Видео

While we don’t know if CC had real friends, there is the line in fnaf 4 “we are still your friends, do you believe that”. On the note of colors, CC is commonly associated with Fredbear (gold and purple) while Cassidy is associated with Golden Freddy (gold and black). And finally, with both William and possibly Michael still being around in some form, William in burntrap or glitchtrap, and Michael being referenced on white boards with the email MAafton along with characters and scenes only Michael would know being seen, then I believe it’d be fair to assume that Glamrock Freddy would be possessed by CC.

@@TheoryReplayZ but that doesn't explain the kid die 2 year after cc death and cassidie more likelihood of being the gamrock Freddy and also cc the "we still you Friends " could all so refer to the animatronic since cc don't have Friends if he really do have Friends where were they when cc getting bully we know they die in 1985 so they should still be alive in 1983

@@TheoryReplayZ also is that app still canon last i check is shut down and the white board could also be a red herring that Michael is a live am on side maybe Michael is gamrock foxy in a different location and that why they not at Freddy since he to famous for the place

Considering his father owned the building, CC was likely at Fredbears most the time and likely met the children there, so there’s a good chance he was friends with the soon to be missing children, albeit it’s a bit iffy.

I did not know ar had the email in it, and I’m like 80% sure it’s canon. The white board is something I need to look back over to see if it leads anywhere, but if very well could be a red herring.

On the contrary, Fredbear’s Family Diner and Circus Baby’s could be open before that. I definitely need to redo this video because there is a lot I missed.

Although I do think his body would be ash and dust by the time he would go down there, him literally finding his own body would fit ideas shown in the Tales from the Pizzaplex book series.

He agreed with GlamMike or against GlamMike?

@@3DFella Well, with actually, I personally don't.

My theory honestly depends on who possesses Golden Freddy, if Andrew exists, then cc, if Cassidy exists, then her. Besides that tho, it’s a solid take, and I’ll definitely be considering it when continuing further on this theory, if I am to.

Couple things to note the books aren't canon, and characters like andrew are stand ins for others, like andrew is actually cassidys stand in, in the story "the man in room 712" or something like that the ghostly kid with curly black hair a detail used to describe cassidy prevents people from trying to kill the guy and tortures him by using things from his own mind and that is used to give insight on ucn like the funtimes being there dispite cassidy never meeting them and that's one of the books 2 purposes the books have the other being ideas like the mimic the story of the mimic came out before they showed up in game and while it has no connection besides its function to the game one it's where the idea first emerged the books serve to give insight into the mysterys of fnaf and suggest ideas that might show up in the future if received well

You oughta be careful when using the word ‘stand-in’ when it comes to the books, some people on twitter will rake you over the coals, I don’t mind tho.

@TheoryReplayZ they can try until they can give me solid evidence that both are connected. I've got no reason to try and incorporate all that into my theory crafting.

Fair

Scott has stated that the books aren’t canon the line people point to as evidence of canonicity was written by the publisher not Scott not steel wool the publisher and guess what the line has been replaced meaning it most likely meant nothing to begin with. Even if it was the Mimic why would Freddy help Gregory escape? Why would he feel sad about Bonnie’s disappearance? Don’t give me the Mimic is GlitchTrap because GlitchTrap says and I quote “I always come back let me out” lines the Mimic would never have heard so please for the love of god think before you accept a theory as truth and please think before you comment

@@connorcunningham6310 LMAO YOU need to think before you comment... 😂 There's a literal daycare for the animatronics and a way to teach them in Help Wanted 2. They are all super intelligent robots that can learn and we see that with the mini-game and the doors in FNAF SB. That's literally what the game directly tells us. Freddy has a glitch that reboots him into safe mode. So how's that not the obvious reason why he helps Gregory? He isn't being controlled like the others because he says himself at the beginning... He's cut off from the main network. You adding in that extra stuff about him being possessed isn't in the games my guy... He just did what he was trained to do, and that's help children. For the love of God, look at all the evidence before believing in stuff and don't accept things at face value 😂

@@connorcunningham6310 You want to really prove me wrong? Tell me, which ending in FNAF SB is canonical? I know the correct answer, but I'm betting you jumped on a theory for the wrong answer.

