What would YOU do with 6♠ 6♥ on the turn? Your Stack (SB): $69,620 Their Stack (BB): $106,610 Pot: $25,950 Board: 6♣ 5♦ 3♣ 7♣ You check, BB bets 18,000 A) Fold B) Call C) Raise to $36,000 (small) D) Raise to $69,920 (all-in)
I would call with the set. I think a 4 is unlikely and I could see aces, kings, or even queens with one club making that bet and I can always decide to fold if I don't hit a boat and decide he has the flush.
B) call. Definitely call against a battling and aggressive player like LuDa Chris who s for sure calling the min raise on the flop with a wide range and might be betting overpairs with a club or even some floats with Ac as bluffs. The set can very well be behind but nick has outs and can definitely get value on the river if the board pairs.
"When a lot of action happens on the river it doesn't seem like people do much bluffing." This is the most important lesson you have taught me over the years.
DId anyone notice the live tell from Nick V. When he put in that small bet, that hand shake was the excitement of somebody with the nuts. Not 100% accurate of course but enough to just call.
Knowing how Nick plays, it was indeed a good fold by Luda on the river.. however, given the action on the flop, (with Luda getting his pot-sized bet min check-raised), he should have just called the 9k on the river, especially since his flush wasn't a higher one.
super smoo spot on. Luda chris didnt give any regard to the min click raise on the flop and its implication on nick s range. what about the small lead on the river by a player like Nick?! Is it ever a 4? if nick checks the straight on the turn would he ever lead river? Is nick ever block betting 88 or 99 that he somehow min click check raised on the flop and still called a big turn bet with? Alarm bells should definitely have sounded for chris on that lead but he just raised also not thinking of what he’s targetting and can get value from! Only nut flush or better should consider raising river given the action and the opponent type.
Ages ago when only limit was played in california cardrooms I saw at the table next to mine a hand in which it was capped at four bets with four of nine left. The flop was AQ9. It was capped (open and three raises) and all remained. Two passively called it down and two did all the betting. Turn was a deuce and a;ll four remained when it was capped again and this time three of four bet or raised. River was a deuce. Hands:AA, QQ, 99 ...and...22.
Nick is super nitty. He only puts large sums of money at risk with near nut type hands, and he’s been running really well lately. The river raise by Chris wasn’t well thought out. It was more personal than anything else, and a huge misstep.
commonly called Nit Vertucci on the hustler stream chat for a reason lol. Nick basically never ever bluffs the river. And Luda has the tendency to go too loose and not pay attention to table image at times.
A legal raise must as large as the most recent bet/raise. Think of the "delta". If Player A takes the bet from $0 (no bet this round) to $100, the next legal raise must be at least $100 more. So Player B could make it $100 extra ($200 to go), or $150 extra, or $3000 extra, or any amount higher than $100 on top. If, for example, Player B makes it $350 to go (this is a $250 raise), the "delta" is $250, and Player C is obligated to go to at least $250 above that (i.e, "$600 to go"). The exception to all of this is that any player can go all-in at any time, even if the raise would have been less than the minimum described above. So if Player A takes the bet from $0 (no bet) to $100, Player B can go all in for his last $103. In this case if Player C wished to raise, he would be obligated to follow the legal minimum raise that Player A had set; i.e., a "delta" of $100. Also, if Player C, D and E all call the $103, no legal minmum raise has occured, so the action would not be "re-opened". Therefore, when action gets back around to Player A, he would only be allowed to call the extra $3 (or fold), and would not be be allowed to raise again. See: www.pokerrrrapp.com/single-post/minimum-raise-rules-in-no-limit-texas-hold-em
For context, this hand was immediately after Nick felted Luda in 80K pot. The previous hand was even more ridiculous and Luda probably leveled himself (otherwise the river raise is just burning money)! Nick Action: PF: RFI 400 C3B (1000) F: (7 7 3) XR (2K to 6K) T: (5) XC (8K) R: (9) XC (16K) Nick Called down w 43?!?! Luda blasted off w JT??? Them two be battling like crazy ... or just crazy.
thanks for the content bro I really appreciated it.I think the recent games in hustle casino are soft but still a lot of fun to watch.and are u interested in a hand in recently hustle video 200/400/800 1:25:45 when garret value betting full pot with his kq in a (T 2 A J A )flush board I just watched that and I don’t think that’s a good play from garret , and I think he should always check his kq. do u think of that
I would call. If u raise you only get called by better hands. If we call we are still ahead of big overpairs that have a club that could bet this sizing on the turn.
