Love this! This is the first time I've seen a YT channel explain this so simply. So many of them write off the field as a "sucker" bet. Frequency play is definitely worthy of paying attention to in the game as a strategy. Thank you! Subbed.
This is such smart play and an EXCELLENT strategy! I love the depth of this higher-level thinking. Your theories in craps are spot on. This strategy has to be one of the most unused/underrated but also among the best! It makes use of frequency and probability in an advantage play-way to extract added value. Thank you Jacob for sharing your unique wisdom!
Once you lose 6 or more times in a row and lose your entire bankroll it’s gonna be a long climb back to even at one unit wins at a time…It makes a lot more sense to cap the bet sequence at 1-2-4 since most of your wins will be in those first 3 bets…..These Marty bet strategies with no cap are loser bet strategies.No matter what game you play…..
Jacob is recommending the Gambler's Fallacy. It's a weak basis for a strategy - unless you have an endless bankroll. Does anyone have a bottomless bankroll? I didn't think so.
Thanks Jacob, frequency strategies with straight martingale betting is normally a recipe for disaster unless you have a big enough bankroll and cojones to match. However, I think you have shown that there are enough variations to how each player can attack this strategy that we can easily find a format to fit both our budget and courage limits. I would probably start field betting after 4+ non field hits and ditto the 5-6-8 after 4+ field hits. With the lays, the repeater is one method, or 4+ hits on the 6 and 8 before a seven, 3+ hits on the 5 and 9 before a seven and 2+ hits on the 4 and 10 before a seven. Again you have given us some great food for thought and show that dice control is not the only way to win at this game. Cheers Rob
Like the vid, but the problem with the strategy is you lost out on so much field money. You'd have doubled your winnings had you stayed playing the field only stopping when 2 non field numbers hit in a row. You could keep the place the 5,6, and 8 when x number of fields hit then take down part. Just a suggestion.
I have been practicing Frequency play. Three non fields, I go up on the Field. Three Fields, I put 85 on the inside. This has been incredibly successful! Can't wait to try this in the casino!!!! This may be the best I have ever seen. Time will tell...
I play frequency all the time on the craps tables with lots of success. However I have learned that from time to time the rolls go completely crazy like 9 4's rolled before a 7. 22 non field rolls. 38 non horn numbers. 7 nines in a row etc etc. So what I do is set a stop win. If I am fighting back and forth I either quit for the day or take a break. I never push it. I will say that I am the least favorite of repeaters. Jacob your about the only one I follow anymore regarding craps. We have the same mindset. The only difference is I go one step farther on dice influencing. Have an amazing day.
One important lesson that I have learned when betting on repeaters is if a comeout 7 occurs during the roll you must reset and start over. This one lesson has saved me thousands of dollars at the craps tables.
Jacob, I tried to play this way as you outlined it in the video. I played on a simulated game computer generated. Thought I would do bad. Not that badly, but, playing the field is not the greatest bet by itself. You are correct on this. Twice it hit five consecutive field numbers. There were other times when it hit two in a row and others that hit three before I lost it. Subscribed to your friend's group. They are still under 1,000, but, getting closer.
Looks like a Martingale on the Field, make me scare to loose my bankroll on a bad start. I would adapt this strategy but with a different approach on the bankroll. Ex: The first bet one unit a lost, second bet 2 units lost, 3rd. 3 units lost, 4th 4 units win then go back to 3 units win, then to 2 units. So have lost the 3first bets for a total of 6 units and you have won the two next for 7 units =+1. Now if you win the next bet you'll be 50/50 3 wins and 3 lost but 3units in the rack. On the long run even if you're 47/53 % winnings/lost you'll be a winner. Putting all my bankroll on one roll of dice, ouf!! I don't have that courage.
