Видео

解機吧。這是導演對光明會得指控。

二十年前第一次看这电影有种说不出的压抑，尤其那配乐到现在还久久不能忘怀。开场阿汤和她老婆要去宴会前，妮可基曼退下衣服加上配乐给人一种好戏就要开始的感觉，这一幕还一直记到现在。

Ai shows no emotion reflexion. CANT do it. Next.

Was Ida Sessions the woman that claimed to be Evelyn Mullray at the beginning of the movie?

mulray does wear glasses in the movie?? And evelyn says he doesnt!!!

Wow interesting connection

Noah Cross hires JJ Gittes to find his daughter, but all he really needs to do is follow her mother. A plot hole wide enough to drive a truck through.

great analysis

I think you work for the CIA; the movie is in your face about elite control manipulation sexual perversion / abuse and child abuse for pleasure and power. The story of the couple is just a vehicle to take us to the world Kubrick knows, 😮hates and wants to expose. All the other stuff are tricks he puts in or fails to put in for reasons we Will never understand. Dreams reflect reality he tells us the truth thru a story about a couples sexual relationship presented as a dream as much to protect himself as us. It didn’t work; they murdered him. Again your analysis failed or you work for the elites. But we know.

Hang on. Did I miss something? I thought that Cross had sex with his daughter and that’s where the child came from. That’s why when Jack was slapping her around at the end trying to get the truth she kept saying she’s my daughter, she’s my sister, she’s my daughter, she’s my sister. Which means that the girl was both her daughter and sister because of incest between her and Cross. Plus, given the fact that Roman Polanski is a pedophile himself this type of story line would be right up his alley, and probably turned him on. That’s my take anyway.

讲得很不错，我了解到这个正式版本可能是被发行方剪辑并删减后的版本，不知道你是不是这样认为的？

Jake NOT Jack. Say it correctly.

I saw the film for the first time when it came out in theaters, I never fully understood this film until just now after watching this video, I’ve seen people try to explain it before but none I’ve done such an amazing job as yourself good sir

I always had it in my mind that they were singing to show how they had lost their minds together, the duality of man, the struggles of war. showing they were reverting to a child like innocence while being “born the kill” as it said on jokers 🪖

解说了个寂寞，重点是一个没敢提啊。丢了西瓜，捡了芝麻，是对这个解说的最高的评价。

寶藏級的影片還好我挖到了❤

Great analysis.

這是看過最好的解讀，分析的客觀理性。

庫導我最喜歡就是這部，剛重看了一次，正在網上找看看別人對這部電影的看法，剛好就找到這

Right a fictional script, perhaps to put a positive spin on Mulwray's (William Mulholland in real life) activities which was buying up land in the Owens Valley depleting it's lake and draining the aquifer ruining the lives of the people in the Owens Valley Mulwray (Mulholland) was awarded honors, but they were purely political, he never was schooled in engineering which lead to several collapsed structures and the St. Francis dam collapse killing 430 people. Mulholland (Mulwray) was not murdered of course but his actions left him in solitude. The rest is show bizz.

Ridley Scott is probably fuming!

Great analysis but don't use AI voice please

Fantastic video, very well done!!

This was the best analysis of the movie.

The background music always gets me

这应该是全网不论中西最好的解读，英文电影博主我也看过很多，大部分都非常水，跟博主根本没法比。

OMG 😱 he did exactly what everyone else’s does, Easter eggs….he was just another idiot, nothing more

The film was crap

Seems like Noah cross got many reasons to kill Mulwray.

I think it’s coincidence but I still love finding this out. Stanley probably would have found it amusing too. In an interview with Stanley by Michael Ciment, Stanley mentioned that he noticed coincidences with names. Jack Nicholson was the same first name as Jack Torrance. Danny Lloyd was same first name as Danny Torrance. Lloyd was the name of the bartender. Wendy Torrance was same first name as composer Wendy Carlos. The director and the hotel in the book share the same first name. He also pointed out that in a scene where Jack wakes up from a nightmare, the soundtrack “Jakob’s Dream” was used.

这部电影太牛逼了 至今无人能超越

I feel like I'd have to be a genuine schizophrenic to enjoy the film as Kubrick intended.

Mostly just the same continuity errors that occur in most movies, according to director Lee Unkrich, in talks and interviews about his extensive documentary project on The Shining, which included many discussions with people who worked with Kubrick. Despite Kubrick's reputation as a perfectionist, he didn't micromanage every moment of everything on every movie toward some goal of imbuing every scene with hidden meanings.

Yes but there's somthing I thought when i whatched the shining. The bear is apparently a time loop I thought in the 1921 scene so I thought is it one of them party's where they wear animal masks in the old fashioned party's mabe the bear man/dogman was trying to make all the over party guests gelous but my question is if this was a loop of a ghost in a time line how did the bearman/dogman die please comment and tell me how he died im soo confused and very deep in my small theory

This is the best analysis of chinatown on the internet

I think its a good analysis

嗯，说错了，博主应该是很喜欢哲学，或者是读哲学的看博主的解说真的学会很多东西，我今天还特意去买了一个榮格心理书的入门版

博主介绍的电影我都看过，然后再看完博主的解释之后我怀疑博主是有毒心理学家这个电影的一个普通人怎么可以看得这么細緻 博主真的很厉害 因为我看电影只会看大概的那个剧情完全留意不到这些东西找到博主的频道之后，好像终于有人给了我答案

This movie took some time getting into, I think alot of the reason I did not like it at first was because the initial trailer mislead me into thinking it was some raucous zany comedy and when it was clear it wasn’t it soured my viewing. But time has been kind to this movie, it’s easy to follow the more you watch it.

0:18 LMAO, what cracks me up about this scene is the little movement of the bear man while his rear end is exposed, before he stops to look at Wendy with his lover. Absolutely hilarious.

Good analysis. Not a fan of the AI voice though.

Recrear la Historia es tarea difícil si no se cuenta con el material necesario y si se tiene algo podría no ser exacto. En nuestros tiempos modernos y gracias a la Tecnología tenemos testimonios Grabados que convierten los acontecimientos en indesmentibles

The narration was god aweful

Hollis Mulwray = (William) Mulholland, who Noah Cross is based on.

Chinatown is my favorite movie. I can watch it over & over.

Jack Nicholson for Napoleon? Why not a lesser known but dedicated European actor?

With all of his dedication to War and Peace, Bondarchuk actually killed horses for realism. Callous, inhumane, and arrogant. Killed distribution. 8 hours long!

Learned that as NB and his romantic interest were transported to St. Helena she panicked with terror thinking they were being sent to Antarctica then fighting to jump ship in suicide.

Barry Lyndon was beautiful, detailed, and innovative but not realistic.

Waterloo was annoying.