Видео

you do understand what you said that he documented a reaction , ground breaking enough ,he did not split the atom

I enjoyed that very much; thanks for posting. God bless.

Ernest was an earnest scientist.

I love this channel, but unfortunately, RUclips is making it more difficult to watch with the mandatory 10 minute commercials.

thanks about Niels Bohr, thanks Hertz and Franck. I love the Munich and Berlin Physics. sorry the world stupider since 1950's

So its more accurate to say that he observed the splitting of the atom than he caused it. I had never known tge method before, thanks.

Incorrect. He wasn't the first to split the atom. He was the first to observe it.

I thought young Einstein did it in the wood shed.

Ernest Rutherford is my favorite scientist. From a sheep ranch in New Zealand, he was educated in New Zealand, then Cambridge, before moving to Canada. His list of accomplishments is massive, but to me, his biggest achievement was in educating the next generation of scientists. 10 of his Ph.D. grad students got Nobel Prizes, no body else has ever had more than 2.

Wait so Rutherford predicted the neutron?

If there’s a theory about chaos then you better rethink that term. As there’s no such thing as chaos but rather unexplained events and unpredictable outcomes.

Maybe he was combative because he was ripped off

At min 1:16, what is the component M? Is a source of high energy used in the experiment or is just natural emissions from the material on the slider component? I think the video needs some extra info.

McGill!!!

"Plunk"? In all of the texts from my college science classes, and all of the lectures, I always saw and heard his name pronounced and spelled as Plank. You learn something new everyday.

Sad that most school only teach that he came up with a later incorrect model of the atom, and nothing more.

That would be a tough one for sure since the very definition of an atom is still undetermined. And the materialist BS of “modern” science continues on 💪🖕🏻

He used a katana.

"Spitting of the atom" does not refer to the process described, although it is indeed induced partial splitting and a major achievement. Furthermore, Rutherford went on to develop atom smashers but the spitting the atom and releasing more energy that was put in , remained elusive, leading him to claim that nuclear energy would not be possible for another generation. Fermi was the first to split the atom. Otto Hahn, trained by Rutherford in nuclear chemistry repeated the experiment and found boron. Lise Meitner was then able to deduce that U235 was split but Hahn took the credit as Meitner had escaped nazi Germany. The problem with recognizing Rutherford as being the first to split the atom is that his experiment did not lead to energy production, reactors that produce plutonium (the major fissionable material) or bombs that we associate with nuclear fission, whereas Fermi's did. This point is historically important as Fermi defected from Fascist Italy to the USA, had he not done so the world might have been different.

Whichever the way he did it, he made me fail in physics!!!😂😊😂😊😂

Incredibly smart men.

Very interesting, thank you ! When I studied solid-state physics in the uni I heard a lot the surnames Bragg and Laue but I never searched about these scientists. Thanks to this video and the previous one I finally know who were they. Thanks a lot !

E.T.S Walton split the atom for the first time.

Nitrogen?!? I was expecting uranium or some other heavy element...

Well done!!

Great informative video. Quality is first-rate.

I use X-Ray Diffraction in my Face Centered Cubic metals research!!! So much easier that Scanning Electron Microscopy in terms of sample prep ❤

what's the big deal about splitting the atom? anyone can do it, just get your atom, put it on a solid surface, get out your chisel, carefully put it on the atom, then wack it with a Mallet as hard as you can, and the atom will split in two, easy peasy! Just be careful cos the pieces sometimes fly everywhere and it can be a devil to find all of them🤣🤣

I remember reading some thought the son rode on the dads coattails but it wasn't true they both showed genius and were deserving.

I had scientific 1918 magazine which did include article of Rutherford experiment.

The Braggs have a lot to brag about

I really like how you explain physics in a very understandable way in these short videos. The biographical and historic information is also much appreciated.

Laurence reminds me a bit of a young Cillian Murphy

Really appreciate the quality of your videos. They always make my weekend better

I can only imagine the dose of ionizing radiation these scientists absorbed.

I like the video, love you love intelligence science

Thanks Bauer, thanks van lowen

I am enjoying these videos and seeing some of the human side of the pioneers of methods that became routine parts of my working days. On my first x-ray diffractometer the diffraction pattern was record on film. If you couldn't figure out what my unknown specimen was by comparing the experimental film strip with a library of film strips of known materials then resort to using the Bragg equation to determine the d-spacings of the three strongest lines was required. Then you had use books that indexed the d-spacings and if you were lucky could figure out what you had. God help you if it was a mixture. Our next instrument was computerized but manual use of the Bragg equation occasionally came in handy for sorting out an artifact from a mystery component.

Thank you for that fascinating history lesson 🙏. That really was an excellent video 👏🤩

Can’t you narrate your own videos? Are you lazy? This fake voice sucks

OK, show us a live virus under scanning electron microscope. Prove virology once and for all. They won't do it, because they can't do it, because scanning electron microscope doesn't exist, and you're being lied to. If it's not repeatable, it's not science. When the tools and methods of "S"cience are only available to a few people, and held under lock and ket, that is the opposite of scientific method. Trust should have no place in real science. If you have to trust someone's word, it's not science.

Your videos are awesome !

Box? Your initial description is confusing. Did you mean to say "screen"?

Thanks! I really enjoy your content, keep it up!

Thank you for learning me and thank to all and forgett youuuuu tube ❤

He not electro statick light ..no I doubt I think never no one made still , no current

It seems like alll great inverotrs not easy life 😅good I’m not telling my project😂

Tesla kind of a man honnour❤

Great channel. Instant view ❤

At this time, we still had some brains in Germany. Not anymore. Now we mostly consist of people from some Ubbualakk country, including their behavior