@@Adventist1997 Princess quest and BurnTrap

​@@connorcunningham6310 Princess Quest is the 3-star ending while Burntrap is the 2-star... Then we find Freddy's body in the exact place we see Freddy get attacked in the PQ ending. Gregory took his head and left with Vanny. So what's the conclusive answer as to which ending is canon after looking at all the evidence currently have?

I had thought about that near the end of editing and I opted not to, mainly because I see a lot of people hating on it. So I didn’t want to get hated on for using the character encyclopedia

​@@TheoryReplayZ That's very fair! Luckily, it seems that despite the quality of the art being questionable at times, not to mention the written information being inconsistent, it seems the DESIGNS are, I guess, canon.

Yup

They also refer to the Puppet as a he which is objectively not true

Thank you

My god we see the blob in ruin and what do you think destroyed the pizza Plex also hw2 had 2 canon endings so why can’t security breach

Yeah, this video was very much outdated but I decided to bite the bullet and just go with it. I actually haven’t heard about the theory about Mike being alive, kinda cool lol.

I was nodding in the beginning but that last sentence, I don't know how you got to that conclusion or what it's about.

@@emerson-biggons7078 Elizabeth is a robot created by William and Henry

That’s probably what it was thank you

I know

Something I learned after making this video is that there is a good chance that Henry was the person who made baby. He had made her in the silver eyes, and the grey guy at the end of fnaf world might be Henry, who says they made something horrible. Just something to consider. Besides that though, it’s still a possibility that CC died first.

The posters didn’t seem to hold much information besides reassuring who is who in the Afton family. They don’t really seem to give any information as to who died when.

