- Видео 23
- Просмотров 653 562
Azide Performance
Добавлен 25 мар 2022
Azide Performance is dedicated to helping you become a faster, more explosive athlete.
The ONE THING Killing Your Speed
JOIN SprintElite → azideperformance.com/sprintelite
** I reuploaded this video with better video quality.
** I reuploaded this video with better video quality.
Просмотров: 716
Видео
The QUICKEST Way To get Faster
Просмотров 10 тыс.11 месяцев назад
JOIN SprintElite → azideperformance.com/sprintelite ACCELERATION TRAINING PROGRAM → azideperformance.com/free-acceleration-course/
The BIGGEST MYTH In Improving Speed (According to SCIENCE)
Просмотров 15 тыс.Год назад
The BIGGEST MYTH In Improving Speed (According to SCIENCE)
The MOST IMPORTANT Muscles For Speed
Просмотров 284 тыс.Год назад
The MOST IMPORTANT Muscles For Speed
The BEST Exercise to Get Faster (According To SCIENCE)
Просмотров 142 тыс.Год назад
The BEST Exercise to Get Faster (According To SCIENCE)
Noah Lyles 200m Final 19.31 New American Record!
Просмотров 62 тыс.2 года назад
Noah Lyles 200m Final 19.31 New American Record!
The Best exercise for sprinting is repeat hill sprints eventually working up to carrying a little bit of weight in a vest. >10% BW Hill sprints are less likely to cause hamstring injuries than flat land sprinting.
Downvote because you forgot THE VERY most important muscle OF THEM ALL: Having fun!
The lighter the upper body is the less weight the legs have to carry !! Power to weight ratio: Too much focus on upper body training!!
Great👍
This is a terrible take.
This is bs. Every muscle is important. Why rank it? What an ldiot. Try to remove your f muscles and transplant it to s muscles then.
bro putting core above quad, calf and glute med is absolutely wild!
Lol. Core 8s indeed #1! Psoas = core
Awesome
I have had lower back pain on the right side for 2 years now, not due to the disc or spine. Every time you run fast or endurance, you will feel a lot of back pain. What is the problem? I have been exercising my glutes for 1 month and feel better? So what should I do to completely stop that?
nice no wonder i like sprinting im fkn pear shaped
In general I can also agree that this exercise (1:07, 1:10,2:32,3:50, 5:09, 7:20) can bring improvements, albeit relative, in terms of strength. However, I don't think it leads to a significant improvement in speed, at least it's not the best way to acquire it and in any case at most 1. At the start the sprinter stretches the torso forward and upward, while in the exercise in question the movement is forward and downward. Therefore it is clear that it is not emulative of the real athletic gesture of a competition, as it does not present the same sense of execution. Brief logical premise: it is not the case that since training sessions conducted with a classic isotonic machine (in this case the leg curl) have not led to significant improvements in terms of speed, then this means that one must necessarily think that the same exercise performed in the opposite way could be the solution. It is now up to verify whether at least theoretically such an exercise is suitable for producing an improvement in speed and power. Well 2. in the exercise in question the overload is made up of the athlete's own body weight. However, in that position the weight of the body is - for the joint involved which is the knee so to speak - enormously increased due to the proportion between the distance between the weight and the fulcrum. To give an example, if the weight of a 190 cm tall athlete were 150 pounds (already deducting the weight of the tibias and feet which remain outside the movement) and assuming that the insertion 5 cm, the average body weight would be 100 pounds distributing it uniformly along the entire length Y of 150 cm. Consequently, the overload actually supported by the joint in such an exercise should be 100 multiplied by ratio between X and Y i.e. 5 and 150 i.e. 30 therefore 100 x 30 = 3000 pounds Now, it is not so much (at least not only) the weight actually supported, but rather that clearly for every pound, it will produce an overload of 30 times greater. It follows that a progressive workout of such a workout will have at least 30 pound intervals. The risk (in my concrete opinion) is an undertraining of the muscles because clearly if the knee has reached its maximum tolerance limit and therefore will no longer be able to allow the torso to rise, clearly the hamstrings will no longer be able to carry out repetitions and therefore they will be undertrained. Even if the athlete places the additional weights as low as possible in order to lower the distance between the (additional) weight and the fulcrum it does not solve the problem but simply postpones it. Therefore, rather than training with eccentric repetitions, I would talk about exclusively negative repetitions (with the exception of an execution present in the video at 3:50), but these are particular and very limited workouts in time whose effects can, if anything, be had on strength but not on power or speed on the track. 