Should You Buy a 2025 Mazda CX-70? Thorough Review By A Mechanic
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
- A Mechanic Reviews the 2025 Mazda Should You Buy One?
In this video we take a look at the Latest Mazda CX-70. We start with a proper technical review under the hood.
Then we look at the exterior and interior. Then we talk about some things we don't like about it.
TCCN Automotive Inc.
Toyota and Lexus Specialist Repair
Visit www.tccnautomotive.com to schedule your appointment today.
Recommended Tools:
Basic Scan Tool amzn.to/3Jm6aom
Very good DIY Scan Tool amzn.to/3zF7dvH
Advanced Scan tool amzn.to/3q3L3QQ
Spill Free Coolant Replacement Funnel amzn.to/3uJfKxm
Sun roof drain cleaning tool amzn.to/3GMDlQ9
Good DIY Torque Wrench 1/2" amzn.to/3gE9bnw
Wireless Apple CarPlay for Toyota\Lexus amzn.to/3uKElSo
Very Good Triple Camera Borescope amzn.to/3MrgFs0
*as an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Follow the channel on Social Media :
/ thecarcarenut
/ thecarcarenut
Check out the channel Merch store
/ @thecarcarenut
Make a one time donation to the channel:
www.paypal.me/CCNdonate
Check out the amazon store:
www.amazon.com/shop/thecarcarenut
*as an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
#thecarcarenut #tccnautomotive #Mazda #mazdacx70
0:00 Intro
0:32 Under The Hood
11:43 Interior and Exterior
18:11 Should You Buy One? 
Авто/Мото
Can’t wait for the cx-65 the 1 row suv
😂
LOL
How about the CX 62.5 with just the driver's seat?
@@chibbyylol Mazda-4. minus 4 wheels
😂😂😂
I didn't notice it until about halfway through the video, but I like the filming method using the green lighting on the background. It makes objects in the foreground really pop. Keep up the great work. I am currently shopping for a new car (I am leaning toward a Honda Pilot, but... $$$), and I love these videos. They help out so much.
The CX-70 seems like such a missed opportunity. All they needed was to shorten it a little bit. My wife hates the size of the CX-90 but I want the mild hybrid system that you can't get with the CX-5/CX-50.
I think the CX-60 is your answer however the CX-60 isn't coming to the states, only Europe and Australia from my understanding
I think they are so behind on tech. I love Mazda and my mazda3 2019, but they really have got to jump on the hybrid train sooner than later. They need time to develop and gain reputatoon
I lovr my cx90. Its a gem!!!
They have a CX80 in other markets with a third row, they just needed to bring that over and remove the third row and bam
@@Atenza5 Isn't the 70 the same thing as the 80 minutes the 3rd row? The 70 is just the 60 for the NA market.
I don't have children. At most, with friends, I would have 5 people in my car and that's incredibly rare. But I'm a skier and will often drive 2 or 3 of us with a ton of gear on 6 hour road trips. While currently driving a CX-5, those are the times I wish I had more cargo space. That's what makes the CX-70 so tempting for me. If more than 5 people are going somewhere, we can just take a second car. Folding down a third row means there's still a third row taking up valuable space. Even having removable seats doesn't work for me with very limited space to store them. Sure, I wish the 70 offered unique styling and lower pricing than the 90, but it's understandable why they did it this way.
The whole reason I got the 70, I have no use at all for a third row but I can definitely use the space, and I like the feel of the big car. I also understand the naming, it’s for a different audience, makes it easier to search and talk about
That is the demographic they are going for. But price it accordingly. They are using the "remove third row option" to increase margin. There is still a path forward and that is to introduce a CX60 which is a two row, and in between the size of this and the CX50. I think they came out with this as a large two row premium SUV and didn't want to have to retool all new chassis and interior components. Mazda has to reuse as much of their designs as possible to economize. After all, they aren't the size of Toyota.
