Видео

57:00 Why is the freewill statement non-sense? Would love if he expanded on that.

Thank you, I thoroughly enjoyed this conversation and learnt a tremendous amount! I may be wrong here, but one tiny observation is Naval might be using Inductivism to explain the world running out of resources. "Humans have never run out of resources in the past" might not necessarily equate to "Humans will never run out of resources in the future". Also, "Humans are always one experiment away from generating new knowledge" while might hold true, seems to exist on an infinite time scale. That next leap in knowledge creation may not necessarily come soon enough if at all. Pulling from Taleb's explanations in "Fooled by Randomness" we could have multiple one-off prolific scientific discoveries followed by nothing at all. Relying on an infinite Randomness while our best bet, might seem overly optimistic While I agree with the broader concept and sentiment that growth and rational optimism might be our best bet, I find it challenging to understand the reasoning behind the explanation.

Emile Durkheim, “Crime is society’s norm”

This is a great year end surprise🎉,Tnx for the word from Naval and best of luck for future ❤

How to Think? 0:04:12 - The Four Strands of the Fabric of Reality David Deutsch’s "Four Strands"-epistemology, evolution, quantum theory, and computation-are positioned as interwoven pillars explaining reality. Naval frames them as tools for navigating life, not merely academic abstractions. Strengths: The unifying framework is powerful, emphasizing interconnected knowledge systems and creativity’s role in progress. Challenges: Naval romanticizes their accessibility. Concepts like quantum mechanics and computational theory are highly specialized and abstract, making them impractical for daily decisions. Deeper Insight: These strands can inspire systemic thinking, but they must be paired with actionable principles for personal and societal applications. 0:06:01 & 0:07:54 - Epistemology & GroupThink Naval critiques jargon like "epistemology" and reframes it as "how to know what’s true." His interpretation centers on fallibilism (the idea that our knowledge is always incomplete and revisable). He also argues that groups prioritize consensus over truth, while individuals can independently pursue truth through error correction. Naval seems to believe in individual discovery as an epistemological bedrock. Strengths: Simplifies an often complex subject, making it relatable. Insightful critique of groupthink, especially relevant in polarized social and scientific environments. Challenges: The dismissal of "jargon" risks undervaluing precision. Naval's rejection of binary true/false paradigms can blur actionable conclusions. Also overlooks the collaborative nature of scientific progress, where authority & peer review and interdisciplinary work refine individual ideas. In the absence of such collaboration, there is a lot of room for "noise" and snake-oil salesmen. Deeper Insight: Epistemology is crucial for navigating misinformation but must be paired with principles like falsifiability and actionable heuristics to avoid intellectual nihilism. The tension between consensus and individual inquiry can be harmonized through structured systems encouraging dissent while maintaining collaborative progress. 0:56:24 - Applying Epistemology in Personal Life Naval advocates for falsifiability and adaptability in personal and professional decision-making. Strengths: Encourages a mindset of continuous learning and improvement. Challenges: May overemphasize theory over actionable practices in some contexts. Deeper Insight: Pair epistemological principles with practical tools like reflection and feedback loops. 0:35:48 - The Importance of Freedom of Thought and Communication Naval emphasizes that free thought and communication are foundational to innovation and societal progress. Strengths: Defends free speech as essential for error correction and diverse perspectives. Challenges: Underemphasizes the need to balance free speech with mechanisms to address harm (e.g., disinformation). Deeper Insight: Freedom of thought thrives in environments where robust debate and accountability coexist. 0:54:44 - The Importance of Knowledge Creation Naval emphasizes that knowledge creation, not resource accumulation, defines wealth and progress. Strengths: Reorients focus from material scarcity to intellectual abundance. Challenges: Overlooks the barriers (e.g., disinformation, propaganda, etc.) that limit access to knowledge creation. Deeper Insight: Democratize access to knowledge to unlock collective potential. 01:06:40 - The Importance of Error Correction Naval highlights error correction as the essence of scientific and personal progress. Strengths: Positions error correction as foundational to resilience and growth. Challenges: Underexplores systemic resistance to error correction, such as institutional inertia. Deeper Insight: Foster cultures where admitting and addressing errors is rewarded rather than stigmatized. Naval on Common Societal/Political Stances: 0:13:15 - Pro-Natalism Naval champions population growth as a driver of innovation and creativity, challenging narratives of overpopulation. Strengths: Links population size to potential knowledge creation, a critical factor in solving global challenges. Challenges: Oversimplifies the relationship between population growth and sustainability, ignoring environmental and resource management constraints. Deeper Insight: Population growth can be beneficial when coupled with investment in education, technology, and equitable resource distribution. 0:13:43 & 0:15:22 - Are We Running Out of Resources? Are We Destroying the Earth? Naval contends that resources are not finite but limited by our knowledge and technology. He acknowledges environmental concerns but rejects alarmist narratives, focusing instead on humanity’s potential to rejuvenate and protect ecosystems. Strengths: Optimistically reframes scarcity as a solvable challenge through innovation. Challenges: Neglects ecological timeframes and the energy cost of resource substitution & human misery caused in the process. Deeper Insight: While knowledge can unlock new resources, integrating sustainability principles is crucial to ensure long-term prosperity and this a fundamental shift from current accelerationist development agenda. 0:20:32 - The Risks of Regulating AI Naval argues against regulating AI, emphasizing the risk of stifling innovation and the futility of restricting mathematical progress. Strengths: Challenges reactionary regulation that could hinder beneficial technological advancements. Challenges: Minimizes real concerns about AI misuse, such as job displacement, privacy violations, and militarization. Deeper Insight: Instead of outright rejection, advocate for adaptive governance frameworks that evolve with AI capabilities while safeguarding against misuse. 0:29:00 - The Problem with Degrowth Naval dismisses degrowth as performative and anti-human, framing it as a rejection of progress. Strengths: Calls attention to the value of innovation and growth in improving quality of life. Challenges: Strawmans degrowth, ignoring its emphasis on sustainable well-being rather than economic regression. Deeper Insight: A nuanced critique of degrowth integrates its focus on sustainability with Naval’s optimism about human potential. 0:38:37 - The Role of Religion in Society Naval critiques modern ideologies as "shadow religions" while recognizing the human need for meaning. Strengths: Insightfully identifies parallels between traditional religions and secular ideologies. Challenges: Risks dismissing ideological movements as inherently dogmatic, ignoring their capacity for progress. Deeper Insight: Engage critically with ideologies to extract their positive contributions while mitigating dogmatic tendencies.

