Видео

Unfortunately I don't own one or have access to one. Looks like an interesting camera. Cheers, Howard

Hi kubrat. I'm not set up to do that. If the video wasn't clear enough, all I can suggest is that you download the manual from the internet. All the best Howard

Hi Naza. They certainly are very solidly built. The top and bottom plates are definitely thicker than the later models. Probably a result of taking over Nicca who made quality cameras. Cheers, Howard

Agreed!

Hi Schlippers. I didn't know about the Carl Zeiss connection. Thanks for that. I agree, they are excellent and well made Soviet cameras with very sharp lenses. I often use the Industar on my Sony mirrorless Alpha 1. Cheers, Howard

Thanks Christopher. Happy 2025 to you too.

I had another one many years ago and used it a lot. As you say, once you get used to the ergonomics they are great to use. Excellent cameras. Cheers, Howard

@@bring-shrubbery Thanks, never too late, at least you can always look back at the earlier videos. Cheers, Howard

Hi Brian, happy new year. Yes, I remember those times too. Every time I handle these early Konicas I am still surprised at the quality of manufacture. My IIa is stunning. If I was only allowed one camera it would be the IIa. Cheers, Howard

@@howpow A happy new year to you, Howard. Since I bought that Kiev camera, I haven't been too thrilled about its ergonomics. I've thought to replace it with one of the Nikon S series cameras. How do you think the Konica III compares?

@@howpow Congratulations on breaking 1K subscribers. I know it was a goal for last year. Very nice.

@@avnostlga I guess you really can't go too far wrong with a Nikon S series, I have never handled one but I am sure they are excellent. If you don't mind the double stroke cocking mechanism, the IIIa model is the pick of the Konicas, preferably with the f1.8 lens. Of course it's a fixed lens unlike the Nikon. Yes, it was nice to get 1000 subscribers, but still no coffee, I need 4000 hours viewing every 365 Days for that to happen. Oh well, at least the reviews are there for posterity.

@@howpow RUclips keeps raising the bar. I see some creators have a heart icon where viewers can contribute to the creator. Not sure if you are eligible for that yet; but just an observation I've made. You still achieved a goal for your channel. I've never handled either camera. The double stroke doesn't bother me, as long as the shutter is locked if you forget that second stroke. Nikon, I only know the build quality from other Nikon's I've owned. That said, the build quality of the Kiev is really nice (1974).

Hi Malc. Bring me the right amount of money and it's all yours. See you soon.

@@soldierloz Hi Laurie. What a great gift. Have you put a film through it yet? I'm doing very well thanks 👍

⁠@@howpow Hi Howard, great to hear you’re doing well Sir, that’s great news to us followers. Ok …. I’m about to load a film in my Konica iii (early model no EV scale) so was wondering if you could recommend a safe black & white film? There are many to choose from but always happy for your advice my friend. Incidentally, I took your advice and picked up a mint Olympus RC … what amazing camera it is! It’s almost like a younger brother to the Olympus SP. Such lovely quality and feels great to hold. Please keep your videos coming … I check in most days to watch them! 📸 Sincere wishes to you my friend. Laurie

@@soldierloz Hi Laurie, good to hear from you again. As for film, if you're shooting in good light I'd be inclined to use Delta 100. That would allow you to use an f stop around 5.6 which is probably somewhere near the sweet spot of the lens without running out of top speeds. eg f5.6 at 1/500th. For general shooting in a range of conditions I'd use Delta 400. I'm glad you like the RC, they are great little cameras. Have fun, Howard

Hi Andrew. I've got a T2, as you say, built like a brick, lovely camera, but not the same quality as the 50's rangefinders. They were amazing. Cheers, Howard

Thanks LE. These cameras hold up remarkably well. Cheers, Howard

@@howpow Some years ago, I set about collecting a sample of the Konica II and III versions. I noted then that almost all I looked at were in very fine physical condition. I attribute that to use of high quality materials and a chrome plating which is probably twice as thick as standard for cameras of the era. Another factor might be that they were made as the age of fixed lens 35mm RF cameras of high quality and expense was drawing to a close, so they probably got less than average use as popular interest move toward SLRs. The Konica RF cameras which followed these were nice in their own right, but had a much lower build quality.

