Видео

The only reason I can think of would be if some of the normals are flipped. If that's the issue, you can correct it by going to Mesh > Normals > Recaulculate Outside (Shift N). Hope this helps!

@@Blendini Sorry for for the late reply, busy making cacti. Thank you for responding. I got it figured out, just simple rotation. Still learning. Another request. How would you render this out. I did it as an fbx file and put it in Davinci Resolve. Well, I have 4000 pricklys and that doesnt work. So, how do you format this out for use in a scene?

@@mattl5402 That's a good question, I've only rendered still images right in Blender. It's possible to make the spines with less geometry, which might help. Otherwise, geometry nodes might do the trick. I am working on a cactus tutorial with geometry nodes now-- it may take a week or two to finish and post.

Thanks for watching!

LMB (left-mouse-button) makes knife selections. Click RMB to end knife selections. Hit ENTER to turn your cuts into edges and points.

Thanks for the sub!

Yes, great catch! A value of 1 (the default) is fully opaque. Setting Alpha = 0 results in full transparency! Thanks!

I'm so impressed with the content. I really wish you had a comprehensive course on all of blender's tools. I would buy the course in a heartbeat; it would be money well spent on my part.

Thank you, that means a lot! I do what I can, trying to keep up with Blender's rapid upgrades. Stay subscribed to the channel-- more tutorials to come!

Glad it helped!

thank you!

I may do a tutorial on making this model photorealistic, but it would definitely take a while to produce, so here's some info that may help. This tutorial demonstrates procedural textures, but there are several tutorials on photorealism that show the techniques you'd apply to any object or scene, including this burger. Here's a great one that covers the entire process in depth by Blender Guru: ruclips.net/video/R1-Ef54uTeU/видео.html&ab_channel=BlenderGuru Here's the gist: 1. Modeling: Use real-world references to ensure the model is to scale and has necessary imperfections 2. Materials: Most organic materials have some degree of subsurface; ensure the material settings match real world behavior, something I learned after I made this burger (here's a tutorial on realistic materials; you can skip to the subsurface section here: ruclips.net/video/_5dWa3z7bGw/видео.html 3. Lighting: Use an HDRI to account for real world lighting-- this tutorial used simple point lights. 4. Post Processing: Photography introduces qualities that must be added in after the fact. We do this using compositing nodes like Glare, Motion Blur, Lens Distortion - Dispersion & Disort (which simulate Chromatic Aberration and Barrel Distortion respectively). With this particular model, the most important changes would probably be adding some unsymmetrical imperfections using reference images or real-world objects as a guide, add an HDRI for lighting, and ensuring the materials adhere to real-world behaviors. I hope that helps!

Hi, Thanks for watching the tutorial. How can I help? If you'd like to send an email, you can find my email address listed on this channel's About page.

Glad I could help!

Thank you!

Thanks!

감사! 감사합니다! 영광입니다. 도움이 되어 다행입니다!

This technique works for any shape that is a curve. If you want to rotate the conveyor belt 90 degrees, select the curve and belt mesh and rotate both of them. Then apply the rotations. Then with the belt mesh selected, tab into edit mode and rotate the initial block to the proper orientation.

I just tested this and the collision still works; I had to set the Collision Source to Final and Animated checked.

@@Blendini My Rigid body works weird: I’ve got the same settings, but box, which falls on conveyor, goes through it and collapse with mesh, like this mesh doesn’t have curve modifier, but it has🤔

@@arusblog7356 If your curve deform axis isn't negative, your objects aren't too small, you've applied the array modifier, applied any scale/rotation transformations, and your conveyor belt rigid body settings are passive, animated checked, collision source deforming checked if set to deform, or final, then you may want try Scene Properties > Rigid Body World (should have a check next to it) expand it and hit "Remove Rigid Body World". This will remove all rigid body world settings, which you'll have to add and define again. Sometimes, the simulation results get weird if we've made changes to objects after rigid body settings have been configured. I recreated your issue, and removing Rigid Body World, and adding those RB settings back to the objects solved the issue.

@@Blendini thank you, I’ll try again with removing rigid body. And maybe I have to make point cache

@@Blendini I'm having a similar issue, my rigid body seems to either bounce off, or collide with the "non-curve modified" mesh. I went through all of your suggestions and am still not getting a decent result

I love that, thank you!

Some of the rigid body issues you mentioned above are addressed in this tutorial -> ruclips.net/video/p28RFytAAIo/видео.html After checking those issues, to make the object land and stick (no bounce) increase the friction for both surfaces. Much of rigid body activity depends on picking the right collision shape for your objects-- the linked tutorial talks about this in more detail, but picking the right shape involves a bit of trial and error.

If you're talking about the array, check for unapplied transformations. If you've rotated your cube on the 90 degrees around the Z axis, a Factor X offset on the array, will appear as a Y-offset. Applying transformations will fix this. Otherwise, check out this tutorial which clarifies common issues with curves, arrays and rigid bodies: ruclips.net/video/p28RFytAAIo/видео.html

@@Blendini - I rotated it. Thanks It seems to work now, but I have come across other weird things.

@@Blendini I got things to work. I had to use "keys" to turn off forces and such. A little fakery too. Here's the final project: ruclips.net/video/OeIDoXyMzeA/видео.html

Glad you like them!

Good to see you too, thanks for checking out the vid.

sorry, just now seeing this! still need help?

Hey, i'm glad you were able to get this to work. The mesh shape does matter; I was able to recreate your issue but I've had some trouble getting consistent results. I'm going to look into this more and may produce another tutorial that works for the newer versions of blender. Thanks for the feedback!

I have the same problem and i swear it's driving me crazy... Tried a lot of other tutorials and other solutions are just to time consuming so i need this to work haha

Thanks!