Видео

Now take a look at midjourney showcase, something of that quality takes human artist decades of practice and weeks of work, midjourney does it like in 20-30 seconds 😉 Not even mentioning “mediocre pointless and un-interesting stuff” which still takes human at least hours to produce 😅

Like any other language programmer cant do the same 🤭 Frankly, dynamic language programmers are more likely to riot and start their own gig, just because it takes them exponentially less time to create something of their own 😉

@@Sergio_Loureiro 1. Registers are frequently used in embedded and firmware programming, if you didnt use them doesn’t mean others dont. 2. Use of smart pointers is not automatic in any way, you still need to write this code, also they dont resolve circular dependencies. 3. It is independent for at least twenty years or so, doesnt change the point there are still jobs where you have to write hardware-dependent code 👋

@@AlexeyTutorials Do you mind answering this since my goto is Odin, Swift and a few other semi-systems languages. IN the case of 1, aren't register programming used in drivers for like say the GPU? I want to assume any embedded SOC of any kind would need a firmware to run registers to move/allocate. Also, I think the 'market' numbers might actually not take into account this and game development, which is where I expect the bulk of development to be. Because C++, unlike C, has plenty of alternatives for drivers/embedded development.

@@twenty-fifth420 odin seems like hobbyist language with extremely low market share, are you planning to develop own pet projects or find a contract job? If second, I’d recommend going with Swift, but only if you like developing iOS apps. I dont have experience in programming GPU drivers, but in embedded devices registers are used for high-performance memory and reading device intrinsic state and received data from input channels. Funny thing with gamedev, mostly AAA studios are developing in C++ and thats a tiny percentage, other studios go either HTML5 or Unity 😉

Wdym? In my country several local hardware and firmware companies actively headhunt last year students proficient in c++, lots of unis teach this language for four years straight and even microcontroller programming course is enough to land a job. Those who focus on python/java/c#/etc still have to complete their course on c++ 😉

Not ranting, giving advice to those who thinking to go C++ way. Is it fun tho? 20 years ago when I started there wasnt much alternative for desktop development - it was either Delphi or C++ Builder, but now you have plenty of convenient choices unless you really into low-level stuff 😉

@@AlexeyTutorials So it is people like you doing all these ..eh.. great desktop applications we love?

@@raymundhofmann7661 someone else, I switched to other languages a long time ago 😉

@@AlexeyTutorials Better switch to Rust. Then your time is completely taken up by telling others how great it is so you can't worsen to the crappy software crisis.

Share is still pretty low, thats the point. I understand first result might be exxageraged, thats why I showed two charts from two different sources 😉

very nice language and solves lots of pain points c++ has, also average salaries of rust developers are much higher than of c++, but I think this is for now while its hyped and doesnt have enough workforce on the market 🤔

@@AlexeyTutorials It is also overly favoured by Crypto startups, and the venture-capital well for blockchain technology is drying up. So we may well have a glut of unemployed Rust programmers soon.

@@AlexeyTutorials I'm a fresh electronics engg grad and I already am familiar with a lot of Python and "know enough" of C/C++. My question is Rust the 'future' or should I stick to developing skills in C or Python? I don't like Java/Javascript or anything web based or something similar

rust crates sitll slower than their c/c++ counterparts xdddd

@ you should stick to one field, decide what you want to do and choice of language will come naturally 😉

But hey I literally showed salary report for Germany in the first seconds of the video, C++ vs React 🙄

@AlexeyTutorials had multiple job offers in that language. Problem is, the country side pay way less in everything in IT and metros pay way better This side show the median and/or have old data Check Thinkcell in Berlin: 130k C++

@AlexeyTutorials Can't write a example, but there is a company in Berlin, if you get hired, you earn very much. C++ is a language, where all Microsoft partners would like to hire you My job is with this language and have a good life, this sites show no the complete picture

Some people get 100 billion for doing nothing and you say 100k is good?

@TravisBerthelot yes, for the average absolute, normal jobs in that area pay ~75k + 100 billions for nothing do you NOT get from work, you get it because you have already much, home, company shares, invests....

Exactly what I wanted to write. In the beginning of the vid he literally showed a chart where difference is salaries was miniscule.

it is a markup launguage , but generally they are fallen in coding catagory..

@@xninja2369 Then ppl are dumb. There are no loops, no 'if' conditions... How tf is it a "coding" language? 🤨

@@zdspider6778 bruh chill it's only data about earning not anything else bruh , they aren't comparing launguage, they are comparing income based on launguage

I'm from America, the home of english, and I had no trouble understanding this video. HTML is both programming and coding. Tables and divs are programs. Your limited grasp of english may be responsible for these semantic blocks in your understanding of computer technology.

@@schnauzerhead I thought html is not programming launguage because because it doesn't allow loop & variable , when I do google it's also say it's not programming launguage.. Edit : American is not home of English , Britain is..

What is the truth?

@herethere464 that c++ beginner would warn less than python one.