I played only the field and dont pass for almost a year very conservatively which for me was a 30% profit goal per session. You tend to think you are missing out on hot rolls, but you can survive and win when the pass liners get wiped out. The sweetspot is 3 consecutive non-fields then bet the field. 4 is better but you'll wait long enough already for 3. If you lose double the bet once. If you lose that, wait for the 3 no fields again bet 4x and if you lose, you wait again and bet for 10x. Once the non fields go past 5 they can keep right on going to 14+ and wipe you out. "Not a lot of repeater numbers." Maybe you mean before the 7 shows. Numbers randomly repeat all the time. More rare is 36 rolls with no repeat numbers. You will see an average of two identical dice-pair (1-4, 4-1 or 3-3, 3-3) repeats in 36 rolls. Once 7 is thrown, it's 1 in 6 that it's thrown right back. About half the time, '2 sevens in a row' is what just happened every time 7 is thrown on the first throw of the comeout. Seems like we have some very similar ideas on craps, but when I see a number roll at a certain high frequency, I do the opposite of what you do and bet a hop progession it will continue. I don't have to fight the seven to chase the number down.
How many times you roll field has absolutely NOTHING to do with the next roll!! Im so confused by how many people are saying how great of a idea this is.
Fallacy. Every roll is independent of itself and the last roll has no bearing on the next one. You can roll 55 non field bets on a row. I’ve seen 18 blacks in a row in roulette and people saying “red is due”.
I don't disagree with you. But there is statistical diluting that happens. If you are looking at each roll individually you are correct, but there is a reason the payouts are based in the probability of the combinations. They are consistent enough for the casino to bet on so why not use the same logic to bet as well.
I did something similar one time. I was up to $250 on the field before it paid out....lol. 6 non field#'s in a row. I like what you did here. I would be mindful of roll count when pressing up that field wager.
Very silly strategy. What the dice just did has absolutely nothing to do with the next throw. It will not change anything. You will always find that eventually.
Love this! This is the first time I've seen a YT channel explain this so simply. So many of them write off the field as a "sucker" bet. Frequency play is definitely worthy of paying attention to in the game as a strategy. Thank you! Subbed.
This is such smart play and an EXCELLENT strategy! I love the depth of this higher-level thinking. Your theories in craps are spot on. This strategy has to be one of the most unused/underrated but also among the best! It makes use of frequency and probability in an advantage play-way to extract added value. Thank you Jacob for sharing your unique wisdom!
Thank you
Smart play using the math of the game.
This is great!
Once you lose 6 or more times in a row and lose your entire bankroll it’s gonna be a long climb back to even at one unit wins at a time…It makes a lot more sense to cap the bet sequence at 1-2-4 since most of your wins will be in those first 3 bets…..These Marty bet strategies with no cap are loser bet strategies.No matter what game you play…..
Jacob is recommending the Gambler's Fallacy. It's a weak basis for a strategy - unless you have an endless bankroll. Does anyone have a bottomless bankroll? I didn't think so.
Damn coach....you made that look way too easy. Made me want to go play in the garden. Lol. Good frequency strategy. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks Larry
Thanks Jacob, frequency strategies with straight martingale betting is normally a recipe for disaster unless you have a big enough bankroll and cojones to match. However, I think you have shown that there are enough variations to how each player can attack this strategy that we can easily find a format to fit both our budget and courage limits. I would probably start field betting after 4+ non field hits and ditto the 5-6-8 after 4+ field hits. With the lays, the repeater is one method, or 4+ hits on the 6 and 8 before a seven, 3+ hits on the 5 and 9 before a seven and 2+ hits on the 4 and 10 before a seven. Again you have given us some great food for thought and show that dice control is not the only way to win at this game. Cheers Rob
Yes your exactly right
Good Stuff, thanks
Like the vid, but the problem with the strategy is you lost out on so much field money. You'd have doubled your winnings had you stayed playing the field only stopping when 2 non field numbers hit in a row. You could keep the place the 5,6, and 8 when x number of fields hit then take down part. Just a suggestion.
I have been practicing Frequency play. Three non fields, I go up on the Field. Three Fields, I put 85 on the inside. This has been incredibly successful! Can't wait to try this in the casino!!!! This may be the best I have ever seen. Time will tell...
this is the best craps thinking I have seen lately, expand it please
I play frequency all the time on the craps tables with lots of success. However I have learned that from time to time the rolls go completely crazy like 9 4's rolled before a 7. 22 non field rolls. 38 non horn numbers. 7 nines in a row etc etc. So what I do is set a stop win. If I am fighting back and forth I either quit for the day or take a break. I never push it. I will say that I am the least favorite of repeaters. Jacob your about the only one I follow anymore regarding craps. We have the same mindset. The only difference is I go one step farther on dice influencing. Have an amazing day.
