How the General Electric GEnx Jet Engine is Constructed

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
  • A good overview of how a jet engine works. This specific example is the General Electric GEnx that is used on the Boeing 787. This animation was produced by General Electric.

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @AgentJayZ
    @AgentJayZ 12 лет назад +22

    I like the way you put all these together...
    These new technology engines are really sophisticated.

  • @friedmanirit
    @friedmanirit 10 лет назад +2

    It's Like No Other.
    Can You Just Imagine How Amazing All Of Our Other Parts Are?

  • @JoeEngineersThings
    @JoeEngineersThings 10 лет назад +17

    This is an overview of the General Electric "GEnx" engine, or the "Next Generation" turbofan; the title is misleading. For people with a basic understanding of turbine engines, this video shows how GE is making improvements. For those that are not familiar with turbine engines, here are the basics:
    *On the ground, an electric or air powered starter is used to get the engine to start spinning. The engine (front to back) consists of a fan, a compressor, a combustor, a high pressure turbine, and a low pressure turbine. It is called a turbofan because the second turbine spins the fan to generate thrust (move lots of air).
    *When spinning the compressor pressurizes air and moves it toward the back of the engine. Note that the pressurized air is hot.
    *Fuel is added and mixed with the hot air in the combustor, where there is also an igniter. The combustion gases expand and accelerate out the combustor and through the turbines.
    *The high pressure turbine (HPT) is connected to the compressor by a shaft, so spinning the HPT is also spinning the compressor. Note that the compressor, combustor, and first turbine are the engine 'core' - the components responsible for keeping the engine running.
    *The low pressure turbine (LPT) is connected to the fan by another shaft (here they are counter rotating). So spinning the second turbine is also spinning the fan at the front of the engine. The fan provides most of the thrust. The turbines are on different shafts because the HPT and compressor spin really fast, and the LPT and fan spin slower.
    The engine powers itself once it is running as long as fuel is being added. The parts are spinning, not reciprocating like a piston in a car engine. The forces in a spinning engine are more constant or 'steady state' and the parts are moving in basically one direction (circle) which is part of what makes turbine engines so reliable. 'Things in motion stay in motion...'

    • @vidjdwhite
      @vidjdwhite 9 лет назад +1

      Joe how does the jet compress the gas, explode it and move it into forward motion in a controlled and safe manner?

    • @johnc.hastie2679
      @johnc.hastie2679 6 лет назад

      J M u

    • @spaceinvader384
      @spaceinvader384 6 лет назад

      Big thanks to JM on this overview. Cleared some of my previous misunderstanding of the jet engine concept. I think the big fan in front, turns by shafts from HPT and LPT, moves the air towards the back to generate thrust. Might be slow on start but once regulated fuel/explosion comes in, the airflow becomes vastly exponential from repetitive/powerful turbine actions. Correct me if I am wrong.

    • @Martindyna
      @Martindyna 5 лет назад

      @@vidjdwhite You have just hit the nail on the head there, sir !! This is NEVER explained but I will now try to explain (but it's only my version that may not be totally correct).
      Any fan / compressor has what's called a `fan curve' (also pumps have pump curves) to illustrate how it will perform when the flow rate is varied i.e. how the pressure across it will vary as you vary the flow.
      Invariably as the flow is decreased the pressure across the compressor INCREASES; therefore during start up of the jet engine when the burner is switched on the pressure after the compressor stage increases which will tend to reduce the air flow into the compressor but this reduction in air flow will increase the pressure gain over the compressor so a new BALANCE is achieved with the burner on. Google `fan curve'.
      With the burner on this vastly increases the volumetric flowrate with the pressure reasonably stable.
      The same can be said for a locomotive steam engine - with the boiler sitting at e.g. 10 barg (145 psig) and zero steam take off the fire only has to supply boiler heat losses. Once you start to draw steam off the fire has to provide a lot of heat to maintain the steam flow rate at the same pressure.

