AMERICAN FIREPOWER! 2nd Indianhead Deck Build an Review- Steel Division 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 янв 2024
  • 🕹️ In this video, we dive deep into 2nd Indianhead Infantry! Whether you're a seasoned general or new to the front, there's something here for everyone!
    🎖️ Welcome to Atkpwr Gaming, your strategic battlefield for all things Steel Division II and WARNO!
    🔔 Subscribe to Atkpwr Gaming for more immersive RTS gameplay, strategies, and updates. Your support is our strength!
    💬 Got strategies, stories, or questions? The battlefield is vast - share your thoughts in the comments below!
    🌐 Follow me on social media for sneak peeks and more:
    Under construction
    💖 Support Atkpwr Gaming:
    Join our Patreon at / atkpwrgaming for exclusive content, training, and more. Your support fuels our gaming conquests!
    🔗 Useful Links:
    Get Steel Division II: store.steampowered.com/app/91...
    Get WARNO: store.steampowered.com/app/16...
    Other SD2 RUclipsrs : @Hobotango @Atlacatlgames @themastervox2822 @homerssd2276 @vulcanhdgaming
    🏆 Together, let's conquer the world of WWII RTS gaming. See you on the battlefield, commanders!
    #SteelDivisionII #WARNO #RTS #Videogames
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 56

  • @goodoldfaith8435
    @goodoldfaith8435 6 месяцев назад +9

    I appreciate you doing these again. Very insightful to see how all Divs are affected by the newer changes.
    Though may you do a review of 5th Gebirgsjager. I would like to know more on this hidden gem I keep hearing about from you.

    • @GrandSnow469
      @GrandSnow469 6 месяцев назад +4

      I believe he already did. Look it up. It didn't change much.

    • @goodoldfaith8435
      @goodoldfaith8435 6 месяцев назад

      @@GrandSnow469 Yep found it. Thanks!

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching!

  • @GrandSnow469
    @GrandSnow469 6 месяцев назад +6

    Hi, would you consider reviewing the soviet 3rd Mech? To my mind it is pretty terrible, it would be funny seeing you complain about this division. It is also quite unique as it is one of the few true Sherman spam decks in the game having 7 cards of them. A lot worse than 3rd Tank so to speak which is a bit more flexible with its IS-2s.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      I will try to check it out!

    • @Serious_Ludd
      @Serious_Ludd 5 месяцев назад

      Dang, I personally think it's one of the better soviets divs. Love playing with them

  • @jonathanforrest7215
    @jonathanforrest7215 6 месяцев назад +3

    Maybe for a vid or short you could demonstrate how agility doesn't change the turn radius/show how well it reduces damage taken.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      I can try, that would be a tough experiment to pull off exactly

  • @paolonemeno4870
    @paolonemeno4870 6 месяцев назад

    Finally, you showing some love to US divs. Keep it up champ.

  • @freeformwings8963
    @freeformwings8963 6 месяцев назад +1

    Imo if I take engineers I like to double vet them in B phase because you go from 10 squads to 9 squads so you aren't sacrificing much to make everyone double vet. I also recommend trying out C phase Assault Group double vet in .50 cal half tracks, at only 35 points for a half track and the assault squad with the smoke nade they're great. They help round off attack groups during C phase and can punish a lack of light AT.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Yeah thats understandable, forgot about the double vet thing