@randallstewart1224 Hi Randall. Thanks for your comment. I think you make a lot of really good points. I suspect that a lot of cameras bought in that era didn't get a great deal of use. Very few of mine show any wear at all on the pressure plates. Have you still got your Konica collection?

@@howpow My sin? I acquire, but I never sold. At 78, I now face a serious disposal problem. From the 1950s, I've got a good cross-section of the neat little Olympus 35 rangefinder models. (Not as optically outstanding as I first thought.) As for the Konica series, I avoided the Model I on the basis that it hardly reflect the qualities of the II and III models. I regret the IIIM, as I decided this Frankenstein addition of the meter to the IIIA was too complex to warrant its repair, if even possible.)

@randallstewart1224 At 83 in a couple of weeks, I have the same disposal problem. I prepared a spreadsheet the other day and marked 35 cameras for disposal this year. That will leave me with about 70 to deal with in the Next few years. My Konica IIa and III and IIIM will go to my daughter along with a few other select cameras.

Hi mia. I don't have any other socials. I can though assure you that if it's in good condition and the rangefinder is correctly set, that prints up to A4 size will stand up well against the vast majority of 35mm film cameras. Have fun Howard

Hi luigi, the c35 does require a 1.35v battery to function correctly.

Hi, that's interesting. Both my 2.8 versions are "Yashinon", but I checked with a f1.9 on eBay at the moment for $500 (WOW), and it's lens is the same as yours. I assume that whoever made the dress rings for the f1.9 lens stuffed up and Yashica decided to use them anyhow. Very nice lens either way. Cheers, Howard

I'm pleased it was helpful.

My experience has been quite different. Admittedly I had to do some work on my 9 to free the shutter, but both my 7s versions work perfectly. You mention a number of very good cameras, but there is a lot of interest in old rangefinders. To each his own.

​@@howpow -- A few caveats here. You imply that I dismiss rangefinders. Not so, I own a couple . This idea of the <best> Hi-Matic, taken as a recommendation, jumps the buyer's point of view. My comments were to the reliability of the Hi-Matics 60 years down the road, not when new. Many up on Ebay, usually with no video, just pix and assurances, are likely to need DIY repair, as you did with the shutter on that 9, proving my point to some extent. Or will need a CLA, far from a sure thing. The wise buyer will first contact a repair shop or two to learn if it CAN be repaired, as the problem is often parts. May I ask how much did YOU PUT INTO this Himatic, in guineas and work-hours? Among rangefinders, a Canon QL gen III from 1972, for example, is likely to be repair-able, worth repairing and esteemed on the street. I owned a Hi-Matic bought new, so we can right disagree without the truism To Each His Own. I grant you that the 9, when new, was better than its successor the 11, due to manual mode. The Hi-matic was the pinnacle of Minolta rangefinders, was it? I'd like your review on the 1963 Minolta AL, with its f2.0 lens, Citizen shutter with 1/1000 sec top shutter speed, nice Zebra-stripe stubby lens and selenium cell meter! Like motorcars, older models were often superior. A 1/3 stop brighter lens doesn't make it the best. The Konica -Minolta website incorrectly brags that in 1962 "astronaut John Glenn ... successfully took photographs of the Earth from space, using the Minolta Hi-Matic camera." The Hi-Matic wasn't even coined until 1965; Glenn's camera, proven by a glance at the Smithsonian website, was an Ansco Autoset, though made by Minolta. Selenium-cell meter, heavily modded rig, with Ansco film -- the ONLY rangefinder to go to space, after which for NASA it was SLRs only -- with the rangefinder on the focusing screen!

The SP/SPn cameras are great in my opinion. I have a very nice Canonet GIII QL 17, but for some unknown reason I never seem to use it. It just doesn't call to me. Who can explain it? Cheers, Howard

My pleasure. Assuming the camera works as intended you have just bought great camera. Enjoy 😁

Z

Z

Z

A CLA should mean that the camera will be working when you get it back. Assuming that there is nothing really serious wrong when they open it up. $100 sounds too cheap. If you are going to have done you want it done properly.