Call. With my stack I'm not going anywhere with a set. I think the flop told a story and polarised ( for me) that Luda has a club draw. That a club came on the turn and he bet confirmed this. I dont need to get into any battles just yet so a raise or All In just wont work
B Call. 18k to win 61k, you need 29% equity,and you only have 10 outs = 23%. So you don’t have direct odds. If opponent has a flush though, it’s going to be difficult for him to fold to a river bet though. So I think you have some implied odds. Maybe 10% block bet the river if you pair up…
It is possible that I'm behind, but I could catch up by board pairing or hitting a case 6. So I'm thinking I have 10 outs to make the effective nutz. My EV is through the roof if I make boat, and the current odds are about even (matching what I think my equity is) with $18K to take a pot of $62K... I have to float even if I think I'm behind. I could be ahead also. Highly doubtful that LudaChris had pocket 4's, 24, or 48 with the initial 3-bet. So I call.
Seems like a standard call. The question is if we call a blank river all in. I think I will do in most cases. Havent heard your opinion... but what a weird river lead. If you lead here if would make it much bigger). This seems now an easy call for his opponent.
I'm calling river. Not raising Nick's range is almost all flopped sets. Flushes we can almost discount entirely -AQ, AK or KQ of clubs prolly won't be so passive preflop. The only real club combos that you beat are 98c. There are almost no small flushes possible except 56, which is now a full 🏡. Therefore, we can narrow to full 🏘️ or bluffs on the river. And a bluff here simply doesn't sound probable at all, since every draw hit. A raise is a huge mistake. No worse hand will call except 98c, and even then he might hero fold.
Thats what happens when people make bad plays : luda s raise on the river is pretty bad and when he realizes he got trapped and didnt think the hand through before raising he goes off at Nick and his “bad luck”. Had he just called like he should have we wouldnt gave heard any of that rant!
See how Luda Chris says he's never good? This is where I think you can make money if you have the guts to 3bet jam rivers like this, as even high stakes players rarely bluff here. They always think you MUST have it. You can realisticaly 3bet rivers against good players and get them to fold very strong hands... Not a play for 1/2 but in games like this, I think this is probably the final frontier of riverplay in live poker in 2022
I'm always just calling the small river bet when the board pairs up, why give money away? Calling the raise the turn was brave and good if you hit the river, but horrible if you miss and don't make the full house.
Luda narrows down Nick's range to 33 55 66 on the river, but is there any chance Nick's range includes something like A9cc? Or did his behavior on previous streets make that unlikely?
Hey Mr Little, you say you dont love a donk on the river becouse (among other reasons) ip is "obviously" going to bet if they have a flush. Is he though? if oop range is mostly flushes and sets, as you said, is it not too thin to valuebet most flushes (like J high flush as is the case)?
Chris’s river raise is terrible. Never getting called by worse, and he’s never good when he gets raised. Just call the block bet, collect chips when you’re good and be glad you got off relatively cheaply when you’re not.
Nick is not a maniac, but given the action any capable player should be able to bluff 67 (or any other hand that severely blocks boats) or too a lesser extent AcX given Chris's turn+river sizing is so flush skewed. Maybe a crafty player could even use a hand with both properties like Ac6x or Ac7x. It's not like these strategies aren't widely known now.
luda chris played this hand, from flop to finish, about as bad as one could play it with a jack high flush draw, lol // you could justify this with nut-flush draw and a pair, but thats about it. and nick... well, he played it like nick would, but i was impressed by his inducement on river lead. would not have min-clicked tho on flop. thats just tacky, maybe 12.5k instead of 10 at least.
Should Nick ever just call river? Since people bluff so rarely should he really expect to be called with worse hands than a full house? Am I too nitty here? Let's omit the part that maybe one of them is a maniac. Since luda criss3-bet we shouldn't be afraid of 55 or 77 like never, right? And maybe very rarely someone would 3-bet with 65s? And there's zero combos possible, right? So do we only expect to be called by Axs of clubs? I'm only discussing this because we're so deep. It's a no brainer at 100-200BB
Look I get that in practice a lot of players will simply never have a bluff here, but 10 to 1 or better is an absolutely absurd price, to the degree that I would just sigh call here. Again in practice we're almost never good but we only need to be good 1 in 11 to break even and I think it is way too exploitable to fold closing the action on the river getting 10 to 1 or better. There is a chance, all be it small, for some opponents to take this line as a sick exploit against us if they expect us to fold getting these odds, and over the long run I think if you simply call always in these spots when getting this absurd of a price you're not giving up a ton.