Great review as always . Personally I don’t see an issue with CX-70 having only two rows , grand Cherokee, Subaru Outback and 4Runner are similar size vehicles and come in two rows of seats. The only vehicles that have a usable 3rd row are minivans or very large SUV’s , I just don’t see the point of a 3rd row where only small children can sit. I would pick CX 70 over CX 90.
I wouldn’t need the third row ever, I’ve considered this to replace my CX50. We store a lot of stuff in the trunk lol especially a massage table since my wife does mobile massage and we need all the space possible. That table never leaves and we shop at Costco pretty often. Might be most ideal for us unlike other families lol
It might have more room to negotiate on price too since most people will get the CX 90.
I prefer this with only two row, although, I may be in the minority.
@@Papolucho702 If I were you, I'd go for the CX-90 and just fold down the 3rd row. The resale value might be better as well because of the presence of that 3rd row. Mazda has some good finance and lease deals right now for the 90.
if you have lug around a lot of things, get a truck
AMD has a good point. If you wanted a 2-row SUV they could have made it smaller. Otherwise get a cx-90 and just fold down rear seat and bam you have the same amount of storage as cx-70 lol
Mobile massage? Nice. I’m sure it’s a legit massage. Wink wink.
As someone who wants a cx-70 I will explain the difference to me. First it has a sportier look nicer wheels and less chrome compared to the 90. Also I only have 2 kids so I don’t need a 3rd row. But we do take trips and have a dog so we need the cargo room. For me it’s perfect. Also the 70 doesn’t have the cloth stitching on the dash like the 90 does. Lastly getting a floor mat for the back is easier since it’s only one size. If there was a third row it would make the mat either too small or it would have to be rolled up. Anyway. Looking forward to getting one soon. Great review
This is a terrific looking SUV. Hats off to Mazda for staying in the game and now increasing in popularity.
The fact that Mazda is dropping start/stop and cylinder deactivation makes me want another one. Not this one but another. Thank you love the reviews. Great presentation.
I saw that about the CX 5 on this channel. I guess it’s across-the-board. I thought it was a temporary thing. Do you know if they are dropping it for good? I’m possibly looking at a CX 5 for my wife and do not want it.
That was only for the 2023 due to the chip shortage! It will be back for sure due to EPA requirements.
@@gregjoubert5118 Not sure. They can say what they want about the shortages but they have problems and are costing the company money in warranty work. I have not yet met someone who says they are looking for one with it lol. Go naturally aspirated if they have it. I think they just don't want to admit to the failures out loud. They all have that 2.5 and ours has been flawless. Really nice vehicles.
@@gregjoubert5118 Agreed . I just bought a turbo cx5 no istop or cylinder deactivation . Buy now , as new unproven model out next year .
@gregjoubert5118 I recently bought a 2024 CX5 (non-turbo) and it has istop/cylinder deactivation. Manufactured in Japan in April 2024. Might be different for turbo models.
I went to look at one this past weekend. I can't get over the fact that they left the CX-90 3rd row cup holders in the CX-70.
Great for tailgating
Great for laying in the boot, hatch open with a couple of drinks on the beach
They didn't leave the cup holders
@@jstrig they did
@@XX-166 No, they didn't. Look again. They took out the cupholders but left the area where the cupholders were for storage.
it's almost like a CX-90 but without the 3rd row. i hope he mentions that throughout the video...
I think Mazda didn't have the funds to make a drastically different model here. They probably decided it was more cost effective to use what they already designed and just delete the 3rd row. It's still a beautiful looking vehicle, but I was expecting a slightly longer and wider version of the CX-60.
exactly 💯
They have CX-80 which is a shorter version of CX70/90. It's a better option then CX-70.
@@GooseVan ... I think most people were expecting the CX60 with the same powertrains as the CX90. I don't really know why they decided against that, but with the amount of negative feedback, the Mazda CX70 may be shortlived and we may eventually get the CX60/80 here in N.A.
not true. they got CX60 in other regions, which is a shorter full-size SUV.
@@GooseVan Cx80 is like CX5 with more cargo space, but CX70 is wider and longer and they have CX9 until 2023 don't need the CX80 for USA.
