Видео

Crazy stuff, Paulie. I just learned something new today thanks to this video!

can admit though now i am afraid of using it. was gonna use it as an intro to my welcome youtube page but afraid it may get taken down even though i wouldn't monetize that video ever

can't help but wonder if this why their song quality changed. the first few songs i downloaded from there were great now all i get out is exactly what i put in stayed back to me with music tunes.

Works for getting rid for channel 2+, but doesnt work for channel 1. Playing at channel 2 will trigger channel 1 wtf

You need to be wearing a cape from now on! Thank you!!!

Hi Paul, I was with Taxi for a few years, so I can throw my tuppence with in here. All of what Paul has said here is true, but misses the point in my opinion. Its not a scam, so lets just say that now. Is it value for money...depends on where you are with your writing. Taxi has managed to create a system whereby the members feel like they have achieved a win just for getting a forward passed them. I fell for this illusionary sense of achievement but after a while started to realise it wasnt amounting to a whole hill of beans. I can underpin Paul's point that the screeners dont get it right all the time. In fact, I would say that there is a real mixed bag of quality amongst the screeners. The head screener is a decent fellow and knows his stuff, but unlike Paul my experience is the head screener may agree theres nothing wrong with the track, but the deadline has gone. Some of the briefs are for a specific project and are obvious by the written criteria, some/majority seem to be just generic space fillers for libraries - these are the ones you may/may not ever get a call back from as they simply arent for any specific project (certainly nothing you cant achieve with a reelcrafter reel link and a mail to a library). There is the usual forcefield of defences used at this point online if you see posts elsewhere - your material isnt good enough (one of my tracks that was returned by Taxi which I had just been approached by a publisher for, who commissioned an album of that genre from me) - not prolific enough - well, this is true of course...the more you submit, the more chance of a forward, but thats just obvious and how prolific can you be? - Production quality is low - also true but often if you check out the forward blog you will wonder how some of them get a forward when yours was rejected. Summary...it's not just about researching and doing yourself v Taxi. The libraries are already there and if you have a showreel of a certain genre, why slog it out trying to get passed the gatekeeper Taxi, just send an email direct to the publisher. In summary its not a scam, but its probably a business model that thrives on return business, which if you were getting publishing deals left right and centre you wouldnt have time to spend with Taxi listings- so its slightly at odds with itself. Who would I recommend Taxi to - if you havent ever written to brief before and need some practice.

Generative AI music will replace you and yet you are on the side of corporate tech giants like Spotify and Suno who clearly dont give a fuck about you. Good luck with that.

Someone's sucking the old Spotify D

Quite enjoyed this vid tbf. In fact I actually bought both vespertone and anamorph because of your playing (in parts, particularly the last ten or so patches) and another video on vespertone because, despite your negative review (respect your opinion, this isn’t a dig at all) I believe I can use (and have used) at least half a dozen or so sounds, which, for the money I paid, is defo worth it. Thanks for the post dude 👊

very useful tutorial man tnx. God bless you

Thank you!!! Been struggling for a while now with this. FINALLY fixed 🙏

The legal argument that a tool that can generate pre-existing works is therefore breaching copyright is absolutely laughable. A guy about 15 years ago or more already did a website that hosted every melody in existence through a generative recursive algorithm. Same shit as the Monkey typewriter website.

AI music is very good for what it is. However, the overall sound quality is still absolute garbage tier, compared to professionally made or recorded tracks. I don't mind listening to AI music for the memes as it has some very good novelty to it. However, youtube keeps pushing to me mixes into my discovery queue that are AI music, and its very irritating, as I have to keep changing it. It'll be interesting to see how it is in 10 years. Also you describe the piano as realistic sounding, yet there are clearly artifacts present that massively distort the quality like at 15:40 that gives it almost a half organ sound. 100% you'd know that its AI made.

I was about to return my nt1 signature and audient id14 but I found you and I fixed it

Check out his TSX live stage💜

Easy, thank you

🩶🐾

Thanks for the transcription! I transcribed it to Alto Saxophone. I switched the time signature to 6/8 and made an edit to the rhythm in the first, second, and last measures.

How did i only find this now… non of the ‘comment sync, and ill send it to u for 1000 dollars’. Very informative stuff

So it's just modal interchange ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I couldn’t be happier with how this arrangement turned out ❤

This is an incredibly cool interpretation. This is what jazz is all about. Bravo!

mine still not working

🩶💿🎵🎙️

Really Thank you!! you made my fucking day! thanks thanks thanks!

Fact is, Taxi is only interested in cornpop; the kind of obvious drivel someone with poor musical taste likes. Anyone a bit edgy, a bit left of centre, anything experimental is not suitable for them and they will reject it. Better than charging $5 to keep the volume down, they should ask for auditions. Anyone middle of the road accepted, people either who are out of tune, cannot write a song/music or edgy artists would be rejected and save themselves money.

Great video!! Thank you!!!

