Holy smokes! This is EXACTLY what I've been looking for! I'm not even playing guitar: I'm a piano player but this explanation of jazz theory is outstanding. Very clear and really straight forward! I could watch this content every day HAPPILY! Thank you so much!
Great lesson....as a jazz-fusion guitarist myself I always look for new ways to learn and incorporate these notions constructively into my playing. Personally, I noticed that the more you adopt chord substitutions, the further away you get from the "feel" you're trying to express with a chord progression you come up with (so, not necessarily the typical 1,6,2,5), BUT at the same time, being an avid Pat Metheny fan for over 40 years, I couldn't help but noticing the way he uses substitutions in different renditions of his own songs, STILL managing to maintain the overall meaning of the message or the atmosphere of the piece he's playing. I suppose my point is YES, do use chord subs, but be careful on how to use them, try to not abuse them, as I notice some jazz-fusion musicians do, just for the sake of "Hey look how good and articulate I am!".... 🙂
Like "AnotherAnonymous" I am also not a guitar player, but this is a great summary of chord substitutions in only 13 minutes! You make it all sound easy!
I dont know about total beginners, but for me, as somebody who has mostly studied classical theory and not much jazz theory, you made it make so much sense to me.
Trumpet player trying to understand what’s going on when I hear “good comping” love this video. Keep making educational content like this. I can’t wait to watch more of your videos
It's so nice to hear this and understand everything you are talking about. This all sinks in after a while. Very different from when I first started watching all these videos online.
Great lesson! Will help greatly in my effort to analyze jazz standards, which I always find important. One small point: was at first confused by your use of "substitute for".... so for example, in describing a tritone substitution, the tritone chord substitutes for the V chord, not the other way around.
Thanks for pointing this out! On the music the 2 and 5 are four beats, but I play them two beats. Typically that chord progression would have them two beats long like I played it. But all could be four beats as well
@@Learnjazzstandards the problem with this explanation is that, if you do not maintain the common ground of “4 bars of music” … you’re not actually practicing chord substitution. You have to maintain form and time feel. Let’s get that straight!
One of my favorite subs that I've come across is the iv subbed for the V. The new progression for example would be Dmin7-Fmin7-C∆. Playing melodic minor over the V into the I sounds so cool!
I feel like a lot of these chord substitution don’t need to entirely replace the chords. Mainly because the chord progression you used to work on was simple for the sake of explaining but like you could keep the chord the same for the first two beats and then sub them for the last two beats of a measure. For example I think in bar two you could do two beats of Am7 and two beats of A7 which both utilized the secondary dominant but also the chromatic motion of the third going from C to C# to finally D as the home.
I can interpret a large part of the function of these substitutions from your expressions while playing em. Haha love it, great video altogether I learned a hell of a lot
Thanks very from the inner of my heart. This lesson enlightened more my chords knowledge and stuff. Can you share also the thematic about improvisation on chords substitution on C A D G progression. Thanks in advance!
I would recommend examining the concept of chord substitution, from the perspective of harmonic movements. In example: substitute |D-7|G7| for two bars of Gsus4. (RULE: substitute a “2 5” movement with a sus chord build off the root of the “5”. ) you could sub an entire 3625 with just a long sus4 chord. A more modern technique, but used by early luminaries. A well rounded explanation of chord substitution should touch on the concept of “pedaling a bass note”. A bass player can suggest to an improviser, a “chord substitution”, on the fly (often with the use of a ‘pedal tone’)
Such valuable information! Question: when improvising over the various substitutions how does it sound when you play lines that relate to the original, non-substitution chord?
Spicy 😊. Seriously, though, you should just try it and hear with your own ears. You could start with a very simple example that illustrates the emphasis on different chord tones. E.g., in Brent's example, you could just play do, re, mi (C, D, E) over each chord of the I vi ii V progression and listen to how different chord tones are emphasized depending on the chord being played. E.g., on the ii chord (Dmin7), the 7 and 9 are emphasized which adds more color/tension than when playing the same notes over the C chord. It gets more complex, of course, when you play non-diatonic harmony, but you could try a similar exercise with a more complex progression. A lot of it is determined by the harmony you want to imply, and skilled improvisors take into account the harmony of phrases rather than of just a single chord.