Around 51:00 , does that mean, he rejects theory of evolution of coming from apes? or he agrees we have evolved from lower intelligence and functioning species but we are uniquely different and knowledgable.

the quality of this podcast is just 🤌🤌🤌

Thank you very much!

Please do more videos with Naval. Grateful to see this. Thankyou.

Why this discussion? What's his involvement in research and academics to talk about these topics? Please enlighten.

@24:12 matrix glitch… universe winking 🤔

Who is Popper?

Just like Deutsch, you really need to re-listen multiple times to really understand what Naval is saying. Naval giving analogies and examples helps a lot. Timeless insights and advice.

Thnku for this podcast ❤

Great thoughts - enjoyed it. if Naval asks some first principles question on virology and genetics (start by reads books like Virus Mania that have done it for us, not rely on the mainstream/consensus science views of them uncritically, as he sees the problems with status seeking, groupthink and corruption and how truth seeking fails in groups), it would have the same societal impact of him backing 2nd Amd, Trump, free speech etc. the fear of carbon, viruses, climate are all interlinked and are for seeding totalitarian 'solutions'.

Way to go, mate. Appreciate it :)

Humans are gods. We weild power unfathomable, the potential untapped, the scales unknown. Our virility mixed with curiosity makes the physical reality open itself. The co-creative partnership we have with the cosmos, even if for a flicker or instant, is the playful vibrancy it needed. Like a newborn toddler we run around and break or make things, but we are at home ,always. No fear, rage rage against the dying night.

Finally. I hope you find another calling now.

Hinton wants to regulate ai as he’s worried about its effects, he’s not innumerate.

Great to see naval with you❤

“When people make more they plant gardens” that made me laugh out loud As if that matters at all in the calculation lol

The Fabric of Reality by David Deutsch (Hindi) ruclips.net/video/2qbRMB46piw/видео.html

14:40 sounds like someone is referring to ZPE

Bro did better job then millions of subscriber holder hosts👏👏

Great podcast Arjun

poopodoopo

Hindi has ancient words for 1. people who don't age old but will die someday (Ajar) 2. Amar ( who can't die)

Immortality will stop progress. No new people, no new ideas

Arjun will surely be the Joe Rogan of the e/acc world, even Lex Fridman hasn’t interviewed Naval yet

Great interview !