Hi. The camera only requires one battery, the battery should be 6mm thick and sits Positive side down into the battery cover. I've never seen a wein cell but I would expect them to be the same 6mm. If they are 6mm you shouldn't have been able to fit them in.

This is what I saw in terms of placement of battery: 3. Insert the Battery: • Place the battery with the positive (+) side facing out (visible when you put the cover back on). • Ensure the battery fits snugly into the compartment. 4. Replace the Cover: Screw the cover back in place by turning it clockwise until secure, but do not overtighten. 5. Check the Meter:

Is this wrong?

​@@rodgercarey3480That's correct

​@@rodgercarey3480No. The positive + should fit neatly into the battery cover. Another point, have a look at the Iso setting on the bottom of the camera and make sure that it isn't in the OFF position.

You can take the top off and clean the viewfinder components, but you need to know what you are doing. Best to see if everything else works first. If so it would be best to take it to a camera repair person to do the cleaning if it really needs it. Cheers, Howard.

I think the best idea is to take it to a "good" camera shop and get them to have a look at it. There should be someone there who can advise you. Good luck, Howard

Hi Laurie, sounds like you're starting to suffer the dreaded GAS syndrome. I had a bad case about 10 years ago. 😀 Congratulations on your Vito IIa. I've never actually handled one, but I'm sure it's the same superb engineering that Voigtlander practised in that era. Rangefinder unit as well, very impressive. That system will certainly introduce you to "Slow Photography". I'm pleased that you are enjoying your vintage film journey. Have a great Christmas, you never know, you might get some snow for the festive season. Cheers, Howard 🇦🇺

@@malcolmthomas8161 Thanks Malc. You'll have to show it to me next time we visit.

I'm glad you liked it. Cheers, Howard

No. Unfortunately I don't have any half frame cameras. I regret not getting a couple when they were nice and cheap, but that is no longer the case. ☹️

Hi JP. To be fair, they were always very highly regarded by those in the know. That idea with the black electrical tape is a really good one. I might use that on some of my old selenium cell cameras. Cheers, Howard 😀

You're right. I read a review once praising the quiet shutter. I thought, that's not my experience. They are definitely loud. 😀

@@howpow They are indeed. I was quite surprised.

My pleasure. It's always good to hear that someone has benefited from my little videos. Cheers, Howard 😀

Well, it has that same great lens and Olympus build. I've never actually seen one but I'm not surprised to hear that it produces great photos Enjoy!

That's a tough call. That Hexanon lens is excellent, but I think that the more modern Olympus 7 element lens may just have the edge. But both are fabulous lens.

@@howpow thanks for the answer

@@Socrates... My pleasure 😀

IMO it's not even close. The Konica IIIA is built without compromise in quality. The lens is excellent, as is that of the SP. The SP would have a comparative advantage for its internal light meter and optional spot reading mode. But the spot meter mode rarely functions these days, and the full area meter eats up a Wein Cell battery so fast that no one seriously uses it. The build precision on the Oly isn't even close to the Konica, and the SP lacks the exceptional viewfinder and focusing of the IIIA.

@@randallstewart1224 The Konica IIIa is a fabulous camera. I have both a IIIM and a IIa which I love, and yes build quality is superior to the SP and the viewfinder is brilliant. However the SP's metering makes a big difference to the convenience of photography. My spot meter works okay. Cheers, Howard

Hi Christopher, always good to hear from you. You certainly have a way with words. You should write a novel. I know what you mean though, that was how I picked the SPn up the other day and made the decision to put a film through it. How many cameras do you have now, must be more than a few. It is good handling these mechanical marvels, therapeutic.

Hi James. Sounds like yours must be operating very smoothly. Definitely time to get it ready and take it for a nice walk. Enjoy, Howard

Hi Laurie. Thanks for your comment. They really are excellent cameras, and the compact form makes them so much lighter to carry around. Cheers, Howard

Hi Laurie. Once again thanks for the flattering comment. Much appreciated. Olympus went through a golden age and the OM1n was right in the thick of it. Cheers, Howsrd

@howpow Howard. You are more than welcome. Ok a quick question for you friend. Which camera would you recommend between the Olympus RC or the AGFA Super Solinette? (the latter has a stiff adjustment but working fine vs the Olympus that's had new seals and battery upgrade with meter working) Opinion?