Well done mate. It is a relief to see young people demystifying this stuff for the generations to come. Very clear and concise information. Thanks you got me subscribed.
The question is: do you still improvise diatonically over the substitutions (as if they weren't there basically) or are you now forced to improvise on the new changes? and, conversely, can you use substitute arpeggios to improvise over a I vi ii V?
Absolutely amazing lesson dude! Thanks so much, you are really the best! It would be very useful when you also show a freeboard graphic with the chords you are using 💜
I was a student in the prior century. I've forgotten all the *why* of subs. It's all been reduced to alt Dom7 subs, tri tone sub, and symmetric dim scale theory. I kinda always think in dim chords a half step apart... Putting this in my study folder. Thanks.
It would be interesting to talk about how substitutions work with the other instruments, particularly the bass. The diatonic substitution in the first example seems straightforward. If the bass still treats that bar as Cmaj7, playing Emin7 over Cmaj7 just turns it into Cmaj9. For some of the other substitutions, though, it seems you would need to plan ahead, hope the other musicians have very big ears, or enjoy some very spicy sounds.
I love chords and the subs. However I have a hard time understanding how the subs are done. While your demo helps put it in use I don't have a solid idea of how to choose the right subs. I have to let the music and sound guide me to what's right.
Would this apply to big band songs? Also, is there a limit to substitutions? I feel that if I use too much it might get comments in regard to changing the sound of the song too much.
What is Bb7 the secondary dominant of? It looks like this was borrowed from the relative minor using the Eb as your reference note to get the Fmin7 to the Bb7. Is this the way to think of it?
djspexx1, He was treating the Bb7 chord as if “IT” was a 5 (V). And counting backwards from the Bb [5 or V7], 5 to the 4 is one step down Ab [4 or IV], 4 to the 3 is a half step down, G [3 or iii min], 3 to the 2 is one step down “F” [2 or ii min]. Adding the minor 7 note to Fmin, he gets “Fmin7” (2) - Bb7 (5).
My way of thinking about a tritone sub may not technically be correct. But I always just think of it as a dominant 7th chord that’s a half step above the target chord. I mean that’s how the voice leading works that way too. So I’ve always just thought of it like that
@@cesargomezu1459 to me theirs just a lot more thinking involved with how it’s usually described “go to the V chord, then go a tritone above that chord, and make it a dominant 7th chord”
Very cool. The diatonic reharm thing is interesting; I've noticed Freddie Hubbard using it in more of a modal approach, e.g. playing an F major triad over B half dim.(II chord in A-minor ii-V-i); if you are thinking of B locrian on the B half. dim., then F major (lydian) can be thought of as a diatonic reharmonization. Of course, the rhythm section could voice the B half dim with C# (super-locrian), so that creates chromatic tension. Interesting topic, thank you!
At 9:45 you called the Fmin7 a “two” but what is that in relation to? It’s the iv to the C and the v to the Bb right? It would be a ii to an Eb but there isn’t one
it's a ii7(two) in relation to the Eb tonality that Bb7 is borrowed from. The Bb7 resolves to a different place (C), but we connect the F-7 to the Bb7 because they share a key. We could call the F-7 the iv of C in the same way we could call call Bb7 the bVII7 of C, but it' easier to think of it as a ii7-V7 in the new key (Eb) which we momentarily drift into.
I would not have had the chance to learn this. I'm 72 and it's the first time
I've gotten it. Thanks for the guidance.
Holy smokes! This is EXACTLY what I've been looking for!
I'm not even playing guitar: I'm a piano player but this explanation of jazz theory is outstanding. Very clear and really straight forward! I could watch this content every day HAPPILY!
Thank you so much!
Thank you!
i have heard this explained to me for 30 years. Your explanation is the best that i have heard yet, very informative. Thank you.
Wonderful!
Great lesson....as a jazz-fusion guitarist myself I always look for new ways to learn and incorporate these notions constructively into my playing. Personally, I noticed that the more you adopt chord substitutions, the further away you get from the "feel" you're trying to express with a chord progression you come up with (so, not necessarily the typical 1,6,2,5), BUT at the same time, being an avid Pat Metheny fan for over 40 years, I couldn't help but noticing the way he uses substitutions in different renditions of his own songs, STILL managing to maintain the overall meaning of the message or the atmosphere of the piece he's playing. I suppose my point is YES, do use chord subs, but be careful on how to use them, try to not abuse them, as I notice some jazz-fusion musicians do, just for the sake of "Hey look how good and articulate I am!".... 🙂
This is why I love jazz. The creative potential is insane
FANTASTIC lesson. Thanks. Bill Evans did these sort of substitutions SOOOOO cleverly.. subtly and aesthetically. THank you for this lesson.