  • @SATISHSHARMA-uz9yr
    @SATISHSHARMA-uz9yr 3 года назад +2

    It is indeed an exciting experience to see the 3D use in explaining the assembly of such sophisticated new age Engine of Flying Machines. 🤗

  • @LastAvailableAlias
    @LastAvailableAlias 10 лет назад +98

    More like a sales video

  • @Geoffr524
    @Geoffr524 10 лет назад +1

    Where the GE shines, is on my favorite, the B777-300ER. Great engine and airliner.

  • @ewewerwe4342
    @ewewerwe4342 9 лет назад +11

    This morning i woke up without knowing how a jet engine works, after watching this i know a lot and i will sleep better to night.

    • @ahsanafzal48
      @ahsanafzal48 9 лет назад +13

      Tomorrow watch porn and the next day you will wake up after the best night of your life

    • @daffidavit
      @daffidavit 5 лет назад

      @@ahsanafzal48 All porn does is make you want to find somebody who you "may" never find to solve your loneliness. It does not work.

    • @daffidavit
      @daffidavit 5 лет назад

      @@ahsanafzal48 yeah, that's because you've been there too.

    • @daffidavit
      @daffidavit 5 лет назад

      @@ahsanafzal48 snooze, snore, snooze, snore.

  • @VictorMiranda-yt6xe
    @VictorMiranda-yt6xe 6 лет назад

    Mr. PilotTroll: You are right 100%. All light bulb manufactures, more than 80 years ago AGREED to limit the life span of each incandescent bulb to NOT MORE THAN 6 MONTHS. The only incandescent bulbs that last (almost) forever are the ones used by the subways (MTA) in new York City (as far as I know) and those bulbs have the thread counterclockwise, so nobody can use them, unless the socket is available. with counterclockwise thread too. 02/17/18.

  • @MrAlone72
    @MrAlone72 5 лет назад +9

    Anyone notice him saying repeatedly “This Amazing Engines” ?

    • @artemmm2
      @artemmm2 4 года назад

      I am full a of amazings in my head, need to meditate to forget it)

  • @billwest7481
    @billwest7481 5 лет назад

    Basically an encased turboprop using light weight alloys, composites, and sensors. Put some automatic directional and output controls on those burners if you want more efficiency.

  • @mzh3000
    @mzh3000 8 лет назад +4

    Saw the engine and thought of one thing. Podracing.
    Look up "Ody mandrell" or "Clegg Holdfast". Their engines look like this engine :P

  • @Griwa2007
    @Griwa2007 10 лет назад +2

    I'm not a specialist, but I do strongly believe this is a GE engine.

  • @markserati9819
    @markserati9819 10 лет назад +3

    Haven't work on one in years, but having worked on GE, Pratts, and Rolls Royce/ Allison. Ge was by far made the best. I was impressed that GE made their engineers actually work in rebuild factories before they were allowed to design. They learned to make things easy, murphy proof, and modular. It appears they're finally taking advantage of material innovations and modularity design v. high time components, excellent applications. The next innovation will be extending material life of expensive components like high speed turbines and combustion chambers from breakdown by thermal cycles. Right now they keep the engines running almost constantly, but that can be changed. GE, call me.

  • @otikbasalo
    @otikbasalo 11 лет назад

    yes. both have the same principle in burning but differs the propulsion. a turbojet, the propulsion is by its exhaust while in a turbofan, the propulsion is by a fan.

  • @Player18652
    @Player18652 8 лет назад

    GREAT SCOT, THIS IS HEAVY DOC.

  • @GaneshmanLamathinker
    @GaneshmanLamathinker 11 лет назад

    Its a product definition than a jet engine tutorial.In normal jet engine after combution the expanded gase rushes out making the power fan turning to continue shaft turning and pushing the atmosphere behind to make thrust.But adding extra fan will develop torque to rotate shaft but the ubstration of gas flow will reduce air pushing thrust out side.It will be useful for automotive purpose where torque is necessary no thrust. required.

  • @Pontiacman1964
    @Pontiacman1964 8 лет назад +1

    As long as airlines follow the manufacturer maintenance guidelines, and don't use shortcuts like American did in 1979, it should be a very good trouble-free engine.