Fire away

​@@TheoryReplayZ There's two halves, the part I'm certain about and the more iffy stretch part. If it's in there cool, if not I hope you hear me out. Let me set the stage with a fact. FNAF 1's location is the ONLY time in the whole series where Guards being murdered at night by animatronics was a regular occurrence. It's easy to forget that as it was the first game in the series, but it's true. FNAF 2's location only ever had 3 guards. The first guy was William and he got out after a Week. Second guy was Jeremy who survived the Nightshift(but probably got his frontal lobe nibbled off on the following Dayshift), and the Third Guy was Fritz who is probably Micheal. There's also some notable revelations here I'll get back to in a minute. FNAF 3, one guard, probably Micheal(though some fringe theorists think it's Henry), they live. FNAF 4, no guards. FNAF SL...this one is actually kind of hard to say, FNAF 6, one guard, Micheal, dies but not because of animatronics. FNAF 2 also establishes via Phone Guy that this is the first time this sort of thing has ever happened. Guard 1's reports were thought of as impossible and it's only during Jeremy's week they start to figure out a theory(the bare endoskeleton thing) and offer up some solutions. This tells us the original location that was open for a bit after the murders either didn't have nightguards(makes sense enough, no big crime, no need) or the Puppet hadn't gotten to them yet. It also tells us Guard fatalities are something they're actively trying to avoid. But in FNAF 1? There's a whole procedure for it. Body removed, property cleaned and bleached, carpets replaced, missing person report within 90 days. A institutional solution for it combined with Phone Guy's "Most people don't last this long" implies MANY guards at this location have come and perished before Micheal arrives in 92/93(doesn't matter, but TLDR 93 has never been proven. Matpat picked it because of the Aurora Chuck E Cheese incident, the tax data said it could be anywhere from 1991-1996, and the Faz Fact that referenced it was cut and might not be canon. But that would have the work week not align with FNAF 2, which is Sunday-Saturday and has Friday the 13th as your last payday. 1992 is the only other date in which Friday the 13th and the work week line up.) This means that not only have a ton of guards died, but there's a procedure for it, meaning the company is both aware and doesn't care. But why? This isn't hugely profitable 2030s Fazbear entertainment sweeping a few missing kids and staff under the rug, this is 1990s floundering Fazbear. Why waste so much many dealing with dozens of dead guards...unless...gathering dead guards is the goal. Let me ask another question. Who is running the show in the 1990s? Henry is out the timeline from the mid 80s until right before FNAF 6, maybe he's hiding in guilt, heck, I personally buy the theory he was framed(explaining the newspaper clipping saying the suspect was convicted) and spent a couple decades in jail, starting on the FNAF 6 project right after getting out. But even if he was here, Henry would never allow any of this to happen. And I already explained above why the faceless corporate overlord types, or even Miss Afton if you wanna bring that up, wouldn't do this. The profit motive isn't there. The location is a crumbling mess and the cleanup procedure is massive and expensive. That only leaves our boy William Afton, who is alive at this point, was free as recently as 1987, and we have zero evidence he was charged for the DCI/SAVE THEM incident. William Afton was running the FNAF 1 location and funding the cleanups of stuffed, dead, guards. But why? Well, for years the fandom has talked of William doing remnant experiments, soul experiments, maybe even agony experiments. That's how we get the theory the original 5 souls may have ended up in Funtime Freddy and Ballora and eventually in Molten Freddy and The Blob. But would William really have stuck to the same handful of souls, especially as he seemingly didn't want to mess with his daughter? Why not get a larger sample size, recreate the suffering? But kids are too risky to go after, he's done that twice and gotten away by the skin of his teeth. People care about kids, but what about poor working class blokes? Transients? People no one would notice if they suddenly were to vanish. I'm of the belief the FNAF 1 location, Bear themed restaurant and all, is a honey pot. It's a trap. It would certainly explain things like the door design and power supply. Transients, Desperate people, poor workers down on their luck, read a newspaper ad, dead in a few days, stuffed and ready for testing. This theory predates the Movie, but the Movie absolutely backs it up with him encouraging people to take the job. The location may have closed in 92/93, but the FNAF 2 ending and Phone Guy lines suggest it may have opened up far sooner than that, within a year of the FNAF 2 location closing. Dozens of men could have died there before the place finally closed at 'years end' a few weeks after Micheals run. And seemingly it didn't work. Maybe because the suffering wasn't enough. Maybe these men lacked the hope to hold on that the kids did, drained by a terrible life prior. Or maybe it's simply because The Puppet had cottoned on and wasn't going to help bring anyone back. Not anymore.(We know they were at the FNAF 1 location, both from the timeline and the FNAF 2 cutscenes, yet we never see them. Curious). So eventually as the place shut down William decided to take a closer look at the originals. Break them up, study their bits, perhaps reuse them. What made them special? And it would explain why that original remnant kept being re-used, the circumstances were specific and it was so hard to get more. They were no longer needed as unintentional killers. And Sister Location? Which most people place next to FNAF 1 in the timeline(either before or after depends). While it's not as blatant, it's the only other location with HINTS of prior guard fatalities. Plus the two technitions. Curious then this is the one place we know was fully a William operation. That's the main theory. All above. FNAF 1 location is a trap to lure in guards to get stuffed and use for remnant experiments. It didn't work, so William eventually scrapped the animatronics to study directly after it closed. Ok, here's the bit of a stretch part. Phone Guy. The eternal enigma. Leading candidate to be the Purple Guy for over a year. We know he was innocent, and in hindsight it was kind of obvious from the start(The FNAF 2 phonecalls very clearly tell us it's the Dayshift Guard/Former Nightguars, and they aren't the same person as Phone Guy. Heck they trick Phone Guy). But he's definitely sketchy. He helps hide what's going on in the FNAF 2 location, covers up Springsuit fatalities, organizes the saferooms being sealed, and knows very well what's happening to all the guards at the FNAF 1 location. He's not a killer, but he is a diehard company loyalist who has been complicit in and helped cover up numerous crimes. Bit of a toadie. And we also have evidence William has blackmailed and threatened people more than once. He got the Funtime Designs past those execs who knew what they were for. SOMEONE was arrested in the 80s for the MCI and it clearly wasn't him. (Henry is the prime theory as it explains a bunch of other things, but back in the day a popular option was 'the guy in the foxy costume from Foxy Go Go' or 'One of the other bullies from Fnaf 4). This coo-coo banana pants theory is that Phone Guy was essentially strong-armed into being William's igor and right hand man in running the FNAF 1 location, handling the logistics of the new hires and managing the clean ups. Phone Guy is a toadie to start with(as shown above) and William could easily threaten to either frame him for the DCI/Save Them, or just leak all the audio of Phone Guy covering up various deaths on behalf of Fazbear over the years(probably edited to relieve William of any blame). The tapes were in the same room as Springbonnie, he has access to them. That would explain why Phone Guy, while not being THE killer, is clearly involved in so much nasty business. Toadie to William to the end, especially when being credibly threatened. It would also explain why in FNAF 1, despite towing the line and never fully telling you to 'leave and never come back' or something sensible like that, he does TRY to give subtle hints to either help you out or warn out without crossing the line. His previous deeds were very impersonal and detatched, he was the middleman, not the cause. Now he's directly involved like never before, he can't write off the blame in his mind anymore, "only following orders" is a lot harder when you're there in person and leading people to their deaths directly. (BTW, great title for a Phone Guy theory video. Only Following Orders). So he's trying desperately to get some warnings out in-between dismissing them and legal jargon and lying to you about the cause of the malfunction. This would also explain his fate. While Phone Guy had nominally been a guard since the place opened(as indicated by his FNAF 2 dialogue), it was obviously more of a training role, head guard, served only on paper in a lot of ways. He wasn't doing it weekly for all those years. But I'm guessing his disobediance and evidence of trying to sneak out warnings eventually came to Williams attention. Which combined with the fact all the Stuffed Guards were not working out in the experiments and William was probably getting angry...he sent Phone Guy to do things in person, and ensured he'd never come back. It was indeed his last week, just as promised.

