Видео

So does this mean the switch 2 could be $800? This is concerning cuz gaming could fundamentally get worse in the next 5 years?

I am a old generation player born in the 90’s. I have played a lot of games in my life. I will solely focus on the Mario and Luigi series. I personally do not like the newer games that they are making. Mario and Luigi brothership has more negative than positive. I 100% every single Mario and Luigi RPG. Let’s talk about the positive of the game. The battle system was improved and it’s one of the best. It has good character designs and unique mechanics with Luigi. One of the few biggest disappointment I had was the boring storyline and the map designs were not creative with the lack of new enemies. I felt like the game gave me more boring side quests and puzzles than the main story gameplay. The game only has few extra bosses for experienced players to tackle on and the rest is just not challenging enough. I just felt that the game needed improvement on the main story and map designs. People that loved this game will not understand how good the other RPG were and comparing to other RPG from the past, this game does not stand out at all. I do give the developers enough credit for trying to make this game work. I will give this game a solid 7/10.

I can barely afford to buy games in the US as is 😒 Good thing Weekly payment apps exist cus Id be struggling with any purchases in general

I know people who when i talk about brothership are like “isn’t that the game that got terribly received” because of the IGN review. It’s as much an indictment on people’s lack of awareness on basic psychology and just accepting whatever they hear as it is IGNs review itself.

Its sadly a mediocre game just like mario bros wonder. These games lack the nintendo magic. It’s hard to explain but I feel like bowsers inside story was a much better game in every aspect. Mario wonder was a good game but it doesn’t just have that feel of a game like mario bros ds. I don’t know whats wrong with nintendo but they need to start making interesting and atmospheric games again.

I don't think its ign alone I think people who had the opportunity to review the game were dishonest because they wanted to show up ign review by creating a direct opposite review in no shape or form are either ign or these individuals leaving 10/10 peak reviews being honest thus they see actual reviews and they are 6.5/10 - 8/10 which makes sense the music isn't as great as say paper jam the load screens are long luigi ai is odd the story is very unorganic

Bruh I played the game for like a hour and it seemed good to me but this game new outlets are so fake bruh the will rate shit games much higher just stop rating.

People forget how cheap it is to ACTUALLY MANUFACTURE cartridges and discs now, only the manufacturing price would be impacted by the tariffs.

I also felt the game was mediocre. Maybe it'll be more enjoyable without the extremely distracting performance issues if it runs better on Switch 2

Never forget and never forgive the 7.9 they gave Double Dash

I've been seeing a lot of "IGN also gave X game Y score" as if it's one person reviewing all these games. The guy is allowed to give it a 5 in his review, and you are allowed to disregard it if you feel that way. It's okay. Both can be true.

sort of unrelated but score inflation is a real phenomenon where everyone is afraid to give anything a score lower than 7 so a 5 which should be the median is seen as offensive. But it shouldnt be.

Frankly, I don't care much, and neither should the fans. You like the game ? Good ! Just enjoy it and ignore the negative reviews. The game is flawed, but it's still a good game in my opinion, like 7/10. I think what got people riled up was the fact that they gave brothership the same score that other really shitty games like Concord or even Dustborn got in IGN reviews. But really, you should just enjoy the game. But don't be an idiot and say that the game is perfect. It's not. The fact it's the first mario and luigi games in like a decade doesn't make it immune to criticism. And if you are worried that Nintendo will let the franchise "die" again, if they continue many other franchises like Metroid after Other M, or even Paper mario after Sticker star, I don't why a slightly mixed reception would make them stop making any other Mario & Luigi games in the future.

before I watch this video I want it said that, despite the IGN review, I still went into this game open minded, but it ended up disappointing me. and that sucks. I love the original four games and was hoping this revival would revive the identity that paper jam single-handedly murdered. this game does not achieve such. very rarely do I find myself speeding through dialogue but this game is so boring that I have no choice.

Critic reviews are garbage, have been for a while now. I'll wait until peer reviews come out from independent small reviewers. The game is a high 8.5 for me, it's a great game, lots of content, can play it at your own pace.

Well, it has the twistee Island theme, so it's immediately a 11/10 for me

I remember there was a lot of hype around the metroid games back on the gamecube/wii era but the bad reception of other m put the franchise on a comma. Like a holywood movie realising poorly and having to wait 4-5 years to make another movie with the same ip.

I don't buy aliexpress withouth a review because of fake stores on amazon i trust buying with no review.

Pokemon mystery dungeon If you know, you know not to take IGN seriously, ever (Also, the anti-woke grift has ruined all actual discussion of games I swear)

In the past many reviews ruined me games, that I many years later play or I saw some essay or retrospective on those games and get annoyed on those reviews, that put my away from interesting games. Example: Pokken Tournament, the review talked about a shallow gameplay, but that was totally wrong. As I played it for the first time it was fun and interesting so I brought the DX version on the Switch. I experimented with the system and found I couple fun good combos. This game is a blast and one of my favourite fighting games. I only consult reviews, if I miss informations about a game or want to hear another opinion after I played it for my self. As I was younger I used them as a buy criterion. A error, that I will never do again, but also we get today much more informations about a game, if we want to buy it or not.

Who cares about IGN? Didn’t they give Wukong just 5/10 points?

The best Pokemon game is still Pokken Tournament. I had interest in Legend of Arceus, but in the end it looks to similar to the main Pokemon games, which are for me boring. The Pokemon Pinball games and the Mystery Dungeons games are fun too. Also I am a little bit salty that we got Pokemon Puzzle League instead of a Panel De Pon game.

There have been many times when I have purchased games because I’m interested in it yet the critics panned it. Nier was a phenomenal game that, at the time, received 4/10’s almost all the way across the board. From then on, I only follow my interests and my opinions.