  • @MichalProbka
    @MichalProbka 9 лет назад +1

    I love it! Thi is the type of animation I wanto to make in the suture

  • @nadhimnassir
    @nadhimnassir 11 лет назад

    السعي الحقيقي للكمال مدعاة للتطور المستمر (سبحان الله ) علم الانسان ما لم يعلم

  • @mokeimusic
    @mokeimusic 12 лет назад

    Much better than the J-52s that I worked around.

  • @baillou2
    @baillou2 11 лет назад

    I've had several replies to the question. You can read them below. I'm not sure torque is the issue since the engine on one side of the plane spins in the opposite direction of the other. It would cancel out and maybe even add stability like a gyroscope.

  • @rbflowin_TV
    @rbflowin_TV 10 лет назад

    So simple! I will make one now.

  • @TiberiuCorbu
    @TiberiuCorbu 11 лет назад +27

    Sorry but this is not really "How a jet engine works" ... I can only raise my middle finger

  • @pereduranofcourse
    @pereduranofcourse 11 лет назад

    Because if all the stages would be rotating the same direction, the air would start to whirl up and therefore reducing the differencial in speed between the other blades, making it just use up energy sideways but with a "backflow".

  • @TheShadow960
    @TheShadow960 9 лет назад +3

    This is not entirely a jet. It's a turbofan.

  • @danielramirezcruz.2209
    @danielramirezcruz.2209 5 лет назад

    Super video... thanks...

  • @TCSwizz2
    @TCSwizz2 10 лет назад +8

    If they build jet engines like they build washing machines then count me out. I'll stick to driving :D

  • @cedude69
    @cedude69 11 лет назад

    Hoy Shit! There is a lot more involved in a turbo engine than I ever imagined!

  • @PixelCortex
    @PixelCortex 10 лет назад +144

    I still don't understand how jet engines work

    • @Kareszkoma
      @Kareszkoma 9 лет назад +6

      The air has lesser space each paddle, and because of the high speed it cant go back but gets pushed forward. Than the paddle hits it and twist it -> than that mixes and burns, and all that tries to go out, in an even narrower hole, which pushes the plane forward.

    • @shaanakhtar3114
      @shaanakhtar3114 9 лет назад

      ***** *Newtons third law is: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Newtons second law is: Force = mass x acceleration.

    • @bautistajohnnathanieldebor5355
      @bautistajohnnathanieldebor5355 9 лет назад +2

      its simple just remember these steps sucks air,squeezes it,combust,and exhoust

    • @Walternumnuts
      @Walternumnuts 9 лет назад +6

      Magic.

    • @riccardosmirnov5063
      @riccardosmirnov5063 9 лет назад +7

      PixelCortex AFAIK, schematically: compressor, combustion chambers, turbine. A jet engine takes a certain amount of incoming air in the unit of time (the flow rate is a volume in the unit of time, like m3/sec ...) and then accelerates it to the exhaust. The greater is the accelerated flow into the engine, the greater will be the thrust. The combustion chambers accelerate the airflow like an explosion (air and fuel). For amplify all this, the output flow of the combustion chambers hits the blades of a turbine. This turbine spins a compressor put in the front of the engine. The compressor further compresses the incoming airflow for the combustion chambers, further amplifying the incoming flow rate, so amplifying the thrust. Modern turbofans have also a fan keyed on the shaft of the turbine, like a propeller. This fan is run by the turbine. The fan works in the lower atmosphere (take off and climb), where the air is more dense, like a very efficient propeller; while the jet works better in the higher atmosphere. This combination increases the efficiency of the engine and decreases fuel consumption.

  • @baillou2
    @baillou2 11 лет назад

    That makes sense. I guess the only part that seems counter-intuitive is that the air wouldn't create more "back-pressure" due to it leaving the engine at a slightly slower speed and therefore slow down everything upstream by a proportional amount.
    I don't know if that makes any sense, but that's how it works out in my head. I suppose the secret is a happy middle.

    • @Andre_Thomasson
      @Andre_Thomasson Год назад

      It shouldnt create backpressure if the mass flow is the same, velocity just depends on how far its compressed i guess

  • @manjufly
    @manjufly 11 лет назад

    very good explanation. its easy to understand.
    I would like to know does it required any external power to rotate the fans in the initial stage. how it starts spin in the initial stage.