Glad you enjoyed it! Bill Evans was a master at this
Wow, that little two minutes on tritone substitutions cleared up a long-time mystery I've had listening to jazz. So THAT's what they're doing! LOL
THANKS! Don't worry about going too fast or whatever. We can back it up and watch again what we didn't get the 1st time.
GREAT lesson! Thanks, again!
Like "AnotherAnonymous" I am also not a guitar player, but this is a great summary of chord substitutions in only 13 minutes! You make it all sound easy!
Thanks!
I dont know about total beginners, but for me, as somebody who has mostly studied classical theory and not much jazz theory, you made it make so much sense to me.
Trumpet player trying to understand what’s going on when I hear “good comping” love this video. Keep making educational content like this. I can’t wait to watch more of your videos
It's so nice to hear this and understand everything you are talking about. This all sinks in after a while. Very different from when I first started watching all these videos online.
This is the first time I understand all of these concepts so easily ✊
Great lesson! Will help greatly in my effort to analyze jazz standards, which I always find important. One small point: was at first confused by your use of "substitute for".... so for example, in describing a tritone substitution, the tritone chord substitutes for the V chord, not the other way around.
Yo that back door dominant sound was fire. I like reharming lady bird with a circle of fifths from the bIII in the turnaround to the bVII at bar 4.
Love it!
I wish you explained why the first example works though. The way it is explained made it sound like a random substitution
Really helpful. This sums up 4-5 different concepts that help been perpetually confusing to me. Thx!!
This is amazing. I'm learning jazz guitar now. The big issue is getting this stuff into my brain. Being able to identify things on the fly.
Perfectly presented and paced! Please NOTE: You said that Bb7 is the back door dominant of G7 (and I believe you meant of C).
I've never seen an accurate tutorial that's better than this. This is so straight to the point
Thank you! I'm glad you find it helpful.
Cool. Just a catch detail. On the 1 4 3m 6m 2m 5 you gave them all the same time value. The 2m 5 should’ve been twice as long.
Thanks for pointing this out! On the music the 2 and 5 are four beats, but I play them two beats. Typically that chord progression would have them two beats long like I played it. But all could be four beats as well
Hmm, you’re substituting over a 4 bar phrase so I would think you’d want it to remain a 4 bar phrase. All good, though
@@vicormule735I found one!
Noticed it too , but I suppose he was just showing us the chords there, and not how to play them in time.
@@Learnjazzstandards the problem with this explanation is that, if you do not maintain the common ground of “4 bars of music” … you’re not actually practicing chord substitution. You have to maintain form and time feel. Let’s get that straight!
A very neat summation of common jazz/blues chord substitutions! It takes me a lot longer to go through these concepts with my students!
One of my favorite subs that I've come across is the iv subbed for the V. The new progression for example would be Dmin7-Fmin7-C∆. Playing melodic minor over the V into the I sounds so cool!
Next album is gonna go crazy
Jerry Coker Jazz improvisation. The real bible of understanding jazz chords and more.
I feel like a lot of these chord substitution don’t need to entirely replace the chords. Mainly because the chord progression you used to work on was simple for the sake of explaining but like you could keep the chord the same for the first two beats and then sub them for the last two beats of a measure. For example I think in bar two you could do two beats of Am7 and two beats of A7 which both utilized the secondary dominant but also the chromatic motion of the third going from C to C# to finally D as the home.
Very enlightening. You have a gift for making a not so easy subject understandable. much appreciate your gift. Thank you
Thanks! What a lovely guitar you are playing.
you're videos are the best and clearest on these subjects, thank you!!
Wow, thank you!
I can interpret a large part of the function of these substitutions from your expressions while playing em. Haha love it, great video altogether I learned a hell of a lot
Thank you so much for helping me understand the chord subs that I never understood before🙇♂
Really helpful video! Easy to understand if you've got some theory knowledge, otherwise you might have to check out his basics videos.