3. this exercise thus configured does not present any grip. It must be said that at each step or stride the sprinter must be able to transfer that already increased weight force and transmit it from the opposite leg and it is only thanks to this force that he is also able to project the opposite leg forward and upwards more quickly and therefore to fall or rather project it downwards even more quickly. Now, with this exercise the athlete would train to resist a forward fall as slowly as possible, there is no push from the feet and even less is there any grip on which act to increase the repetitions (and neither the position nor the significantly high overload can help the athlete in this) However, a clarification must be made regarding plyometrics to put it into perspective Suppose that to cover a distance x of the sprint (for example 100 meters), at the maximum speed y (for example 10 seconds) an athlete expresses a weight force equal to if he were to perform a downward jump from 5 meters above the ground. It is clear that if this were true, any training conducted in plyometrics with this height or in any case with a height of even just 80% or even just 65% (to keep within the limits of the classic percentages that denote power) would not be possible. as the athlete would be exposed to serious damage (therefore minimum heights of 3 metres) or in any case they would not be sustainable for a long time. Conversely, if the athlete performed low jumps of 1 meter it would be like undertraining. Therefore it is clear that it is completely useless to use plyometric exercises (if not as a diversion) at least as a method to reach maximum speed. However, to believe that such an exercise and with a certain load is actually valid for improving speed (on the track in this case) the results of an athlete should be compared, certainly not a champion (and not even an expert, around 10.20, 30 and so on 40 meters, before and after training carried out with such an exercise and load, after a certain period. Returning to the counter-reaction, which essentially would be the objective of a training carried out in plyometrics as in this exercise given that the athlete projects the body downwards with a consequent stop, I think that this exercise is not even good for this purpose. Counter-reaction is a technique known to express even more speed and power in other disciplines and the rule is quite simple. A countermovement is performed, either on that limb or on the opposite limb. In upper limb swing disciplines (e.g. javelin, or shot put, but also in American football, etc.) it is easy as the limbs to be stretched are not the
PART 2 supporting limbs. But in running the issue is more complicated because the counter-reaction must be applied on the same leg which is also the only supporting one. Here it is clear that the counter-reaction in running depends on the power expressed not only by the quadriceps muscle of the supporting leg but also by the forefoot, however it is determined above all, I would say, on the basis of the weight force increased and transmitted by the force of the opposite leg In the exercise in question this counter-reaction can be trained through the execution consisting only of eccentric phases but only to the extent that the forefoot can also allow the athlete to 1) resist the overload, 2) stop suddenly and 3) perform a minimum of rise with the torso I doubt about it. In this exercise the balls of the feet are completely excluded, therefore no thrust or contrasting force can come from the balls of the feet to express more weight force to support the descent downwards as well as the ascent, practically the athlete should produce a contrasting force from the shins and dorsum of the feet similar to what the balls of the feet could produce (impossible) This in summary defines how limited it is as an exercise To enhance the counter-reaction of the hamstrings (if this is the objective of the exercise in question) we should focus on increasing the repetitions but in that position the athlete cannot continue to carry out repetitions and increasing the overload without having to stop because the position assumed he doesn't allow it (see example leg extension exercise below) and doesn't even have holds available to use to withstand the overload And this is one of the disadvantages of exercises performed with free weights such as the free squat, the deadlift and also this exercise and so on (later I will talk about isotonic machines): the athlete cannot in any way increase the repetitions taking advantage from any holds as isotonic machines often train muscles in an isolated way and the holds are not positioned to allow further repetitions beyond the expressed maximum (achieved by isolating the muscles involved in the exercise). But in this exercise the situation is more unfavorable because the holds do not exist at all. The number of repetitions is determined by the personal maximum in known percentages, but also by the absence or presence of appropriately positioned holds. In the absence of these holds the athlete cannot perform further repetitions and cannot increase the overload I'll give you an example: there is a logical difference between performing leg extension repetitions, for example, without the aid of holds and with the aid of holds. This is because thanks to these holds the athlete is able not only to stabilize the execution but also to produce enough force to counteract the overload. In the absence of these grips, after a certain overload the athlete would tend to rise from the sitting position. And in fact some leg extensions are equipped with belts (a terrible solution because it is not the best, but there are other exercises with terrible solutions and the entire background of athletics has just as many, starting with the towing of an apparatus on which discs and attached with a chain to the athlete's center of gravity because it completely eliminates the aerial phase and more than anything else does not train the hamstrings to the maximum, not to mention that it is unable to transfer even all the weight force produced by the previous stride) In the lying leg curl, the athlete would tend to slide backwards. In the majority of isotonic machines (moreover the majority are created for fitness and wellness purposes and certainly not for training athletes in which the competition gestures have nothing to do with the positions assumed on said machines and even less with the execution) it is clear that they must be adapted to the specific purpose. Generally, these machines also have problems with limits on overload and balance (in fact, the user almost always trains within the execution range) so training on isotonic machines, at least in a traditional way, is reductive unless some variations are made Now, returning to the exercise in question, since it is carried out with free weights, these holds are clearly absent, also because the athlete, if anything, would also have his hands full to support an additional overload, apart from the balancing problems that I mentioned. The limited results obtained with this exercise is defined by the amount of force that he can sustain with the only grip at his disposal, i.e. the back of the feet (i.e. not even the balls of the feet which are well known for having much more push) than in in reality they are a simple support, so even if they wanted they could not act as a grip. If anything one type of grip might be possible but the feet should be positioned perpendicular to the leg while here the feet are positioned parallel to the legs. Something very similar to the exercise seen at 2:32, note that only thanks to this push of the arms can the athlete control the execution better, however since the arms are engaged for this purpose this exercise can be performed without overload, hence undertraining. And in fact, the higher the overload, the more difficult the athlete will have to carry out this exercise, because to increase his weight strength he would have to apply even more pressure to counteract the overload, but this is impossible as the higher the overload increases. , he will be less able to counteract the descent because to do so he will have to apply enormous pressure with the back of his feet and the shins (clearly not suitable for this purpose) and even less will he be able to go back up because the athlete will rather tend to collapse. Additional weights could be applied to the torso and therefore the athlete could continue to perform repetitions using the push of the arms, but I believe that in this exercise is precisely the static position that makes it limited, because if the position was dynamic the athlete could help himself with a horizontal movement I understand that with this exercise you are trying to perfect a reactive response at a certain moment of the race gesture in the hypothesis that it can make a difference in terms of the timing (infinitesimal for me but still not the best). It is clear that it is essential to develop the power to recall the limb backwards but not in the sense of execution of this exercise which is totally opposite in terms of execution arc to that of the competition and in such an unfavorable position In any case, if you use exercises aimed at training only a certain moment and with an overload that clearly undertrains, you will still not be able to have ideal improvements. The results of any much-vaunted research should also distinguish the subjects examined not only by age and weight but also by the density of fiber concentration per square centimeter of the muscles involved and by the insertion lengths of the tendons of these muscles in the respective bones, otherwise the results obtained cannot provide certainty that the subjects examined had the same starting conditions.
brother love your videos but can you make a video about improving speed for footballers 👃
What are your thoughts on light ankle, wrist weights or a puff out training jacket for increased drag/resistance?
JOIN SprintElite → azideperformance.com/sprintelite ** I reuploaded this video with better video quality.
I tried do it and I feel only my semitendinous muscle grow and work, other hamstring muscle feel like don't work. Now my semitendinosus got bigger and my leg looks like a rectangle. Do you know why???
Great content 👍👍
Parachute works?
For sprinting which is more effective depth jump or drop jump?
Glutes Hamstrings Abs Obliques Tfl Sartorius Hip flexors Solus and gastr quads
Still one of the best out there. Although I don't fully agree with everything, I think its very solid, and you do a good job explaining the function.
this is a future Olympic champion.
I think he already won Olympics medal
Actually he’s a past Olympic champion he won Tokyo 2021
And you skip the back knee area, I thought you said this is the most important one.
Woe ❤❤❤
Greatest blast off start of all time. 😅
Sir how to cure from it band syndrome please help🥺 Love from Delhi
Nice video.