  • @bhanunarayanapuram1508
    @bhanunarayanapuram1508 6 лет назад

    Very nice

  • @jaskaransinghmalhi1420
    @jaskaransinghmalhi1420 9 лет назад

    state of the art............awesome

  • @THEYOUNGMILLIONAIRES_
    @THEYOUNGMILLIONAIRES_ 9 лет назад

    Just imagine how weve improved the ther parts of this amazing engine

  • @JKevinBrady801
    @JKevinBrady801 11 лет назад

    The technology really is amazing - I've been on three flights that had total engine failure years ago - Today you have airline pilots that go their entire career without shutting one down - I've been on over 1800 airline flights and been in 6 emergency landings - no big deal then, today you make the 6 o'clock news if you need to go abort a landing (been on 4 of those - never an emergency thou)

  • @Synystr7
    @Synystr7 7 лет назад

    Wait... So, this is just a giant ducted fan that is spun up by a jet engine? Its basically a prop plane on steroids? That blows my mind.

  • @guyonthecouch007
    @guyonthecouch007 11 лет назад +1

    so the thumbs down are the ppl who can build a better one than GE i assume

  • @baillou2
    @baillou2 11 лет назад

    I think I understand. Basically the whirling air coming off the first set of turbine stages would be spinning in the same direction as the second set and therefore wouldn't produce much work because it would just "slip through".
    Is that more or less what you mean?

  • @likeawhispr
    @likeawhispr 11 лет назад

    So is the air flowing through the fan providing most of the propulsion or is most of the propulsion (thrust) coming from air flowing through the core? I think that's what most laymen don't understand, and need clarified. :)

  • @MrJdsenior
    @MrJdsenior 4 года назад

    I can simplify this FAR more:
    How does a jet engine work?
    Pretty well, most of the time.
    How's that?

  • @karusho18
    @karusho18 11 месяцев назад

    Where can I get the script for this video ? The subtitles are not automatically generated

  • @ComfortMgalulaMackwelliNC
    @ComfortMgalulaMackwelliNC 10 лет назад

    @ 7:8 low pressure turbine.... how does the counter rotating design work?? the connection.. with the Low Pressure Fan Blade infront??

  • @nricz
    @nricz 12 лет назад

    This is "How the advertising of jet engines works"

  • @MelomaniaDJs
    @MelomaniaDJs 5 лет назад

    Magnificent free energy generator. Where can I find a small scale version

  • @AdriaanVerburg
    @AdriaanVerburg 11 лет назад

    The largest fan which is in the front seems to push air around the outside of the engine. Does that air on the outside also provide thrust? And if so what percentage of the thrust comes from the outside airflow from the large fan?

  • @subsystem8
    @subsystem8 12 лет назад

    sweet they're finally making POD RACERS!

  • @baillou2
    @baillou2 11 лет назад

    I was thinking that the spiral flow off of the main turbine was causing the second to not be as efficient as it wouldn't produce as much pressure against the turbine blades, but are you saying that the only increase in efficiency is the propulsive thrust generated as it leaves the engine? It makes sense now that I think about it. Could it be a combination of the two that adds efficiency?

  • @anwarkhan6074
    @anwarkhan6074 6 лет назад +1

    very good well done in tec world.

  • @VamosConLaPeli
    @VamosConLaPeli 11 лет назад

    I put General Electric on my black list for *anything* in 2002, after buying an answering machine with a KNOWN bug, commented in the instructions manual: "If it stops answering calls switch off (unplug) and on again", regardless that fact that you might be 12000 km far away. Finally I decided not to rely on General Electric stuff any more, I slammed it against the wall. When I fly, I'm always curious about the engines brandname, and veeery happy that so often it isn't GE, synonym of bad quality.

  • @Roman_Mahoro
    @Roman_Mahoro 8 лет назад

    первое видео, где на 3д реконструкции, лопасти турбин, идущих сразу за вентилятором имеют наклон в правильном направлении, такое впечатление, что другие видео делали в одном месте, с одной и той же ошибкой. Или я чего то не понимаю

  • @YSTech2010
    @YSTech2010 10 лет назад +1

    I think GE is innovative and a money saving choice, but RR builds reliable engines.