The appeal was that they can market this as a 2 row and make it automatically the largest 2 row available - think ford edge, chevy blazer, grand cherokee, ect. It's pure marketing
Exactly.
Honda Passport bigger
@@christianebernardo not a chance
I like the fact that it only has two rows, most people don't need three, but yet still has plenty of room in the back.
Ive test drove the CX70.I liked this one due to the size and not having the third row.I didnt care for the CX5,nice but to small.So I think Mazda did a great job for creating this larger size in a two.Some people liked the larger size SUV.Plus it looks amazing very classy
Love that you are willing to state the obvious to Mazda while other reviewers are too afraid. WTF Mazda?!?
Which reviewers were too afraid to state the obvious? Every review I’ve seen only mentions the obvious and nothing else
@@garrettw99 Redline reviews, Straight Pipes and Automotive Press. There are others as well. Most indicate it’s the same then try to hype the 2 major differences. I like Mazda, own a cx-5, but they mailed it in on the 70. Gold Pony just released his review yesterday. Haven’t watched it so not sure what he’s saying….
@@lss-jprep4980 well yeah. It’s easy to make a video like this, which only repeats for 20 minutes “this is just a CX-90. Whose idea was this?”. It shows you put more effort in your videos if you don’t state the obvious and incessantly repeat it throughout the video. But I agree this car is gonna flop if they don’t at least lower the price.
But he does not do it to Toyota. Didn't he encourage people to buy the Tundra when he showed his, despite the massive recall that hasn't even given a solution to fix the engine grenade? This dude is a biased clown.
@@passZword he said in the beginning of that video that he is a mechanic and it isn’t a big deal to him if anything on the car breaks. He has access to parts. Reliability isn’t everything, contrary to what Toyota fanboys think
Another great detailed video as usual. I gotta say I love that it doesn’t have a third row if you want a third row get a minivan. Minivans are great for that. These so-called sport utility vehicles, (station wagons), need some sort of utility and no third seat gives you a lower floor.
Agreed.
always appreciate and enjoy your review!
3rd row delete was smart. Families with more than 3 kids are very rare nowadays. So you get the utility of being able to actually store things in the back of the vehicle. This with the hybrid system design makes this extremely compelling. I might be able to afford this on the used market in 6 years.
AMD, The CX-70 and CX-90 seem like a work in progress but I nonetheless look forward to the CX-80 with two and a half rows. 😉🤣
that would be so sick 🤩🤩
Volume is volume. Folding down a third row seat doesn't make it disappear. You're using the space you could otherwise be using to haul stuff.
There's less than a sq foot of storage the the cubby underneath. Probably a couple pickle ball paddles and pickle balls. The value of a third row compared to empty space is way more. The CX-70 should be cheaper by a lot.
@@Rockytop8118 The total volume of the third row seat is less than a square foot? Sounds like you misplaced a decimal point in the metric conversion.
@@coalbuster the cubby underneath isn't the same size as what the seat would fit under. For whatever reason Mazda didn't make the cubby in the 70 as big.
@@Rockytop8118 I don't understand why they would do that. Seems like a mistake or at least a missed opportunity. My point is CCN said why would you want a large SUV without a third-row seat. I can think of a lot of reasons. Mainly, I want to use the space they fold down into for storage or, for removable seats (which I had for my van), I don't want to have to store them in my garage.
Here in the Dallas market, CX-90s are being discounted $4000-5000. CX-70s are barely being discounted at all. Seems like more than enough reason for me to live with an unused 3rd row
It's worth pointing out that Mazdas are still assembled in Japan unlike most Toyotas, Nissans and Hondas.
CX-50 says Hi!
@@JoseDiaz-qw7mg cx-30 says hi!
@@nesmith2621The CX-30 we get here in the UK is Japanese built.
