Видео

Glad you found it useful! :)

Aww Thank you! I'm glad you found it useful! :)

@@DrMatJ 🙏

Glad you found it helpful!

I'm glad you like it! It is a great tool, isn't it!

Glad you like it!

Thank you and I'm sorry! I hope the subtitles are helpful! Please let me know if there is anything you'd like me to cover!

@@DrMatJ Thanks for your response brother, If you dont mind you please share more subtitles and captions in your phd helping videos

Background information, rationale for the study, hypothesis, aims and objectives, methods, results, and conclusions which will include summary of the data, broader picture, and future implications :) keep the text to minimum and try to include more figures/tables to illustrate your points :)

Inspired by our conversation :)

My preference as a supervisor was always to have less text and more images/brief bullet points. Your role there is to talk the audience through the process of creating the plasmid rather than make them read how to do it. We are looking for a logical flow, clear presentation, eye contact, and confident voice. Like any speech, you need the beginning, the middle, and the end. Beginning and the end should really be only one slide long each. You will not gain extra points for making it pretty or eye catchy. It needs to be clear with lots of white spaces. We love white spaces and we just want to listen to you explaining things rather than reading off your sides. We also don't want you to simply read what is on the slides. A lot of students just read which doesn't prove that they understand the topic. It just proves that they can read. You need to talk and help yourself with images to illustrate things, rather than let the presentation talk for you. Does make sense? An excellent presentation is not so much in the slides but in the way you present the information yourself

@@DrMatJ Thanks for all of this. Do top marks tend to come from critical thought? i.e What research I would do in the future/How I would do my project again if I could?

@Sheena1234ization you got this right, but it is not enough. The presentation needs to run in a perfectly logical flow. In general, all students add evidence of critical thinking. Evaluation of the data, future directions, broader picture, and links to research done by others. What really makes an essay or presentation stand out is the flow. All of this needs to be organised logically, and the transitions from one section to the next need to be smooth. How are they smooth? Because they make sense. They are logically ordered. It seems trivial but it is rarely accomplished. The best way to make sure that you got it right is to present your data to lay audience and then ask them questions to see if they understood it. If they didn't, you need to rephrase

@@DrMatJ Thanks a lot will take note!

Thank you! :)

Personally, I find the copying/pasting business a bit of a hassle, and sometimes it is useful to already have preexisting questions/prompts present, but all in all I agree, it is a good way to analyse one paper at a time :) I'm glad it works well for you

Thank you for creating a great resource!

It is a great tool!

Thanks! I'll make the next video about it! :)

Not sure, I just checked it and I don't have any issues. Let's troubleshoot this with a couple of basic questions: 1) Have you downloaded PDF gear from their website? www.pdfgear.com/ 2) Are you trying to edit something that is actually a text rather than an image embedded in a PDF? 3) If this doesn't work, send me screenshots to matjurga1@gmail.com

See my reply to the other comment. We'll troubleshoot it together

Very cool! :) what AI do you use for extraction? And thanks for watching! Appreciated :)

Thank you! Appreciated!

Thank you! I'm glad it helped you :) I saw your email and will reply to you today/tomorrow!

Thank you! Appreciated!

Thank you! :)

Thank you! Appreciate it! I made a video on potential careers for graduates here ruclips.net/video/fULKrv_wQoQ/видео.html You might find something there for yourself but really people tend to change jobs for years until they find something they like :) it might even take 8 to 10 years and that's absolutely normal. You don't have to commit to career straight away!

@@DrMatJ thank you this looks helpful, I am about to complete my Undergraduate degree, I’m no where near PhD level, is this video still relevant?

Yes, it will still give you potential ideas! Also, a lot of people like you join a lab in industry first, and then they move internally within the company to different positions to find what they like. Once you are in, it is so much easier to change job roles and also learn what jobs are out there

@@DrMatJ thanks :)

If you want to use just one tool, I'd recommend Copyleaks. It is all in one and works very well. However, for AI checks, I'd also use a secondary checker like GPTzero, contentatscale, or sapling. I think it is good to use at least two checkers for AI, just in case. I made 2 videos on this AI checkers: ruclips.net/video/slue5Udwa40/видео.html Plagiarism checkers: ruclips.net/video/uAeUWbCn3I8/видео.html

Thanks a lot, Mat. I genuinely appreciate it@@DrMatJ

Right now, ChatPDF will only allow you 2 PDFs a day (free version), SciSpace free version is great for a quick overview of multiple papers but it will not go into the nitty gritty details, Kahubi is great and very versatile but it will allow you to create outputs up to 5000 words a month. So they are fairly limited if you want to go into details and ask a lot of questions. On the other hand, explainpaper has unlimited number of highlight explanations, powerdrill will let you ask 200 questions (so potentially 200 papers summarized) a month and finally, openread is quite limited with the number of actions you can take but it does provide loads of information and will easily exceed Kahubi's 5000 word limit. Personally, I'd use all of them depending on my needs. If I am just trying to understand one paper, then ChatPDF and Kahubi or Openread is more than enough. If I want to analyze 20 papers in detail in a single evening, then I'd go to explainpaper, powerdrill, and Kahubi or Openread. If I want to have a quick overview of lots of papers, then SciSpace. I hope this makes sense!

Definitely, that would be great! Thank you! And thank you for following! Best luck with your thesis! :)

Thank you very much!@@DrMatJ

Thank you! :)

Haha dzieki! :) good luck with your thesis! Yes, the prompt has been around for a while but it looks like it stopped working in the last month or so. Regarding the GPT4 and Claude3 Opus, yes they are better at writing but also pricey. However, any prompts, once out in the public, will not last long just like GPT3.5 prompts. The AI detection platforms will eventually catch up, but I'll have a look and do a bit of research on this :) What's your opinion on all of this?