I mean I guess you're technically correct, but the question is: If we're "sigh calling" then why raise that river at all? We're only ever getting jammed by better hands, and there are so many, and we're probably only getting called by better flushes. The raise is just a greedy "I finally made a good hand in a live game, so I must raise the river." At the river you're basically just bluff catching and beating A5s and over pairs with a spade. Actually such an easy call spot the more you think about it.
Nick is insane politically: he bet *in December 2020* that Trump would be reelected and again *in summer 2022* that Trump would be "reinstated" in August. However, he is on the tight side as a poker player, though not a nit. He is always good here.
I'm calling! IF.....I have 4-6c....🤣.....Guy should have shoved "all-in" when he hit his marginal flush....Not impressed with the play at all....and his "luck" seems to run the way mine does....So? really not impressed.
![RAMPAGE BLUFFS In A $150,000 Pot! [LARGEST Game Of His LIFE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f3eshEYQDko/mqdefault.jpg)
![How To Extract MAX VALUE Against RECREATIONALS [WSOP Main Event]](/img/1.gif)
What would YOU do with 6♠ 6♥ on the turn?
Your Stack (SB): $69,620
Their Stack (BB): $106,610
Pot: $25,950
Board: 6♣ 5♦ 3♣ 7♣
You check, BB bets 18,000
A) Fold
B) Call
C) Raise to $36,000 (small)
D) Raise to $69,920 (all-in)
I would call with the set. I think a 4 is unlikely and I could see aces, kings, or even queens with one club making that bet and I can always decide to fold if I don't hit a boat and decide he has the flush.
Easy call...glad to see you got the board right on paper. In the video, you said the turn is the "Jack of Clubs". :P
Call
B) call. Definitely call against a battling and aggressive player like LuDa Chris who s for sure calling the min raise on the flop with a wide range and might be betting overpairs with a club or even some floats with Ac as bluffs. The set can very well be behind but nick has outs and can definitely get value on the river if the board pairs.
Call
"When a lot of action happens on the river it doesn't seem like people do much bluffing." This is the most important lesson you have taught me over the years.
Also, Nick is not insane. They call him "Nit Vertucci." Though he and Luda Chris really mix it up and have a special dynamic.
Agreed. He is never bluffing.
Unless you're online at America's Cardroom....
It is true almost exclusively because people do too much CALLING. They don't do much bluffing because they do too much calling.
Rampage must’ve seen this message.
DId anyone notice the live tell from Nick V. When he put in that small bet, that hand shake was the excitement of somebody with the nuts. Not 100% accurate of course but enough to just call.
The turn is a jack of clubs? LOL 🤣🤣 that's a weird looking Jack
Once the board pairs, you just call with the middling flush. Silly to reraise.
It's not a reraise. It's just a raise.
Nick is a very solid player. Luda is the insane player. Luda never limps. Any hand he plays he three bets. Runs insane bluffs constantly.
So you're saying Luda's a young Asian male poker player...gotcha.
@@adamwatkins1150 Asian male ages 20 to 60.
Never limping is insane? That sounds pretty fundamentally sound to me.
@@daddyskaddy94why does everyone seem to hate limping?
It's good for gathering data and for trying to get to flops or even turns cheaply
I’d call one time. That was such a brutal turn. Then the river? Chris lit money on fire!
the alarm bell sound in the video made me think the purge was happening in my town
Nick plays pretty straight forward. And doesn’t get out of line. So that play was never a bluff. It was a good fold by Luda !
Knowing how Nick plays, it was indeed a good fold by Luda on the river.. however, given the action on the flop, (with Luda getting his pot-sized bet min check-raised), he should have just called the 9k on the river, especially since his flush wasn't a higher one.
Forsure!
Yeah he beats one hand basically -89clubs. Even 45 clubs is a straight flush and 24 isn't in his range.
He didn't even attempt to sell a bluff, just snap jammed his stack without batting an eye. 😂 Still great read and fold by Luda.
super smoo spot on. Luda chris didnt give any regard to the min click raise on the flop and its implication on nick s range. what about the small lead on the river by a player like Nick?! Is it ever a 4? if nick checks the straight on the turn would he ever lead river? Is nick ever block betting 88 or 99 that he somehow min click check raised on the flop and still called a big turn bet with? Alarm bells should definitely have sounded for chris on that lead but he just raised also not thinking of what he’s targetting and can get value from! Only nut flush or better should consider raising river given the action and the opponent type.
