Видео

This video (and Bruce's vid with the Shedster) should be mandatory for all counselling graduate students to watch before getting a degree conferred.

needs more shedler

Congratulations to you and all of your coauthors for this very important and much anticipated publication. I was hoping for it to get published since I first heard about it in 2018 in the book „The Cycle of Excellence“.

Thanks for posting this! I’m trying to get into the meeting during my early mornings, but with kids at home it’s hard!

I appreciate your comments about the lack of direction on what to do. Also, I am not sure that we have looked at the full picture of how social media use can be connective versus harmful for teens. I think there are some differences in the types of use, time on SM versus interacting in person and other ways of connecting that will also help us understand more about what we are seeing.

Whenever I watch you Scott I think about how lucky Tobey and I were to encounter you way back. Our clients were lucky as well.

Important conversation, thanks for bringing these resources to our attention.

Hi Scott, I like to see you now and then, when you mail suggestions for me. I really liked this BookCase discussion from you and Dan. Got something to think about when it comes to my grandchildren and there future. Thank you. Du kan mejla igen! ;-)

A lot of highly valued research in the social sciences that has been relied up on for many years has been refuted. "Publish or perish" is a huge problem in academia. And scientific research in medicine as well has been subverted in recent decades by corporate agendas. Much of the trust in good science has been eroded unfortunately.

A really interesting and thought-provoking discussion

emphasis is on post modernism: constructivism & social constructivism

There's a deconstruction and reconstruction of my way of thinking whenever I listen to you. It's refreshing.

Should social science be considered a "science"? I find that the word "science" has such a weight and air of authority to it that people can't help but equivocate social sciences with natural sciences.

Interesting and for sure let's be critical on what we offer our youths. Maybe we should also consider where they live, difference between the US and Europe for instance, or between cities and the countryside.

Appreciated so much the discussion

Really like this series, thanks for continuing it!

I've been interested in reading the Anxious Generation. This was helpful to know a bit more about it before I jump in. Thanks!

Hello there, I'd like to use this content in a program I am putting together. How would I go about getting permission to use it?

He's describing me, when I was a client. Yes, I needed the person-centred relational approach BUT I needed the practical bits of CBT, too, along with a smattering of pyschodynamic and Gesalt. Having a therapist that could flex their approach worked well for me.

How can I turn on the SPI in my FIT-outcome account?

Looking forward to Part 2 on the SPI.

An excellent conversation, highly appropriate for our times. Many thanks both.

I lived in this town the killer lived in when this happened- this little girl's body wasn't found until the disappearance of my 2nd cousin- Susie's remains were found during the search for my cousin- Sandra Dykman Smallegan-who was also murdered by the killer

Hi, I'd like to have permission to use this video in a course I run. Is there someone I can contact for this please?

You didn’t get scammed by the taxi? Everyone says not to use those taxis at airports in Vietnam and should only use grab instead

Nicely said, Scott. The problem, in my experience, does tend to sit with me not taking the time to adequately talk about the purpose of the SRS. When I explain that honest feedback helps me to improve, as well as enhancing outcomes, it frames lower scores as beneficial; as a gift rather than an insult.

I adopted the practice of (1) asking the client for blunt, honest feedback, and (2) making the next appointment, giving the client a clipboard to fill out in the waiting room by self, and starting the next session so there wasn't as much demand characteristics. Scott's reminder here is highly helpful, to be a bit teasing, only the smart people watching will adopt it.

In the attempt to defeat death man has been inevitably obliged to defeat life, for the two are inextricably linked. Henry Miller

Thank you very much for this debate. I practice a dance form called Contact Improvisation where people use touch to explore movement, sometimes slow and meditative, sometimes dynamic and acrobatic. As the name implies it is both a relational and a spontaneous form of dance practice. In our circles we often have the debate whether we should just stay with the unknown, be guided by it and be curious as to what happens or whether we can practice physical, coordinational and co-attunment skills to be able to continue and enjoy our practice In my experience both are skills. I sometimes have to both drill and get feedback in order to improve a movement skill or a the way I perceive, feel and connect with another. And then when a structured skill is improved, I let go into the unknown. In that sense, personally, I do not see a conflict between having a structure in place and then being flexible within the structure or in being taken beyond the structure. Or sometimes just choosing to be in the unknown free jam space when I dance, I stumble upon a structure.

