Видео

But didn't Martin Luther try to push his own authority?

Thank GOD for this! Welcome home brother.

All religions reject the heart of Christianity which is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. You have the Word of God which you do not understand because you want God to do things your way and not his. I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire: Only Jesus can baptize you with the Holy Spirit, you baptize with water yet you won't repent!

👍

Baptist converted since tell the story in a format of a revivalism.

I once heard a demon wake me up from my sleep say,”you better finish the race “! Demonic voice and everything as if of you don’t there’s gonna be severe consequences. I was battling him in my sleep that I was even praying in my sleep and he couldn’t get through that he left mentioning that comment.

Clear and concise communication. I appreciate your ministry. I am a convert with a similar story as yours. Now I help teach OCIA.

Before the last supper Jesus washes the disciples’s feet. This is going back to exodus 40: 30-32 when moses brung aaron and his sons to the consecration of the priesthood. Leviticus 8:7 describes how Moses carried out these washings before he dresses aaron and his sons in priestly gartments. When peter refused to have his feet washed Jesus said if i do not wash you, you have no part in me. John 13:8 the greek word for part meros echoes portion that Old Testament priests were to have in god and god alone. Read numbers 18:20. Jesus is saying you have no part in me signals the apostles priestly status , having a unique share in jesus as Aaron and the levites had a unique share in god. This would also seem to point to Jesus’ s divinity as well. When John and Luke’s last supper narratives are taken together, we have a total details that support the conclusion that jesus made the apostles his new covenant ministerial priests. Jesus commands the apostles to do this in remembrance of me which suggest they are to offer the last supper as a sacrifice.

Protestants praise but they don’t worship God.

If you had listened to Martin Luther, we wouldn't be here.

I’m a catholic convert from Paganism/Wicca. I was knee deep in everything pagan, “light-work”, crystals, divination, and at one point I thought I was a starseed. If Jesus could reach me, he can reach anyone. Praise Jesus and the Catholic Church for saving me!

Samuel said, "To obey is better than sacrifice." Paul's idea of sacrificial worship in the new covenant is different from the Greco-Roman idea. He calls Jesus our High Priest, the sole member of the order of Melchizedec. When he writes about appointing a presbyteros he eschews the proper term for priest: heireus. Paul says, "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service." Living obedience, not empty ritual by corruptible priesthood.

Adam and Eve’s sin brought both physical and spiritual death into the world because they ate the forbidden fruit (Genesis 2:17, 3:19). This reversed the eternity God originally intended for them, subjecting all of humanity to corruption (Romans 5:12). But just as death entered through eating, Jesus offers His Flesh and Blood in the Eucharist as the antidote to death, restoring eternal life: "Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day" (John 6:54, KJV 1611). Unlike the fruit of disobedience that cursed mankind, the Eucharist is the true "fruit of the Tree of Life"-Jesus Christ Himself. By consuming His Body and Blood, we receive the grace to undo Adam’s sin and regain the immortality he lost. The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms: “The Eucharist is ‘the source and summit of the Christian life’... for in the Blessed Eucharist is contained the whole spiritual good of the Church, namely Christ himself” (CCC 1324). This divine reversal is profound: Adam ate and died; we eat Christ and live. The Eucharist is not mere symbolism but the real presence of Jesus (John 6:55), giving us the hope of resurrection. St. Irenaeus (c. 130-202 AD) confirms: “Just as the bread, which comes from the earth, after God’s blessing has been invoked upon it, is no longer ordinary bread but the Eucharist, so too our bodies, after receiving the Eucharist, are no longer corruptible, having the hope of resurrection” (Against Heresies 4.18.5). Mary, the New Eve, played a role in reversing the Fall. Where Eve’s disobedience brought death, Mary’s obedience (Luke 1:38) allowed Christ, the New Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45), to offer us His Body as the true Bread of Life. This is why Jesus insists: “Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you” (John 6:53, KJV 1611). The Eucharist and Incorruptible Saints As further proof of the Eucharist’s power, the incorruptible bodies of Catholic saints stand as miraculous witnesses to Christ’s promise of eternal life. Many saints who lived in deep devotion to the Eucharist have been preserved from decay after death, defying natural corruption. Notable examples include: St. Bernadette Soubirous (d. 1879) - Her body remains fresh, despite no embalming. St. John Vianney (d. 1859) - His heart remains incorrupt, a testament to his Eucharistic devotion. St. Catherine Labouré (d. 1876) - Over a century later, her body remains intact. St. Charbel Makhlouf (d. 1898) - His body exuded a miraculous, fragrant oil. St. Francis Xavier (d. 1552) - His body remains largely intact despite centuries. These incorruptibles prove Christ’s words: "He that eateth this bread shall live for ever" (John 6:58, KJV 1611). Their uncorrupted state points to the promise that those nourished by the Eucharist will be transformed and raised in glory at the final resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:52-53). The Eucharist is not just a ritual-it is the divine remedy for both spiritual death and physical resurrection. Through Christ’s Flesh, we conquer the curse of Adam and live again in eternity.

