Видео

The Sudarium of Oviedo has been radiocarbon dated. It coumes out around 700 AD, give or take. Shroudies...were the RC tests done on "repaired sections" of the sudarium, too? What's your explanation for the radiocarbon dates of the Sudarium?

Is there a photo negative of it?

7:33 This video does not present the correcr reason that the Shroud's radiocarbon data is off by 1400 years. The Poor Clare nuns only patched the burned holes in the Shroud. They did not reweave the Shrouds' corners. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absorption," Rucker, 2020.

I am quite surprised that no one is talking about the latest Eucharistic Miracle which happened in Madavana, Kerala in India. This happened very recently (turning of host into blood) just last August, on 4 consecutive Sunday masses witnessed by the whole Church gathering. At the last occasion it turned into a small bleeding tissue with strong resemblance of a heart. Just search for 'Madavana Eucharistic Miracle' in the State of Kerala, India.

Me gusta los muppets

I enjoy all of Father Dalton’s talks on the Shroud.

But it doesn't mean anything to few satanic cult believing idiots of sola scriptura a man made tradition invented by a devil possessed man, they were desperately trying to disprove the shroud of Turin in order to ridicule the Church of saints that Jesus established under the stewardship of Peter but the shroud remained as the ultimate testimonial relic for Jesus's resurrection a devinely masterpiece which no human knowledge or power or science can even comprehend

Doesn't matter anymore only a few bunch of satanic cult believing idiots of sola scriptura a man made tradition invented by a devil possessed man are desperately trying to disprove the shroud of Turin in order to discredit by making a false testimony against the Church of saints that Jesus established under the stewardship of Peter but the shroud of Turin remained as the ultimate testimonial masterpiece of Jesus's resurrection which no human power or knowledge can even comprehend

Today i cried over the evidence of the shroud of Turin. I wanted a reason to believe in Jesus and I have my reason now with the shroud. I also heard lovely christian song about Jesus that appears to defy human explanations. Thanks for making this video

Thank you father for your beautiful son and Holy spirit,I love you now and forever

41:50 It is good that Russ mentions the Sign of Jonah in respect to the Shroud. But he makes a mistake when he says that the Sign of Jonah is about Jesus' resurrection 42:22 Jesus' resurrection was NOT the sign in the first century because very few people witnessed Jesus alive after his death by crucifixion, and even fewer witnessed his mortal wounds. Jesus did not parade around Israel and Judea displaying his fatal injuries. Only the disciple Thomas and a few other disciples were ever allowed to see them. In addition to that, in Mark 8 Jesus is recorded as saying that NO sign (from heaven) would be given to Israel. And in Luke 11 Jesus said that his ministry was the ONLY sign that Israel would receive, and there cannot be two only signs for the same population in the same era. See: "The Image on the Turin Shroud Is 'The Sign of Jonah' For Our Generation!" by Rev. Larry Stalley, 2020 And: "The Enigma of the Sign of Jonah," BSTS Shroud Newsletter, Summer 2023.

The shroud must be real! I heard the only way it could have been made was with super intense light but no heat. If the only image is what you can see with the naked eye then I would be a sceptic. But the information that shows up in the negative of a photo of it along with the wounds matching Jesus’s passion and the blood being human AB blood it must be real. If the shroud is real then Jesus is real, what’s more if the shroud is real then Jesus IS who he said he is!! He is I AM, he is God made flesh!! Amen, lord please guide me to follow you the way you want to be followed!!

we see he was ripped as well

I am sure that Jesus is smiling when He hears how beautifully Fr. Dalton is defending His Burial Cloth! It also saddens me to say that I truly believe that there was an agenda with the Carbon testing! May God forgive them! God bless you all for covering this most important conversation. 🙏

Thank you, Father. This was very interesting and uplifting. I pray more people see this and see the Truth.

No textile scientist who has examined the Shroud has alleged that the Shroud contains even a single undocumented repair. In fact the textile experts who have examined the Shroud in person say that the part of the Shroud that was cut for the 1988 radiocarbon test was a continous part of the Shroud.