  • @BlitkriegsAndCoffee
    @BlitkriegsAndCoffee 6 месяцев назад +2

    My Thoughts:
    * Don't vet the Hellcats. You want as many as possible for that APCR goodness and their vet curve isn't as good as the M10s.
    * Double Vetting Engineers is quite viable. Their vet curve is very generous.
    * A card of Bazookas or Rifle(leaders) in B is actually pretty good most of the time. No handheld AT is shockingly frustrating when every halftrack or armored car suddenly turns into a brick wall against you. Doubly so as your Marauders are already stretched thin providing recon.
    * The M4A1 Shermans will hopefully be better in the next patch when their double vet curve will be brought in line with the 80 point version. (although I personally hate how the current balance of Mediums is moving more and more towards making them good through double vet rather than baseline stats)
    * The biggest problem with the P-47 fighters is turn rate more than anything. It takes it nearly half the map to do a 180* turn, which means it usually only gets kills in head to heads.
    * No, no, no. The P-38 Bomber doesn't have 2x 500kg bombs. It has 2x 1000kg(!) bombs. It drops more firepower than many high altitude medium bombers. Only the P-47 in a few other divisions surpass it with the same loadout but medium toughness. It isn't mandatory to take because of its low HP, but it makes some huge booms when it lands.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Did I misread the bomber or is it a graphical bug?

    • @BlitkriegsAndCoffee
      @BlitkriegsAndCoffee 6 месяцев назад

      @@atkpwrgaming Misread it. While dual 500kg bombs is strong for axis, its pretty commonplace for American and Commonwealth divisions.
      2x 1000kgs on a dive bomber though is only on a few aircraft and accurately annihilates a huge swath of ground.

  • @steffent.6477
    @steffent.6477 6 месяцев назад

    I like taking the M16 to accompany my tanks when advancing because I tend to forget towed guns sitting in bushes somewhere^^

  • @R.Specktre
    @R.Specktre 6 месяцев назад +1

    Good deck. Want to see this in play.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      I think there was a league game or two recently with it

  • @shanemiller667
    @shanemiller667 5 месяцев назад

    I would take 4 X 107mm mortars with radio in A phase any day ATKPWR-rest of build is cool

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  5 месяцев назад

      Thanks for the suggestion!

  • @markcollins6578
    @markcollins6578 6 месяцев назад

    Agility does affect turn - been on a forum where its been confirmed (they showed a video) that if the aircraft needs 1500m for 180 turn the vetting lessens the turn by say 10% so ends up as 1350m. Not sure but it feels like the vetting also appears to quicken the reload time - but cannot find confirmation, not sure about the repair time as that is dependent on damage taken. Note that Agility is not based relative to other planes but rather relative to itself e.g. good agility can still see different turning circles for different planes. There is also something about fighters you never mention - they are available a lot quicker than bombers after use. Even if the bomber was only called in as a fighter it will still take longer to be available than the equivalent plane in fighter only format e.g. P-47D's

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Interesting. I have been told many many times by knowledgable players that this is not the case. Do you have a link to the forum video?

  • @paintingwithmartin
    @paintingwithmartin 6 месяцев назад

    What I lack in this division is heavy bombers and possibly also Easy 8s Shermans. I also lack cheap infantry, otherwise this div performs well. What do you think of their rocket artillery?

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Easy 8s would be fabulous. The xylophone is incredibly underwhelming overall

  • @lepathewarrior4445
    @lepathewarrior4445 6 месяцев назад

    I take the 105 howitzer just because it can bring in supply for the long toms

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Yeah I realized that too absolutely necessary

  • @dominuslogik484
    @dominuslogik484 6 месяцев назад +1

    those long toms are definitely one of my favorite arty, decent dispersion and a disgusting rate of fire for a 155mm.
    The Xylophone is really much better than the Katyusha considering they are the same price but the Xylophone gets 32 rockets and the Katyusha usually only gets 16 with there being one version that carries more but the rockets are smaller.
    that being said I would still not take the Xylophone because its really just not that useful in a deck with so many good long range HE and artillery options available to it. I feel like the Calliope could be useful though that is in the 3rd US armored. 60 rockets aught to be enough to saturate and do some work.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Yeah, the rockets dont do that much and there's so much other good arty here

    • @dominuslogik484
      @dominuslogik484 6 месяцев назад

      @@atkpwrgaming after testing it out I will revise my assessment on the Calliope. its awful, takes too long to aim and only fires 30 of its rockets per barrage then takes several minutes to reload it feels like.
      dropped the Barrage on 2 shermans in a town that didn't even fall back but it basically did no damage to them and it didn't even kill the infantry squad right next to them either.

