Видео

@@chessbrilliance8783 fully agree!

I don’t follow many chess streamers on Twitch, but Gata is unique. He despises cheaters, and so do I. He’s authentic and doesn’t pretend to be someone he’s not just for views, likes, or sponsorships. He speaks his mind honestly, without putting mask on or sugarcoating anything to please others. That’s why I like to watch his streams

Thank you for your comment. Many people are so immersed in the fake system that they will fight to protect it, especially those who have invested so much money: like, subscriptions, donations, following, do their idols, which turns out to be wolves in sheep's clothing... It's hard for people to let go of their "investment plans" if you know what I mean. They will continue to defend it, even when they know it's based on deception and lies. This is because they've invested so much, whether emotionally, financially, or both, that they become attached to the idea and will fight to protect it, even when the truth is clear

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter Yeah, they are selling principles and truth down the river for lucre and popularity just like in real life/business/etc. It may even undermine FIDE if the latter has to pay its respects to the online matrix (or receive sponsorship from them). FIDE's stance is too meek. They are not ready to do what needs to be done. The only way to fight it is expose cheaters and cheating. It will rub a lot of folks the wrong way but there's no other way. I am mostly worried about OTB but online is easier to deal with in terms of amount of cheating and rating inconsistencies of astronomical proportions. But I saw people perform too engine-like OTB recently and FIDE is not doing anything. It's like they are afraid to use ACPL again 'cause trolls and bloggers sing songs how ACPL means nothing and how they easily get 99% accuracy at amateur and even beginner level. And they swamp everything with this nonsense. It's like the truth has been buried deep on the bottom of the ocean and banned from ever mentioning it.

100%!

You don't know what engine he could have and what depth was set. Against humans in blitz even some ''weak" engine is good enough. Danya isn't an idiot, he did ''it''wisely.

​@@kristof80able It was not a complicated position at all for the engine. It was a very obviously winning position. His reaction doesn't look suspicious to me at all. The only incriminating thing could be if we could confirm he is looking away from the board.

@@kristof80able at first glance it looks like it might be a zugzwang which is why daniel reacted like that.

And isn't the "evaluation bar" you speak of just simply the timer stopping and starting when a move is made?

Ok it seems i'm not the first to realize this

@black_squall yes that was the timer, but there are still other questions which are still valid in this for daniel

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter I agree I'm just trying to go through them one by one and see what I think is valid.

@@black_squall I see. Good thing you are doing research on your own. Respect for that

Hello! Have you checked the original and also listened to what he was saying at the exact moment he was looking above? Watch my video again - the translation is there for you. He claimed he was looking at the clock at that very moment, but the eye tracker data indicates he was looking way above it… it’s all right there. Before you even consider excusing him by saying the eye tracker wasn’t calibrated, take note of how accurately he looked at his own clock, which rules out the possibility of a calibration issue. In other words, Daniel lied. The question is: Why he lied and where is he looking so frequently above the board, above the clock, in a chess game? Hikaru claims that it’s obvious for him and clear. Not to be “glued” to the screen, but to glance somewhere else every 5 seconds is clear for Nakamura

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter I'm not questioning the calibration. I am saying what could he possibly be looking at above the clock? I highly doubt he had a third monitor there, it would make no sense. And to be clear, I'm not taking any sides here, I just feel like you're jumping to conclusions.

@@darkknight32920 It doesn't need to be another monitor at all. Pay attention that he is only streaming his browser, not the entire desktop. From his previous setups, we know there is a gap between the browser and the top of the monitor. This gap allows him to place plugins or programs. Another possibility (though less likely) is attaching a tablet directly to the laptop behind the monitor. This would keep his gaze slightly up, just 5 cm above the camera and higher than the screen. In this case, when asked to show the room, all he would need to do is pick up the laptop, rotate it, and show the room. The tablet would always stay behind the laptop. This shows how easy it is to outsmart the audience. Now, I'm not saying this happened. First it’s important to eliminate the possibility of programs or plugins between the browser and the top of the monitor. Question is: why does he stream only his browser, not his whole desctop? This would help prove his innocence and show full transparency

One hint here - check his bullet games, and compare his eyes movement yourself

​@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter The shit at 10:58 is hardest for me to wrap my head around....hopefully he will provide some explanation. But yes I will look at his bullet games - the problem is his setup has changed a lot...sometimes he leans very close to the monitor and it stands to reason his eye movements would change dramatically than when he is leaning back.