London town undefeated

How does this not have a million views I’m grateful I’m here

This was amazing!

Great to see both of you together! This is a Christmas present for every Naval listener.

I think, Naval has become overly optimistic about the world. While he has always been this way, he used to consider both sides of the argument. For instance, at 20:38, he explains that people with more money are only eating marginally better food than the rest of the population. This perspective is highly subjective and cannot be reduced to plain black-and-white terms. A significant portion of the global population still struggles to access proper nutritional food; for many, even subpar food in adequate quantities is unavailable, forget about the quality. In contrast, millionaires and billionaires can afford much better-quality food that helps them live a better life. Claiming that the divide isn't substantial feels like denial. Additionally, opportunities are far from equal. Naval himself has acknowledged that factors such as where you are born, the education you receive, and many other factors heavily influence how much a person can excel in his life. Perhaps it's time for Naval to go on a world tour to witness the struggles firsthand.

we are so lucky that the founder of angelist knows about quantum nob and he’s sharing it with us!

How did you get him on your podcast?

I wished Naval talked more about the deep connection between epistomology (theory of knowledge) and creating wealth. Since that’s what many of us know him from

Naval is the god of common sense.

Clear thinker naval 🙏

0:00 - Intro 0:56 - Impact of Reading Atlas Shrugged 2:46 - Transition from Online Writing to Book Writing 4:26 - The Importance of Timing with Books 6:51 - The Challenges of Writing a Book vs. Online Content 8:27 - The Role of External Validation in Writing 10:39 - The Relationship Between Time Spent on Writing and Durability 12:14 - Marketing a Non-Traditional Non-Fiction Book 13:44 - Balancing Engagement and Information in Writing 17:48 - The Strategy Behind Crypto Explanations in the Book 21:51 - The Idea of "Come for the Money, Stay for the Tech" 23:59 - The Potential of Decentralized Social Media 28:53 - The Risks and Speculative Nature of Crypto Investments 31:33 - The Experience with Three Arrows Capital and the Concept of Exit Liquidity 34:48 - The Emotional and Psychological Impact of the Crypto World 36:29 - Anonymity in the Crypto Space 38:33 - The Appeal of Pseudonyms 39:30 - Productive Constraints for Writers 42:37 - The Development of the Prolific App 44:28 - Reading Habits and Note-Taking 46:29 - The Future of Work and the Shift from Traditional Career Paths 50:32 - The Reemergence of Traditional Gender Roles 56:58 - The Potential Impact of Longevity on Societal Norms 59:59 - Personal Hygiene Choices: No Shampoo and Tallow Soap

0:04:12 - The Four Strands of the Fabric of Reality 0:06:01 - Epistemology Explained 0:07:54 - Group Consensus vs. Individual Truth-Seeking 0:13:15 - The Case for a Greater Population 0:13:43 - Are We Running Out of Resources? 0:15:22 - Are We Destroying the Earth? 0:20:32 - The Risks of Regulating AI 0:29:00 - The Problem with Degrowth 0:35:48 - The Importance of Freedom of Thought and Communication 0:38:37 - The Role of Religion in Society 0:42:45 - Humans as Universal Explainers 0:54:44 - The Importance of Knowledge Creation 0:56:24 - Applying Epistemology in Personal Life 01:06:40 - The Importance of Error Correction 01:10:57 - The Problem with Induction

Hey Arjun Khemani, is that Arjun Rampal in your DP?

Is there a link pointing to the theory of everything? I can only get the movie on google search

The part where he speaks about rejecting an idea if it doesn't make sense to you, instead of just thinking that it can't fit into your framework at the moment... That's a quote or an idea from a famous philosopher or scientist, perhaps Deutch, Kuhn or Feynam... Can anyone help me remember?

This is wonderful Arjun! Thanks for doing this.

Thanks!

David's view of history is Eurocentric and incomplete. Yes, he is right that Europe lacked progress until the greeko Roman civilization but there were other civilizations with rational thought flourishing during Europe's insignificance period for example the Indian, Chinese, and Egyptian civilizations. Progress occurred there at an astonishing pace and much of the technology we take for granted was developed there and digested into Europe (Trade with India is the reason behind the Gold Standard across the world) The enlightenment he speaks about has happened several times in many different geographies across the world with more if not equal progress.

congrats bro

Naval ❤