I have always wondered why some biblical translations use priest (hiereus) in some cases and elder (presbuteros) in other cases. The elders were the new testament priest so is this why in James 5 it states "call for the elders (presbuteros) of the church" rather than hiereus in order not to confuse the old testament priesthood with the new testament priesthood of Christ?

So blessed to be a Catholic

Welcome home Pastor and your wife

To be a Christian, we are to be like the Melchesidec of old Melchesidec Abraham and his lineage. Each of us directly interacts with Jesus and follows him. To do this we must hear his voice. In visions, verbally in our head, through other people, through things that happen. Being a Priest and a king, each of us is what being in Christ is based on. Do you hear Jesus? Have you seen Jesus? Have you seen angels? Can you see demons? Do you know what your Gifts from Jesus and the Holy Spirit are? Mine are Healing, Wisdom, and Discernment. With Discernment of Spirit's. I can slay in the Spirit, heal, see demons, cast them out, know things a human couldn't know. I have seen Jesus twice and he personally gave me a black daughter at the age of 12. I received her at age 25. Do you walk with Jesus or are you dead inside?

Thank you for the great everyday example to use with my Protestant family and friends in explaining the concept of Purgatory. *Especially for those who don’t study theology or refuse to have a scholarly debate. It’s a thought provoking truth to let them ponder.

Sacrifice of thanksgiving aka “Eucharistos” NOT the once for all sacrifice for atonement

Hebrews 10:1-3 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect. 2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins. 3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. - the difference in Catholicism and a Baptist, is that the Baptist practices the Lord supper or communion, looking at the finished work of Jesus Christ. Where the catholic priest continues to sacrifice, saying that the work of Christ is insufficient. How is it possible to crucify the Lord again? Hebrews 6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. - the faithfulness of Christ is our confidence, not in our own righteousness.

