![Evidence at Trial](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 48
- Просмотров 271 446
Evidence at Trial
США
Добавлен 28 апр 2019
Evidence at Trial is about a community of lawyers devoted to mastering the tools of litigation. From blog articles and online courses to live events, Evidence at Trial is passionate about helping attorneys develop and improve their individual practice.
Talking Superwitness Michael Cohen with Will Cain on @WillCainShow
Be sure to check out @WillCainShow Best podcast / video show on the planet.
Просмотров: 77
Видео
Talking Trials with Will Cain
Просмотров 2163 месяца назад
Many thanks to Will Cain of Fox & Friends and the Will Cain Show for the chance to sit down and talk trials. Follow Will Cain on X at @willcain Be sure to also check out and subscribe to the the Will Cain Show (best podcast and livestream show around) at radio.foxnews.com/podcast/will-cain-show/
Congress' January 6th Report: An "Admissible" Document?
Просмотров 15 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Welcome to our in-depth analysis, where we dissect the groundbreaking decision by the Colorado Supreme Court regarding former President Donald Trump's eligibility to appear on the ballot. This ruling, rooted in the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Section 3, has sparked extensive debate and scrutiny. Here are the 5 key takeaways from the court's decision and the evidence considered during ...
Trump is OFF the BALLOT?!?!
Просмотров 2,3 тыс.6 месяцев назад
In Dave Sugden's latest video, he looks at the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that held Donald Trump cannot be on the presidential primary ballot. Want a topic covered? Leave a comment!
Donald Trump Fraud Trial: The Impeachment That Wasn't!
Просмотров 3946 месяцев назад
Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial looks at the missed impeachment opportunity in Donald Trump's examination. Would you like a topic covered? Leave a comment!
Donald Trump Fraud Trial: The Judge Did WHAT!?!?!
Просмотров 151 тыс.7 месяцев назад
Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial looks at the conduct of Judge Engoron in the pending Donald Trump Fraud Trial. Would you like a topic covered? Leave a comment!
Donald's TRIAL TESTIMONY was ... What?!?!?
Просмотров 12 тыс.7 месяцев назад
Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial breaks down the recent trial testimony of Donald Trump in the People v. Donald Trump et al. case now pending in New York. Want a topic covered? Leave a comment! Check out @evidenceattrial's online courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses.
Are Medical Records Admissible at Trial?
Просмотров 6348 месяцев назад
@evidenceattrial 's Dave Sugden explains how to approach admissibility issues of medical records. Check out @evidenceattrial 's courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses. What a topic covered? Leave a comment!
Hearsay and Donald Trump
Просмотров 14 тыс.8 месяцев назад
In this video, Dave Sugden breaks down a recent hearsay dispute in the People v. Donald Trump trial pending in New York. Check out @evidenceattrial's courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses. Want a topic covered? Leave a comment!
What is the Party Admission Exception to Hearsay?
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.9 месяцев назад
In this video, Dave Sugden discusses the recent lawsuit filed against Steven Tyler of Aerosmith to discuss the party admission exception to the hearsay rule. Check out @evidenceattrial's courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses. What a topic covered? Leave a comment!
How to Authenticate Documents at Trial
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.9 месяцев назад
In his latest video, Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial explains how to authenticate documents at trial. Check out @evidenceattrial's online courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/onlin.... Have a question? Leave a comment!
How to Handle the Non-Responsive Answer?
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.10 месяцев назад
Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial explains how to handle witnesses who refuse to answer questions. Check out @evidenceattrial's online courses at www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses. Have a question? Leave a comment!
Justin Bieber, Usher and ... Judicial Notice?!?!
Просмотров 47710 месяцев назад
In his latest video, Dave Sugden breaks down the doctrine of judicial notice. For an article on the topic, check out: www.evidenceattrial.com/blog/is-it-too-late-to-say-i-m-sorry-usher-justin-bieber-and-judicial-notice. Check out Evidence at Trial's online courses at: www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses.
Martha Stewart v. Michael Jackson: Fearless and Fruitless Opening Statements!