I'd call the turn. I dont think i'd be able to make myself fold the second highest set, but hey, that's why i'm here watching your videos
If the players in the hands were reversed, Nick would probably have to find a call because Chris is in fact insane.
I think the min raise is purely the player dynamics in this particular scenario. Nick is definitely not insane 😂
As soon as the board pairs on the river we are happy to just call his donk bet, even with the nut flush.
I could pick up tells on the guy after that 5 hit on the river!!!
Ages ago when only limit was played in california cardrooms I saw at the table next to mine a hand in which it was capped at four bets with four of nine left. The flop was AQ9. It was capped (open and three raises) and all remained. Two passively called it down and two did all the betting. Turn was a deuce and a;ll four remained when it was capped again and this time three of four bet or raised. River was a deuce. Hands:AA, QQ, 99 ...and...22.
I would call all day. Hard for me to let go off a set in that spot. Thanks, JL.
Luda Chris is completely insane and he and Nick are constantly battling, so I do not mind his value-raise on the river given his image.
Luda Nick vs. Chris V. 😂
Nick's hands were shaking like crazy on the river.
yeah and he checked his cards as well🤣 body language told me everything I needed to know
mine only shake with insane value... bluffing never gets my adrenaline up.
@@jack42011 it's that way for most people. Usually a dead giveaway
@@jack42011 True. Bluffers don’t shake.
Is that David Tuchman with the commentary?
Nick is super nitty. He only puts large sums of money at risk with near nut type hands, and he’s been running really well lately. The river raise by Chris wasn’t well thought out. It was more personal than anything else, and a huge misstep.
commonly called Nit Vertucci on the hustler stream chat for a reason lol. Nick basically never ever bluffs the river. And Luda has the tendency to go too loose and not pay attention to table image at times.
hello can someone please explain to me how to calculate the minimum re-raise post flop (*note: I am not getting betting confused with raising)
A legal raise must as large as the most recent bet/raise. Think of the "delta". If Player A takes the bet from $0 (no bet this round) to $100, the next legal raise must be at least $100 more. So Player B could make it $100 extra ($200 to go), or $150 extra, or $3000 extra, or any amount higher than $100 on top. If, for example, Player B makes it $350 to go (this is a $250 raise), the "delta" is $250, and Player C is obligated to go to at least $250 above that (i.e, "$600 to go").
The exception to all of this is that any player can go all-in at any time, even if the raise would have been less than the minimum described above. So if Player A takes the bet from $0 (no bet) to $100, Player B can go all in for his last $103. In this case if Player C wished to raise, he would be obligated to follow the legal minimum raise that Player A had set; i.e., a "delta" of $100. Also, if Player C, D and E all call the $103, no legal minmum raise has occured, so the action would not be "re-opened". Therefore, when action gets back around to Player A, he would only be allowed to call the extra $3 (or fold), and would not be be allowed to raise again.
See: www.pokerrrrapp.com/single-post/minimum-raise-rules-in-no-limit-texas-hold-em
Thank you so much
I don't understand the min raise on the flop. What draws would you want to do that with to balance your range?
are you born 54 and thinking like that? if yes , my respect is yours!
Almost none. I don't think Nick is balanced here, but it would take alot of hours with him to know for sure.
the same guy leads the river for 0.15x pot when he boats up... dont expect any logical consistency
For context, this hand was immediately after Nick felted Luda in 80K pot. The previous hand was even more ridiculous and Luda probably leveled himself (otherwise the river raise is just burning money)!
Nick Action:
PF: RFI 400 C3B (1000)
F: (7 7 3) XR (2K to 6K)
T: (5) XC (8K)
R: (9) XC (16K)
Nick Called down w 43?!?!
Luda blasted off w JT???
Them two be battling like crazy ... or just crazy.
I think I have to call here to avoid being bluffed off these spots too much. I can also improve on the river.
I’m flatting the 18K bet and hoping the board pairs
On the river Nick’s hand was shaking like a sapling 😂😂😂😂
Call and evaluate river
thanks for the content bro I really appreciated it.I think the recent games in hustle casino are soft but still a lot of fun to watch.and are u interested in a hand in recently hustle video 200/400/800 1:25:45 when garret value betting full pot with his kq in a (T 2 A J A )flush board
I just watched that and I don’t think that’s a good play from garret , and I think he should always check his kq. do u think of that
I would call. If u raise you only get called by better hands. If we call we are still ahead of big overpairs that have a club that could bet this sizing on the turn.