Mazda 3 sedan also says hey! 👋🏽
@@jdmguy44 in America, CX 30 and 50 are made in the US and Mazda 3 are made in Mexivo
I don’t quite understand why you don’t understand why someone would want a CX 90 with only two rows. This is exactly what we’d want! A large SUV with large cargo space instead of a third row. We’re empty nesters who like road trips. More cargo space is what we need.
seriously considering this, can't wait to watch the review!
Me and my wife just bought one and it’s just us. We find ourselves hauling large stuff from time to time and really wanted a big car without feeling like we’re in a soccer mom car. This does have a more sporty look to it compared to the CX-90 and we fell absolutely in love with the melting copper paint on the turbo s premium trim. Now, we have been eyeing down this car before the reveal and we were disappointed in it being the exact same size as the CX-90 because we did hope for something on the smaller end (CX-60 size would have been perfect), but it’s so fun to handle and doesn’t feel as big as it actually is when it comes to the driving dynamics. I know they left the cup holders in the back, which I also initially gave crap about, but I actually think they’re useful and why not? Better than open space when you already have such a large trunk. I also find all the storage space amazing for organizing the car underneath for where the 3rd row would have been. Overall, I’m really happy with the purchase (first Mazda owner) and I’m excited to see what they’ll do next with the line up for upcoming models.
If these start to get marked down at the end of the year my friend might pick one up but at the current prices of the CX-70 probably not
Great review, but too expensive. Love the background lighting.
The purpose of the 70 is to make it sportier w/o all the chrome and the extra row AND still maintain the cargo space. Genius! Super sharp and appealing.
But its's not sportier. It's not any lighter, nimbler or "sportier." No adjustments to the powertrain or suspension to reflect that. It has black accents, chrome wheels, and different vents and that does not make anything sportier. It appears darker, but you can pay an auto shop a few hundred dollars to black out your accents and come out paying less for more in the CX-90 given the better discounts and offers at this point.
@Rockytop8118 Agree to disagree. It's much better looking w/o all the chrome and the altered front. I find it a waste of time to buy a brand new car and then go to a shop to make it look how you want.
Such a well informed review. The vehicle is beautiful and innovative. I appreciate your attention to detail in the review. Blessings!
I have a CX90. The rear door really does open 90°. Not as big inside or out as many might think. So far I'm happy with it.
I was really, really on the fence about getting one; I just can't bring myself to support the subscription-based model for features.
Let us know how many doors you ding in parking lots opening that puppy all the way 😁
@@James-il3tq It sort of feels like a minivan.
Thanks really help your expertise and educated opinion and knowledge on vehicles, especially a Mazda.
There is one very simple reason why Mazda saw fit to create a new model designation for the CX-90 without a third row: in the US auto market, there are almost no SUVs offered with 2 or 3 rows of seating. An automaker is more inclined to offer two different models than one model with both options.
Thank you!! … For calling it what it is every time. Mazda said and enthusiasts were waiting for the cx70 to be a cx60 but bigger not a cx90 at same size, minus 3rd row seats and dechromimg the grill
3rd row is not for everyone or for every situation but how often you use all that cargo room
I prefer a larger SUV with only two rows of seating. I may be in the minority.
exactly! I have the cx9 for 6+ years now. I used 3rd row 3 times, and all those times wouldn;t be a big deal to not have the 3rd row. I do need larger cargo space for our road trips.
That is the point he was trying to make in the video, why does this car exist when you can spend the same amount of money on the model up and for those rare occasions you might need a 3rd row you have it.
The CX70 has no Chrome and front end is more aggressive looking.
IKEA, airport with luggage, Costco, Golf and Hockey, and the list goes on. And that's only me not including my wife's need transferring stuff from storage.
The CX5 is their bread and butter . If they just made it a tad bigger in the back and made a hybrid version they would have a home run . They definitely drop the ball on the CX70 I predict they will be selling them at deep discounts in the near future .
It would also be great if Mazda made a truck in the US, I would be interested in that .
My family is very tall. Would have loved this if they kept the cx90 size but rearranged everything to give more legroom in the 1st and 2nd rows and move the door pillar back as well.
