35. Claudius and the Journeys of Paul
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024
- When the emperor Claudius reigned over Rome, the Christian church experienced some of its most important developments with respect to its early growth. The journeys of the Apostle Paul and the Council of Jerusalem combined to translate the Christian gospel into a message for all people, rather than a belief limited to the Jewish nation. For more free resources, please visit www.brucegore.com.
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HiCxoDeo0hc/mqdefault.jpg)
Sir, you are a gift to the church.
Thank you for all the history teachings. They are all very enlightening.
THIS GUYS BRAIN IS SERIOUS ..GIFTED TEACHER.
"Paul was willing to be anybody's doormat as long as they got their feet clean". This is brilliant! Thank you!
this method to have a small window with the teacher explaining the lecture - inside the screen of the video - and the main names and details written on the big blue screen is fantastic because while you listen to the explanation of the teacher - you keep looking at what it´s written on the big bkue screen and we learn and know by heart everything is explained - fantastic method- even for me at 75 years old - the diction and English speech is so excellent that even being a portuguse native language person l am able to understand -thank you so much for existing on youtube-
"15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:" 1 Corinthians 15:1-4.
"1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." Galatians 1:6-9.
Thank you so much for the lessons.
It is all very interesting .
Thank you again and God bless you sir.
Thank you!
Thank you very much for the teachings
How can you keep such a wealth of detail in so many areas of interest? You astound me. Thanks.
It's easy until my wife drops the cue cards.
Thanks.
Bruce Gore Hahaha! You are a seriously gifted man, I admire your wealth of knowledge and your generosity in sharing it with us. Thank you.
@@GoreBruce
Do you have a website that has all of this loaded on ? RUclips is hit or miss
Very well done. The video is clear, coherent and has plenty of information. Not to say about so many clarifications connecting the two historical lines: Roman and Christianity. Congratulation.
Really great! Best informative, insightful and accurate. Thank you
Thank you!
Clau Clau Claudius shall speak again, after the years 1900 and 1 📚
Claudius was actually a grandson of Augustus and Mark Antony, Claudius was related to both of them.
Claudius was a grandson of the sister of Augustus (Octavia) - Caligula was a great-grandson of both Augustus and Antony.
This guy gets ours of information wrong .
I really like this channel.
I think the ancient people who lived in Britain were called "Picts" because they painted their faces. It meant painted and we get our word picture from this word.
Interesting to trace the rulers of Rome with the Journeys of St. Paul, culminating with his final demise at the hands of Nero. He ran the good race, he kept the faith, a good example for us all.
Is there a web site where you keep all of these broadcasts? Using RUclips is convenient but totally hit or miss
And do you have them up on the iTunes as broadcasts which we can buy? Or in any other podcast format that we can buy?
These lectures are found in RUclips Playlists here:
ruclips.net/user/GoreBruceplaylists
You may also access these and other materials at my website:
www.brucegore.com
Caligula did not have an "infant son" . The child that was killed was his baby daughter, Drusilla -- named for his beloved dead sister.
Thank you for the clarification!
Yes and Caligua wanted to name his Sister Agrippina's infant son, Claudius 📚🤣
@@funfact8660 Then Nero would have been Claudius the 2nd. They all had a zillion names. The Emperor "Claudius'" full name is Tiberious Claudius Drusus Nero Germanicus
@@blacbraun I restore and sell ancient Roman coins and small artifacts for a living, I have all the Augustan and Flavian lines, as well as Galba,Otho and Vitellius, Nerva and Trajanus bronzes and silvers 👍
Ecumenism for all Christians and Peace in Christ Jesus.
Julius Caesar was NOT Emperor of Rome. Augustus was the first Emperor. You could call Julius a dictator but the "Emperor" was not in place yet.
This guy makes a lot of mistakes.
I was so shocked that this guy got that wrong. Augustus was the first emperor .
@@eriksoley6774 100 . %
@@davidcoleman2796 he was being provocative- Julius was defacto first Emperor
Powerhouse.
By DEDUCTION, Abelard Reuchlin discovered Arrius Calpurnius Piso was Flavius Josephus and Arrius' grandson, Emperor Antoninus Pius, was Suetonius. By deduction. He published his findings in 1979.
When you asked them a question no one knew it, my God what was wrong with those people, we learned that is school in history class, I think a lot of church going people really have no clue about history and sure don't read.
So true! I'm chagrined to only now be locking in the historical background to the Bible.
Not just church people.. most people in general..
Thanks for your lectures. I found you through Study or Antiquity and the Middle ages. I don't know if anyone said but your voice reminds me of the actor Jeff Goldbloom.
Thank you!
To say Julius Caesar didn’t want to mess with the Britons is misleading, he defeated them in battle. Claudius did not lead the initial offensives in Britain, he sent Aulus Plautius to lead the legions, Claudius showed up later with reinforcements. The Romans gave up control of Britain in 410 not 476.
Thanks for those corrections!
Another question from me! : talking about christian morals: how much authority over peoples beliefs would/do apostles hold? If Jesus chose them to argue for him in areas he was silent, then wouldnt everything they say be right? what if they disagree on a subject? These questions really grate at me sometimes. I know in Islam there is a guideline of how these things are followed post mohhammed.
AmidalaEmma Classical Christian understanding affirms that the apostles speak with the authority of Christ. He commissioned them with the formula, 'he who hears you hears me.' The apostolic instruction is contained in the writings that were either produced by apostles or sanctioned by apostles, which are found in the canonical scriptures. The apostles certainly reflect varying emphases on subjects, but the Christian tradition has firmly maintained that they do not actually contradict one another.