St. John, ora pro nobis🙏🏼

Amen

Amen brother , I'm currently watching this from Rio De Janiero Brazil , they have the beautiful statue of Christ the Redeemer here , hope you are doing well Dave

"We should have known that it was the worst place to take that sample," ?? Textile scientist Gabriel Vial supervised the selection of the 1988 radiocarbon sample and has repeatedly stated that it was a part of the original cloth. In fact, no textile scientist who has personally examined the Shroud has ever made the claim of any undocumented repairs existing on that cloth. Dr. Rodgers himself examined the cloth in 1978 and did not subsequently report the existence of an undocumented repair. But then in 2004, without having seen the Shroud in over twenty years, Rodgers suddenly wanted us to believe that such a repair did exist. It is all just a little too much. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absorption," Rucker, 2020.

The Shroud cannot be dated by carbon fourteen because it is not an ordinary piece of cloth. That is attested to by the fact that it has the images of a human corpse imprinted on it by what appears to have been some type of radiation. Until one can demonstrate a naturalistic mechanism for the formation of the Shroud's images, one cannot discount the possibility that an associated neutron flux enhanced the Shroud's radiocarbon content when Jesus' dead body dematerialized. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absroption," Rucker, 2020.

At 22:42 Fr. Dalton presents the "invalid sample" hypothesis for the accounting of the Shroud's unexpected radiocarbon readings. This is a popular idea, but it has been falsified on many counts. One of the most dramatic is the 8th century dating of the Sudarium by carbon fourteen. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absorption," Rucker, 2020.

The Marino?Rodgers "secret repair" hypothesis has been falsified on several counts. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absorption," Rucker, 2020.

At minute 35:03 is a photo of Dr. Raymond Rodgers closely examining the Shroud. This photo was taken in 1978 when Dr. Rodgers was a member of the STURP team. Those scientists had five full days of unrestricted access with four tons of instrumentation, and they examined every square inch of the Shroud. No one, including Dr. Rodgers, reported finding any undocumented repairs to the Shroud. But then in 2002, without ever having seen the Shroud in over twenty years, Rodgers suddenly wanted us to believe that an undocumented repair did exist and that it was located precisely at the corner where the Shroud's radiocarbon sample had been cut from in 1988. It is all just a little too much. No textile scientist who has examined the Shroud in person has ever claimed that the Shroud has any secret repair work on its cloth. The Shroud's threads were hand-spun under unknown conditions. Cotton fibers could easily have made their way into that spinning process. The Rodgers/Marino "secret repair" hypothesis does not hold up, and primary falsifications are found in the radiocarbon datings of the Sudarium and the Titulus Crucis. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absorption," Rucker, 2020.

At minute 58:58 we see the falsified "reweaving" hypothesis. Its inclusion in this video detracts from an otherwise credible presentation.

The Shroud Image of Jesus Christ proves His GOSPEL John 3:16 is True, and is Not About HOW but WHO.

It's The Shroud of Jesus Christ...Not Turin! God's Name is not Grace and Jesus' Name is not Faith! We are Not Saved by Grace through Faith. We are Saved by God, by Believing in His Son He Sacrificed to atone for your sins. SALVATION 101 - We are SAVED by GOD, by Doing His Will, and BELIEVING In His SON Matthew 7:21 Your Savior Told us...Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven, But the one who Does the WILL Of My FATHER, who is in heaven John 6:40 MY FATHER’S WILL is that everyone who looks to the Son and BELIEVES in HIM shall have eternal life John 3:16 For GOD so Loved the World that HE Gave (Sacrificed to Die) HIS only SON so that Whoever BELIEVES in HIM, shall not perish, but have ever lasting Life.

