Видео

When shooting digitial I only put old m42 lenses on my 5dmk3 even for professional shoots

I started using my Zenit lens on my R7, and it looks great! That’s exactly the feeling.

My ancient Helios 44-2 still really has that vintage yellowed look compared to the modern TTArtisan M42 remakes. They have more saturation, sharpness, and contrast, but there's a charachter that can't be replicated without severe doctoring

In some ways, I prefer the tone & contrast of older lenses vs the modern stuff.

I love old lenses on modern cameras! Until recently I was using a Nikon F-mount camera which is hard (impossible maybe?) to adapt to other systems but still let you use an awful lot of vintage F-mount lenses, because that mount's been around forever. I upgraded to a Z-mount camera and got an old Pentax medium format lens that's *magic*. I also have a bunch of lenses for my Mamiya RZ and am thinking about getting the Fotodiox adapter for them, though it's not cheap (as you know, those lenses don't have any built-in focusing, so the adapter's more complex). My favorite F-mount lens is the Nikon 50/1.2 (not the crazy expensive Noct! Their smaller/"worse" 1.2). I love the way it gets weird when it's wide open but it's still good enough to not be obnoxious if you stop it down a little bit.

I had high hopes after seeing the thumbnail. Also, you would get more views with a different thumbnail. at least that's my theory

That was exciting😢

That was a very cool video! Perfect match between images and music. Very nicely done.

Were you shooting during the Hot Rod Power Tour? Very cool to see your art after recently discovering your bike riding channel.

The way the music works with the slo-mo in the first minute or so is fantastic! Neat to see serenity and gracefulness in moments that might not have (I'm just guessing, never been to a drag race) felt exactly like that at the time.

Cool Gig! classy photog and production. You have supercharged my day, thanks Tim.

Bloody good job Tim..

Two ideas on how to create that composited photo in camera. Maybe a graduated neutral density filter, Not sure they make any that are quite thick enough though to get the eclipse knocked down enough to capture. Maybe flash on the foreground? I'm just spitballing.

Up here in Southeast Michigan, we didn't get totality, but it was still pretty cool to see. My coworkers and I got to watch it for about a half hour during work, so that was nice.

the juxtaposition of this day between your two channels contents is f***ing outstanding!!! thanks

0.53 Look up the entire olympus pen ee line

Awful song in the background

Fuji film is nice , its god on the greens , but not so good on the reds like Kodak.

Seems like a good time.

mmm silver in the drain is a problem for environment because you have to extract more Ag for films but it' does not poison nor it causes pathologies. Are you able to retrieve the Ag from the solutions? I don't think so. again the "ilford method" just concentrates all the rest of fixer in a little water that will go into the drain as well while if you wash the film in current water you diluite it much more making it much less dangerous. You know water doesn't disappear from the earth once if falls into the drain. Do you keep your shit in the toilet for days until you have enough and then you flush it? I think you have rather to drink less alcholic and believe less bs about what is "environmentally friendly". results seem good anyway but I prefer add a fixer eliminator bath as safety

Thank you for this video. I just purchased one of these cameras. What speed film do you recommend? Do you know the shutter speed and aperture?

The music makes this video a tough watch. i had to give up half way through. Just drop the volume down a bit, please!

Thanks for the walkthrough. Was that Barcelona on your negative?

I love this info! I will be adding a Canonet to my collection when that Camera Trade Show comes around in Brecksville. They always have a lot of good Canonets there!

Hello, I have a Cannnet QL19, and I have a question, the lense has in the aperture in Blu color the numbers 28, 20 and 14and in Blue also in the speed 30th of a second. No idea what is their function.

The ql17giii lens is unreasonably good

Good story. Thanks. toronto canada.

Great video. Thank you

I generally adapt lenses. I use a drop-in filter adapter so I prefer EF lenses to RF lenses whenever I have the choice. I could not afford to replace all of my EF lenses with RF lenses even if I wanted to anyway.

As a Canon and MFT (Pana/ Olympus) guy, I say YES and NO. I started my photographic journey with kit lenses and entry level cameras, and when starting to have money, moved to hi-end cameras, premium, then pro lenses (Canon L, Leica, Zuiko PRO), and YES I recommend to move to pro lenses but also NO, because PRO lenses create big expectations, in terms of picture quality (I mean technical and not artistic). Meaning, it makes you focusing on details (resolution, sharpness) more than on the actual picture itself.