Thanks for hanging out with us!

As a songwriter I have actually found Ai incredibly helpful and enabled be to pivot my music business to be my own label. It has helped when I have not been able to hire vocalists or most recently when I sustained a vocal injury still in need of healing. Given I have people dependent on me to put food on the table it goes a lot way in keeping to workflow going

What mouthpiece does tim ishii use?

Sorry to be the five year old in the room but what on earth is _sync_ ?

Great stuff Paul. I hope your RUclips channel blows up.

Thanks for the advice! are you willing to help me navigate the world of sync?

I have a Yamaha WX5 wind controller. I've been waiting for this for a long time. Thank youl

About the only positive thing in this decade that is roaring IMO.

Question for you: did you check out LoadMe music generator yet? If you did, please either do a video on it or share your opinions about it. I input my own lyrics and styles of music, and the sound is crisp and clear for the most part. People are saying it's a copy of Suno, but in my opinion, it is not. The sounds are different; I have both.

Any wrk around not able to see signal in logic prox,,, instruments track wrking,,, Privacy tab logic is not seen,, any wrk around??

In the present context, it is clear that the music industry derives its revenue from a diverse array of segments, encompassing software and musical instruments. It is imperative for the industry to transition towards a model similar to that employed by RUclips. However, there appears to be a prevailing inclination to engage in litigation as a means to obstruct these critical shifts. This resistance may inadvertently encourage other nations to enhance their music production capacities and assume a leadership role in the global market. The conventional business model has proven to be untenable.

Hi Paul, check out LoudMe AI, not as advanced as Suno yet but it's very good.

They way i see this going is technical musicians not getting paying studio work. all that will be left is large live performance. Record companies will generates music then find some new Taylor swift to front the ai generated songs they thing will make money.

Excellent Bravo I agree.

Very interesting defense. This reminds of 2 things. First, the whole guitar tab apocalypse that happened maybe a decade ago, where labels threatened to sue websites hosting fanmade guitar tab interpretations of popular (copyrighted) songs. This happened when software like GuitarPro allowed people to play midi versions of songs, but which were in the end, just fanmade transciptions. Most tab hosting websites opted to remove most copyrighted content and this had a massive impact in guitar (and music) playing overall, as most kids learning an instrument will want to play their favorite songs. Secondly, its quite bold from Suno to disclose that it is indeed using copyrighted music. The Million Sond Dataset (MSD) has been around for many years now, which is a dataset of metata and audio of copyrighted music, and this was crucial to many developments in MIR and machine learning applied to music. However, access to the audio is notoriously difficult, as it required scrapping the audio from youtube (or elsewhere), and had a lot of dead links, poor quality, etc. But in the end, the labels are just struggling to stay relevant in the XXI century. They managed to convice the streaming platforms under duress to give them massive equity in order to have access to their catalogue. I wonder if this is the end game here.

I can’t wait for Aug 30

Great job breaking this down for us . Also very helpful in understanding how AI works too. Kudos

If Suno would increase the Bit Rate on the Vocals it would be clear winner. Easy to use and Write very good Lyrics. Udio Vocal Quality sounds better but just not as good a creating overall song.

My thoughts: Suno and Udio have claimed that they engaged in fair use by allowing the AI to "listen" to music and then "learn", the same way a human being would score study or listen to music and then go create their own song with inspiration from favorite artists and composers. I see a lot of issues with this. First, if I were to have a photographic memory, I could theoretically take a mental photograph of a painting and be perfectly allowed under the law to store it in my mind. It's a different story when data is in a tangible format given to a computer. At that point, it's material data, not simply an idea in a conscious mind as protected under the law. Even if the original song data given to the AI is not retained and is destroyed after having been converted/transformed into a different type of data, I think this would constitute a "recording". Legally, a recording is a "reproducible" registration of sound on a device, so even if it converts the song into a new data format, it is still registering the sound and converting it into data format. And the record labels have, indeed, shown that the original songs they own are reproducible to an uncanny point at which the AI has spit out near copies of popular songs. This could only be the case if the data stored is such that the original recording would be reproducible. In any case, isn't it technically illegal to download music at all, even if destroyed later?

They copied music tht they intended to profit from. They stole everyones music by hacking servers and personal pc's. That is far as the court case should go. They are in possesion of stolen property. Any thing after that is "profiting from your crime". STOLEN MEANS STOLEN! If you want to make music you should try taking a music lesson. There are millions of victims here. I see that you dont care and probably consider yourself a songwriter by typing "a song about a dog". Of course You should put me out of work and you should be able to hack into my laptop

Team Suno!

To me the songs they showed as proof don't sound close at all, same with ScarJo vs OpenAi drama, everyone went with the meme instead of taking a minute and listen to the audio. I also think this lawsuit is just a warning shot/veiled threat. Labels have been working increasingly as cartels and making their own bed.

Thank you for this video! Nice to stay updated on this 🕺