Id like one but with the straight 6 without a turbo in a lower trim model, i'm ok with 230-250hp in this vehicle, im not racing anyone and im not flooring it to the red light plainly in sight 100 yards from me like half the morons on the road.
Not a bad idea for a base model. But with ever stricter government regulations manufacturers are bring forced into lower displacement engines without turbos. So a base model with this would probably be their 2.5L turbo.
"Why would anyone buy a two row large SUV?" - AMD, I can answer that question because that's exactly what I'm going to do. My wife and I are close to 60 years old and have no kids. We do, however, have two medium sized (60 lbs) dogs. The dogs go with us everywhere so we need a vehicle that can carry two dogs crates side by side in the cargo area and still have room for suitcases, a cooler, extra dog crates for the hotel, event site, camp site,, etc. in the 2nd row (which we always fold down flat). Right now I have a minivan, but am looking for a vehicle with a nicer build, more luxury, and more tech. The next vehicle I get will be a new GX 550 (when dealers have available stock) - specifically the 2 row Overtrail trim.
So, while I may not represent a large percentage of the population, just know that there are still quite a few people like me that consider a 3rd row to be a negative, even if they can be folded down. Because when folded down, the third row still occupies cargo space that I'd rather have.
Oh, and as for resale value, when you keep vehicles for 10 years and 150,000+ miles like I do the difference in resale value between a 3 row and 2 row SUV is negligible.
I know it's just psychological, but I would choose the CX-70 over the 90 just because a third row seat, even folded, gives me the vibe that I'm driving a school bus rather than a near-luxury car.
Lol, same vehicle , except 2 rows vs 3 rows. I think the cx 60 would have been better
I drive a vehicle with a third row, and I've never had passengers in that row. I keep those seats flat, so that I can have more storage. If I could have bought my particular vehicle without a third row, I would have rather done that. I may be in the minority, but I prefer the larger SUV without a third row. As far as pricing, I agree with Car Care Nut.
I just bought one Saturday. I love it! But for the phev I wish it Was longer range
Ahmed, keepin' it real !!! Thank you. Ahmed, I hate cars that turn off and on when they come to a stop. Am I stupid? When engines turn off and on do they really save energy? Are they really better for emissions, gas mileage, and the environment? Somehow I doubt it.
Your not stupid it's a waste. Thankfully Mazda is starting to drop the tech. Otherwise they really are nice cars.
Yes they do save fuel and reduce emissions by shutting down.
I would think that turning off the engine, especially in a hybrid, will reduce emissions. I have a RAV4 hybrid and in heavy traffic I appreciate that that engine turns off. I can then creep forward slowly on battery. This is much more relaxing and quiet. Now in larger pickups, non hybrid, with this turn off feature it gets really annoying to have the big V8 shut off at every stop sign.
I have 2024 Audi Q5.. and this reminds me of it.. even the seat controllers are the same, the trunk is the same design..
The Q5 is superior to this
@@lilred1107 I agree.
@@lilred1107Don’t get me wrong: I love Audi (it’s my favorite luxury brand), but Mazda is more reliable from a maintenance standpoint. You also get 80-90% of the Audi for 20-30% less. Some people may be willing to splurge for the Audi, but others might go for the Mazda as a value proposition.
@JBM425 I agree with you on the reliability, however Mazda has some ways to go to truly get the luxury cachet down. Their approach for all vehicles is sporty with the CX70/90 having a luxury look and it stops there, there needs to be a true feel of luxury from the ride,handling and even browsing through the infotainment system (to which Mazda's is trash at this point)
@@JBM425 I think Audis are getting up there.. my last on lasted to 95K miles.. no issues.. I did all the regular oil changes, etc.. the 2.0T engine is really good in my opinion.
I know Toyota and Lexus is the most reliable, BUT I refuse to play the dealership game its ridiculous. And if you are in Toronto, Toyotas and Lexus being on the car theft hit list definitely makes Mazdas more appealing. Not to mention Mazda's interior is on par with Lexus.
I am so glad they did their own thing vs using the Toyota drive train.