Call. With my stack I'm not going anywhere with a set. I think the flop told a story and polarised ( for me) that Luda has a club draw. That a club came on the turn and he bet confirmed this. I dont need to get into any battles just yet so a raise or All In just wont work
call and pray for the board to pair!
B Call. 18k to win 61k, you need 29% equity,and you only have 10 outs = 23%. So you don’t have direct odds. If opponent has a flush though, it’s going to be difficult for him to fold to a river bet though. So I think you have some implied odds. Maybe 10% block bet the river if you pair up…
11:28 “Turn is the J of ♣️” , correction JL, 7♣️. ✅
As much as I'd like to say fold cuz i know I'm in trouble I'm not foldy enough to fold here.
Call
call 4 sure
It is possible that I'm behind, but I could catch up by board pairing or hitting a case 6. So I'm thinking I have 10 outs to make the effective nutz. My EV is through the roof if I make boat, and the current odds are about even (matching what I think my equity is) with $18K to take a pot of $62K... I have to float even if I think I'm behind. I could be ahead also. Highly doubtful that LudaChris had pocket 4's, 24, or 48 with the initial 3-bet. So I call.
I for sure would call with the price that I'm getting.
Lol I’m commenting as I’m watching and no nick is not insane he is a nit lol that raise on the river was ridiculous
Seems like a standard call. The question is if we call a blank river all in. I think I will do in most cases. Havent heard your opinion... but what a weird river lead. If you lead here if would make it much bigger). This seems now an easy call for his opponent.
If his name is LudaChris, he’s probably going to 3 bet a ton… lol
Call I got outs
I'm calling river. Not raising Nick's range is almost all flopped sets. Flushes we can almost discount entirely -AQ, AK or KQ of clubs prolly won't be so passive preflop. The only real club combos that you beat are 98c. There are almost no small flushes possible except 56, which is now a full 🏡. Therefore, we can narrow to full 🏘️ or bluffs on the river. And a bluff here simply doesn't sound probable at all, since every draw hit. A raise is a huge mistake. No worse hand will call except 98c, and even then he might hero fold.
call
i don't think i'll ever be good enough to fold there, not with those pot odds
Imagine getting angry at your opponents luck when u hit a jack high flush on the turn.
I'd be mad
imagine having emotions playing in a 150k+ pot.
@@michielankersmit8656 Chris getting bitchy at nick for getting lucky when he got lucky first . Just disingenuous. J10s and you got your flush 👏 😂
Thats what happens when people make bad plays : luda s raise on the river is pretty bad and when he realizes he got trapped and didnt think the hand through before raising he goes off at Nick and his “bad luck”. Had he just called like he should have we wouldnt gave heard any of that rant!
See how Luda Chris says he's never good? This is where I think you can make money if you have the guts to 3bet jam rivers like this, as even high stakes players rarely bluff here. They always think you MUST have it. You can realisticaly 3bet rivers against good players and get them to fold very strong hands... Not a play for 1/2 but in games like this, I think this is probably the final frontier of riverplay in live poker in 2022
I'd be very sick that I checked-minraised the flop and call wondering why would I have to do such a silly, fancy looking play on the flop
I think if I was in this spot I would go all in because I think my opponent will have high presents for a drew and only a faw nut hands
I'm always just calling the small river bet when the board pairs up, why give money away? Calling the raise the turn was brave and good if you hit the river, but horrible if you miss and don't make the full house.
Luda narrows down Nick's range to 33 55 66 on the river, but is there any chance Nick's range includes something like A9cc? Or did his behavior on previous streets make that unlikely?
The river raise is way too thin. Well I'm pretty sure it's negative value. You never get called by worse (not even 8c5c).
Yo is that dude getting his chest rubbed at 1:05?
Hey Mr Little, you say you dont love a donk on the river becouse (among other reasons) ip is "obviously" going to bet if they have a flush. Is he though? if oop range is mostly flushes and sets, as you said, is it not too thin to valuebet most flushes (like J high flush as is the case)?
I would think flushes bet.
