Видео

Email me on my site and I'll send you my ordering info. I'm working on a new brake that will have threaded and plugged top holes so you can control the muzzle rise on big magnums. The 300wm is about the largest caliber the current design can control the muzzle rise on to spot shots.

Yep if you reach out to me on my website I can hook you up.

Thanks for the feedback. Yeah the side blast is a little rough for bystanders but the recoil reduction is in a league of its own.

I haven't tried anything faster with that rifle. It's only a 24" barrel and I didn't spend a bunch of time developing a load.

I haven't tested a HuDu but I'd bet a large stack of cash their percentage of recoil reduction claims are pure BS. Drilled hole brakes dont have the surface area a ported brake has no matter how many holes there are. A flat or slightly cupped baffle/port has a large surface area to counter act recoil. Only about 45 degrees of a round hole does any meaningful work at reducing recoil. Probably only about 1/2 that 45 degrees does anywhere near the work of a flat or cupped brake but that surface area is so small on a drilled hole that it would take at least 12 holes to equal 1 baffle. There are 5 baffles per side on my Beast brake in that video. That would mean the brake would need 120 holes or more to come close. Their pictures show 7 holes per side.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 will find out soon on my 7mm PRC I have spoken with them, apparently a lab has done the testing ? Cheer’s I hope you are wrong 😂🙏 thanks for the reply … might be ordering one from you, should this one be a fail. 👍

I've probably tested more brakes than most anyone and I'm rarely surprised. Good luck with it.

A 2 port or 3 port. The specific brake would depend on the barrel diameter, thread size and 1 piece or 2 piece self timed.

Your welcome.

The first port on the MDT Comp is 90% rather than angled back towards the shooter. That greatly reduces the effectiveness of a muzzle brake. It helps with the concussion but gives up a bunch of performance. It's the same principle as the Muscle brake. The first port does a higher percentage of work than the rest and handicapping it by making it 90 degrees drastically reduces the overall effectiveness.

I haven't tested them recently but they have the same ports as the 1 piece Super Beast which are slightly larger than the Big Beast II. I haven't done a overall test because most of my competitors brakes that I use are roughly the size of my Beast/Beast II brakes. They perform much better then they did in my 300wm test since I redesigned them though.

I have thought about doing shotgun and pistol brakes but haven't had a chance yet.

I just received my Beast Brake for my 300 Win Mag. From Nathan. Quality is excellent. I’ll be ordering same for my 300 PRC soon.

@@joebidendidthat5121does the recoil feel the same as a 6.5cm with no brake ?

Win mag now feels like a .223 or 5.56, maybe less. Don’t even think about recoil at all while shooting it. Have not ordered one for the .300 PRC yet

@@joebidendidthat5121 that’s sweet, I’m only asking because i’m building a 8.5lb total weight ( including scope )300 win mag for out west backcountry hunting.

Yes.

Yes it is.

Thank you

It's the standard Raptor. They didn't make the monster version when I bought it.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 Thank you very much, greetings friend.

5 port beast cf or ti beast cf

A .270 with 130's is about 17.8lbs of recoil and a 6.5cm is about 16 with 147's. If you keep the bullet weight down and add a brake he should easily be able to shoot it. My kids shoot my 6.5prc and they are 10 and 11.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 Thank you for the info!

Your welcome

I'm going to try and get a pressure plate setup going this spring to double up the data.

Is it the sporter barrel? If so I usually do a 5 port Super Baby Beast with 9/16x24 threads.

There is no weight in the bucket at all. The bucket just adds a bit of weight to calm the sled upon initial firing to get more consistent results. I guess I could make a expanded metal bucket instead for skeptics like you. That way you could see through it. Unlike some I dont need to cheat. My brakes perform as advertised. Most others don't even show velocity or how they actually come up with their crazy high percentage of recoil reduction claims. I built the test sled, I'm pretty sure if I wanted to cheat I could and you'd never know it was happening. The same could be said for about any video testing anything on RUclips or anywhere else on the internet. The cool thing is I have a even better brake design that is almost finished and will be released soon. The sled travel is a couple inches less already if I don't change anything from now until it is released. When you actually test design changes and tweaks you find out what works. That is how I know I make the most effective brakes on the market. If it came down to having to prove it in front of a audience I'd have no problem doing it. I doubt you'd find others willing to say the same.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492putting that money where your mouth is. Love it.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492when are you releasing that new one? I’ll be in need of one soon

@@lessforloans It depends on when I can get out for more testing. The weather has been cooperative. I want to test a few more tweaks before I release so there is nothing left on the table this time.

So is this new design ready yet

You can contact me with the email on my website. www.muzzlebrakesandmore.com

It was last updated April of this year. I am still active as this video was done in July of this year.

I would do a Ti Beast CF since it has the same ports as the Ti Beast but it is closer to your barrel diameter at the muzzle.

Your welcome.

I hope you like it.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 Love it

I just did a new 300PRC video and will probably do quite a few more soon. It's a bit hard when it's 100 degrees so I might pick a cooler day.

It's really not that warm. Most 300wm's will shoot 210's easily into the 2900's with the slower powders like H-1000, Retumbo, etc and high energy powders like N-570 with go into the 3000's.

The orientation, or the direction of the ports, doesn't change the lateral travel of a brake and the sled. I did use adapters and timed all of my brakes the same for future testing because it seems to bother some people but it doesn't effect the travel of the sled at all. The wheels on the sled are surrounded top and bottom so it rolls the same all the time.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 just curious about effect. I was looking at the Terminator T2 for my .300 win mag. Thank You for the reply.

You'd be wrong. I have a Hypertap and ran it with some prototypes I was testing a couple weeks ago. It's not quite as good as my 4 port Beast.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 - Vid or it didn’t happen.

@@jsl6155 I will put videos up soon now that the weather is better. My prototype video isn't something I let people see.

@@muzzlebrakesandmore3492 - Looking forward to it.

I would take their claims with a heavy grain of salt. There isn't a brake around with 90 degree ports that will come close to brakes with ports angled back.

I'm prototype testing tomorrow as well as some new test with more of my competitors brakes. I changed my sled a bunch to lighten the weight so it will be interesting to see how things shake out with the new sled.

I have a TBAC Ultra9 and will probably add it to the big test I have planned for the 300wm and 300PRC in the next week or so. It's a .30 caliber suppressor but I will probably run it when I do a test on a 6.5PRC as well.