Fusion Industry Association
Fusion Industry Association
  • Видео 229
  • Просмотров 484 267
Fusion News: 2024 Recap
In this special edition of Fusion News, Fusion Industry Association CEO Andrew Holland summarizes fusion's progress in 2024 and introduces some of the major headlines from the year. Links to news stories are included below.
1. Nuclear Startup Pacific Fusion Nabs $900 Million in Funding
www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-25/nuclear-startup-pacific-fusion-raises-900-million-in-funding
2. Thales and the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics set a world record in the field of nuclear fusion
www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/group/press_release/thales-and-max-planck-institute-plasma-physics-set-world-record-field
3. The nuclear fusion industry is having a growth spurt
www.axios.com/2024/07/17...
Просмотров: 3 643

Видео

Fusion News, December 11, 2024
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.21 день назад
Mechanical engineer Jasmine Mund gives today's Fusion News episode, summarizing the major fusion news headlines from the past two weeks. Links to all of the stories mentioned are included below. 1. General Fusion confirms significant fusion neutron yield and plasma stability during MTF compression experiment series with new peer-reviewed publication generalfusion.com/post/general-fusion-confirm...
Fusion News, November 27, 2024
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.Месяц назад
Dr. Cyd Cowley, working at the intersection of fusion and AI at FIA affiliate member digiLab, gives today's global fusion news update. Links to all of the stories mentioned are included below. 1. Nuclear Startup Pacific Fusion Nabs $900 Million in Funding www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-25/nuclear-startup-pacific-fusion-raises-900-million-in-funding 2. Japan launches FAST fusion power p...
Fusion power: the global game-changer
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.Месяц назад
Fusion energy would revolutionize the way we power our world. It is the most efficient source of energy, and is clean, safe, and virtually limitless. Fusion is the way the Sun and all of the stars in the universe generate power. However, replicating this reaction on Earth in a commercially viable way (more energy out than in) is hard. Very hard. But - thanks to breakthroughs in technology, engi...
The Global Fusion Industry in 2024: Report Insights
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.2 месяца назад
Every year, the Fusion Industry Association launches our global fusion industry report, surveying all of the private companies to give a snapshot of where the industry stands year after year. We launched our 2024 report in July 2024 - here are the key highlights. You can read the report in full, along with all previous years', on the FIA website: www.fusionindustryassociation.org/news/from-the-...
Fusion News, October 30, 2024
Просмотров 6 тыс.2 месяца назад
Mechanical design engineer Jasmine Mund gives this week's global fusion news update, summarizing behind all of the major headlines. Links to all of the stories mentioned are included below. 1. Tokamak Energy gives details of pilot fusion energy plant design www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/tokamak-energy-gives-details-of-pilot-fusion-energy-plant-design 2. Thales and the Max Planck Institute...
Fusion News, October 16, 2024
Просмотров 6 тыс.2 месяца назад
Dr. Cyd Cowley, working at the intersection of fusion and AI at FIA affiliate member digiLab, gives today's global fusion news update. Links to all of the stories mentioned are included below. 1. Zap Energy shows off its new fusion power prototype, Century techcrunch.com/2024/10/09/zap-energy-shows-off-its-new-fusion-power-prototype-century/ 2. Fusion, the Web and electric planes: how spin-offs...
Fusion News, October 2, 2024
Просмотров 11 тыс.3 месяца назад
Jeff Peachman, PhD student at the University of Washington, gives today's Fusion News update - summarizing the major recent headlines in fusion energy. Links to all of the stories mentioned are included below. 1. Marvel Fusion lands $70M for laser-powered fusion bet techcrunch.com/2024/09/25/marvel-fusion-lands-70m-for-laser-powered-fusion-bet/ 2. Fusion fuel mix could stabilize burning plasma ...
Fusion News, September 18, 2024
Просмотров 5 тыс.3 месяца назад
Fusion News, September 18, 2024
Senator Kelly praises NRC decision to regulate fusion under byproduct materials framework
Просмотров 3633 месяца назад
Senator Kelly praises NRC decision to regulate fusion under byproduct materials framework
Fusion News, September 4, 2024
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.4 месяца назад
Fusion News, September 4, 2024
Fusion News, August 14, 2024
Просмотров 6 тыс.4 месяца назад
Fusion News, August 14, 2024
Fusion News, July 24, 2024
Просмотров 5 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Fusion News, July 24, 2024
Fusion News, July 10, 2024
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Fusion News, July 10, 2024
Chairman Lucas calls to fully fund provisions in the CHIPS and Science Act
Просмотров 1086 месяцев назад
Chairman Lucas calls to fully fund provisions in the CHIPS and Science Act
Deputy Secretary Turk says "We need to spend more on fusion" in response to questions on DOE budget
Просмотров 3936 месяцев назад
Deputy Secretary Turk says "We need to spend more on fusion" in response to questions on DOE budget
Congresswoman Lofgren asks why DOE is not prioritizing critical programs for commercializing fusion
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.6 месяцев назад
Congresswoman Lofgren asks why DOE is not prioritizing critical programs for commercializing fusion
Congresswoman Lofgren shares disappointment with lack of funding for fusion in DOE FY25 budget
Просмотров 3796 месяцев назад
Congresswoman Lofgren shares disappointment with lack of funding for fusion in DOE FY25 budget
Fusion News, June 26, 2024
Просмотров 9 тыс.6 месяцев назад
Fusion News, June 26, 2024
Fusion News, June 12, 2024
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.6 месяцев назад
Fusion News, June 12, 2024
Fusion News, May 15, 2024
Просмотров 8 тыс.7 месяцев назад
Fusion News, May 15, 2024
Fusion News, May 1, 2024
Просмотров 6 тыс.8 месяцев назад
Fusion News, May 1, 2024
Fusion News, April 17, 2024
Просмотров 8 тыс.8 месяцев назад
Fusion News, April 17, 2024
Fusion News, March 20, 2024
Просмотров 10 тыс.9 месяцев назад
Fusion News, March 20, 2024
Fusion News, March 6, 2024
Просмотров 5 тыс.10 месяцев назад
Fusion News, March 6, 2024
Fusion News, February 21, 2024
Просмотров 19 тыс.10 месяцев назад
Fusion News, February 21, 2024
Fusion News, February 7, 2024
Просмотров 2,7 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Fusion News, February 7, 2024
Fusion News, January 24, 2024
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Fusion News, January 24, 2024
Fusion News, January 10, 2024
Просмотров 10 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Fusion News, January 10, 2024
Fusion News Holiday Edition, December 20, 2023
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.Год назад
Fusion News Holiday Edition, December 20, 2023