Might be the biggest pot on this game but they have huge games on fridays with much bigger pots
He is frequently called "Nit" Vertucci
I hate Luda’s river raise for endless reasons
Chris’s river raise is terrible. Never getting called by worse, and he’s never good when he gets raised. Just call the block bet, collect chips when you’re good and be glad you got off relatively cheaply when you’re not.
good fold. but when you are wrong there its a disaster right?^^
You are getting great odds, so it is - but it's very hard to be wrong in this spot!
That river raise with the jt makes less than 0 sense. The donk lead was the thing that should have gotten him cursing and into a 3 minute tank.
these are surprisingly soft games
Tables with stacks this big are rarely Nit Fests.
Every game is pretty soft if you play well. Anyone can be beat even the people on this poker site.
I think I'd call unless I thought the guy really liked his hand.
Nick is not a maniac, but given the action any capable player should be able to bluff 67 (or any other hand that severely blocks boats) or too a lesser extent AcX given Chris's turn+river sizing is so flush skewed. Maybe a crafty player could even use a hand with both properties like Ac6x or Ac7x. It's not like these strategies aren't widely known now.
Lol think about preflop. Nick doesn't get to the flop with A6o.
i made the same mistake once. writh turn nuts straight
i didn't fold
Luda made an emotional raise on the river. he wanted to get back his money from nick in one hand. Ludas ego lost him more money on that river raise
The massage while playing tilts me
You get tilted easy.
It was a joke
@@alexleiner5625 Ah!
B
luda chris played this hand, from flop to finish, about as bad as one could play it with a jack high flush draw, lol // you could justify this with nut-flush draw and a pair, but thats about it. and nick... well, he played it like nick would, but i was impressed by his inducement on river lead. would not have min-clicked tho on flop. thats just tacky, maybe 12.5k instead of 10 at least.
If he has an overpair a bet on that river is awful
Should Nick ever just call river? Since people bluff so rarely should he really expect to be called with worse hands than a full house? Am I too nitty here? Let's omit the part that maybe one of them is a maniac. Since luda criss3-bet we shouldn't be afraid of 55 or 77 like never, right? And maybe very rarely someone would 3-bet with 65s? And there's zero combos possible, right? So do we only expect to be called by Axs of clubs? I'm only discussing this because we're so deep. It's a no brainer at 100-200BB
Look I get that in practice a lot of players will simply never have a bluff here, but 10 to 1 or better is an absolutely absurd price, to the degree that I would just sigh call here. Again in practice we're almost never good but we only need to be good 1 in 11 to break even and I think it is way too exploitable to fold closing the action on the river getting 10 to 1 or better. There is a chance, all be it small, for some opponents to take this line as a sick exploit against us if they expect us to fold getting these odds, and over the long run I think if you simply call always in these spots when getting this absurd of a price you're not giving up a ton.
Okay it's actually around 9 to 1 but I don't think it's enough of a difference for me to change my mind on what I would do here.
I mean I guess you're technically correct, but the question is: If we're "sigh calling" then why raise that river at all? We're only ever getting jammed by better hands, and there are so many, and we're probably only getting called by better flushes. The raise is just a greedy "I finally made a good hand in a live game, so I must raise the river." At the river you're basically just bluff catching and beating A5s and over pairs with a spade. Actually such an easy call spot the more you think about it.
Haz I wasn't the player in the hand that raised the river lol. I'm analyzing the decision as played.
Johnathan, you say Jack instead of seven at 11:30. Thnx.
How was that a hard decision the board paired up his flush is not the nuts he's not favorable to win of course he made the right read 😉
Easy flat
You are such a cool mother f****r. Love the vids. Keep them coming please.
Nick is insane politically: he bet *in December 2020* that Trump would be reelected and again *in summer 2022* that Trump would be "reinstated" in August. However, he is on the tight side as a poker player, though not a nit. He is always good here.
Flaaat
I don’t like snapshove. I think Nick should have tanked at least a little.
Call, sets are too strong to fold.
Agreed!
Luda chris is a complete psycho I think he min clicked him to tilt him they have like a huge rivalry
how not to use a mask 101
I'm calling! IF.....I have 4-6c....🤣.....Guy should have shoved "all-in" when he hit his marginal flush....Not impressed with the play at all....and his "luck" seems to run the way mine does....So? really not impressed.
didn't Nick V run a real estate scam?
John, do you play with guys like this table? You would seem out of place with tattoo guy and drug dealer guy.
Yes.
Oh come on, is the clickbait title really necessary?
Perhaps, because there can only be one.
Call
Call