Просмотров 71611 месяцев назад
Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial explains how master trial lawyers deliver persuasive opening statements. By examining the opening statements from the Michael Jackson and Martha Stewart trials, you'll see examples of effective (and ineffective) opening statements. For an article on the topic, check out www.evidenceattrial.com/blog/the-michael-jackson-trial-the-art-of-proving-a-defense. For @evid...
The 5-Second Rule For Lawyers
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Dave Sugden of @evidenceattrial provides an important methodology to quickly and accurately spot evidence questions during trial. For a the character evidence video, check out: ruclips.net/video/bwsT5hbLIJ4/видео.html For @evidenceattrial's courses, check out: www.evidenceattrial.com/online-courses Have a question or want a topic covered, leave a comment!
How to Impeach a Witness with Prior Deposition Testimony
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.Год назад
How to Impeach a Witness with Prior Deposition Testimony
CAUTION: Follow (or Avoid) the "One Question Too Many" Rule on Cross-Examination?
Просмотров 902Год назад
CAUTION: Follow (or Avoid) the "One Question Too Many" Rule on Cross-Examination?
Fix a Common (and Unnoticed) Cross-Examination Mistake!
Просмотров 624Год назад
Fix a Common (and Unnoticed) Cross-Examination Mistake!
How to Fix Your Direct Examination! Two Tricks! (No "Written Questions")
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.Год назад
How to Fix Your Direct Examination! Two Tricks! (No "Written Questions")
Objection SUSTAINED?!? Lack of Foundation?? (Quick Fix)
Просмотров 2,3 тыс.Год назад
Objection SUSTAINED?!? Lack of Foundation?? (Quick Fix)
How to Apply the Business Records Exception
Просмотров 801Год назад
How to Apply the Business Records Exception
How to Improve Your Opening Statement in Five Minutes
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.Год назад
How to Improve Your Opening Statement in Five Minutes
I went to Federal court in Wisconsin. they would not allow me use this technique because the judge said I have to give the defendants prior notice that i would use the deposition to impeach. I had never heard such non-sense, and still have not. I have been looking for a FRCP, a local rule, or a circuit rule- to no avail. But they cant be making that up because it would possibly create a mistrial.
Ok let's talk about Milwaukee that great innovative city that Democrats love it's to bad Trump feels he needs to shit on a great city did you know that in the 20s Milwaukee had very successful mayors that ran on the socialist party and brought great things to the city way before FDR even was thinking about social security for seniors Milwaukee was thinking of that for 10 years before some of the social programs saved America economy so remember when Republicans scream that Democrats are socialist they just now their heads like Bernie Sanders and say thanks for the complement.
Where can I find Los Angeles Superior Court "Yellow Evidence Tags"? for Exhibits?
Link to courses doesn't work
Can a police officer authenticate text messages at trial without the victim being there?
Can you please run an analysis on the legitimacy of the recent Trump jury trial verdicts and the any grounds for reversal on appeal?
The algorithm sent this to me. I saw Irving Younger live and in person at a seminar. I've always felt the 10 commandments were interesting but not to be treated too literally.
Good and clear explanation lawyer
What ABOUT FLOATING CASES IN CORRUPT LONDON BOROUGHS REAL LIFE ABUSE IS CONTINUING WITH BO SIGN OF STOPPING AND ACCOUNTABILITY IS VANISHING FOR THE HEENOUS CRIMES RACHEL CROYDON URGENT
Great refresher even if you rely on CEC and CA cases.
Thank you for the comment!
LISTEN PEOPLE, YOU REPUBLICANS WHO WHO VOTE FOR him is STUPID!!!
Simply - Genius!
Thank you for the comment!
I have personally messed up confronting a witneess with a previous inconcistent statement. Although it was not from a deposition but a request for admissions, the question of whether the witness has been asked the same question in the past during cross applies equally and is definetely one I will remember. Brilliant.
Isn't he leading the witness by doing that I mean hello say objection to the judge
Oh please Fanny Willis was practically reading a book up on the stand and Donald Trump can't say anything what is the matter with this country
Why would the Supreme Court or any other courts let him get away with something like this this could kill our judicial system they could do this to everyone that should be terrifying
$8 million. I wonder! Divorced twice with children. I don't believe a man saves very much money going through two divorces. Hmmmm
Thank you for this video. It’s so good
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!
