0:01 The Mind has an incredible ability to Posit-Itself, Be Aware of Itself, Able To Think About Itself. *Action and Product, Act and Fact* 1:01 Self-Conciousness has a dual character. + An Activity of Reflecting + AND An Object of Reflection.3 2:12 An Action and A Product, an Act and a Fact! 2:38 (The Self is Aware to The Self Itself.) 3:08 "I can look inward." 3:22 Practical and Theoretical Reason. Pragmatism. 4:19 The Action and The Object. Consciousness Pre-Supposes Self-Consciousness. Built into The Nature of Consciousness itself. 4:53 Consciousness 5:13 The Fact and The Act are Identical! They are The Same Thing! 5:42 2 Separate aspects to The Same Activity. *Freedom* 6:04 We become aware of our freedom to act, in terms of our directing of our own consciousness. 6:43 Freedom to Direct My Mind as I Choose. 7:31 I direct my own mind to various things! 7:53 I have the freedom to direct My Own Mind to where I want. *Limitations* 8:15 But it is limited. Perceptions are limited to where you are. 8:46 There is a Not I. A 9:49 Freedom to Imagine Things, but Limitations of The Will's inability to actualize whatever The Freedom Images. *Self-Divided Against Itself.* 10:39 We tend to will what we desire, but we don't always have the capacity to do so. 11:33 We Are Essentially Free. 11:51 No Identity of The Kind Exhausts Who You Are. 12:14 You are more than what you imagine yourself to be.
Professor Bonevac, I wanted to ask you a question about analytic:synthetic distinction, which you explained in one of your videos: are geometry theorems analytic or synthetic? Typically abstract representations of geometric figures are used to prove these theorems. But some axioms in geometry can’t be proved and were found empirically.
@@Tm-kt3uw Good question! There’s significant debate about this in the philosophy of mathematics, especially since the development of non-Euclidean geometries.
Thinking is not consciousness. Thinking is self-consciousness. The self positing itself? Can self-consciousness posit consciousness? Can i posit Nature? No. The self seems stuck in between both consciousness and self consciousness. The i of self-consciousness is it the same i of consciousness. The i that experiences and interacts with Nature is different from the i that reflects and interacts with ... the experiencer of the experience of Nature. The experience, the experiencer and the experiencee. Me the tree and the sensations between us.
AI generated Sartre with fully functional eye makes me feel uneasy
0:01 The Mind has an incredible ability to Posit-Itself, Be Aware of Itself, Able To Think About Itself.
*Action and Product, Act and Fact*
1:01 Self-Conciousness has a dual character.
+ An Activity of Reflecting
+ AND An Object of Reflection.3
2:12 An Action and A Product, an Act and a Fact!
2:38 (The Self is Aware to The Self Itself.)
3:08 "I can look inward."
3:22 Practical and Theoretical Reason. Pragmatism.
4:19 The Action and The Object. Consciousness Pre-Supposes Self-Consciousness. Built into The Nature of Consciousness itself.
4:53 Consciousness
5:13 The Fact and The Act are Identical! They are The Same Thing!
5:42 2 Separate aspects to The Same Activity.
*Freedom*
6:04 We become aware of our freedom to act, in terms of our directing of our own consciousness.
6:43 Freedom to Direct My Mind as I Choose.
7:31 I direct my own mind to various things!
7:53 I have the freedom to direct My Own Mind to where I want.
*Limitations*
8:15 But it is limited. Perceptions are limited to where you are.
8:46 There is a Not I. A
9:49 Freedom to Imagine Things, but Limitations of The Will's inability to actualize whatever The Freedom Images.
*Self-Divided Against Itself.*
10:39 We tend to will what we desire, but we don't always have the capacity to do so.
11:33 We Are Essentially Free.
11:51 No Identity of The Kind Exhausts Who You Are.
12:14 You are more than what you imagine yourself to be.
I'm still confused a bit on this.
Everyone should hear this at least once a cycle
Professor Bonevac, I wanted to ask you a question about analytic:synthetic distinction, which you explained in one of your videos: are geometry theorems analytic or synthetic? Typically abstract representations of geometric figures are used to prove these theorems. But some axioms in geometry can’t be proved and were found empirically.
@@Tm-kt3uw Good question! There’s significant debate about this in the philosophy of mathematics, especially since the development of non-Euclidean geometries.
@@PhiloofAlexandria Thank you!!! I’ll try to find more information about different points of view on this question.
Thinking is not consciousness. Thinking is self-consciousness. The self positing itself?
Can self-consciousness posit consciousness? Can i posit Nature? No.
The self seems stuck in between both consciousness and self consciousness. The i of self-consciousness is it the same i of consciousness.
The i that experiences and interacts with Nature is different from the i that reflects and interacts with ... the experiencer of the experience of Nature.
The experience, the experiencer and the experiencee. Me the tree and the sensations between us.
Fichte is excellent
Since 2017 I am constantly telling people what a gem Fichte really is. One of the most important philosophers ever.