Thanks a lot for your answer. I definatly did not know any of that!
Mohammedeanism is a Cult
The Romans left Britannia in 410 AD/1163 AUC (Ab Urbe Condita/Since the founding of the City) it was around the same time as the first sack of Rome by the Vandals.
Germanicus was his own brother or step brother?
l have had fantastic days downloading, learning and and studying History together with Theology -it´s a treasure to increase our faith in the truths of the Bible prophecies mainly Daniel´s chapter 2.
You are about 80 years off concerning when Rome abandoned Britain...it was about 395, not 476 AD.
That was my first criticism, too, about what he said @10:06, even if I hadn't looked up the year yet.
The Roman armies were recalled before the collapse of the West Roman empires. because they were needed closer to Rome.
This guy may know his bible but not history
@ 25:00
Do you mean Gaul as in FRANCE?? I guess you could consider that "north" compared to the Roman Province of Asia... I have NEVER heard that before..
People seriously get Gaul and Galatia mixed up in the Bible??' That's a bit absurd.
There is rumor Paul went to Spain.. so why not just say it was to Galicians?
It seems pretty clear that it was Asia-minor.
Ok.. looked up on the North South theory.. I misunderstood.
My vote is South in any case.
Seems like there was a strong political reason to claim a rejection of the groups at war with the Roman armies, even if they circulated a text that was a roundabout fantasy of the defeat of those armies. Was there much debate if Christians were separate enough from Jews to be subject to the Roman Expulsion of 40ce? Or, of the various diaspora taxes and persecutions following the civil war? It could be like if the Mormon Church, based out of Utah, went to war(over taxes, but claiming religious persecution) with the American Empire. You might see a rise in debate if Branch Davidians(the cult that also has gripes with the American Empire, but somehow able to exist and thrive with Mormon converts) could have "holy underwear", like the New Testament debates over circumcision.
It is likely Christianity at that time would have had no distinction from Judaism from the perspective of a Greco/Roman pagan.
So I think it likely that these disturbances were Jews and Christians having conflict.
Re:the Jerusalem Council, it seems like 2 of the 3 prohibitions for gentiles had to do with diet.
Julius Caesar never proclaimed himself emperor of Rome. Get this right . Wtf . Augustus was the very first emperor. So Claudius was the fourth emperor not the fifth ! .
Claudius was a good person & good emperor... He's sandwiched between 2 lunatics though (Caligula & Nero)...
Julius Caesar was never emperor of Rome . So that statement was misleading. Augustus was the very first emperor
You'll have to take that up with Seutonius (the twelve Caesars) and the universal testimony of all ancient Roman historians.
I guess Timothy's lower-deck hygiene was far from ideal.
Not true Julius wasn’t considered an emperor
Julius was certainly Caesar and, in his later years, the autocrat of Rome, he even wanted to be monarch, and the history from Pharsalus to Actium is muddled anyhow about how the future of Rome would look like. I wouldn't put too much weight on words.
@@Achill101 Julius Caesar was not an Emperor and never had that title.
@@eriksoley6774 - Julius Caesar had the title of Dictator For Life. He ruled Rome as he saw fit. He was no vassal to any other king, but other kings bordering the Roman Empire were his vassals. Looks like an Emperor, sounds like an Emperor, but Erik Soley thinks he was not.
@@Achill101 I am not disputing a thing you just said. All true. His title was "Dictator for Life." Octavian was the first to call himself "Imperator" and because his power passed to an heir peacefully, unlike in the case of Caesar.
@@eriksoley6774 - you bring up an important point for considering an Emperor: is the post inheritable?
First, not all emperors in history were inheritable. Some, like the Holy Roman Emperor, were elected.
Second, who followed Julius Caesar? It was his grand nephew and heir, Octavian, but it was only after more years of Civil War. Later successions were more peaceful, but not all of them.
Who followed Octavian? Not his own child, because he had no surviving child, but his heir Tiberius. Even later, successors were sometimes picked from a variety of candidates, especially if there was no adult son of the Emperor. E.g. Claudius was picked by the Praetorians.
While it is clear that there was no accepted inheritence of the dictator title from Caesar to Octavian, it took longer for the Romans to leave their rejection of the monarchy behind and accept an inherited monarchy as their form of government. No single event or year seems suitable to me as THE START of inheritable monarchy in the Romen Empire.
Claudius should have converted to Christianity.
He only promoted Nero because he believed he was so depraved it would bring down the Emperor System and Rome would return to Republicanism.
You think theres any chance he did? He's my oldest known grandfather and it makes me really sad to think he's lost, seemed like a good man overall.
Go to sleep now, Clau Clau Claudius...
@@clauderobichaud4169 ,
📚 Claudius the god never converted to Christianity...🤣
@@clauderobichaud4169 You are obviously Uneducated, as there were 2 Temples to the god Claudius, one in Colchester in Brittania bulit while Claudius was living, the other in Rome, started by Agrippina, and defunded by her son, Nero, only to be completed during the early reign of Vespasian 📚 you might want to actually study this subject and not daydream conjecture ?
@@clauderobichaud4169 you are totally Clueless...my hands are washed of you Imbecile
My superstitions are true, yours are not. Religion.
too bad he only expelled them
Chrestus can't have been Christ because Jesus was already dead ~15 years earlier.
Not according to his followers. Their message was, He is risen!