Комментарии

  • @JohnSmith-pc3gc
    @JohnSmith-pc3gc 27 минут назад

    "Let me know in the comments" Just use compressed air to drive the machine. Air circulating at hypersonic speeds cam seriously decrease the pressure at the center of a cone.

  • @turbo620
    @turbo620 День назад

    total fantasy

  • @adrian_r
    @adrian_r 4 дня назад

    Please ask someone at Thales how to pronounce their company name!

  • @carmenshivas915
    @carmenshivas915 5 дней назад

    Aside from growing bank accounts and egos, realistically how is this tech any good for God given life and bio rhythms on earth?

  • @michaeldeeth811
    @michaeldeeth811 5 дней назад

    The South Korean magnetic fusion device KSTAR is valued at over $1.2 trillion. Why isn't it mentioned anywhere in any of the Fusion Industry Association podcasts or reports?

  • @elmarmoelzer2229
    @elmarmoelzer2229 5 дней назад

    Amazing progress for fusion this year! The world is truly waking up to the promise of fusion energy, which is no longer a "forever away"- thing but is becoming tangible in the very near future. Helion is leading the charge right now but many others are right behind. Not everyone will make it, but if only one of the teams succeeds, the world will change dramatically! Btw, always love to see people with an "alternative" style in science (like Dr Kesler). I think it makes the field feel more accessible to the general public.