I'd love a two row large SUV. I have a Tahoe - the third row is useless to me, and takes up a bunch of cargo space. Yes it's odd to call this Mazda a different model, but i don't see what the drama is all about.
I find the fact that the front end is slightly more appealing and sportier than the CX 90, and the availability of a bench seat in second row would make me select the CX 70 over the CX 90
I've had the PHEV for a year and drive in EV mode in town. It's always very quiet, as quiet as my Cayenne. EV mode is designed to drive in town which you don't really the engine to kick in, there are 2-3 seconds delay for the engine to kick in if you push really hard. If you want engine to assist more frequently for passing, you should drive in normal mode and it's very seamless for engine to kick in and shutdown, you may not even notice it unless you watch the tach.
We have 2nd row captain chairs. Recently rode with 5; used the 3rd row. Those passengers said it was comfortable.
Apart from the base model cx90 the seating is 2 in the front 2 in the middle and 2 in the back. If you want to have 5 people in the car you HAVE to use the 3rd row.
The cx-70 is the only way to go
Add-on: Mazda recommended Premium Fuel, Base line trim don't have wireless Android Auto/Car Play on 60k CAD car. Last thing, it hold 70L fuel so don't surprise when you go gas station or your EV range drop fast. The most questioning thing people asking is: " why they have 4 cup holder in the back of row seat on cx-70?
Because all they did wall pull the 3rd row seats out of the CX90 and rebadged it as the CX70. In the process, they were too lazy to finish the job and left the CX90 trim with the cup holders.
Premium fuel is a deal breaker for me. Thanks for the info.
@@MissDemeanor-1look again, they’re not cup holders.
@@joychung3639 they recommend premium fuel in the PHEV? With the non-turbo 4cyl? Or just in the turbo charged 3.3l 6cyl?
@@watchmanonthewall14Premium fuel recommended, not required like their 2.5L turbo. All you lose is a tiny bit of torque on regular fuel.
Cool to hear you differentiate between the gas engine and electric motor. Years ago an engineer corrected me on the difference. Never even thought about it, I guess a motor moves and an engine produces power. So is a transmission a motor? Beats me.
You buy a large two row SUV so you don't feel like Gulliver when you get in it and you don't have to drive a marching band around.
So I have a Passport (2021), and it versus the Pilot is a very similar comparison with the Mazda.; The Passport at that time was a couple of grand more. So, your question is why sacrifice the third row? Well for one I'm single, and I wanted the J35 engine. I don't need video monitors in the backseat, nor do I want them. I don't need a com device to talk to ppl in the back rows. I just wanted a reliable, spacious Crossover that wasn't designed to haul around kids. It's really that simple, and worth every extra peeny imo. Now, only if it was two door.
The Passport is a "chopped" Pilot, ie several inches shorter, no? That's not the case here.
The advantage in the Passport is the shorter length and true 5-passenger making it more focused. In the Mazda case, it has the same CX-90 w/o the 3rd row.
@@WScott-gd2mj good point
@@ag4eng yea good point
It’s been my third week of owning CX70 GT-P (inline 6) and I am so happy with this beauty.
Yes, it is not perfect. But its imperfections feel like imperfections of youth. Yes, the solution around newly acquired space at the back is quite immature. Okay. But it’s a damn beauty in its imperfections. It clearly stands out on any parking lot next to way more mature and expensive cars.
X5 (G05) does not seem an obvious choice to me anymore, moreover they get truly ugly in a couple of recent restylings)
Mazda needs to understand the premium and luxury space includes soft riding suspension and steering, as well as thicker glass for sound deadening even on base trims. They have some ways to go and should not be commanding the price they ask for this or the "CX90".
Have you looked inside of a Lexus lately. This Mazda has way more luxury so I'd say Lexus needs to catch up
The suspension definitely is a weak point. I confirmed the rather unrefined ride with a test drive. If Mazda claims they are now a luxury car maker, then make that ride more refined and smoother. I told the dealer this after I took a 30 minute test ride of the CX-60 here in Finland. I was quite disappointed. The unrefined suspension makes me question purchasing the vehicle.