Thanks very from the inner of my heart.
This lesson enlightened more my chords knowledge and stuff.
Can you share also the thematic about improvisation on chords substitution on C A D G progression.
Thanks in advance!
This is the best lesson I've found on this talk so far 💯
Excellent excellent excellent, one of the most helpful videos in my jazz guitar education I have found so far thank you.
Glad it was helpful, thank you!
I would recommend examining the concept of chord substitution, from the perspective of harmonic movements. In example: substitute |D-7|G7| for two bars of Gsus4. (RULE: substitute a “2 5” movement with a sus chord build off the root of the “5”. ) you could sub an entire 3625 with just a long sus4 chord. A more modern technique, but used by early luminaries. A well rounded explanation of chord substitution should touch on the concept of “pedaling a bass note”. A bass player can suggest to an improviser, a “chord substitution”, on the fly (often with the use of a ‘pedal tone’)
Thank you for your efforts in educating aspiring jazz musicians 🙂
great item, nicely compact and concise. without it becoming messy or unclear. well done and thanx!
Whew, I am almost getting this...would be helpful for you to please show hand positions more clearly....thanks!
Such valuable information! Question: when improvising over the various substitutions how does it sound when you play lines that relate to the original, non-substitution chord?
Spicy 😊. Seriously, though, you should just try it and hear with your own ears. You could start with a very simple example that illustrates the emphasis on different chord tones. E.g., in Brent's example, you could just play do, re, mi (C, D, E) over each chord of the I vi ii V progression and listen to how different chord tones are emphasized depending on the chord being played. E.g., on the ii chord (Dmin7), the 7 and 9 are emphasized which adds more color/tension than when playing the same notes over the C chord. It gets more complex, of course, when you play non-diatonic harmony, but you could try a similar exercise with a more complex progression.
A lot of it is determined by the harmony you want to imply, and skilled improvisors take into account the harmony of phrases rather than of just a single chord.
Well done mate. It is a relief to see young people demystifying this stuff for the generations to come. Very clear and concise information. Thanks you got me subscribed.
Much appreciated
Great lesson, Brent! Very concise and clear - thanks for posting this 👍🏻
Thank you, Donna!
This video reminds of that song from McDonald’s. Because IM LOVING IT!
Wow 😮 and thankyou so much for this simpliest yet effective ideas. Really appreciate. Lots of thankssss from India❤❤❤
My pleasure 😊
Beautiful guitar sounds.
Thank you so much!
I'm still a noob with music theory, but this was such a great explanation
Where is the explanation of the Autumn Leaves chord subs in the thumbnail? They are very interesting.
this vidio convert complex data to not complex data
very good leasson
Excelente video... Muchas gracias, like, suscripción y activada la campanita de notificaciones, saludos cordiales desde Lima-Perú 🇵🇪
The question is: do you still improvise diatonically over the substitutions (as if they weren't there basically) or are you now forced to improvise on the new changes? and, conversely, can you use substitute arpeggios to improvise over a I vi ii V?
As long as you resolve/land on a chord tone in the progression, you’re good.
you work with the new progression.
Very helpful. Thanks for the video!
감사합니다. 많이 배워 갑니다.^^
You are a great teacher thank you 🙏
Absolutely amazing lesson dude! Thanks so much, you are really the best! It would be very useful when you also show a freeboard graphic with the chords you are using 💜
Thank You much, Great Lesson, will applying, ❤❤❤❤❤
Thanks you very much, very useful lesson!
Glad it was helpful!
Great video. Explanations are very clear and concise! 👌
Glad you liked it. Thanks!
Very clear, thanks
You are welcome!
God bless tritone subs there is the jazz core❤
Amazing video, thank you so much!!
Glad you like it!
I was a student in the prior century. I've forgotten all the *why* of subs. It's all been reduced to alt Dom7 subs, tri tone sub, and symmetric dim scale theory. I kinda always think in dim chords a half step apart... Putting this in my study folder. Thanks.
Awesome!
Dm7 can be F maj 7
It would be interesting to talk about how substitutions work with the other instruments, particularly the bass.
The diatonic substitution in the first example seems straightforward. If the bass still treats that bar as Cmaj7, playing Emin7 over Cmaj7 just turns it into Cmaj9.