Thanks. Yeah the crazy runs can be painful, but the good runs outweigh them heavily
One important lesson that I have learned when betting on repeaters is if a comeout 7 occurs during the roll you must reset and start over. This one lesson has saved me thousands of dollars at the craps tables.
Field and hard numbers that are not on the field are my favorite bets :)
Jacob, I tried to play this way as you outlined it in the video. I played on a simulated game computer generated. Thought I would do bad. Not that badly, but, playing the field is not the greatest bet by itself. You are correct on this. Twice it hit five consecutive field numbers. There were other times when it hit two in a row and others that hit three before I lost it. Subscribed to your friend's group. They are still under 1,000, but, getting closer.
You are the God, Thank You for this strategy.
Lol, not a God
I dig this one. I like the way you look at the game
Soooooooo many good strategic ways to attack the game
Yeah, I have lots of plays
Looks like a Martingale on the Field, make me scare to loose my bankroll on a bad start.
I would adapt this strategy but with a different approach on the bankroll.
Ex: The first bet one unit a lost, second bet 2 units lost, 3rd. 3 units lost, 4th 4 units win then go back to 3 units win, then to 2 units. So have lost the 3first bets for a total of 6 units and you have won the two next for 7 units =+1. Now if you win the next bet you'll be 50/50 3 wins and 3 lost but 3units in the rack. On the long run even if you're 47/53 % winnings/lost you'll be a winner.
Putting all my bankroll on one roll of dice, ouf!! I don't have that courage.
Yeah you can do it in the fashion you mentioned here
I played only the field and dont pass for almost a year very conservatively which for me was a 30% profit goal per session. You tend to think you are missing out on hot rolls, but you can survive and win when the pass liners get wiped out. The sweetspot is 3 consecutive non-fields then bet the field. 4 is better but you'll wait long enough already for 3. If you lose double the bet once. If you lose that, wait for the 3 no fields again bet 4x and if you lose, you wait again and bet for 10x. Once the non fields go past 5 they can keep right on going to 14+ and wipe you out. "Not a lot of repeater numbers." Maybe you mean before the 7 shows. Numbers randomly repeat all the time. More rare is 36 rolls with no repeat numbers. You will see an average of two identical dice-pair (1-4, 4-1 or 3-3, 3-3) repeats in 36 rolls. Once 7 is thrown, it's 1 in 6 that it's thrown right back. About half the time, '2 sevens in a row' is what just happened every time 7 is thrown on the first throw of the comeout. Seems like we have some very similar ideas on craps, but when I see a number roll at a certain high frequency, I do the opposite of what you do and bet a hop progession it will continue. I don't have to fight the seven to chase the number down.
Would this be a good way to play bubble craps, since there really isn't any chance of a shooter controlling the dice?
Sure. Field seems to work well on bubble
How many times you roll field has absolutely NOTHING to do with the next roll!! Im so confused by how many people are saying how great of a idea this is.
I love playing the field. Sometimes I'll just play the field on randoms to make my mulah.
I do the same thing
Look for 3 or 4 non field numbers and then bet black chips.....progress as you dare on each miss
Lol
Lol
Fallacy. Every roll is independent of itself and the last roll has no bearing on the next one. You can roll 55 non field bets on a row. I’ve seen 18 blacks in a row in roulette and people saying “red is due”.
I don't disagree with you. But there is statistical diluting that happens. If you are looking at each roll individually you are correct, but there is a reason the payouts are based in the probability of the combinations. They are consistent enough for the casino to bet on so why not use the same logic to bet as well.
The big bet @ 15:31 I was hype
Yeah crazy
I did something similar one time. I was up to $250 on the field before it paid out....lol. 6 non field#'s in a row. I like what you did here. I would be mindful of roll count when pressing up that field wager.
the field can come 12+ times in a row
Wr
Im so confused. You're steady rolling field numbers and not betting. Makes no sense. I believe when its hot bet
Very silly strategy. What the dice just did has absolutely nothing to do with the next throw. It will not change anything. You will always find that eventually.
If you were playing the dont and field. You Woulda tore it up
Yeah would have worked well
Example of your don't and field?