterm. The fabia clutch lasted 20,000 miles after tunning and was still ok when we traded in.
The turbo doesn't spool up faster. There is nothing to gain in the lower rpm's. It's not something you can "choose" on these type of engines. A smaller turbo would increase power at lower rpm's, but it would have far less power in the upper rpm range
@@AutoAddictionMedia ok but your car has blocked up filters. If you do both remap and full unblocking of everything in the exhaust system (cat dpf egr) including ditching the blue device, then ask your tunner to max out the low and mid revs boost, thats when you gain the extra benifit of spooling the turbo 400 rpm lower with much faster responce. All these 4 items must be unblocked to make engine breath more air flow. It helps a lot in top gear on the highway. Fuel consumption is much less.
We also did a lap with the Polo on the Nürburgring! ruclips.net/video/Q1KfgLVg0c4/видео.html
Let me know if you like this kind of video as I might be doing a similar video with the Audi RS6 later this year!
Thank you buddy, impressive seeing the gains on a little tdi like that 👍🏴
Good job it was strapped down so well, heard these bluemotions are monsters, even stalking GT2 RSs 🤣
This was very interesting, thanks for sharing. Would love more videos like this!
Thanks for doing this / same as my sons car who’s looking at a remap so pleased to see this..
I combined stage1 with EGR software delete, and indeed it is funny to keep up with many other cars 😎. Fuel consumption depends on how much power you take, between 1L:26km (80km max. relaxed driving) and 1L:20km (many accelerations and speeding). Seat Ibiza ST 1.2TDI.
Loving the content. Keep them coming. Hello from 🇨🇦
Wow thats good
ok that interesting
Yep, thats the usual vag turbo stuff. They allways put out more. Some even like 20-30hp. Looks good in the magazine Tests and all that.
Hi from Glasgow
Great video that presents the difference between stock und tuned. I am looking for a video like that for my polo 6c 1.4 tdi 75 hp, tuned to 115 hp saddly cannot find anywhere....
That 1,2TDI is such a good diesel engine...not most powerful but very reliable engine 👍👍
Great video,, very useful,, thanks very much,, 😃
Very nice video brother keep doing your job is nice 😊
So the fuel consmption?
And, it gets better MPG if you drive accordingly.
Heb ook zoon 1.2 TDI, als je iets eerder schakelt pakt hij hem met meer koppel op en is die dus sneller. 4K touren heb je lang niet nodig
And the DPF? Off...?
money??
€ 299 without the dyno run
That makes me wonder about the factory power figures,
could it be they consider that number as a hot engine in less then ideal atmospheric conditions?
As seeing your stock map numbers it seems plausible being as they noticed it is common across the groups engines
I think the factory power figures are guaranteed even in worst case scenario (high heat, poor fuel conditions etc)
@@AutoAddictionMedia yeah thats what i mean, drive the car in high altitude for 8 hours non stop except for fuel so the engine is really hot and not able to breathe and you get the factory number,
Nice vid buddy, the rs6 will be a treat to see 👍
@@AutoAddictionMedia be curious to see the numbers on limp mode, to see how limp it really goes
The difference between the factory figures and the Vag figures could also be attributed to variations in the dynos themselves.
Seems this doenst fix the real problem, no power below 2000rpm. 900- 100km in fifth on my st makes the car buzz and vibrate.
Anything to tune the turbo to come on earlier? Dont care about the higher power numbers really
The engine is too small to spool up the turbo earlier. You could fit an even smaller turbo, but that would make it lose power in higher rpm ranges
Did you remove dpf?? Or it's not needed?
I've got the same car and got an EGR problem. Do you think that remap the ECU and close the valve EGR electronically is worth it ? Thanks from Italy 🥂
DO NOT fix EGR issues. If its out of warranty get it turned off electronically or block it off physically.
0-60 after the map?
What was the fuel economy hit ?
Voor een accurate meting kon je beter de 2 metingen op hetzelfde stuk asfalt doen. Maar goed, hiermee zie je ook duidelijk dat ie vlotter is geworden.