  • @ESaboHowGravityWorks
    @ESaboHowGravityWorks 6 дней назад

    What about Helion? ruclips.net/video/_bDXXWQxK38/видео.html

  • @dissaid
    @dissaid 6 дней назад

    Happy New Year!

  • @bluefox3634
    @bluefox3634 6 дней назад

    8.92k subscribers - 274 views - 56 thumbs up. Are these good numbers? It doesn't seem so. The material will change the world. Why is it so invisible? Keep up the good work, though!

  • @digitalplayland
    @digitalplayland 6 дней назад

    Great presenters. Happy New Year!

  • @johnh6245
    @johnh6245 6 дней назад

    The FIA exists to promote fusion energy and it’s clearly rather successful but this presentation reported nothing new. Where are for example the reports on DT experiments, methods of enriching lithium, high energy neutron irradiation experiments and tritium breeding experiments - all absolutely essential before any fusion reactor can be built. The only result mentioned was the irrelevant NIF ‘more energy out than in’ work - irrelevant since it ignores the massive energy used to put the energy into the target.

  • @glike2
    @glike2 6 дней назад

    Before the end of the 2030s we will need geoengineering to stop a climate catastrophe, that's too late to use it to do direct carbon capture which would take massive amounts of energy.

  • @AbbeyRoad69147
    @AbbeyRoad69147 6 дней назад

    Long before fusion gets onto the grid, a fusion machine that drives a HEAT EXCHANGER will need to demonstrate it can operate for months at a time with reasonably low maintenance. I am very suspicious, because no one has talked about this. Only a sustained heat-exchanger demonstration will prove the thermodynamic gain, reliability, and running costs.

  • @RandallLorenz
    @RandallLorenz 6 дней назад

    Excellent summary, thanks for an eventful 2024. Lets have a brilliant 2025!

  • @atomhydrogen
    @atomhydrogen 8 дней назад

    The phenomenon of nuclear fusion does not have any reasonable theory; the mechanism of fusion is unknown to now. The present theories of quantum mechanics, quantum chromodynamics, electroweak theory and nuclear forces are unable to explain reactions of nuclear fusion. Until there is a clear theory of this phenomenon, there will be no reliable experiment focused on an industrial result, that is, a continuous nuclear fusion reaction of light elements. So, where is the theory? Are leading journals capable of publishing such a theory, as it would certainly bring a significant revision to the existing theories listed above?..

  • @ChristopherStrevens
    @ChristopherStrevens 18 дней назад

    Our reactor uses ion pressure instead of heat and we use an electromagnetic piston to compress the ions that are made by passing a small current through the neutral gas. we are looking for funding. The three prototypes cost us about £500 each. lit a 3 watt m.e.s lamp.

  • @unbreakableldorado7723
    @unbreakableldorado7723 20 дней назад

    thanks for the udates

  • @unbreakableldorado7723
    @unbreakableldorado7723 20 дней назад

    nice

  • @JJLee-q3b
    @JJLee-q3b 23 дня назад

    Thanks for the update! much love :)

  • @apollo8352
    @apollo8352 23 дня назад

    When we transition to fussion energy and start generating enough to do some serious terofforming. Is all the excess energy being created expected to cause any global heating problems?

  • @rodkeh
    @rodkeh 24 дня назад

    Fusion will never work and it is a total scam and a swindle that will always be just around the corner and anyone who believes the propaganda is a sucker and a fool!