Sir, Basically I just keep posting SHROUD OF TURIN X PRIZE $10 MILLION DOLLAR X PRIZE TO ANYONE WHO CAN REPRODUCE IT BY ANY MEANS OR TECHNOLOGY. We need this to be an ENGINEERING CONTEST, not apologetics, leave that to the apologists, the shroud will "speak for itself". If Trump can raise $15 million in a few months time I'm sure the shroud can raise more. You need to set up the CROWD FUNDING, and for lack of a better word the "Vegas bookey" arena. A journal to chart the progress? Register applicants? Trust to hold the money? Platforms for promotion, UFO, CANDACE OWENS, JOE ROGAN, GLENN BECK, all these hugs platforms just say "go donate a few dollars". I think it could go way bigger than $10 million especially if you challenge Musk. The benefits, advanced technology, like a 40 billion watt ultra violet laser printer with AI that could embed 3D information and the inventors keep the patent. I think DARPA has been doing this since the shroud was investigated by STURP. I've been putting more thought into a rigorous shroud argument. 1. I use Henry Kyberg's EPISTEMOLOGICAL FORMULA PROB, w, l, (S)=(p,q). The probability of any statement S under a given worldview w, stated in a powerful enough language l, is equal to the frequency of each fact given a baysian weight in p,q. NOW, what questions are we going to ask about the shroud to construct statement S? The problem is in worldview w, and whether we are asking "natural" or "supernatural", physical means or miracle. These two are overlapped in the venn diagram because once the miracle "appears" it takes physical form, so if this is viewed as a bell curve the natural is the top half of the curve and miracle is at either extreme. The difference between alpha and omega at the opposite ends of the day curve is simply one of linnear time and true miracles affect, or effect, the way the laws of physics operate. This is sometimes called the quantum effect of "stirring the soup". At the fundamental level this makes Jesus in the resurrection identical with the big bang SINGULARITY and the shroud of Turin the by product of alpha and omega represented in top half of the bell curve as the physical artifact we can observe. OKAY, now let's ask what could produce the image that we understand from our knowledge of the physical world? Either CHEMICAL change (Maillard reaction) or ELECTROMAGNETISM (heat or light). Either must be intelligently designed because neither produce a detailed photo negative with 3D information by natural means. This means it could only have been constructed "accidentally" in the natural if the alpha and omega are identical or to use quantum language "entangled". You're probably familiar with the hypotheses of DAME PICZEK and FRANK TIPLER, I've simply combined language from both to say the shroud is evidence of a supernatural miracle, the resurrection, which the intentional product of the reason, purpose, and physics of the universe. As for the baysian analysis of the evidence in (p,q) that should be set up like the actuarial tables used by insurance companies. You might ask what amount of insurance would be given the shroud IF it could be reproduced. What amount would motivate someone to create technology that might reproduce the shroud? Do you see how powerful this proposition is? After the STURP study and the knowledge of the embedded 3D information IT'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE MILITARY DID NOT FURTHER STUDY IT FOR MILITARY APPLICATIONS not the least of which is to develop the technology to reproduce it. The shroud could only have been produced by God or ET. If ET has left technology to reverse engineer then the shroud would already have been reproduced and it would have been included as evidence in the congressional UAP investigations and hearings. Can you do FOIA REQUESTS to those agencies who would be studying the shroud? There's a website called THE BLACK VAULT that publishes FOIA documents and I've searched there for SHROUD OF TURIN, nothing yet but I don't know if he has requested shroud information. I look at it this way, if that carbon dating had said 1st century the publication of that information would have had military consequences. Our military has a religious doctrine called the BALANCE OF POWER. Israel does too and you see it talked about more in the Israeli press than the American. The goal is to create enough doubt or leave enough doubt in the Apologetics to prevent a theocracy or "justify" a militant fundamentalism. The too most likely candidates for the carbon dating fraud were CIA and MOSSAD. Why didn't the Pope verify the shroud? The RC intelligence agency is called the ENTITY (can't remember the old name but there's a book with the history called the ENTITY) and of course Russia, China and Turkey have their own. As far as Cambridge being involved Britain also has a huge stake as well as history of British Israelism. So the military study of the shroud would begin with an attempt to reproduce it using available medieval technology to prove it's a fraud. That didn't work. Only answer left is God or ET and if they could have proven ET using modern technology they would have used assets to publish that already. One of the latest best attempts at that was by WHITLEY STRIEBER and "award winning journalist" LINDA MOULTON HOWE who said she was taken to Area 51 and told by a General Jesus was not what we have been told. Lastly, having found the shroud can't be reproduced by any technology ancient or modern and the military presumption must be that some type of technology was used the race begins to develop the technology because it may have military applications and we can't let the enemy develop it first. Ok, for arguments sake, let's say Aliens did it with a 40billion watt ultra violet laser printer with AI that could embed 3D information. The problem is the blood, if Aliens left it for whatever reason the image would have been enough. Why add the blood? Why use human blood? That destroys the Alien hypothesis and if we are now reverse engineering Alien technology or are in contact why hasn't that solved the riddle of the shroud? The best theory, comparing the time lines of the alien phenomena and the shroud is that the need to keep the Alien phenomena a secret is disinformation to maintain the religious balance of power that Jesus Christ disrupted by leaving the shroud. Nothing about this is just conspiracy theory it's exactly what the military would be required to do and the steps it would be required to take to maintain national security. How do fight the military and intelligence agencies around the globe? Shroud of Turin, crowd funded, X Prize focused on pure engineering without the apologetics. The shroud will speak for itself. Thanks for all the work you have done.