God will reject the Protestants when they meet Him

Transubstantiation (Instituted in AD 1215) Definition:"The whole substance of the bread and wine is converted into the actual and real, entire body and blood of Christ." Radbertus first suggested this idea in the 9th century. Catholicism supports this by a literal view of Matthew 26:26-29. The bread and wine, however, were only symbols of Christ's body and blood-partaken of as an act of remembrance (Luke 22:19). There is no "conversion" of the bread into literal flesh, nor of the wine into blood. Note: 1) Jesus, after saying "this is My blood" in verse 28, added: "I will not drink at all of this fruit of the vine…" (verse 29)-showing that it was still wine and had not changed into blood. 2) Jesus often described Himself in symbols, yet no one takes these literally: • John 10:7 "I am the door"-Did Jesus mean He was literally wooden? No. • John 14:6 "I am the way"-Did Jesus mean He was literally a road? No. • John 15:5 "I am the vine"-Did Jesus mean He was a literally a vine? No. • John 8:12 "I am the light"-Did Jesus mean He was literally a light? No. • John 6:48 "I am the bread of life"-Did Jesus mean He was literally a loaf of bread? No. • John 6:63 indicates that Jesus was speaking figuratively, spiritually-not literally. 3) The bread and wine did not become Christ's body and blood because God forbids the drinking of blood (Deuteronomy 12:16; Acts 15:20, 29). 4) We take Christ as our Savior once. Passover is to be a recurring memorial and, therefore, has no saving merit of itself. Catholics are commanded to believe in transubstantiation because the teaching was decreed at the Council of Trent (1551) as essential for salvation. The Council pronounced a curse on anyone who would deny it. Paul, on the other hand, pronounced a double curse in Galatians 1:6-9 on anyone who preached a different Gospel-one that denied Christ's death and resurrection as being fully sufficient for salvation. 5) Before Jesus ascended into heaven, He promised to come to us via the Holy Spirit-not through some mysterious "sacrifice of the mass." "[God] shall give you another Comforter, that it may be with you throughout the age: even the Spirit of the truth, which the world cannot receive because it perceives it not, nor knows it; but you know it because it dwells with you, and shall be within you. I will not leave you orphans; I will come to you" (John 14:16-18). How then do we "eat Christ's flesh and drink Christ's blood"? By taking in the words of God when we call on Christ to save us: "The words that I speak to you, they are spirit and they are life" (John 6:63). Peter got the message: "You have the words of eternal life" (verse 68). The scribes, who heard Jesus' words, understood the Hebraic idea of receiving God's words into one's inner being: "Your words were found, and I ate them" (Jeremiah 15:16); "I will put My law in their inward parts" (Jeremiah 31:34). If the transubstantiation doctrine was formulated in the 9th century and is necessary for salvation, what happened to all those living before that time, before transubstantiation was thought of? Did they all go to hell? 19. The Mass (Instituted in AD 394) Definition: "At every mass, Christ is sacrificed again." Catholicism says: "In the mass, no less than on Calvary, Jesus really offers His life to His Father." But must Jesus be continually sacrificed-or was His one-time death sufficient to pay for sin forever? Christ's one-time sacrifice is sufficient; here's why: 1) Jesus, as He died, said: "It is finished" (John 19:30)-the whole work of salvation, for which He came into the world, was accomplished on the cross. Nothing more can be added to it. The mass insults Christ's death on the cross as being not good enough to pay fully for all of our sins. 2) When Jesus died, the veil in the Jews' Temple as torn from top to bottom (Matthew 27:51), showing that the way into God's presence was open to all believers in Christ's work on the cross. No other sacrifice or priesthood was needed, just Jesus' High Priesthood. 3) The New Covenant states that: "Now where remission of these is, it is no longer necessary to offer sacrifices for sin" (Hebrews 10:18). The Catholic mass contradicts this clear statement. 4) In the book of Hebrews, Christ's sacrifice is said to be accomplished "once" for all-never to be repeated: Hebrews 7:27; Hebrews 9:25, 26, 28; and Hebrews 10: 10, 12, 14, 18. Peter adds that "Christ indeed once suffered for sins" (I Peter 3:18).