I honestly love this theory. Fnaf 1 is by far one of the most confusing games to me and this theory would explain a lot if true. With the use of Williams manipulation tactics and remnant experiments it helps sell the idea even further. It also give a solid explanation to why phone guy is the way he is. Off the top of my head the only thing that might give troubles to this theory is whether “follow me” takes place before or after fnaf 1, but besides that I don’t see any problems with it. I highly suggest sharing this with other people to get their input too, because there might be stuff that I’m not remembering. Amazing theory tho. 👍

@@TheoryReplayZ has to be after the animatronics are destroyed

@@TheoryReplayZ Feel free to make a vid using the concept as a basis if you want I'm game I just want to see it out there

lol

I do think it’s possible for the Funtimes to be made earlier, William seems like the type to over compensate by making some high tech looking futuristic robot, but besides that everything you’ve said makes sense. I’m still going to take things from earlier in the timeline with a grain of salt though, mainly because I’m not sure how much of the story Scott had planned out, so details might have been changed. And also thank you for the constructive criticism.

It’s possible Afton knew about the glitch and simply ignored it, but besides that I’m not sure. Thank you for pointing this out to me.

Probably because the Funtimes were, and still are experimental. I mean, why else put them in a bunker.

I presented the idea of a glitch in my video, that’s the glitch I was referring to. I understand the lore fine, it’s the fact that more and more things are getting flipped on its head so we have to start questioning what we knew as fact and see if it still stands.

@PETERTHEGAMER69 @TheoryReplayZ Peter, just because there isn’t evidence doesn’t make this irrelevant. It’s called a theory. A theory is a potential explanation or idea for something, so you can be mad all you want, but let Theory cook his good crap.

I also think that the theory of a glitch is plausible, I mean it’s new technology, what do you expect?

If you search it up, she died outside of Fredbear’s family diner in 1983

​@@Subforexoticbutters it's not confirmed

@@8The-angel8 you can search it up if u’d like

It’s both of her deaths mashed together. In fnaf 6 she died outside an unnamed pizzeria, in the silver eyes she died in a fredbear’s specifically a closet.

@@TheoryReplayZ when you search it up, you will see “Charlotte Emily died outside of Fredbear’s family diner in 1983

Don't worry we're okay with it