  • @Caudata_
    @Caudata_ 6 месяцев назад

    jokes on you man. G43 and SVT40 are identical, and both better than Garand (for some reason, even though G43 wasn't very good IRL and SVT40 was only OK).

    • @Caudata_
      @Caudata_ 6 месяцев назад

      it is a VERY small difference though. Like 2%.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  5 месяцев назад

      Weird, it feels like M1s do so much more damage

  • @steffent.6477
    @steffent.6477 6 месяцев назад

    Only 3 recon in A, no matter how good they are, wouldn't be enough for me to cover the map. Oh wait, I use the marauders too in A together with the M8 and the scouts with the M20 in B.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      I can definitely see that!

  • @cademueller2054
    @cademueller2054 6 месяцев назад

    Are you going to be doing any Warno deck builds?? Would LOVE to see that

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      It will probably be a while on those, because I am not good at that game and have no business telling people how to build decks

  • @steffent.6477
    @steffent.6477 6 месяцев назад

    Just had a game with this div. The ground recon is completly useless against anything that sits in tall grass. You can only spot open streets.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Interesting, which recon?

    • @steffent.6477
      @steffent.6477 6 месяцев назад

      @@atkpwrgaming M8s and infantry. I don't send my recon infantry into close combat though.

  • @markcollins6578
    @markcollins6578 6 месяцев назад

    why are grease guns bad? the card says they are 40% at higher fire rate and damage .5 per gun - stats should be as the Thompson for damage so assault squad delivers 4 damage @ 100m which is one of the best in the game along with their shock. Not saying you are wrong but rather I look at the damage aspect to interpret what to use so its confusing. Bring in Long Toms in C looks bad timing,140 points when you are probably trying to bring in tanks, AT or spam infantry. Best to bring all arty in B to give options - 105 or 155.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Well if my plan is to grind with the arty then having less is really painful. And B phase is usually strained because you are up against aggressive divisions or incomes

    • @Caudata_
      @Caudata_ 6 месяцев назад

      Grease gun issue is that it only rolls for damage every 1.9 seconds. The PPSH41 rolls ever 0.9 seconds, the Suomi and Beretta ever 1.2, and most smg 1.4 or 1.5 seconds. Slowest "Actual" fire rate among SMG, and his has a short magazine of 6 rounds. Many other SMG also have 6 round mag, but they fire faster, and the good SMG combine longer mag with higher RoF.
      Then you throw bad accuracy on top. The Grease gun is better than the Sten but that's it.

  • @steffent.6477
    @steffent.6477 6 месяцев назад

    No Air recon is a big minus for me.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      I dont rely on it much, but I understand

  • @freedomfighters101
    @freedomfighters101 6 месяцев назад

    You spelled indian wrong on your thunmbnail

  • @ranick0622
    @ranick0622 6 месяцев назад

    Ah yes, 2nd ''inidanhead''

  • @steffent.6477
    @steffent.6477 6 месяцев назад +2

    The one div that has Xylos and he doesn't use them... I guess Competitive play doesn't allow for much style or fun units.

    • @BlitkriegsAndCoffee
      @BlitkriegsAndCoffee 6 месяцев назад

      The Xylos can be used in place of one of the the Long Toms. The bigger problem with them is that the pair costs nearly as much as the offmap.

    • @notbotheredable
      @notbotheredable 6 месяцев назад

      They also eat supply in a deck with strained supply as it is.
      Sadly, small calibre rockets are just in a bad place at the moment.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      The other arty in the deck is so much better than them, its hard to take that over them

  • @hibikinyan7180
    @hibikinyan7180 6 месяцев назад

    Rifles early seem better to me. Trading away 5 points and 2 semiautos for a bar? Nahh no way. You do get about 20% extra suppression at 500m, but no extra dps. Sure, you’re much better at 750m, but you’ll lose most fights against germans anyway and miss out on your juicy semiauto advantage.

    • @atkpwrgaming
      @atkpwrgaming  6 месяцев назад

      Eh I always am a fan of double mg. single mgs really dont pack any punch