Feet muscles, Achilles’ tendon, glutes and core.
wrong
Best explanation 👌 ❤
Uhmm the sled Infront of you or behind you ? Or both are ideal?😊
Pour bien pousser il faut libérer les hanches sans une bonne extension pas de pousse complète et donc l'appuie atteri devant le centre de gravité et frappe le sol au lieu de pousser.
Most important: glutes, hip flexiors, hamstrings, obliques.
Psoas, core, glutes
Push and not tap
Is there a way to apply this knowledge to boosting your vertical jump instead? Vertically instead of horizontally.
When you push upwards to uphold something like you’re Superman trying to save everyone from the ceiling falling on them
In the sense of a power workout, then yes. You would simply resist motion in the vertical direction by holding weights or wearing a weighted vest etc... However the other point of sled training is to promote good technique, which isn't as applicable when jumping since it's a less technical movement.
Does it also work with ankle weights
Hmmm not quite - the idea is to resist horizontal motion/resist in the horizontal direction, which ankle weights wouldn't do
Very useful brother 👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽
Azide SprintVision Tech → azideperformance.com/sprint-vision/
When I was in 6th Grade they called me the "Speed Demon" I was told there was no possible way I could become any faster as I had already achieved maximum velocity and no amount of science or technology would be able to help me achieve the impossible feat of running faster, I was left distraught and disappointed, that was until I came across this video by Azide Performance, not only did I become faster, but I was able to finally achieve my life long goal of beating my 6th grade 100m sprint time of 17 seconds, thank you Azide!
Wow! 16 second 100m is just around the corner I can feel it!
What is Your age now and what was the time for the 100m sprint
17 isn't even that fast for a 6th grader lol "Fast" would probably be like 14.0-15.4
@@kirby456 6th grade me smokes 6th grade you in a 100m dash btw punk
@@bomberfan1000 ??? I got 15.2 in 6th grade, you're just slow and the rest of those kids are snails lmao
Where do we get the azide sprint technique review
Hey man - details here: azideperformance.com/ai-sprint-technology/
Whats a good alternative if i cant access a sled
Hill sprints
Yeah hill sprints are good too! Remember a weighted sled doesnt have to be too fancy - just anything that you can tie to yourself that offers resistance (think tyre, sandbag etc...).
Yes horizontal force is king! But i'm not sure if sleds are a good thing. Sleds require a more aggresive forward lean. But that doesn't work the problem. The problem is always lack of power. More forward lean will result in short strides / stumbling throw overstriding. During every stride/step we have certain amount of impulse/power available. The more horizontal we use this power the more we accelerate. BUT we always need enough vertical impulse/power to get time to reposition or limbs. If we don't get enough vertical impulse we will break in the following stride and deccelerate!
That's why the weight should only be like 10-20% of your bodyweight. I'm 195lbs and only use 20lbs with a sled, that is extremely light. But just heavy enough to ensure correct form. But not too heavy that the ground contact times are long and I have to lean a lot
I generally agree with that in the sense that an excessive forward lean is bad (typically causes overstriding, introducing braking forces etc...), however, I don't believe that training with a sled encourages that as it's main point. Rather, I think the main technical change elicited is the foot strike position. IMO the best combination is sled training + a conscious effort to prevent an excessive forward lean when not using a sled. I'm actually currently working on a new video talking about this issue.
@@azideperformance I think forward lean is only an issue when the weight is excessive
i experimented with sleds+weighted vest. I really like it.@@azideperformance
Band resisted sprint is good alternative?
That can work too but is much less optimal (harder to set up, can't sprint for so long, more awkward).
Sprint circuit with farmers walk
Are you still competing in chess, mate?
Somewhat 😁
Craaaaaaazy disrespect for the upper body 🤣 don’t forget that arms lead legs . Not abs
Lol no! Arms are the least important in running! Core is #1
energy leaks are relevant but i disagree that it alone makes core is more important than quads for sprinting. Quads are definitely more important. Like you said, it's super important for the start phase and leg stiffness which is a very important factor for ground contact time. Also trunk control with sprinting isn't necessarily related to core strength and muscle mass and is more so related to neuromuscular coordination.
You need more research, my friend. Rectis femoris (specifically, notnall quads)and lower leg extensors. Its about hip extension and moving the hips past the foot.
The sartorios is part of the hipflexser Chain. Training the tfl and you will most likely get Knee Pain.
y r u spilling my secrettt