  • @mb-3faze
    @mb-3faze 25 дней назад

    Fusion... yes... when I was recent engineering grad, like yourself, there was equally optimistic news on fusion. Since then (40 years) we have managed to harness energy from the only, 'local', working, fusion reactor. And now we're creating a terawatt+ of power every day - pollution-free. Over the years it has become abundantly obvious that even if net power-positive fusion is ever created, the power will be far from pollution-free. In fact things are going to get radioactive pretty quickly and we'll be back to the fission nightmare were the instant a power plant is started, that is the last time that piece of land will be used for farming, housing or indeed anything other than a pit in to which vast quantities of money are poured for a hundred plus years (see Sellafield). To power our civilization on this planet, we only have to look to the sun, the wind and the inexhaustible supply of heat beneath our feet to supply every kWh of energy we will ever need.

  • @XAirForcedotcom
    @XAirForcedotcom 26 дней назад

    OK you’re using panels anyway which means segmented and you can have sensors watching the plasma in each area. It looks like the wave of energy travels around the reactor, and you can use a feedback loop to control the magnetic containment field. The feedback from panel one is fed into panel two so as the energy wave arrives, it can use the magnetic field to choke the energy.

    • @XAirForcedotcom
      @XAirForcedotcom 26 дней назад

      You use AI to keep track of everything and keep adjusting the magnetic field

  • @XAirForcedotcom
    @XAirForcedotcom 26 дней назад

    What did they go looking around for the cutest engineer to put on RUclips? The rest of them are out in the lab or behind a computer. Lol., The entire industry had a meeting and they voted you to represent them. Lol

  • @markgouthro7375
    @markgouthro7375 26 дней назад

    Sound was nearly unintelligible.

  • @mohebalikalani2115
    @mohebalikalani2115 26 дней назад

    Hello, thank you for your explanation, also in seawater as new fuel resource can produce minerals Iones, "ruclips.net/video/sBO1ghQO4VA/видео.htmlsi=ccXDCv-9jAdocKQI"

  • @vernonbrechin4207
    @vernonbrechin4207 26 дней назад

    The reports provided by the FIA all suffer from a conflict of interest. The fans tend to have no interest in critically examining the field that they have fallen in love with and tend to immerse themselves in echo chambers that reinforce what they prefer to believe in. Most can’t even understand the technical jargon in the peer reviewed papers that they cite. The ITER project was mentioned above. Conveniently some key issues were not mentioned. One is it is grossly over its original budget. Two is it is well over a decade behind its original schedule. It has encountered major problems with major component assembly. Its first deuterium-tritium fusion experiments are not expected to begin until 2039. The tritium breeding blanket experiments will likely not happen until 2040 at the earliest. The current commercial price for the radioactive tritium gas fuel component is more than $30,000 USD per gram. All promoters of nuclear energy are in line with the vast majority of the Earth’s 8.0+ billion humans who have masterfully excluded the following warnings from their consciousness. They continue to assume that we have at least 20 years left to turn this ‘Titanic’ around, through the use of their favorite technology. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.8 years ago.

  • @robert-wr9xt
    @robert-wr9xt 26 дней назад

    Fusion news with a smile. Well said and done.

  • @ChristopherStrevens
    @ChristopherStrevens 27 дней назад

    we found a simple arrangement of a coil and tube by chance that starts by itself and changes deuterium to helium. Stop wasting money on the Tokomaks. I wish I understood them!

  • @HiAdrian
    @HiAdrian 27 дней назад

    Thanks Jasmine and team for all the fusion news this year, much appreciated!

  • @HansSchulze
    @HansSchulze 27 дней назад

    Thanks. But please get a boom mike or a röde clip-on mike. Too much echo when listening on large av system.

  • @johnh6245
    @johnh6245 27 дней назад

    General Fusion’s neutron yields are impressive, but when they turn to DT plasmas, will they be able to breed tritium without the presently difficult (and perhaps impossible) step of isotopically enriching the lithium to increase the Li6 content.