@@soldierloz You don't make it easy for me do you. Two entirely different cameras Both terrific. The Super Solinette has the benefit of folding and fitting into a coat pocket, but with the RC having working metering I'd have to go for that. Basically it's far more convenient. By the way, my Super Solinette also has very stiff focusing, it was the famous Agfa green grease.

@howpow thank you Howard, appreciate your guidance. Apologies for the questions. I do like an Olympus albeit an OM1, SP, RC etc. They have that "joire de vivre" about them. Hope you are well over there Howard. 🙏

@@soldierloz No need to apologise, it was a good question. As for my health, I'm hanging in pretty well, for an old bloke. Cheers, Howard 😄

Hi Bindu, these are excellent cameras capable of great photos. Enjoy, Howard

Hi. I think you should at least put a roll of film through the Auto S2, assuming it works as well as it looks. It was one of the great rangefinder cameras, and since the rest appear to be SLRs it would be a new experience. Cheers, Howard

Hi Clark. I think the best idea is to take it to a camera store and let them have a look at it. See what they suggest. Good luck. Howard

Hi Gabriella. The fact that it was mouldy doesn't sound good, but it might be worth seeking out a repairer to see what they think. Good luck. Howard

You could try holding the camera upside down and dripping some lighter fluid into the self timer mechanism and see if it loosens the shutter mechanism.

Hi elwrongo. I'm pleased you found my video useful. These were very nice innovative cameras. Enjoy, Howard 😀

@@howpow I did thankyou. And I'm now watching it again as I've bought another one (2.8) for $20! Its in very good condition with a very good case but strangely the aperture seems coupled not the shutter. It fires okay though. Maybe the helical grease has got a bit stiff. I'm very drawn to this model for some reason. Maybe its my Fuji X100 which seems to share a lot of its styling.

@elwrongo Hi again. They are very interesting and capable cameras. Perhaps you should get an EE as well, same styling but the next model . Me SE is f2.8 and my EE has the f1.9 lens Both very nice cameras. Cheers, Howard ps Sounds like you got it for a good price.

Hi musicianluca. All I can suggest is that the reassembly sequence is incorrect assuming all the original parts went back in. I'm going away for about a week, but when I get back I'll dissemble the wind knob and get back to you with the sequence. Cheers, Howard

Hi. I took my advance lever apart. I took a photo showing the assembly sequence but I don't seem to be able to attach it. Anyhow Lever goes on first then plain washer then spring washer and finally screw down collar. Make sure that the washers are centred properly so that the collar can screw down all the way Good luck Howard

Hi SKP, I agree completely, beautiful compact folding cameras. Cheers, Howard

Hi Laurie. Interesting question. Thinking about it, you already have some excellent full size rangefinder cameras so I think in this instance the compact Olympus RC is the way to go. In terms of photo quality I don't believe you could pick the difference and the slightly wider 42mm lens is interesting. If you still favour the Yashica I would opt for a later version, GTN or GSN. Also the Olympus is fully mechanical so even if the metering fails the camera is still operable. Good luck, Howard

​@@howpow​ thank you kindly Howard. Great. The Yashy i have the chance of is a GT model in beautiful condition. I won't ever require a hot shoe for flash use (which I believe is the main difference between the GT & GSN model) and it will my first black camera! However, I really like the look and features on the RC so yes ... taking on board your idea re smaller Rangefinder. Can see where this is going ... 1 will become 2! Hope you're doing well my friend ... kind wishes and a handshake from the UK to you. Laurie

@@soldierloz Hi Laurie , greetings from Oz. Since you appear to be on a buying spree, can I suggest an Olympus SP or SPn. In my opinion these are probably the best affordable rangefinder cameras ever sold. Superb lens, spot and average metering. Full auto metering, shutter speed priority metering and fully manual metering. Excellent build quality, bright viewfinder and rangefinder and a flashmatic system. Downsides, no depth of field scale and no automatic frame line compensation. A good one is not cheap but they are great cameras. You may already have one but if you haven't I suggest you do some research. I took mine out yesterday and it reminded me just how good they are. Cheers, Howard