I decided on the Mark2 of this lens myself after owning the Sigma version. I couldn’t justify the upgrade on my R6. At some point I will upgrade if the need is truly there. I use mine for Sports and I shoot Soccer. I do like the fact that I don’t have to carry the adaptor with me and just slapping on the RF. I have a RF24-7. I did see the Sigma 105 f1.4 and was thinking I can put that on my R50 crop sensor for better low light in some places where stadium light is bad. Thoughts?

Couldn't sneak that sign past me! I know Szalay's when I see it! Awesome video!

Thanks for this!

Thanks!!

You can rotate the digital back on the camera, just switch it to the R on the right sight of the camera and rotated, you got the adapter plate. You don't have to switch to another camera, put it in the R and rotate.

I fortunately got a 70-200mm f2.8 iii on Marketplace for $900 and I was shocked the whole way back home after in person meet at how extremely clean the lenses is, now I don't have to worry about RF version in my mind with that extending tube mechanism anymore. I use for wildlife with R7 and crop is just insanely sharp. Best 70-200mm of all time.

I Love your content. Very very relatable. Speak about winning mindset in the future many photographers get stuck die to a mindset issue.

Any dude with a beard that also owns a cat - must be a pretty alright kind'a guy! I subscribed!!! Now, on your next video show us the cat.... lol.

love the angle! here for more

Interesting glass.... i use and have several smc f series glass from the pentax line. I shoot pentax so its an easy one for me. Cool video review.

I just wanted to check your channel out& though I'm not into photography it's interesting to see how you approach your Occupation,and as I suspected ,I enjoyed it because I believe you are a great communicator! This channel will grow easily man,just keep talking!😉👍

Still an EF user and I use the Macro 24-105 for landscape and macro and a Sigma 150-600 for wildlife. Now you know my entire set up 😂

I sold the same lens and adapter to help pay for a RF 100-500 F4.5-7.1 and glad I did. The EF 70-200 F2.8 is a very heavy lens to carry around. Just curious, the Canon RF 70-200 F4 is about the same price as what you paid, but shorter and much less in weight. Did you need the EF F2.8 for the wider aperture? I'm seriously considering the getting the RF 70-200 F4.

I just found your channel and I really like it. Your comment on skipping at least one generation on new models is a principle I've used for some time. It works really well for cell phones too. As a hobbyist I've found if you can make the most of what you have in gear is sufficient for the quality of images you are trying to achieve, then you don't need anything new. When your needs exceed that capability is when to start looking. I'm not a fanboy of Canon but like you, it's what I started using and continue to do so. I started with a Canon EF film SLR (showing my age) and now have an R5 upgrading from a 5DS. If Canon comes out with a R5S someday, it will be mine. If not, then maybe a medium format.

You make some good points. Many people tend to measure a "successful" photographer to the guys who have a massive following on social media, are super specialised etc. I'm a pro of 25 years, and yes, in time things do niche down a bit, BUT, like you, I do whatever comes across my way, and being a generalist is probably where most people who make a living from photography are. My RUclips channel just gave me an excuse to start playing with my old film gear again and really helped me reignite the love for shooting and the analogue process.

I’m enjoying your photography content. My son still falls into the hobbyist category, though he uses photography in his journalism major. His most recent toy has been a Canon EOS Rebel 2000, which works like new and cost home about $10.

Ha, didn't recognize you without the beard.

Recently subscribed to both of your channels. I'm into both topics. Hanging out and nerding out about cameras sounds cool. I really dig platforms like Josh Sattin's Camera Talk live stream and The Moe and O Photo Show Podcast (though it's been months since they've published an episode). Best wishes on growing this channel!

Pleasantly surprised! Thought I was in for a biking video, then realized this is a new channel. Photography and cycling are my passions too. Keep it up, please.

I, too, got the kit 24-105 with my R6m2 and fell in love. But it wasn't until I got my EF 70-200 m1 that I really started improving my photography skills.