Видео

Girl calm down I have to turn u off

Nothing impossible for Jason Stratham ur not taking that into account

Ur the expert but I don’t think white sharks eat too many dolphins bc they are groupies so they protect each other

Girl it’s captivity but in the real ocean not a tank

Well I don’t agree with the backwards thing bc if they super smart they can learn to reuse their muscles

I rem thinking when I first watched these I thought was messed up they sent in a shark to big ripped apart by the other sharks why karma was a bitch at the end for them

19:48 funnily enough, one of the largest mako sharks ever caught was nearly 20 feet in length. While this isn't verified there are pictures of it and that estimate seems to be real. I think great whites often reach larger lengths but makos do sometimes become giants.

You deserve so much more than you have you teach people so much❤

Alot of this have to defend themselves before they're born. Some shark babies eat each other in the womb so they can have more space and more food to get bigger for it's birth

What a great reaction, I love how you included shark science. The only thing I wish you would have included was Quint's speech about the USS Indianapolis.

There was a Great White that was in a estuary in Cape Cod and they had a hard time getting it out to sea. Oxygen would deplete and the shark could die of Anoxia. It took a while but they got the animal out to sea saving it's life. The shark was basically harmless. No one was injured.

I couldn't stop laughing thru most of it! I'm willing to suspend disbelief for the sake of art but this movie wasn't art!! :)

She kinda looks/sounds like Natalie Portman. Great video

The harpoon and barrels trick is an old one from the very early days of whaling. Fisherman would stick small whales non fatally with harpoons only for them to dive below the surface, so they began to attach wooden barrels to the lines to keep the whales close enough to the surface for follow-up spears. I’ve never heard it done with sharks but I’ve also never heard of sharks being hunted by harpoons.

Unfortunately, there's SO many people who still believe this is real shark behavior. We need a lot more people like you sharing true information on shark behavior.

This movies made me fascinated with white sharks. I did checked out a massive amount of books on them, watched Shark week just to see them fly after seals near South Africa. To the point where one of my bucket list items is to go to the Guadalupe Islands and cage diving while some of the bigger Pacific coastal sharks are coming through. I think they are an amazing beautiful and smart animal. I would rather swim in clear water with a White shark than about any other species. Yes, they are very curious and happen to use their mouth to test things out. They also spy hop like killer whales. I have done some scuba diving and snorkeling many times and only one time out of I don't know how many have I ever seen a big boy shark. I'd guess maybe a 10 - 12 foot tiger shark in the Caribbean probably scoping for some turtle. It swam within about 20 feet of my wife and I turned a bit towards us at which point I took a little few feet swim towards it. It figured out we weren't prey to eat and went on about it's way. Very humbling, but yet beautiful encounter. I sometimes wish I could be in your position to hang with them and study them. Take care and keep up the good information work on these great animals.

How do we actually know that the mariana trench is the deepest point? Thought we barely had explored 2% of all our oceans? So I guess we could say that it is the deepest known point? Please correct me if I am wrong

The way you explain it about the lung part of the movie is just very funny. movies are stupid sometimes.

Comment. It's not that important but I noticed your voice is not perfectly synchronized with your mouth. Maybe half a second difference. You can easily adjust it in editing if you want. And it's not the only video. 🙂 You can delay your video from your voice in your recording program.

Well, It's a monster movie rather than a shark movie. The shark is more than a shark, it's evil. Not realistic but it,s well made. We care about the characters. And yes, scuba tanks can't explode. I like this movie anyway.

idk why my dad bought the original VCD when it released and thought "i am watching this with my 7 year old son", and yes that 7 year old was me.

See I'm the type of guy that will now mix imperial and metric just to mess with people mwahahaha

It's funny how the same movie can effect people in different ways. I wanted to do what you do until I saw this movie. I am terrified of open water now. I can't go swimming in a lake without the fear of a shark in my mind. Even though I know how sharks behave and that they don't eat people on purpose it is still my biggest fear. But I wanted to go to the Great Barrier Reef and study all kinds of marine life

Why did they put a meg sized tunnel to the open ocean? Maybe to bring in meg sized food?

Thanks Doc: Great Movie and Commentary .😊

Meg the book was told as more serious and scientific sounding vs this comedy movie

You skipped the entire opening scene.

Hey, smart, interesting AND adorable? Have a sub Doc! :)))

I've watched this a bunch of times and I never picked up on him mixing imperial and metric. That's so infuriating.

You do realise it's a movie right? haha

I am kind of disapointed you didnt include Quints speach about the USS Indianapolis.

What really confuses me in these Meg movies is the sharks will eat everything they see. When in reality it takes days for a shark to digest food

Did you consider that Jason Statham can just survive because he's a badass?

Idk if you know this, but the story of the USS Indianapolis is true. You only heard a quarter of it.

Ah. Doesn't get that DBS is a comedy. Not uncommon.

Could you react to "Under Paris". It is a little more violent and scary but it's dumb fun and you'd freak out watching it because of some of the inaccuracies.