Thank you very much for this! Where one might possibly find the video with Wendy Amie (?) mentioned at 31:03? With much appreciation!

1:11:39 As a Bruce fanboy I am a bit triggered by Chris statements here. :) The decontextualized books he talks about is not what Bruce Wampold, Scott Miller, Daryl Chow and others intended with deliberate practice. Chris is thinking about the APA series by Rousmaniere and Vasz, which I have criticized for the same reason as Chris: They are like a cookbook and in that sense are similar to manuals which have not moved our field forward in years. For trainees they may be helpful to grasp a specific model and become more convincing. But for the average practitioner, DP needs to be highly individualized to sustain development over the lifespan.

Bruce!!

Thanks for this 👍

The issue why nobody could drive that bike is because nobody understands how bikes works. If they started to change bike direction with their mass, and not with steering wheel, thay could easely drive that bike

Hi

Oh, that was too short. I was all prepared to move into the "How do we apply these ideas to practice?" discussion when the music came on. 😂

I've had clients question the difference between Socially and Interpersonally-they might be distinct to some therapists and researchers but they really aren't for the average person. I know the brackets clarify, but I still get the question.

Scott, this is a good point. I see another broader issue that practitioners and clients have for rating the outcome rating scale: - do I rate it as a gauge of how I am doing based on the four domains (ie, individually, close relationships, socially, and overall), or - do I rate it based specifically on why I am in therapy? The first is a proxy for their general wellbeing and the second is specifically defined. From a clinical perspective, this becomes more relevant in the repeated-measurement in follow-up sessions. Love to hear your thoughts on this, as well as others in the community on how you use this.

Thanks for clarifying. Thru the years Ive often encountered clients setting more than one mark on a given subscale, to distinguish areas from each other. Whats your thoughts on that? 🙂

Thanks Scott this was very helpful, useful and made a lot of sense👍🤓

It's a lot easier to adopt "trauma informed" policies than do deliberate practice or measure outcomes in a meaningful way.

Honest & candid personal reflections about DP being a marathon & not a sprint, as Scott & Daryl say in their books & trainings. Jimmy, it’s good to meet another FIT & DP junkie who doesn’t give up when the going gets tough - well, not so far 😊

Resistance is futile.

Such an important and interesting video Scott and Dan. Some therapy in the UK like the rest of world has changed from a place of enquiry to formulas and managerialism putting people into spreadsheets

it is a pity that in the editing both speakers comments at the end were left at the end instead of being moved to the beginning

as a social worker / therapist in a rural county in Maryland I have never made anywhere near $90,000 a year but I have gotten to places like local jails and homes where families are monitored because of vulnerable adults and children. So you're using science as a reason to undo laws related to protecting vulnerable people. I guess that's being too kind! In actuality the people that work for social service agencies and qualify people for food stamps and other monetary benefits make even far less than actual licensed social workers. As a 76 year old still practicing social worker I have a student loan that I am continuing to pay for for another six or seven years which will put me close to 30 years of payments. I have looked at attending your trainings and found them to be so expensive I'd have to charge my clients way more and then they couldn't afford me. Please do your credibility a favor and use better examples. Thank you

@8:36 “People will move once they get the RIGHT facts”… What the heck are “THE RIGHT FACTS” ?😂

WHAAT? I don't know any social workers making $90K a year. LOL!!

Perhaps you should address the elephant in the room - Transgenderism. The genital mutilation of pre-pubescent children a la Josef Mengele. Silence is complicity in your field. This insanity defies all ethics, and is a human rights atrocity. Mental health "professionals" are absolutely the perpetrators from the APA to you both.

Well, governments, unlike scientists, have to govern. And the rules, in my opinion, are a little different in a lethal pandemic, than in “normal” times. Yes, the decision to lock down is not without consequences, for education etc. But a more critical issue is the socially unjust distribution of the direct adverse impacts of the pandemic (death, severe illness, long Covid) and the secondary impacts on education.