He's not looking at the clock he's looking at the pawn on A7. He's concerned about some kind of zugzwang in the time scramble but he figures it out.

@@black_squall bullshit he plays on a small laptop, His head line ends a a bit above the monitor(you can see in mirror behind) and he clearly looks above that line. And he cuts the vid in such a crucial moment and whisperes sth..

and comment I pointed out your own edit that calls you out on it,is out. how telling.

You are stupid or just playing?😂

To answer your own question, you’d first need to seek the wisdom of logical thinking and stop following the crowd like a flock of sheep. The first step is to act independently, do your own research, and approach it objectively, without any bias

Kinda sus I must say since your last chapter is titled "the truth" 🤔. What are you hiding? Are you in kahoots with the chesstrix in any way? I have a weird feeling that this is meant to conceal something by making me feel like I discovered "the truth"!!

Tbh this non chalant answer makes you even more sus. Could you tell at least what your background is and what you are up to? Otherwise I struggle to distinguish you from other snakeoil agent smiths :(

Ok so now you stop answering?! 100% sus!! I should start a channel about you and call it EXPOSING CHESSTRIX DOUBLE AGENTES.

😂, but why? For exposing his cheating and using engine during matches?

Time management is surely important?

@@itsameamarioyaplumber3981 I agree, but don't they have a feel for that or that is the proper way of doing it - checking the clock every 2 seconds? I honestly don't know, other GMs could give feedback on how often they check the opponent's clock throughout the game from the beginning till intense situations and time scrambles.

Good point

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter As an amateur, I barely manage to check my own clock, and not even that when there is little time left.

@Stillandyet I'm a relatively strong player (2200) and when I play 3 min I check the clock quite a bit especially early and late in the game. I understand Danya is on a different level but checking one's time at least for me is not suspicious.

Not sure if I follow, what do you mean?

thanks for the idea

Right, no need to check your trusted friend. Proper GM's concentrate on the game, But super duper ninja GM just plays the best moves with out thinking.

@@Gr8Believer i don’t know anybody in the world of chess. Never met a GM in my life. I just play it as a hobby and don’t invest too much time in studying it, other than watching videos here and there. And I think I have only watched 2 videos by Mr Naroditsky. I do not know and will never know how a proper GM concentrates. I do know I don’t need to think much to beat someone a few hundred points lower than me. I know I have had close to 100% accuracy in some of my games. In any case, the points/questions you raise are not proof of anything (answered or not) And stating that the majority of the chess community is seeking clarification to YOUR points is without basis. Ultimately, I think focus should be put on coming up with a solution: what is a practical setup that would alleviate/minimize possibilities of cheating?

Chat on YT: Facepalm So, you didn't even imvest time to watch the full eye tracking video to investigate on your own and to see that he was doing it all the time, yet you invest time to write the comment like that? 😅 listen you brain washed kido, go back watching Hikaru streams and ask him what to think about your life😅

@@zhihanpeng7033 Aren't you that kid who sends money to hikaru nakamura in hopes of being recognized among other kids? Meanwhile, he despises every single one of you, all your attempts, and if you have your own opinion, he will simply ban you? Hah, just go back to your sandbox, you pathetic fool. Grow up! 🤡

Saw Danyas comments, it is chat Window, but he should’ve kept it

​@SidStewie Petrosian also had "just" a chat in his phone 😊

Aren't you that kid who sends money to hikaru nakamura in hopes of being recognized among other kids? Meanwhile, he despises every single one of you, all your attempts, and if you have your own opinion, he will simply ban you? Hah, just go back to your sandbox, you pathetic fool. Grow up! 🤡

@@SzymonMiedzianowski Resorting to Ad Hominem is always distasteful. Would love if you could give a well thought out response.

Kramnik narcissist? Better look at Naroditsky's video thumbnails. Danya F-16 pilot, Danya astronaut, Indiana ''Danya'' Jones, Danya jumbo jet captain, Sherlock ''Danya'' Holmes, Danya firefighter and so on. He really could have been a great pilot he uses engines very well.