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 26 дней назад

      General Fusion stated that their experiment generated 600 million fusion neutrons per second but the fusion reactions lasted less than a microsecond. Do the math and you will see it is not as impressive as you first assumed. The famous 12/05/2022 NIF laser shot resulted in the generation approximately 1 x 10E+18 fusion neutrons for a reaction that only lasted for about 80 pico seconds before 96% of the unfused fuel was blasted away from the reaction center and sucked into the target chamber vacuum pumping system. Learn how experimenters manipulate their presentations in the quest to elicit more investment funding.

    • @johnh6245
      @johnh6245 26 дней назад

      A reply asks about the breeding blanket’s thickness and if there have been simulations of the breeding. The blanket thickness needs to be about a metre in order to absorb most of the 14 MeV neutrons. There are simulation papers on breeding and the breeding ratio in the literature but there is no experimental experience, and nor can there be on the scale required. Can a billion dollar reactor be built on a vague assumption that it will work??

    • @michaeldeeth811
      @michaeldeeth811 26 дней назад

      It is a common misconception that increasing the Li6 content increases the tritium breeding ratio. To prove my point, consider a 2 meter thick FLiBe blanket having natural isotopic ratios: Be9=0.1428... Li6=0.0217... Li7=0.2640... F19=0.5714... According to OpenMC's simulation, the TBR of this natural FLiBe mixture is 1.25. When I increase the enrichment to 100% Li6 (0% Li7) the TBR dropped to 1.08. And, most interestingly, when I decreased the amount of Li6, so there was 100x as much Li7 as Li6, the TBR increased to 1.26.

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 26 дней назад

      - Thank you for the correction. I admit that my one microsecond figure was a guess. Thank you for pointing out that the measured fusion reactions lasted for 0.000,275 second. That would mean that the number of fusion neutrons released would be around 600,000,000 x 0.000,275 = 165,000 fusion neutrons. What purpose may have been served by stating the neutron number in terms of neutrons per second? Perhaps the experimenters eventually aim to have their ‘implosion’ reactions last for a full second. The 165,000 neutrons compares with the 12/05/2022 NIF experiment that generated ~ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 neutrons during the 0.000,000,000,08 second that reaction lasted before explosively blowing 96% of the unfused fuel away from the reaction center ‘hot spot.’ NIF began operating in 2009 after being succeeded by a series of five other laser driven inertial confinement (ICF) fusion experimental machines that ‘proved’ NIF would achieve a ‘scientific breakeven’ fusion reaction by 2012. It missed that goal by a factor of over 100. The funding continued since its primary purpose has always been as a thermonuclear weapon (H-bomb) research tool. After a decade of tweeks, costing many additional billions of USD, it finally achieved the long sought after goal of ‘scientific breakeven’ reaction which involved pumping the lasers with more than 100 times the energy than resulted from the fusion reaction, which remains many, many, orders of magnitude away from anything that could be considered a nuclear fusion energy, commercially practical, pilot power plant.

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 26 дней назад

      @ - General Fusion employs a variation of Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF). In such cases the fusion ‘burn’ is expected to last for only a tiny fraction of a second before the fusion reactions blasts much of the unfused fuel away from the ‘hot spot’ where conditions are optimal for fusion to occur. There will be limited propagation, of the fusion reaction, before disassembly happens. In the proposed power plant designs there will need to be lengthy recovery times between each ‘shot,’ with the fusion time lasting only a tiny fraction of the time between each ‘shot’ cycle. If the ‘ON’ duty cycle is 0.01 then the fusion energy, emitted during each ‘shot,’ will need to be 100 times greater than the average thermal energy generated by the power plant. In the case of a power plant designed to produce an average thermal energy of 100,000,000 watt-hours the averaged energy of each fusion energy pulse would need to be 100,000,000,000 watt-hours. The ‘scientific gain,’ Q-plasma value for pulsed experimental machines applies only to the short period of time fusion is actually occurring. It doesn’t apply to any lengthy recovery period between each pulse. Any consideration of a power plant design must consider the total averaged input energy into the facility to formulate the a Q-total value. In the case of today’s record breaking nuclear fusion experimental reactors their Q-total value, averaged over a 24-hour period, remains well below 0.01.