Dat is bij het gebruik van een Dragy niet relevant. De Dragy houd namelijk ook rekening met een eventuele helling. In beide tests is te zien dat er geen sprake is van een helling (bergop of bergaf)
@@AutoAddictionMedia Dat is zeker wel relevant. Het is simpelweg een betere vergelijking als je het op dezelfde weg vergelijkt, vooral als je op het dezelfde dag onder dezelfde (droge) omstandigheden de metingen uitvoerd.
Zo heb ik vaak zat 50-120km/h gemeten met mijn eigen auto. Overal bijna 0,00% slope en toch deed ie er op dag 1 7 seconden over en een week erna deed ie er bijna 8 seconden over. Dit was nochtans precies op dezelfde locatie, met dezelfde hellingspercentage.
Buiten temperatuur en wind kunnen best een verschil maken, vooral als je 100-200kmh zou meten.
@@ThenameisOskar Bij deze lage vermogens verwacht ik geen schokkende verschillen. Is overigens beide op dezelfde dag getest
Merk je na een jaar rijden op andere software dat hij zuiniger is of is dat een fabel?
Sinds de chip erop zit rijd ik er een stuk pittiger mee dus geen idee over verbruik. Het ging mij er meer om dat hij voor de chip niet vooruit te branden was
Ik volg je al lang maar wist nooit dat je Nederlands was
Do this tune warrant a stronger clutch?
nope
Lol m'n Ibiza 1.2 TDI boekt deze er uit.
1.6 moet makkelijk 140pk kunnen en 8.1 seconden halen.
Dit is een 1.2tdi... En hij heeft ook een RS6 dus ik denk niet dat het hem veel uitmaakt ;)
@@veeerzes Ja je moet wat met deze benzine prijzen😂
Did you deliberately choose no power increase below 2200 rpm ? I use mine everyday 45 mins on highway 90 to 135 kph. But thats 1500rpm to 2200 rpm. So this engine tune does not help much. How come your 20% gain is not available from 1400 rpm and up ? That would be very usefull for anyone on the highway that has to slow down for trucks and accelerate back to cruising speed again. If you can make the car stronger in the 90 to 150 kph speed range that is helpful for most people.
That doesnt work for cars with manual gearbox. It would make the clutch suffer alot. It does work for cars with an automatic gearbox, with a torque convertor.
@@ThenameisOskar wifey had a 1.6tdi Fabia 104hp. We did a full emission delete to unblock the filters and remove the egr. Then remap. With unblocked filters (cat dpf) hollowed out the turbo spools up about 400rpm lower. So i asked the tuner engineer to focus on low down punch. From 1400 rpm there was good turbo boost pressure. We maxed out what we could. 104hp became 152hp. And 184 lbs torque became 240lbs. The performance was much better. And the fuel economy transformed. On the highway at 65 to 70 mph we used to get 75 to 80 mpg. After tunning over 100 mpg. I never got a chance to test the top speed.
There was no trouble with the clutch. But there are upgraded clutches available if needed. So next time it needs replacing i would use a stronger clutch. But we upgraded to a much higher spec Octavia 1.6tdi SEL. So i dont know about longterm. The fabia clutch lasted 20,000 miles after tunning and was still ok when we traded in.
The turbo doesn't spool up faster. There is nothing to gain in the lower rpm's. It's not something you can "choose" on these type of engines. A smaller turbo would increase power at lower rpm's, but it would have far less power in the upper rpm range
@@AutoAddictionMedia ok but your car has blocked up filters. If you do both remap and full unblocking of everything in the exhaust system (cat dpf egr) including ditching the blue device, then ask your tunner to max out the low and mid revs boost, thats when you gain the extra benifit of spooling the turbo 400 rpm lower with much faster responce. All these 4 items must be unblocked to make engine breath more air flow. It helps a lot in top gear on the highway. Fuel consumption is much less.
Just make it breathe and on egr delete it will run better
EGR has been disabled in this tune
@@AutoAddictionMedia egr kills power
@Tobias Cat He says that it's disabled, not deleted. Two different things. Deleteing the EGR system AND disable it in the MAP is best
Oky try Peugeot 208 🤔
Try a Peugeot at a VAG tuner? I don't see what you're trying to say
Yea
@@jevfot4526 "yea" 😂😂😂😂😂😂 yea what 🤣
I dont no 🤣🍕