​@@kristof80ableDania Witch, Dania Warlock , Dania Top Ten Blitz Player , Dania "Found the move" Naroditsky 😂

@@kristof80able HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA I cried laughing at your comment, what a work of art 🤣 It is also very true...

@@osanomt Thanks, btw I'm quite sure that even Robin Hood didn't have so many arrows as Danya on his thumbnails.🤣

You really dont understand...It is not about Kramnik. We just do not like cheaters. It happens that Kramnik is the one that is trying to do something. And I am glad that there is a channel like this one ! If Hikaru took the lead against cheating it would be fine for me. Ah wait, he thinks there is 2% cheating in online chess...

In the history of mankind there were never any conspiracy. Nothing, never ever was hidden. People are good and always telling the truth.

That's funny, but most "conspiracy theories" of the past 4-8 years have turned out to be true. Jeffrey Epstein, P. Diddy, Hunter laptop, gain-of-function, vaccine side effects, Nordstream, Ukraine Nazis, etc. etc. etc.

Big conspiracy: some elite athletes are cheaters. Wow, mind-blowing, so far-feched !

@@victorfinberg8595 and RUclips deleted yet another one of my chess comments. Why are RUclips algorithms working to protect Danya?

@@illarionbykov7401 there are AT LEAST 6 possibilities. 1) you may be lying outright. i am NOT saying you are lying, but this is always a possibility that a third party must be aware of. 2) you are MISTAKEN. perhaps your comments are still there, but there is some error in the way YOU are using the interface. 3) youtube has in fact deleted your comments RANDOMLY, i.e. for no particular reason except that the system has "bugs" 4) your comments were OBJECTIVELY offensive. in this case, you would have no cause for complaint. 5) your comments would NOT be offensive to a reasonable person, but the system has somehow decided that they are offensive and should be deleted. 6) you have violated some TECHNICAL rule, eg. some channels ban the use of hyperlinks. as you can see, there are many, many "explanations". i have personally observed ALL of the above, in large enough numbers that i can verify that they are all real. on the other hand, nobody that i have encountered can say FOR CERTAIN why the deletions happen. to a certain extent, you just have to live with this stuff, which affects large numbers of people. after all, you are using a FREE service and can make no demands on the platform. hope this helps

Proving that someone isn’t telling the truth is proving they’re lying and that they’re a liar. At this point their entire credibility is called into question. Altough I agree, demonstrating that someone lied isn’t definitive proof that he was using engine, but in this case, he needs to explain where he was looking, because it certainly wasn’t at the clock, as shown in the video he provided himself. The conclusion as to why he lied seems very onesided tho, especially with him being silent for a long time now...

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter He lied for educational purposes

"its possible that any given person is a sexual predator," This is a false equivalence fallacy. Do you have video of a predator's eyes constantly moving to the side to look at a woman's skirt while sitting at the restaurant? Then absolutely, yes, that is evidence that possibly the man is a predator who might attack.

@@citizenguy Haha good move!

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter he can't win can he? he gives answers, he gives cameras, he gives eye tracking, and he's called a liar. He stays silent, you say it's because he has no answers. What is your game here? You've provided nothing but manipulated video clips and claimed it's evidence of something, when it is nothing of the sort. You repeatedly spout conspiratorial rubbish and endless aspersions at Naroditsky's honesty and his character and you have absolutely nothing to back it up. I've watched all your videos, and all of Kramnik's, and there's nothing at all. If I had any doubt at all before, I now know Naroditsky is clean, because a huge amount of effort has been made to prove otherwise, and it's come up with absolutely nothing. All you have done is demonstrate beyond any doubt that he isn't a cheat. I wonder if Danya paid you for this. He couldn't have got a better friend - look what my enemies have - nothing at all! That's better than anything a friend could say. And if he does cheat, you have given him the best possible smokescreen to hide behind. Well done.

You yourself proved the point of the video, when he comments he's also looking at the engine to know the best variations 😅 (btw, I don't mean to make fun of you with my comment). ☺

You have a problem if you are Hikaru's fan. If you criticize the analysis of eye movement, then you must also criticize Hikaru for talking about Petrosian's eyes.