  • @franciscojaviertrev
    @franciscojaviertrev 27 дней назад

    I love all the narrators updates on nuclear fusion, you benefit the whole world... These are the chats that I like....

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 25 дней назад

      They all have become masterful in fooling themselves regarding the level of advancement regarding even the two major record holders in the magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) and the inertial confinement fusion (ICF) fields. They assume that by 2040 we will be mass producing commercially competitive fusion power plants and that they will have no problem in generating all the tritium that is required for their own operation. It simply serves as a distraction away from investing the annual billions of USD being directed into these numerous experimental endeavors then plowing the funds into energy sources such as wind and solar. Virtually all nuclear energy promoters, are in line with the vast majority of Earth's other 8.0+ billion humans, who continue to assume that we still have at least 20 years left to turn this 'Titanic' around using their favorite nuclear technology. They have become masterful in excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.8 years ago.

  • @tjmozdzen
    @tjmozdzen 27 дней назад

    I love the shorts. Perfect amount of detail for me!

  • @ariellazovic1815
    @ariellazovic1815 27 дней назад

    che los re banco pero se me hace dificil sostener la atencion cuando hablan sin mirar a la camara.. ¿no hay manera de ajustar el teleprompter para q les quede a la altura correcta?

  • @bodenebarker3019
    @bodenebarker3019 27 дней назад

    Thanks for the update - much appreciated.

  • @-dlb-
    @-dlb- 27 дней назад

    This is such a race!

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies Месяц назад

    Eric Lerner at LPPFusion, and Eric Lander at Pacific Fusion sound like they should meet! I am certain pulsed fusion reactors are the correct answer.

  • @spr1334
    @spr1334 Месяц назад

    So, When we getting it down the wires?

  • @vernonbrechin4207
    @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

    These sales hype presentations are intended to attract massive investment funding into the scores of nuclear fusion energy experimental projects to allow the experimenters to continue their play that has been going on since the 1950s. It relies upon gross deceptions that have become institutionalized in the field that aims to snow journalists, the general public and clueless investors who rely upon critical assessments provided by the fans in this community. These hype reports are based upon the hype that appears in popular publications. The editors and presenters tend to make no efforts to review the peer reviewed technical papers and likely wouldn't understand them if they even tried. The fans tend to immerse themselves in echo chamber information sources to reinforce what they prefer to believe in. Typically they have zero interest in seeking out critical assessments of the technologies that they have come to love and assume will save us all from the dire warnings regarding Anthropogenic Climate Disruption (ACD) effects. Here is my recap of the presentations made in this video. 1) Nuclear Startup Pacific Fusion Nabs $900 Million in Funding Generating promotional hype that attracts investors is one thing. Delivering practical results is extremely different. This startup has not demonstrated any fusion level compression parameters. It hasn't employed D-T fuel in its experiments, or produced any results suggesting the production of even one watt-hour of fusion energy. It is experimenting with a very short pulsed device where the Q-plasma value only applies to the extremely short 'ON' time of well under 150 nanoseconds. The recovery time is likely to be substantially longer than that. It doesn't include any provision for tritium breading. 2) Japan launches FAST fusion power project This is a proposed project that has yet to demonstrate a use of D-T fuel, or the production of a single watt-hour of fusion energy. It will be a pulsed device so all mention of Q-plasma values achieved will only apply to conditions during the 'ON' time and recovery periods could be substantial. 3) The Quest to Build a star on Earth Only a tiny fraction of the scores of experimental nuclear fusion experimental programs employ D-T fusion fuel and have produced more than a watt-hour of fusion thermal energy generation. In most cases the demonstrated fusion has been extremely brief during the days the experimental shots were conducted. No experiment has yet demonstrated a self-sustaining reaction without massive quantities of input power supplied to such facilities. 4) Limitless fusion power: Tokamak Energy heats up with $125M from investors including British Patient Capital This company has not employed D-T fusion fuel but has only demonstrated fusion level plasm temperatures at the cost of large amounts of energy feeding their facility. The experiments are done with the ST40 high-field compact spherical tokamak. It has been two years since they achieved the goal of a plasma temperature in excess of 100 million degrees Celsius. 5) Nuclear fusion start-up claims milestone with unconventional reactor OpenStar Technologies LTD achieved 300,000 °C for 20 seconds. No D-T fusion fuel was employed so it is unlikely it generated anything above a milliwatt-hour of fusion thermal energy despite a large input of energy to power the experimental facility. It is likely to be a pulsed experimental reactor with lengthy recovery time between shots so the Q-plasma value will only apply to the 'ON' period of time for the device. See the Wikipedia article titled 'List of fusion experiments.' There is a massive market for hopeful presentations and numerous opportunists have learned how to capitalize upon those cravings. Many of these privately and federally funded startups claim that they can create a commercially practical nuclear fusion energy electricity generating pilot power plant by the end of the 1930s. Currently, the most advanced ones remain many orders of magnitude away from such a technical goal. Their entire schtick is based upon a state of denial of the following warnings. The tens-of-billions, worth of invested USD, would be better applied to constructing solar and wind farm based energy sources. Virtually all nuclear energy promoters, are in line with the vast majority of Earth's other 8.0+ billion humans, who continue to assume that we still have at least 20 years left to turn this 'Titanic' around using their favorite nuclear technology. They have become masterful in excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5.8 years ago.