E' Leonardo l'autore della Sindone? Secondo lo storico dell’arte Giorgio Vasari, Leonardo da Vinci in punto di morte, rivolgendosi al re francese Francesco I presente al suo capezzale, gli disse: Quanto aveva offeso Dio e gli uomini non avendo operato nell’arte come si conveniva. Leonardo stava parlando al committente della Sindone, che lui stesso aveva segretamente realizzato, e che ora, in punto di morte, ne sarebbe pentito? Difatti c’è corrispondenza tra l’immagine nel suo complesso e nei suoi dettagli con le opere artistiche di Leonardo da Vinci e relativi particolari. Tanto, che l’immagine sindonica si può tendenzialmente ricostruire dai dipinti e disegni di Leonardo. Il volto sindonico partendo dall’Autoritratto di Leonardo. La forma e le proporzioni della figura umana, sono simili a quelle del disegno dell’Uomo Vitruviano. Doppiamente sorprendente è il fatto, che l’immagine della ferita al costato della Sindone, dal punto di vista grafico è un volto caricaturale stilizzato su un torace accennato. E che assomiglia in modo impressionante al guerriero centrale della Lotta per lo stendardo, che era la parte centrale dell’incompiuta e, allo stato attuale perduta, Battaglia di Anghiari iniziata da Leonardo a Palazzo Vecchio a Firenze nei primi anni del 1500. Il braccio destro della Sindone, più lungo del sinistro, così come lo sono il braccio destro della Madonna dell’Annunciazione, e del San Girolamo, che presentano la medesima anomalia. Le dita molto lunghe della mano destra dell’uomo sindonico, così come sono estese le dita della mano destra nel ritratto della Dama con l’ermellino. L’indice e il medio della mano destra dell’immagine sindonica sono innaturalmente lunghi uguali, come l’indice e il medio della mano destra dell’angelo dell’Annunciazione, anch’essi di simile lunghezza. La posizione da ambidestro dell’uomo della sindone, con la mano sinistra posta sulla destra, come sono da persona ambidestra la posizione delle mani di Gesù nell’Ultima Cena .dipinta da Leonardo a Milano. Mentre l’uomo della Sindone è un morto con gli occhi chiusi che sta per tornare in vita, la Gioconda per il professore universitario di linguistica Mario Alinei è il ritratto di una donna morta con gli occhi aperti. L’immagine presenta nel complesso particolari contraddittori: la bellezza complessiva dell’immagine contrasta con le anomalie anatomiche riguardanti la lunghezza del braccio destro e delle dita. Al contempo la bellezza radiosa del volto dell’uomo si oppone violentemente con l’immagine inquietante del volto stilizzato che emerge o meglio coincide con la ferita al costato. Ma anche nelle opere di Leonardo questo contrasto è spesso presente e rende inquietante molti dei suoi lavori artistici. Queste considerazioni dimostrano la paternità artistica di Leonardo, se la Sindone è puramente opera umana. In tal caso realizzata su probabile commissione segreta dei reali di Francia e/o del casato dei Savoia, che poi avrebbero fatto la sostituzione di nascosto e in incognito del telo precedente con quello di Leonardo. In tale ipotesi Leonardo non solo, ha costruito l’immagine sindonica, ma l’avrebbe anche implicitamente firmata. Ma al contempo non si esclude l’attribuzione a Nostro Signore, che potrebbe avere realizzato un autoritratto di natura miracolosa. Come rivela la suora beatificata Anna Caterina Emmerick nelle sue visioni sulla Passione di Gesù. In tal senso se la Sindone è un autoritratto sui generis di Nostro Signore, ne consegue che Gesù di Nazaret e Leonardo da Vinci realizzarono opere artistiche simili. www.amazon.it/Sindone-Torino-opere.../dp/B01FOEAHKO/

Thanks for posting! ❤⛪️Thanks, Fr Dalton!