Will have to look and will be back to you in a while about this one

there you go buddy: my part was somewhere around 0min - 10 min ruclips.net/video/iFdoGDFnT3c/видео.html

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter Thank you!

@@kristof80able 42:00 is even better

​@@Bernard-Cheat-HunterDanya has no shame. This is so obvious. There could be compilations from his glances. The funny thing is that when he played at the bullet chess championship or when he has someone with him in the room, he does not behave that way. This could be more evidence. What do you think ?

100%! I’d also like to hear Daniel’s side of the story about eye tracker and what he has to say because if he’s innocent, and it was a softwere issue, he should be doing everything possible to clear up these suspicions. Avoiding a response, unfortunately, only adds to the suspicions

he literally explained everything 70 times your inability to look it up does not make what you said a fact

apparently so

Exactly why that evidence is dubious at best and proves nothing in my opinion.

@@JarrettKirk So according to your logic, all it takes is to fabricate incriminating evidence against yourself so that everyone thinks it would be too stupid to be true. It’s a classic trick. relying on people to think "No one would be irrational enough to incriminate themselves" and that way, you might just get away with it. You're so naive, buddy, it’s almost laughable. Grow up and get a bit of wisdom, for crying out loud

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter Hi, thanks for the reply and I really enjoyed your video! Interesting stuff. Sorry I didn’t properly explain. My idea is that, logically, does it benefit Danya himself to post a suspicious video of him cheating? I think the answer is “No” because no matter what, it only makes him look more guilty! Also, Danya posting “incriminating evidence” is not “all it takes” for me to believe he is innocent. I consider the whole picture. But honestly, this isn’t my main takeaway from the video. The burden of proof is on the prosecutor, and I believe in innocent until proven guilty! So the main point is that the final clip in your video is not conclusive, in my opinion. Which means Danya is innocent, unless more conclusive evidence comes to light. (Also, Ad Hominem arguments actually hurt your position more than help it. I would stray away from those as they are counterproductive) Thanks for reading!

​@@JarrettKirk Let me explain the situation a bit, because I don’t think you fully understand it, yet you have enough nerve to share your opinion on the matter without knowing the facts, which is very strange in the first place. If you don’t have the basic knowledge about the material, like eye tracking, where it came from, or who posted it online, then why are you even commenting? This wasn’t a recording by Daniel, but Daniel was asked by a Russian RUclipsr to stream it live, and the test was conducted during a live stream between Daniel and the RUclipsr. So the outcomes were what they were, with no chance to take them back or to alter/edit the footage _you can call it eye lie detector test ;). Do you understand now? The link is in the description of my video, but of course, you didn’t check it because you didn’t do any research. But again, you’re arguing without knowing the facts, just articulating what you feel is right, which is honestly a big laugh to me. How old are you, seriously? It’s like someone entering a courtroom, not knowing the case, and saying, "He’s not innocent because I feel like he didn’t do it" when they have no idea about the matter, you see? This is what you are doing right now. So, to wrap this up, your assumption is completely wrong because you didn’t care to do your own research. Instead, you trust someone else's opinion about it and is backed up by your emotions, guided by appearances and sympathy instead of objective truth. This says everything about your rationality, if you ask me. Sorry to be honest with you, but I prefer to tell the facts straight to your face. "Stultus ego sum, qui non quaero"

check 1:00:40 of that video and turn on english subtitles

@@Bernard-Cheat-HunterHmm I’m not seeing an English subtitles option, what is he saying here?

@@JarrettKirk At 15:25 of my video above, the scene plays with the already translated Russian into English. Take a look

@@Bernard-Cheat-Hunter Ah I didn’t notice that! Thank you sir. I was wondering what you make of this clip? You say Daniel is lying, but I’m not so sure. When he looks above the board, he says he’s looking at black’s clock. Could this not be due to some miscalibration? You mention that he looks at his white clock correctly, but I’m just not very familiar with the technology. Also, it makes no logical sense for Danya to upload this eye tracker video. If he were cheating, it would make no sense for him to cheat when trying to exonerate himself. Unless if you have an explanation? Just curious, thanks for reading!