Switch is 10 years old. Wth did they expect.

I don’t trust most reviews, especially “official reviews”. As official review sites and places are fake, if not rigged customers reviews as they sometimes delete people reviews to balance out the their narrative or their alignment. Heck I won’t even surprise by bot or fake reviewers. We don’t know the actual total sales and this is the holiday, so people are prepping for the holidays and we already had some good games that came out from the past 2 months like Zelda, Dragon Ball, and Sonic. So people wallet are a bit tight and saving up for the holiday. If I had to say this is that these offcial review site like ign and even metacritic the one that will have an impact ON THEMSELVES! People are less trusting to these sites, especially bio ware recent game that gotten so much heat that sales failed and customers were angry at them when those who trusted the reviews and not surprises here as many were bribe to make the review sound good and all know too well to these bait trick. They should focus on customers review (if possible. Hopefully not rigged) then official reviewers.

I do love how everyone claims that game reviewers are useless, but then have a meltdown for weeks whenever a big outlet posts a controversial review (clickbait or not). The majority of people already pay attention more to user reviews (be it on Amazon, Steam, etc), so at this point all these people are doing are giving the mainstream outlets more credibility and popularity (regardless of whether you think thats a good thing or not).

Just got the news and I think I figured out what was going on. Dragon Quest cannibalize the sales. As so far it’s the best selling game in Japan with the switch and PlayStation sales. So it might be less of the IGN affecting things and more it being sold at a VERY unfortunate time.

i wish youtubers would learn to ignore ign more and stop making videos about that 5 number

Who owns IGN?

I like the game and only have some nitpicks. My main thing is I really wish it were more tactile, like when you press A to pull, it would have been more fun if we had to move or spin the joystick too.

Yes, but Nintendo needs to do something about that unnecessary flaws. And they need to show some ambition and not just doing 90 % good enough games. How did they look at the menu of Zelda EoW an thought this is good? Of Fi annoying the heck out of you in Zelda SS?

Nintendo will be fine but the anime industry wont be

Hey, Sony. How about making use of your currently-owned resources instead of buying companies?

02:49 More information about Mario and Sonic's status nowadays. The IOC cancelled the series in favour of esports and NFTs. This is an instance of one of the IOC's many corrupt practices (ironic because they are meant to represent the harmony of humanity). This was a bad decision because it upset many fans, NFTs are dead now, the Mario and Sonic fanbase was big enough to warrant the Mario and Sonic games being released, and the IOC can easily do Mario and Sonic, esports and even the NFTs (as idiotic as they are) since they are one of the biggest sporting companies in the world and have lots of money. However, like you said, Mario and Sonic can return and we might see it return in the 2030s. Why do I think it will return in the 2030s? Well, it's because the IOC is getting a new president soon and there's a chance that they'll bring back Mario and Sonic since they would likely have different opinions and visions from the current president.

It's a problem when reviews are critical to push improvement, this hurts the industry!!! But if a game is a perfect 10/10 from multiple sources only before review embargo lifts, clearly the game is just good, criticism is bad, just look at all the tens! Paid reviews? Clearly you've had a bit too much to think. Stop thinking! Just make all choices based on a reductive generalized score meant to provide a broad description of a nuanced perspective and never look any deeper.

you're so very well spoken, it makes your videos satisfying to listen to

Hey all you people shitting on Scarlet and Violet.. The games function fine, framerate is a bit naff but beyond that its bug free since patching. In terms of gameplay, story, characters and worldbuilding this was the best pokemon by far. How many of you are just bandwagoning with no actual experience of the game? And how many that do played after the patches were implemented? Nobody needs your unqualified speculation..

I played and finished Mario and Luigi Brothership, I did the majority of the sidequests, and leveled up my characters to level 47. I personally would rate the game a 9/10. It’s slow to start, sure, but it didn’t mean it wasn’t fun. My biggest issue with the game is the loading times between each area. Otherwise I see myself replaying this game, I loved it!

This is what happened to TOTK imo. So much negativity by the pc fans with BG 3 and botw fans trashing tears for no reason. TOTK clears both but especially botw because it does everything better and with more things to do, again in my opinion

don't swear off reviews. Swear off numbers though jesus christ. If I could make review numbers illegal I would. THere is NO benefit unless you argue "I'm lazy and I don't want to think about things." High Scores do just as much damage, especially if you've bought a "well reviewed" peice of trash on Amazon without reading reviews.

See Brak acquire. Acquire, Brak, acquire.

Now xbox doesn’t seem like a bad choice right now for gaming.

So underrated. DK could use a “Kirby Forgotten Land” treatment.

you remind me of Karl Jobst with your script

This game is dog ass

I'll be honest, it did have an effect on me. I've felt let down ever since Dream Team, so this one had a high bar to clear if it was to get me back into the series. I'd need to see it being praised as much as Bowser's Inside Story for me to care.

This review doesn't pertain directly to this particular video, but I just want to say since RUclips tells me I'm in the top 0.3% of your viewers that I do enjoy watching your videos. The fact they're based on statistics and facts rather than so much speculation like most gaming RUclipsrs makes it a good watch even if the subjects are sometimes what my friends would call nerdy. Lol. And plus my hillbilly gay ass from Kentucky just imagines some fancy brit speaking over a cup of tea and it is almost an ASMR experience. Keep up the good work. 😁

I just keep going back to that dunkey video that shows how viewers react to reviews, basing its whole merit on the score at the end. People just want reviews to reflect their preconceived notions on a game. One comment on the video was for Age of Calamity that went like "9 is a fair score for this game. Can't wait to pick it up tomorrow!"

why do people even care about that review? just move on, not like it ruins the enjoyment of the game for you, right...?

makes sense. I played the remake of M&L BIS and loved it just to hear 5 years later that the game was bad.