New Telescope Can See WAY MORE than JWST and Hubble
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- ↓↓↓ Links and more in full description below ↓↓↓
You can buy me a coffee if you enjoyed this and want to support these videos. You don't have to though, no pressure. www.buymeacoff...
LINKS:
Euclid’s Field of View: www.esa.int/ES...
Euclid NISP details: sci.esa.int/we....
Euclid VIS details: sci.esa.int/we...
-----
Hubble Horsehead 1999: www.jpl.nasa.g...
Hubble Horsehead 2013: esahubble.org/...
Hubble instruments: hubblesite.org...
Hubble Wide Field Camera 3: esahubble.org/...
Hey team!
If there is some other cool topic in physics you think we should learn about together, leave a comment down below!
Until next time, stay safe.
Please consider subscribing if you enjoyed the video, and you can also find me on Twitter and Instagram:
/ chrisdpattison
/ chrispattison22
Your channel is going to grow. I'm sure of it. You're a natural.
This video, so excellently presented, has shown the reason why the Euclid images are so outstanding. The very wide angle lens on Euclid achieves amazing results with each ‘point’ covering an enormous area of space in a remarkably short time. Your choices to demonstrate what a single pointing of Euclid can cover compared to JWST were just awesome. I’m blown away, Chris! Many thanks as always
Agreed, great job Chris 👍👍👍
6:17 There seems to be a triangular 'formation' ? Rays 30 deg and 60 deg from bottom left and an obviious 'apex' just left of centre near the top.
1:15 looks like a star destroyer. Or a Dorito.
Thanks for making me crazy
Amazing perspective!
Spot on chris 👍 🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞
It would be awesome to see a 3D model made once enough data is gathered by Euclid. To see a 3D model of immense objects in space would be such an amazing thing.
Great job 👍👍👍
Loved the video
Can they use Euclid images to observe moving objects like dwarf planets or asteroids?
They're all designed to do different things. Like comparing apples, oranges, and avocados. Spitzer, radio telescopes, etc., all do different things as well. The important thing to remember is that all of the information collectively gives us a better understanding of the universe.
The pictures are cool. However, the images are infrared originally shot in UV light and the "pretty pictures" are colored in by someone like a coloring book.
Why didn’t you discuss the resolution of each telescope, there is usually a trade off between field of view and resolution, it would be impressive is Euclid had the same resolution as Hubble and JWST with a massive field of view, but I would guess this is not the case.
To be fair, you should mention Euclid does have a lower resolution than Hubble.
I love all your videos! Thank you!
Please Stop IT!! Just call it Webb!! Stop using jwst. It just makes no sense !!!!
JWST is the term astronomers use when talking to each other
We should call it 'Jimmy'.