@@v60polestar88 this is a serious reaction and questions: WTF. really? so, no go for a lexus? I am thinking of an RX
@@lsj6721Nope on the Lexus. Lexus interiors use to be a thing of beauty but over the last 5 years they just look like regular Toyota interiors with a few upgrades. The Mazda was designed from the ground up to be a premium vehicle will Lexus are basic Toyotas with add ons like lament front glass and some extra bells and whistles but it’s still basically a regular Toyota. I own a 2015 RX350 and it never felt like a luxury vehicle. Just a premium Toyota
@@v60polestar88 Thank you for this information
that slip up at the beginning tho.. I see what you did there Amidi hahaha
I love the choice of 2-row and 3-row. I'm not counting the price difference. I like the drivetrain design. Great review.
As ever, calling it as it is. Thanks
thank you very much.
I had to bail out on this review because of the constant cx90 reference. We all know it's the same and we all scratch our heads.
However I think this vehicle is a great opportunity to discuss mazdas greatest challenge. CAFE standards. It's why we don't get the cx 60 like other countries, and why it's very likely that the next cx5 will only have the PHEV engine on offer.
Just a thought. I'm a big fan of your channel. Thanks for your reviews and knowledge.
But that's a government regulation issue. I'm assuming you would like that to change, but how can a RUclipsr change anything like that?
@Play4Vida a utuber cant change anything. But it does answer the question as to why mazda made the 70 instead of giving us the cx60 we all want.
There's a big demand for mid size 2 row suv with big power.
By re badging the 90 it sets up performance platforms for the future.
I don't understand your review this is one gorgeous machine it's in competition with a Honda passport with your blows away interior engine beautiful car great riding car too sporty SUV or around 52,000 can't beat it
I think the reason for the copy and paste job is crash and environmental certifications - they can tell the EPA and NHTSA that “look, they’re exactly the same”
I’m always confused with Mazda’s trim’s good video 👍🏽👍🏽
I drive a 2024 CX-5.
Got to be honest, if I needed lots of cargo capacity - I'd take a 70 over a 90.
Truth is, I don't even want the option of being able to tote extra passengers.
I do question the naming of this vehicle though.
Should just sell the 90 as a two or three row option.
The engine start-stop feature is the main issue. Disabling this feature improves the transition from the electric motor to the gas engine.
But it's a multi-step process rather than pressing a single button, is that correct?
IT IS NOT ENGINE START STOP LIKE U THINKING. WHAT NARATOR SAYS IS HYBRID ENGINE START STOP MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
GJ! Pls consider reviewing the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Also the Nissan Rouge and Sentra
And finally, a car with a Chinese platform like Volvo or Lotus
Appreciated!
1) the Outlander and Rogue are essentially the same and they are both trash. 2) the Sentra is nowhere as nice as a Civic or Corolla and is best avoided. At most it would be a 30 second video. Do not buy this heap. End of video.
Scotty just have 2 thumbs up to your engine cover comment 😂
You didn’t waste my time because you validated why I don’t have one. I own a 2016 CX-5 with 100K miles and it is the most reliable vehicle I have ever owned. I wanted a two-row with more room which you delivered but price it accordingly.
Yep, I agree my cx5 select is PERFECT for all my needs. AMD is correct, this is not making sense & they need to go back to the drawing board on these models. Enough said !!!
Gorgeous suv
Great Vid.. it looks like the older one..
Hi i like your review, would you please do review on 2023/24 mitsubishi outlander phev really want to hear from you especially about power train!!!!
We request Mazda CX-50
and Thank you for your hard work
I think you're missing the point of the car and all the different use cases/lifestyles where more cargo space is desirable vs a third row. I have been waiting for the CX-70 since I heard it was on it's way and I knew the only change would be the lack of third row. It's a thousand bucks cheaper per model designation and I don't need to spend a grand on rear seats I'll never use. Essentially Mazda has done what Audi did with the Q7 and Q8 without the downside of losing interior space to make it look sexier. If the Audi Q7 was available for less with a third row delete, it' be my choice over the Q8 too.
good film sir
I'll wait until I buy one. Still enjoying my Mazda 3
Please review the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV!!
