Видео

Like oceans and rivers? That's sorta the easiest thing to do haha. Working on a large waterfall sim

@@RoyalsAndRogues yes, a large waterfall would be a good test, thank you! I was also thinking whether liquigen can mix different color liquids. I don't have liquigen yet and i haven't played with it. Just throwing some thoughts here.

@@bfewdv It's worth it, tons of fun and insanely fast. What it lacks in depth it makes up for in speed. If want to give it a try I have a link the the description for a free trial that lets JangaFX know I sent you.

Thank you! If i decide to go with the trial, it will be through your link :)

Does this happen with my test project file? It works fine for me but I am on v2024.4. Check to make sure the mesh isn't too dense, your target length might be too low or high, your bendiness isn't too high or too low... there are a lot of things that can go wrong. Under "mix animation" Check "with Force" and adjust the settings there until it works. One thing to do is going into your simulation settings (Ctl + D) and upping the substeps and dampening. Lastly you can use a cloth sim tag instead and wait for it to calm down and then check "set initial state" in the dresser menu but your object will have to be editable.

Welcome! Hope it helped.

You can use attraction instead and if you want it to move with an object without changing the water but it's very sensitive.

@@RoyalsAndRogues thank you!

This isn't really a tutorial as much as a very specific use case. This post might help: www.linkedin.com/posts/keyjason_real-time-illustration-sim-of-the-4-stroke-activity-7138531200813432832-o1IL? If you ask Jason nicely on Twitter or LinkedIn he might give you the project file/tips for setting it up.

Emitter node > Activity > Show Same with other nodes Collider > general > show The other thing is under view in your preview window uncheck "All input shapes when paused".

USD isn't supported by JangaFX yet.

Yep, you should definitely do that, I recommend it at the end of the video, but I find it's best to keep it all lined up just makes things simple.

You can use real world sizes and just shrink the voxels to get the level of detail you need. I was starting from my previous tutorial that's while it's the size it is in the tut.

I am not a heavy blender user but you might be able to put it in a null object and move that instead?

Working on it!

You can use an Add material node to give it a material

@@RoyalsAndRogues thanks for the reply, after doing some resesrch i found out on my own but i appreciate it!

I agree haha

I have a beginner's guide for embergen. They are both node based and share some similarities but way more setting and inputs in Embergen

I'll try to include Blender in my next tutorial about Import/exporting with Liquigen. I just wanted to get this out ASAP so people could start playing around without being lost. I'm not a blender user but will see where I can get with it.

@@RoyalsAndRogues makes sense... but if you're not comfortable in blender I could also use an unreal workflow with Liguigen! :)

Depends on how you do it. You can make an object have a floating animation and import that as a collision object. Or you can align an object to the surface and offset it in your DCC . But I don't think you can drop a rubber duck into Liquigen and have it float around live.

Emitter>particle collision> Up Friction, lower bounce, if it's still not sticking enough you can make the repulsion intensity a negative number so the collider pulls it in instead of pushing away.

@@RoyalsAndRogues great , thanks a lot !

I'm not sure what you mean... You would just start the render after the last frame both machines did.

@@RoyalsAndRogues That's what I figured: you're basically managing the render yourself. I was talking about extremely long, multi-day renders that have large refraction/SSS/etc areas so each frame is a hog in its own right. I typically don't know how much I'm going to get rendered each night, so I end up with lots of breaks in my EXR sequence as TR splits each section in half every time I fire up the render after a workday. I'm finding it useful to keep a txt file tracking what's been rendered each time I need to stop, so I have easy reference of what frames still need to be filled in. Currently tracking an 1800-frame render with a txt file that looks like this: 0000-1095 1146-1159 1272-1290 1448-1454 It's a lot easier to update the txt file with info from Picture Viewer's clear list before I stop render than to try and look at filenames in the image sequence folder later to try and spot the breaks, especially with multiple AOV passes. It'd be amazing if Team Render checked the folder and knew on its own which frames had been rendered, and then avoided overwriting already-rendered frames when you fire it up so that you don't have to track it yourself. I think those types of features are probably why people start using managers like Deadline? (edit) Like @bluebearcreativeAU , I had also been dragging my feet on digging in and getting TR to work until I found your video. So thanks!

Yes, easily. I don't cover that type of emission here but you could easily set it up.

If you want it to spray wide look a my blood splat video (Put a cone in front of the emitter and up the direction it shoots in). If you want a jet of water just up the emission direction/target.

These comments mean the world to us!

Working on importing and attraction for the next tutorial.

@@RoyalsAndRogueslooking forward to it. this was super helpful

What about it?

​@@RoyalsAndRoguesi am already a jangafx suite customer....but these particles abc do not ever import into unreal...😢...however anyother abc with mesh ( both liquids and so and so) opens and works fine...but particles ( or points abc) never...plz help if any work around😢😢

Glad it helped

Glad we could help.

Maybe not 10 minutes, I always lose a lot of time tweaking stuff to get it just right. But it's crazy how far free or affordable tech has come.

@@RoyalsAndRogues 10 minutes I mean for the professional person who already have presets> they just drag and drop the presets with little tweaks> however, technology has made things much much cheaper and achievable than before> doing GPU stimulations in past (Can u imagine cost of GPU computer 10 years ago and also little technology) > size of computer and GPU required to run such stimulation and Softwares required> too much pain and money> and now itz so easy and education is also available on internet

did you find any solution for this. pls answer

@@leafshinobi8781 Hey, in the geometry nodes editor you just need to add a set material node, and then select the material there. Then you can edit the material in the shader tab like usual

@@colejohnstonco yes I found that later. Thanks anyways

I for sure ran out of time by the end. Would have liked to spend more time on the sim to get it right but my main goal was to talk about the differences not really make the best version of each. TBA the Air quib could use a lot of love too, pre-cutting the shirt so it blows open, tapping it down better so it stays on my body, getting a back squib to show penetration. ETC One thing I wish I did looking back is a mix of all the methods to show they aren't exclusive.

@@RoyalsAndRogues nah bro. I get it. Spending too much time on quality stuff for social media is always risky. I love the video. Eitherway. It you ask me. I'd always do it in post. For more control even if it might not look as real. But I'm bias as a vfx artist 🤪