Yes yes, this is the right way, you can use this shader as a base, and then layer up more details over 👌

I’m not sure to be honest, I’d recommend start learning AI tools to speed up your workflow and earn money while you can 😉

Is this because they made playable clone of Minecraft just by training AI on it? 🙄🤭 Can you imagine what these tools are capable of if using together with tools like Runway ML to create hyper realistic gameplay? 😉

@AlexeyTutorials can you? Because this is trained on data. So it is not original. Do you know what hyper realistic gameplay even is? Do people even want it? Because it's well known in actual game dev that fun does not come from full emulation.

yeah but it can combine concepts from data it trained on just like Midjourney can mix subjects and styles which never existed before together 😉 What I’ve seen from comments under these hyperrealistic tests with gta vice city and half-life well yeah, people want it 🤌

@@AlexeyTutorials until they actually play it. Consumers are largely stupid and detached from creation.

thats just your wishful thinking, I’d rather play hyperrealistic remasters of old games than their legacy graphics 👋

I wouldn’t bet on that 🤭 However, anyone can download neural network and train it to play some game on its youtube walktrough videos 😁

theyre so cheap bro wtf

But hey, have you seen realtime AI games in browser before? 🙄😉 Revolution means that this is the completely new approach to developing games, never seen before. And it doesnt just exist as some whitepaper or lab prototype, its a publicly available playable game 😉

@@AlexeyTutorials No, revolution means it is going to revolutionize. Fidget spinners didn't revolutionize anything, but NES' and other consoles did. Fidget spinners was a completely new approach to fidget toys... doesn't mean it was revolutionary... Just because something is new, doesn't make it a revolution. Also, it is currently not a completely new approach to developing games. Right now it is an approach to try and replicate a game with realtime AI... And in terms of the realtime browser part? So? That's like people posting not the first image, but the first image of a goat, and going "Have you seen an image of a goat on the internet before?" It's not rocking big boats, it's interesting, it's cool, it is something that should be iterated on... but, at the current stage, it is not revolutionary, it is not particularly useful, and it is not a new approach to develop video games. Not yet.

it has all chances to, like GANs already revolutionized creating concept art and stock assets 👋 Was NES a completely new approach to home consoles? Not really, we had atari before it. Why you even comparing it to fidget toys, a completely different concept? Revolution is a fundamental change to some process, Neural Networks is a fundamental change to many areas already, but we didnt have them producing games from scratch, just by looking at gameplay videos of other games. Example with goat is also shuffling up concepts by you, fundamentally its just another image content, not completely another thing like a “game” or “video” produced by neural network. What you mean not a new approach to develop games? You mean that AI browser game is not playable? Or not a game? Or wasnt developed? What do you mean?

@@AlexeyTutorials Yes, it has all CHANCES to, but that does not mean it has. Just because it is a completely new approach does not mean it is revolutionary. And a revolutionary technology, does not need to be a completely new approach. The printing press was made of several pieces of older technology put together. Nothing really new, but revolutionized information sharing. And what I meant by not a new approach to developing games, since they didn't develop a game. They attempted to replicate an existing game, and they did it with their Doom version before that. For it to be revolutionary, it would have to ACTUALLY revolutionize. It would have to actually change up the industry, it would have to change the world in some way. Early neural networks weren't revolutionary, because they didn't change anything. It is only been "recently" that they have revolutionized how people approach a lot of things, and been useful. You can genuinely say that it was ChatGPT that revolutionized LLMs, not because they had a completely new approach, but because they improved the technology enough to actually be useful, and not an interesting gimmick. "Example with goat is also shuffling up concepts by you, fundamentally its just another image content, not completely another thing like a “game” or “video” produced by neural network." Also, in terms of "fundamentally just another image content", well, it was not just "another image content" originally. The "Game with AI" is not even a "completely new approach", it is closer to the printing press, just a slightly different use of already existing AI technology. At the moment, not a particularly useful use either, beyond the research and artistic value it has. It would need to be improved SIGNIFICANTLY (like original Language Generative Neural Networks) before it could ever be considered revolutionary. Are you seeing game studios dropping their current tools to use this tech? I ain't... I am not seeing ANYONE publicly trying to develop a game with this technology at the moment. That makes it NOT revolutionary.

It already has, although I wouldn't use the term "take over". Generative AI is a tool that is already being utilised in the workflow of many game developers. So, even if games that are generated in the same vein as this Minecraft demo aren't practical yet or revolutionary, generative AI as a whole is. For better or for worse, the modern implementation of neural networks is the biggest revolution in technology since the internet.

What else needs to be done on that golem model? How much it would take human to model and texture? 😉

@@AlexeyTutorials Retopology, separating geometry segments. This is one mesh. and insufficient for anything but staging.

@@rtjer42 why would you separate golem into segments? What retopo you need for it and why if you can ask AI to provide any polycount?

@@AlexeyTutorials isnt it obvious, you have a hard surface creature animated to a soft surface animation. it wouldnt pass quality control of any supervisor. unless you want cheap, unrealistic looking motion. if you did it on something made of flesh, no problem, but you arent.

@@rtjer42 dont think golem is hard surface, its a magical creature, not a robot. I asked for a specific time it would take human to model and texture it from scratch 😉

Whats wrong with these?