I loved the Mazda CX 70 in person with the red interior - just was a little too expensive.
Rear bench seat is a must have if you have a dog..... Captains chairs and/or 3rd rows are often completely useless.
Great video, newer tech and needs to be vented out. Price is at Lexus level also.
Have had many Mazda vehicles and loved them all. This seems fantastic and I love that it was made in Japan (as were all of mine), but WHEW, you better hope anything going wrong, esp with the powertrain is under full warranty. From loosening the first bolt, to wiping down the wrenches was 25 mins to do a timing belt in my 323. Did my clutch laying on a driveway by myself, and aside from a lot of effort at least the procedure was simple and straight forward. Days like these are looooong gone. Heck, even the back spark plugs on this engine look like a nightmare from here, being so far under the firewall.
I wish Mazda would make a Mazda9 sedan (as a come back of the 929 and Millenia) using the new RWD architecture underpinnings and Inline 6 from the CX-70/90. If they did, I'd buy it.
Can you please do a thorough review of 2025 Camry LE or XSE trims ?
They use that engine cover to insulate the engine not to lose heat while it's off.
I have a feeling for 2026 the CX 70 is gonna get discontinued and then they’re just gonna offer the CX 90 with two rows 😁
In addition to the 3rd row and colors, the front facia is also different between the CX-70 and CX-90.
For that price I would buy a Ford Explorer King Ranch or Timberline, or a loaded Grand Cherokee L, and have something that's actually enjoyable.
Agree that the CX70 makes little sense; just get the 90.
I was looking forward to the 70 but when I added all the options I wanted it was more expensive than a comparably equipped RX350. The second 70 that I drove had a sagging headliner and an unbalanced from wheel. Decided the cheaper RX Hybrid was the way to go!
Everyone who was originally hoping for the CX-70 wanted the RoW 2-door 2-row CX-60 that was slightly larger than the CX-5/CX-50, not a rebadged CX-90 with a third row delete.
Exactly what I was hoping for. Something bigger than my CX-5, but smaller than the CX-90. The concept here is preposterous.
This is a really nice looking car! I like that it’s a 2-row but wish the length would have shorten some. I had a 3-row Tahoe for a short time and found the third row useless and only used once. The price for this is kinda steep also.
Here in MX we get the CX-70 with less power output and equipment than the CX-90 despite having the same Inline 6 engine at almost at the same price
comprarías una cx70.
sabiendo que la versión que llegó a México si conviertes dólares a pesos debería costar 840,000
y nos la están dejando en 1035,000
195,000 pesos más cara, creo que la traída a México no lo justifica.
justo acabo de encargar una en blanco y después de ver esto me la estoy pensando.
Should of just been another trim level for the 90. Call it something like the CX-90 Sport Trim Package like how Audi has the Black Optic Package since it deletes a lot of the chrome.
They should of definitely kept the 3rd row. Exactly as you mentioned, people buy a vehicle of that size for 2 things: to haul people and cargo. When youre not hauling people, fold the 3rd row down for the cargo, and when you have to haul people, fold up the 3rd row. Pretty simple.
I would Ahmad to review the latest CX50 Hybrid with the Toyota engine, transmission, EV motors / hybrid system. It’s a Mazda fit and finish with Toyota guts and proven hybrid.
Please Mazda 6 review 😍
Great review. Could you please review 2024 Chevy Traverse? Great specs but no idea on reliability. Thanks a ton!
Agreed
In defense of a two-row: a couple of inches less does make a difference in driving and handling. I personally like the CX-5 (having had one for 10 days in Florida last year), but I want more cargo capacity without going up to the CX-90. If they attempted to put a third row in the CX-70, it would be almost useless; it might also take away legroom from the second row.
Would be great if Mitsubishi will lend you an Outlander PHEV for review 😁
Great video!