No. The heart of Christianity is Jesus and what he did for us on the cross. Although transubstantiation was accepted very early on in Christianity, the original apostles teach that the bread and the wine is an ALLEGORY. But, but, but... OK. Maybe you believe that it really becomes the body and blood of Jesus and you have proof texts for that. I don't have a problem with that. If you read the Bible that way and you are convinced by the tradition passed down then I don't think it would be helpful to argue the toss. After all, many did understand it that way. But not everybody. The Didache does not even mention transubstantiation. You would expect a document of that nature to to teach "The heart of Christianity", wouldn't you? But no. Its very Jewish it's description of the eucharist. The verses that talk about it are somewhat "poetic". They are a bit hazy as to whether the eucharist REPRESENTS the body and blood of of Jesus or actually BECOMES the body and blood of Jesus. That's not a rejection, that's just a different understanding. Its not heresy, it's just a belief system that is completely valid. Protestants take communion very seriously. We examine ourselves and ensure we don't take it unworthily. We repent of sin and it is a very serious moment. That is all the scriptures require of us. You can't prove otherwise. That's going to end up in a big debate that will lead nowhere. Here's my suggestion: Bury the hatchet. You don't HAVE to believe in transubstantiation to have a valid Lords supper. What is the point in throwing rocks at another brother who sees things differently and with good reason? Its OK. let him be. Many Protestant churches model their worship styles around David and the Psalms. That's ok. You don't HAVE to do a litturgy. I actually enjoy both. I am equally edified. How about more thinking about unity? I think that is a better way

It is simply false to assert that "Protestants reject the heart of Christianity." JESUS is the heart of Christianity. You should stop lying about and attacking your brothers and sisters in Jesus. You are causing unnecessary division among the Body of Christ.

All good. Some supporting comments: 1. midairfortress at 4:58 - "... some have supposed, some scholars have supposed that this change to a new word might have been influenced by the many Levitical priests who were obedient to the new faith, the faith founded by Jesus Christ." Response: A. Malachi 3: 3-4 (KJV): And he shall sit as a refiner and purifier of silver: and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and purge them as gold and silver, that they may offer unto the LORD an offering in righteousness. Then shall the offering of Judah and Jerusalem be pleasant unto the LORD, as in the days of old, and as in former years. B. Acts 6:7 (KJV): Then the word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith. 2. midairfortress at 5:58 - 6:15: "In fact, until we get to Hebrews 2:17, the word priest is never used to describe Jesus. Yet no one supposes that Jesus is not depicting Himself as the priest, the high priest of the New Covenant in the gospels. Just the word is not used." Comment: Although the word 'Gospel' is reserved for the main eye witness accounts of Jesus, either first hand from Matthew and John, or second hand from Mark (writing what Peter had preached according to St. Irenaeus of Lyon) and Luke (a companion of Paul, also according to Irenaeus), there are elements of authoritative 'Gospel' in other New Testament books: A. The Acts of the Apostles can be considered another 'Gospel' since the resurrected Jesus appears and speaks to Paul. B. The Book of Revelation can be considered another 'Gospel' since John transmits what the resurrected Jesus in heaven is telling him. C. Likewise, the letter to the Hebrews can be considered another 'Gospel' as its unknown author appears to be a temple insider who (1) not only observes Jesus, but also, (2) attributes Psalm 40:6-8 as fulfilled in Jesus' own words at the beginning of His Incarnation: (1) Hebrews 5:7 (KJV): Who in the days of his flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto Him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that He feared. (2) Hebrews 10:5 (KJV): Wherefore when He cometh into the world, He saith, "Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me." 3. Protestants will accept Jesus Christ as the new high priest according to the order of Melchizedek, but reject that He ordained the Apostles to the same priesthood also. A. However, according to Hebrews 7:1-3 (KJV): For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; 2To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace; 3Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually. B. At the Last Supper, Jesus Christ, the high priest according to the order of Melchizedek, conferred His kingdom (Heb 7:2) upon His apostles: Gospel of Luke 22:29 (KJV): "And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me" C. At the Last Supper, Jesus Christ, the high priest according to the order of Melchizedek, conferred His peace (Heb 7:2) upon His apostles: Gospel of John 14:27 (KJV): "Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." D. Hence, it follows that besides conferring the kingdom and the peace of Melchizedek upon His apostles, Jesus Christ conferred His priesthood upon His apostles as integral to that kingdom of peace : Gospel of Luke 22:19-20 (KJV): And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. 4. The many converted priests of Acts 6:7 would immediately grasp that the new rite from the Last Supper was both the fulfillment and supercession of the temple grain offerings outlined in Leviticus, Chapters 2 & 6. Leviticus 6:14-18 (KJV): And this is the law of the meat offering: the sons of Aaron shall offer it before the LORD, before the altar. And he shall take of it his handful, of the flour of the meat offering, and of the oil thereof, and all the frankincense which is upon the meat offering, and shall burn it upon the altar for a sweet savour, even the memorial of it, unto the LORD. And the remainder thereof shall Aaron and his sons eat: with unleavened bread shall it be eaten in the holy place; in the court of the tabernacle of the congregation they shall eat it. It shall not be baken with leaven. I have given it unto them for their portion of my offerings made by fire; it is most holy, as is the sin offering, and as the trespass offering. All the males among the children of Aaron shall eat of it. It shall be a statute for ever in your generations concerning the offerings of the LORD made by fire: every one that toucheth them shall be holy. (The "meat offering" in Leviticus 6 above is the early modern English rendering of "grain offering" according to Strong's 4503 [e], that is translated from the Hebrew word הַמִּנְחָ֑ה and transliterated as ham-min-hah, besides being one of Dr. Mark Ward's 'false friends' in his King James Bible study series). [biblehub com /text/leviticus/6-14.htm] 5. And if the King James Bible was good enough for the prophets Moses and Malachi, the Hebrews author and Saints John and Luke ...