55:03 “Adesso tu mi trovi un professore universitario di statistica…” “E dove te lo trovo? Io non conosco nessuno!” Parentesi simpaticissima e provvidenziale! Grazie, professoressa!

Barrie is with the LORD now! Will be missed by many including me! Well done, good and faithful servant!

I just learned Barrie passed away a few days ago. Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord.

One of the biggest challenges with the medieval forgery theory is this either: (1) there lived in France a genius at the end of the Middle Ages greater than Michelangelo and Da Vinci who created a masterpiece with hidden details that no one was able to see or would be able to see until the 20th century. Not only did he hide these details in the forgery, but he chose to depict a Christ crucified through the wrists and crowned with a helmet-like crown common to the Mideast, but foreign to the European imagination. And there’s no record or mention of him!!! OR (2) a medieval forger accidentally produced an image that accidentally included the reverse negative image, accidentally included the detail that is only observable in the reverse negative, etc. Sometimes the simplest explanation is the most logical. It’s more likely than not the shroud covered Jesus of Nazareth.

I have come to understand that 2 nails were used to pin the feet. In this very video at the 1:43:07 mark, you show a slide form the shroud that in my opinion clearly shows two nail wounds. One nail was driven through the left foots ankle, exiting the heel as seen in the picture, and anther nail driven through both feet exiting the center of the left foot as seen in the picture.

What an amazing Sermon. Thank you and bless you and your passion for our Savior.

Perfect presentation. MARANATHA!

Very helpful and informative. Many thanks.

No doubt that is Jesus. Only God that can produce such a image. ❤️🙏✨

I thought there was carbon dating done recently that put the shroud in the first century.

To right😮

Not to be confused with the Mandylion called the "Image of Edessa " The only gift directly given by Christ to man At the time of Jesus there ruled a King called Abgar in Edessa (Urhai) who having heard of Jesus & his PERSECUTION by the Jews, sent word to him inviting him to live & preach in his kingdom peacefully, to which Jesus send back word that he would not come but would send his representative, Later came Mar Mari and Mar Addai, the pair off the 72 disciples, The King was greatly pleased at seeIng them remembering the words of Jesus, thus came in pocession of the Mandylion as a gift from Christ, The first King to become a Christian, who arranged for the disciples to preach Christ across his kingdom Edessa went on to become a major center of Christian learning from where orginated the Anaphora of Mari and Addai, the oldest know Apostolic Liturgy called the "Gem" A safe place for Christians inc the Jews who accepted their Messiah while there was heavy PERSECUTIONS going on in Jerusalem & Rome, During the latter part of the 2nd centuary there was born in the land of Abgar (Edessa) to a Christian Greek innkeeper daughter, Helena, a Son who went on to become CONSTANTINE THE GREAT leading to the EDICT OF MILAN, He who became Emperor of all of the East & West It is reasoned that after Abgar invited Jesus, Christ washed his face & dried it with a piece of cloth, and the image of his face became imprinted on the cloth, It is reasoned that which caused the image of his face to be imprinted on the cloth was his STRONG EMOTION The Mandylion went on to be a priced pocession of the Byzantine Empire, even as its truth continues,

Thank you Father, you are teaching me so much! I am a cradle Catholic and trying to truly understand my faith. You have helped me so much understand what our Lord went through and I watch your talks over & over. May God Bless you!

I personally think the shroud just fell through Him

Science can't deny this. The shroud is absolute proof Jesus is exactly who He said He is. God's Son! 100% accuracy. You and I. Are going to be judged by Jesus!

Why is this guy rocking back and forth?

He struggled with the entire presentation,saying a lot of words without saying much at all...no offense intended

So, essentially Jesus was "beamed" out of the tomb, then reconstituted physically intact soon after. Did he walk out of the tomb after the stone was rolled away, or was he "re-made" elsewhere?

The shroud is a RESULT of your faith not the cause of your faith...

Boost sound