  • @kylev.8248
    @kylev.8248 Месяц назад

    What a beautiful human

  • @JJLee-q3b
    @JJLee-q3b Месяц назад

    fusion is life😊

  • @michaeldeeth811
    @michaeldeeth811 Месяц назад

    In Cyd's 3rd story, The Quest to Build a Star on Earth, Dr. Cowley commented about fusion start-ups, "there's an awful lot of supercharged hype." When people don't deliver, the consequences will be worrisome. 😞

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

      Ask yourself if and when the failed efforts will ever be held accountable for wasting vast amounts of resources that could be better spent on deploying immediate adaptations such as wind and solar energy farms. ITER is now grossly over its original budget and over a decade behind its original schedule. It's first D-T fusion experiments are not expected to happen before 2039, with its tritium blanket experiments beyond that. It continues to be funded because it has become to enormous to cancel. Many experimenters are aware of how to get their foot in the door so they too will be unlikely to be defunded.

  • @RaySpainPlayer
    @RaySpainPlayer Месяц назад

    We're all so excited. We'll have fusion 25 years from now.

  • @ricardoantunez106
    @ricardoantunez106 Месяц назад

    Fusion energy is cool.

  • @patrickmchargue7122
    @patrickmchargue7122 Месяц назад

    In other not-covered news, Lawrenceville Plasma started Proton-Boron fusion tests.

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

      This commenter is likely referring to LPPFusion and their extremely slick sales pitch which claims that their fusion approach is simple to achieve and will solve virtually all our energy problems. Typical fans tend to have no desire to critically probe into such claims. Ask yourself if their experimental program has generated any peer reviewed articles that have appeared in highly respected scientific journals. Ask if any of their experiments have achieved even a fusion energy output above one miliwatt-hour of thermal, or electrical energy at any time. Ask how long their longest plasma confinement time has lasted and how much energy was supplied to the facility during any day they claim to have generated fusion energy. Keep in mind that the Q-plasma value only applies to the 'ON' time in pulsed fusion reactors.

  • @jjeherrera
    @jjeherrera Месяц назад

    2:51 Considering ITER won't be achieving Q>1 before 2035, and it isn't designed to produce electric power, FAST shows Japan (and others) have convinced themselves that we can't wait for the ITER-DEMO roadmap.