Great explanation of what we believe in our Catholic faith!

Christs spirit is already in the Fathers hands, no more sacrifices nor re-presenting Jesus to the Father.

I find it interesting that Catholics only use Johns account in John 20:23 when there are three other accounts of this same commission. Mark 16:15-18 is the most detailed account. It actually states what remits or retains the persons sin. Catholics don't like Mark 16:15--18 because it gives power to the gospel and not the Apostles (priests). It's a good test if your priests are the right ones. Have them perform the signs in Mark 16:17-18.

Thank you for the diligent efforts you expend to explain the faith. You wonderfully bring together sacred scripture, sacred tradition and history.🙏🏻

All the covenants are for Israel, not the gentile. The only covenant that would be for the gentiles would be the Abrahamic covenant when God said those that bless Israel, he will bless. Those that curse Israel, God will curse. Romans 9:3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; Even the new convenant is for Israel read Jeremiah 31:31-34.

There is only one priesthood snd thats the Levitical priesthood.

Thank you brother! I’m not a catholic, not yet, but this video has broaden my understanding quite a bit. Peace and grace!

Foreshadowing of the Eucharistic Sacrifice Gen. 14:18 - this is the first time that the word “priest” is used in Old Testament. Melchizedek is both a priest and a king and he offers a bread and wine sacrifice to God. Psalm 76:2 - Melchizedek is the king of Salem. Salem is the future Jeru-salem where Jesus, the eternal priest and king, established his new Kingdom and the Eucharistic sacrifice which He offered under the appearance of bread and wine. Psalm 110:4 - this is the prophecy that Jesus will be the eternal priest and king in the same manner as this mysterious priest Melchizedek. This prophecy requires us to look for an eternal bread and wine sacrifice in the future. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the Eucharistic sacrifice of the Catholic Church. Malachi 1:11 - this is a prophecy of a pure offering that will be offered in every place from the rising of the sun to its setting. Thus, there will be only one sacrifice, but it will be offered in many places around the world. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the Catholic Church in the Masses around the world, where the sacrifice of Christ which transcends time and space is offered for our salvation. If this prophecy is not fulfilled by the Catholic Church, then Malachi is a false prophet.

Superb

Sanctification is a process that one goes through in life. Many struggle with sin, they can't shake it off even though the desire is there, it's like Saint Paul says think of things i don't want to think do things i don't want to do. The bibles says no sin may enter heaven. The good news is that Jesus died for us so that our sins may be forgiven, however when we die if we still have those attachments to sin they must be cleansed , purified as through fire, before we enter into the presence of the Lord. Our Parents forgive us for playing in the mud but we must be cleaned before we enter our home.