I could be wrong, but maybe the reason sharks are interested in boats is because off dead wales floating. I know it is quite a feast for sharks

Pointing out plot holes in a movie like Meg 2 would be like brainstorming all the reasons why a car with 3 wheels isn’t driving properly.

"Three feet of water about ten feet from the beach..." Isn't that where the vast majority of people in the ocean are?

Peter Benchley also makes a appearance in the movie as the newscaster who talks about the form of a killer shark.

😂😂😂😂

This was such a great video, thank you so much. I'm looking to shift into the green sector in the UK and looking at career profiles. Thanks!!

I thought she said "Dr Salmon Roe" at first I was like "Wtf that's actually her name?"

Also what you need to think about is the film was 1975, how much more information did your learn in the last 45 yrs since this film came out.

Didn't they learn anything from Jurassic Park well bad example since they made 7 movies...Don't screw with natural evolution of life especially apex predator that is already ten times smarter than what humans are

Megaladon is extinct, Godzilla however...............

I'm not with you on the "rogue" theory. It's rare, I admit, but you said there is no evidence of any case, and that is misleading. The Jersey shark attacks of 1916 are the best example, where a single shark (the accepted theory by experts. And yes, it is the most accepted theory) killed 4 swimmers and injured a fifth one. Since sharks have a slow digestive system, a shark going after 5 people in this short span of time strongly suggests it was targeting humans. It was most likely a bull shark. Here are some details on the strength of the single shark theory: Historical and Expert Opinions Dr. George Burgess: Background: Dr. Burgess was a noted shark expert and former director of the Florida Program for Shark Research at the Florida Museum of Natural History. Support for Single Shark Theory: In various interviews and publications, Dr. Burgess has suggested that the pattern of the attacks in 1916 aligns with the behavior of a single rogue shark. He has pointed out that the timing and locations of the attacks fit the behavior of a single shark moving along the coast and into the creek. Richard Fernicola: Author and Researcher: Richard G. Fernicola authored "Twelve Days of Terror," a detailed book on the 1916 shark attacks. Analysis: Fernicola's extensive research, including historical records and eyewitness accounts, supports the idea that a single shark was responsible. He examined the attack sites, the nature of the wounds, and the patterns of shark movement, concluding that it was likely one shark that traveled along the coast and entered Matawan Creek. Scientific Analysis Bite Marks and Wounds: Examination: Experts analyzed the wounds of the victims and compared them to known shark bite patterns. The size and shape of the bites were consistent with those of a single shark. Consistency: The consistency of the bite marks across different victims suggests a single shark, as it is unlikely multiple sharks of the same size and species would be present in such a short time frame and specific area. Behavioral Patterns Attack Sequence and Timing: Timeline: The attacks happened over a span of just 12 days. The rapid succession of attacks in a relatively confined area points towards the behavior of a single shark rather than multiple sharks appearing simultaneously and independently. Rogue Shark Behavior: Rogue Shark Theory: The theory of a "rogue" shark suggests that certain sharks might deviate from typical behavior and repeatedly attack humans. The 1916 attacks, with their sudden onset and concentrated timeline, fit this pattern. This behavior has been documented in other instances where sharks exhibit a temporary but aggressive change in behavior, leading to multiple attacks in a short period. Supporting Literature Books and Research Papers: "Twelve Days of Terror" by Richard G. Fernicola: This book provides a detailed narrative and analysis of the 1916 attacks, supporting the single shark theory. Fernicola's meticulous research includes historical documents, medical reports, and interviews with experts. "Close to Shore" by Michael Capuzzo: Another comprehensive account of the 1916 attacks, Capuzzo's book also leans towards the single shark theory, offering a mix of historical storytelling and scientific insight. Documentaries and Media: Documentaries: Programs on networks like the History Channel and Discovery Channel (e.g., during Shark Week) have explored the 1916 attacks in depth. These documentaries often feature expert interviews and analysis that support the single shark theory, highlighting the consistency and unusual nature of the attacks. Conclusion from Authorities Government and Museum Reports: American Museum of Natural History: In the aftermath of the attacks, experts from institutions like the American Museum of Natural History analyzed the incidents. Their findings leaned towards the single shark theory, based on the patterns of attacks and the nature of the wounds. Contemporary Reports: Reports from the time, including those from local authorities and newspapers, also suggested the likelihood of a single shark being responsible, as they described a sequence of attacks that seemed too coordinated and consistent for multiple sharks to be independently involved.

Back in the day, Hollyweird didn't care about historical accuracy or complete realism. They cared about actually entertaining folks and telling a grand tale...as it SHOULD be.

The Meg was enjoyable despite it's absurdity. The Meg 2 was just awful garbage in every conceivable way. The information you shared was quite enjoyable, but it's disappointing to me to hear these attributes of animals for their adaptation to evolution, rather than being intelligently designed the way that they are.

Any thoughts or comments on when the character Quint has a monologue about the USS Indianapolis?