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

      Many of the experimental efforts have given up waiting for ITER to add to their knowledge base to help them along. Many fans assume that one of the other numerous competing technological approaches is bound to achieve a commercially practical source of fusion energy within the next 1.5 decades. The fans have been left with the impression that if enough billions of USD are thrown at a project that they are bound to overcome the problems that have been plaguing the field since the experiments began in the 1950s. Billions have been invested in cancer research over the last half-century and yet there still is no general cure. ITER is grossly over its original budget and well over a decade behind its original schedule. It has become to big to cancel, a lesson that makes many investor's mouth's water. If you closely examine the recent ITER announcement you will learn that they don't expect to begin their 1st D-T fusion experiments until 2039, not 2035. They can't produce any significant fraction of a Q-plasma value until they transition from plasma heating experiments to D-T fueled experiments. They also can't begin their tritium breeding experiments until they reach significant fusion energy generation levels. It has become an intuitional process to mislead journalists, the general public and investors with their special definition of the Q value. They always are referring to the Q-plasma value which tends to involve an input energy value that is a tiny fraction of the energy needed to power the experimental facilities. In pulsed fusion devices, which includes virtually all tokamak-type devices when operating near their full fusion energy levels, the Q-plasma value only applies to the short period of time the reactor is in its 'ON' state and generating fusion energy. A more accurate evaluation criteria would be Q-total which compares the input energy to operate the facility to the output energy derived from the fusion reactions, all averaged over a day of the experiment. The record breaking fusion energy achievements, today, are many orders of magnitude away from anything close to an economically practical fusion energy electrical generating pilot power plant. The sales promoters have left the funders with the impression that these efforts are very close to achieving economic practicality.

  • @Aedonius
    @Aedonius Месяц назад

    Cold Fusion is the way. It is what Helion is based off of. Compressed plasmoids or exotic vacuum objects. It has been proven over and over again if you pay attention to the right areas, for example, The Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project. One project specifically is by Bin Juine Huang in Taiwan who put out a paper at beginning of the year in Nature SR regarding his cavitation based reactor.. He is currently in the process of scaling to a commercial plant.

    • @MattNolanCustom
      @MattNolanCustom Месяц назад

      dude, your word salad is missing some croutons

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

      Many people are enamored by technical jargon, especially those who have little incentive to critically examine the claims and those who simply don't have the deep technical background needed to read and understand the peer-reviewed technical papers on the topics that they have become fans of.

  • @michaeldeeth811
    @michaeldeeth811 Месяц назад

    Dr. Cyd Cowley's podcasts are a breath of fresh air in the world that is speeding toward gloom and doom. His enthusiasm is infectious, and his presentations are always uplifting and bubbling over with optimism. ☢

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

      Many people have found value in immersing themselves in the technical dreams provided by hope peddlers.

  • @johnh6245
    @johnh6245 Месяц назад

    And where do all these amazing finance boosted firms plan to source their tritium to get their marvellous reactors started?

    • @vernonbrechin4207
      @vernonbrechin4207 Месяц назад

      Excellent point. Since the controlled nuclear fusion experiments began in the 1950s the journalists, the general public and the funders have been given the impression that the hydrogen fuel is virtually limitless. Most of the workers, in the field, have also swallowed this lie and never bothered to inquire into the reality of the situation. Cleverly, the details have been kept from them to keep their morale up. The fact has always been that the tritium component of D-T fuel is both radioactive and extremely rare. The current market value is above $30,000 per gram and expected to become increasingly expensive. The sales hype, in response to the current rarity is always that once a commercially practical fusion power plant becomes operational they will be designed to generate their own tritium supply. That, in itself, will be a major challenge that might not create a self-supply for many decades to come. Any critic, who looks into this issue will come to realize that very few experimental facilities have ever employed tritium in their experiments despite constant references to the machine being referred to as a 'fusion reactor.' The sales hype has become endemic in the field, led by people who are likely to claim that they are not deliberately trying to mislead anyone.