Although this video is helpful it doesn't discuss a key piece of info about people's disposition and nature. These are immutable traits and lend themselves to determining whether someone will be good at litigation i believe. Ive done civil litgation for 5 months now and I find depositions, oral arguments to be high pressure and very stressful. I am not sure if this comes down to personal disposition or something that some can get better at dealing with through experience.
Hang in there! 5 months of litigation ... you're just getting started so feeling uncomfortable is to be expected; don't let that discourage you. You'll start feeling and getting better with experience!
So Party Admission is the same as "Admission by Party Opponent"?
so interesting! thank you very much!
The NY State Commission on Judicial judges should investigate judge Arthur Engoron.
Is Colorado the only states that has a brain and courage?
Both republicans hate Trump
J6 is polocy and ray Epps just how much don’t you see
🤣🤣🤣🤣
IS NANCY PELOSI RESPONSIBLE FOR JAN 6 ROOT BECAUSE SHE FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY. JUST LIKE HILLARY LEFT BENGAZZI UNDEFENDED ALLOW ING U.S. CITIZENS TO BE MURDERED. THINK OF WHAT YOU HAVE SEEN.WITH YOUR OWN EYES NOT A FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
According to your cult leader it was Nikki Haley who left the capital helpless. Get your shit together.
More important better worry about why there trying so hard to destroy trumps life destroy our country from within now we know
No one has the right to take the vote away from another bona fide American citizen register to vote in their country
Can you talk about the custodian piece of this exception? A public records request was filed and the documents were just uploaded on the portal. Will I run into problems getting this admitted in Arizona without an affidavit?
Omg so helpful 😊 thank you so much!
Thank you for the comment!
Pelosi planned this not Donald Trump,he offered10,000 national guards,pelosi refused it,watch the tapes released from J6,not to mention the 117 deleted tapes.
False misinformed
Rubbish comments
God is with trump Biden not the president trump is profercey said and god said Biden stolen the election andso others county stolen the election
The Democrats belongs in prison
Polosi did jan 6 not trump he was not in trouble
Relation to Jakeem Jeffries? The Congressman with distracting jazz hands 👐🏾 please stop moving your loud hands 🙌🏼 couldn’t hear a thing you said
Thanks for the comment. High five! ✋🏻
SUCH B.S.
All demacrats and 2 rhinos
It was Pelosi who started the insurrection.
Pelosi directed too the National Guard to stand down and move into the underground parking garage. Then she involved the root on the White House.
It was Nancy Pelosi who started this whole mess.
It's all hearsay. It shouldn't be amiable in court.
More liberal LIES! Trump 2024!
BULLSHIT
The report cannot be trusted when the evidence used to compile it was cherry picked and much of their supposed evidence was destroyed by them instead of it being preserved like normal govt documents would be. Furthermore while the democrats love to use the words sedition and insurrection regularly the fact remains that no one was charged or convicted of insurrection.
Anybody with any sense knows it was a setup, and Pelosi was the mastermind....she said they would not lose the election, as the demonRATS had a lot of arrows in their quiver....she was right, and they stole the election, and they had the system set up the steal the 2022 election.....
beating a dead horse with bickering about things that will go nowhere instead of actually doing something. it is admissible, so what. nothing will be done about any of it.
They can say Donald Trump started that but nobody was convicted of insurrection so you can't just say oh he's the one that did it he's an insurrectionist without having a court find him guilty of insurrection as much as the Democrats keep saying he's guilty well that doesn't make him guilty
it served it's purpose wether it matters now or not. this caused a lot of damage to our country and is still costing us as long it is distracting, and in court or congress is wasting time and money bickering about something they are going to do nothing about.
The fake Republicans that were on that committee siding with the Democrats all the time and then when they were questioning these so-called witnesses they just repeated what the Democrats now can we be done with this this is one-sided they didn't want Jim Jordan and the other real Republican because they know they couldn't hide with real Republicans and real Republicans would have asked tougher questions and got to the bottom of the that's why Nancy pelosi didn't want these two real Republicans she would rather have fake Republicans that do the Democrats bidding and willing to lie along with the Democrats that's why they hid evidence and then deleted it but as usual we have people that can get deleted emails now they want the password so that they can see all 100 statements that would delete it
Thank you for the comment!!
Not to mention that some of their star witnesses have been proved to be liars.