Great video brother! Keep up the good work!

Jesus rose from supper and washed the disciples feet - Peters reaction was no. It should remind us of the Levitical priests (Moses). I have never made that connection (act of consecration: John 17:17-19)

Protestants reject the false doctrine that the Eucharist is a sacrifice. It is not. Communion is a remembrance, not a sacrifice. Sacrifice is laying one's life down. Hebrews 10:11,12 Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God. How is this description of Jewish temple worship any different than the Eucharist?

LA EUCARISTIA SACRIFICIO MALAQUIAS 1:11 HEBREOS 10:8-10

Outstanding explanation of the New Testament priesthood! Many thanks.

Awesome presentation-it reminds me of todays rosary: The fifth and final Luminous Mystery of the Rosary is the Institution of the Eucharist.

So if I converted from Protestantism to Catholicism what would guarantee my entrance into heaven?

Great video. The protestant view that the Lord is present (spiritually) if one believes that He is is absurd. It reduces faith to pure subjectivism. How long does it take until such view lead the person into uncertainty, and then into complete apostasy?

📜 Hebrews 4:14Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has ascended into heaven, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold firmly to the faith we profess. 📜 1Peter 4:4As you come to him, the living Stone-rejected by humans but chosen by God and precious to him- 5you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house a to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. 📜 John 1:14The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. 📜 1Prter 4:11If anyone speaks, they should do so as one who speaks the very words of God. If anyone serves, they should do so with the strength God provides, so that in all things God may be praised through Jesus Christ. To him be the glory and the power for ever and ever. Amen. 📜 Jeremiah 7:3This is what the Lord Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Reform your ways and your actions, and I will let you live in this place. 4Do not trust in deceptive words and say, “This is the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord!” ...16“So do not pray for this people nor offer any plea or petition for them; do not plead with me, for I will not listen to you. 17Do you not see what they are doing in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? 18The children gather wood, the fathers light the fire, and the women knead the dough and make cakes to offer to the Queen of Heaven. They pour out drink offerings to other gods to arouse my anger. 19But am I the one they are provoking? declares the Lord. Are they not rather harming themselves, to their own shame?

i agree to a large extent. but do note: in the anglican eucharistic service, sacrifice is explicitly mentioned, and a sacrifice is offered. this sacrifice however is one of PRAISE and THANKSGIVING. I am not speaking for anglo-catholic theology here (though i am one), but the prayer book is explicit in its affirmation of "eucharistic sacrifice". the disagreement is over what is being sacrificed.

Everybody goes to bootcamp training in any military or law enforcement to become one. Hazing and intense discipline. You learn the chain of command and salute to officers whether they male or female or any race, color or creed. If you join the military you will salute to officers who may be atheist or buddhist. So it kills me when protestants say they wont bend the knee to Mary or to none of the patriarchs and matriarcha of the Bible. The Kingdom of God is a Monarchy so you will go to purgatory if you think you're not going to genuflect to Mary or any of the Champions of God. Purgatory is where the Holy Barbarians are going to beat every drop of rebellion and fleshly desires. You will experience the mass in a brutal way. A lot of people have a lot of mouth and a lot of opinions and that will get God smacked right out of you. St.Faustina said she saw demons in purgatory too so Purgatory is a Scared Straight military boot camp. Either that or Hell. Graduate from purgatory and you join Gods Holy Army.

So because Prots don't agree on everything, we don't know what worship is? How about the many instances in the Bible referring to worship? You should watch Gavin Orlund's video on worship.

I have been a Protestant for 84yrs !!!! Their is no way I will become Roman Catholic..I am living in a country which is 80% CATHOLIC and the new POPE is from this country...

I've been wondering for a long time WHEN someone would refute Dr Barnett?

Thank you for your videos. I appreciate your perspective.