For some of the other substitutions, though, it seems you would need to plan ahead, hope the other musicians have very big ears, or enjoy some very spicy sounds.
Well explained
Thanks,very useful!
Thanks
this is really good!! thank you for this video
An amazing video.
I agree ,great lesson.
Best explanation ever!
Wow, thanks!
What is the guitar you use in the video?
It’s a custom Victor Baker
Thank you, Brother 🌹😎🌹
So great explanation. Thanks!
Thank you!
I'm in need of an advice, how to not mind to intensive hands waiving?
Thnx mr master
that's a great lesson. you got a new subscriber.
Thank you!
May I ask why F min7 is considered a ii in the back door dominant section of the video? Thanks
Great video!
Thanks!
Impecable
I love chords and the subs. However I have a hard time understanding how the subs are done. While your demo helps put it in use I don't have a solid idea of how to choose the right subs. I have to let the music and sound guide me to what's right.
Hi, I didn't quite understand what makes Fmin7 the 2chord in the backdoor dominant example. Would appreciate a brief explanation, thanks!
Im confused in that part aswell, wouldnt the 2 be the Dm7 ??
I think whats hes doing is that since the Bb7 is the dominant of E then the Fmin7 is the two of E
But im just guessing
right, i am confused to where he got f-7 as the 2 chord, you and i are the only ones who caught it. That is from all the comments below the video.
You can use the Vii chord to replace the V
6:40
Great review!
Thanks!
Thanks so much!
Thanks!
Very well done 👍.
Super video
Would this apply to big band songs? Also, is there a limit to substitutions? I feel that if I use too much it might get comments in regard to changing the sound of the song too much.
What is Bb7 the secondary dominant of? It looks like this was borrowed from the relative minor using the Eb as your reference note to get the Fmin7 to the Bb7. Is this the way to think of it?
Can you help me understand in the last part of backdoor dominants, I don't catch why Fmin7 is II of any chord. I'm no expert in theory.
Mostly I say, it’s for easier transitions with guitar chord shapes
Hi , how come Fmin7 a two? In the backdoor dominant example?
djspexx1, He was treating the Bb7 chord as if “IT” was a 5 (V).
And counting backwards from the Bb [5 or V7],
5 to the 4 is one step down Ab [4 or IV],
4 to the 3 is a half step down, G [3 or iii min],
3 to the 2 is one step down “F” [2 or ii min].
Adding the minor 7 note to Fmin,
he gets “Fmin7” (2) - Bb7 (5).
excellent goos sir Brent !!
Thanks!
👍👍 it's good for kids
Very good sir!
Thanks!
This is sooo goooooooooooooooood.
My way of thinking about a tritone sub may not technically be correct. But I always just think of it as a dominant 7th chord that’s a half step above the target chord. I mean that’s how the voice leading works that way too. So I’ve always just thought of it like that
Easy and correct way of thinking
@@cesargomezu1459 to me theirs just a lot more thinking involved with how it’s usually described “go to the V chord, then go a tritone above that chord, and make it a dominant 7th chord”
@@heiro9611 totally. We can deeply understand and that's great, and we can also have a fast practical way of doing it on the spot ✅
That is correct Your just not trying to break it down .. g7 to c r c# 7 to c ….😊
Nice victor baker
Thank you!
Very cool. The diatonic reharm thing is interesting; I've noticed Freddie Hubbard using it in more of a modal approach, e.g. playing an F major triad over B half dim.(II chord in A-minor ii-V-i); if you are thinking of B locrian on the B half. dim., then F major (lydian) can be thought of as a diatonic reharmonization. Of course, the rhythm section could voice the B half dim with C# (super-locrian), so that creates chromatic tension. Interesting topic, thank you!
At 9:45 you called the Fmin7 a “two” but what is that in relation to? It’s the iv to the C and the v to the Bb right? It would be a ii to an Eb but there isn’t one
it's a ii7(two) in relation to the Eb tonality that Bb7 is borrowed from. The Bb7 resolves to a different place (C), but we connect the F-7 to the Bb7 because they share a key. We could call the F-7 the iv of C in the same way we could call call Bb7 the bVII7 of C, but it' easier to think of it as a ii7-V7 in the new key (Eb) which we momentarily drift into.
It’s in relation to deez nuts.