  • @tomaspianist
    @tomaspianist 11 лет назад

    wow great question! I was thinking about the same

  • @mikewarren7855
    @mikewarren7855 10 лет назад

    Great. where can i get one?

  • @minhlinhvo482
    @minhlinhvo482 11 лет назад

    verry good

  • @burto
    @burto 10 лет назад +1

    Misleading title albeit still an interesting video.

  • @MrEe1010
    @MrEe1010 8 лет назад

    What software was this model made in?

  • @Crashman2
    @Crashman2 12 лет назад

    A HIGH-BYPASS Turbofan, at that! Nacelles don't fool me....

  • @bradpittyay
    @bradpittyay 11 лет назад

    Who the leader guys in the jet engine market? GE or RR ? Be interested to know

  • @shivarudranavi297
    @shivarudranavi297 11 лет назад

    nice

  • @trevor61396
    @trevor61396 11 лет назад

    How Long did this take to render on 3ds max?

  • @omar390z
    @omar390z 12 лет назад

    i heared that the price of one blade in that engine is like the price of a luxury car ... but how much exactly ?

  • @NiL2050R
    @NiL2050R 11 лет назад

    nice engine

  • @avjake
    @avjake 9 лет назад

    How often are the bearings on these engines changed? And how long does that take?

    • @joevignolor4u949
      @joevignolor4u949 8 лет назад +1

      +eJacob Cornelius - Engine bearings in a jet engine are not typically replaced purely on a timed cycle. What they do periodically is to withdraw a sample of engine oil from the engine and analyze it for metal content. If the metal content suddenly rises that is an indication of an impending bearing failure and the engine must be disassembled and all the bearing must be inspected and any bad ones replaced.
      How long that takes depends on which bearing it is and where inside the engine the bad bearing is located. Jet engines I am familiar with used to take 2 to 3 days to completely disassemble them and then 4 to 5 days to reassemble and test them before they would go back into service.

  • @MrUnder30seconds
    @MrUnder30seconds 10 лет назад +2

    but how does a jet engine work?
    wheres the expansion?

  • @greghm
    @greghm 12 лет назад

    More like a commercial advertisement than a technology course.

  • @jdmk20aek
    @jdmk20aek 12 лет назад

    can someone explain the counter rotating part please!!!

  • @sreekumarbabu6766
    @sreekumarbabu6766 10 лет назад

    good

  • @tydey8123
    @tydey8123 11 лет назад

    I agree. It's infomercial.

  • @bmhater1283
    @bmhater1283 4 года назад

    That music holy shit

  • @Penguin_of_Death
    @Penguin_of_Death 10 лет назад +9

    It's pronounced TURBINES you dummy, TURBANS are a form of headwear common amongst Sikhs

    • @ejkk9513
      @ejkk9513 5 лет назад

      Thank you! As an American, I'm getting REALLY tired of hearing Americans mispronouncing such a simple and established word.

  • @door-to-doorhentaisalesman2978
    @door-to-doorhentaisalesman2978 7 лет назад +7

    After watching this ad, i want to buy a GE jet engine for my family.

  • @flufanga
    @flufanga 8 лет назад +6

    Excellent promotional video. However, it would be much better if the narrator spoke in normal conversational English rather than with the breathless tone s of awe and excitation that are frankly ridiculous.

  • @trevorbillings6025
    @trevorbillings6025 9 лет назад +5

    This video is more of an advertisement for the GEnx then a video on how a airplanes engine works.

  • @Nekrossai
    @Nekrossai 12 лет назад +7

    Just imagine what they were able to do with other parts of this amazing engine.

  • @kurtdeibler
    @kurtdeibler 10 лет назад +6

    This advertiser is simply using advanced graphics and stilted language to distract you from the primary take away message: The environmental extremists comprising the all powerful EPA have overhauled the global emission regulations and standards to the extent that all power plant manufacturers have to design entirely new engines to comply with regulations created with the intent of punishing the participants of internal combustion technology. The advertised product is simply what GE had to do in order to survive as a player in manufacturers of gas turbines in the EPA's "brave new green/clean world." The alternative would have been to spin off that segment of it's operations.
    Accordingly, this well-pitched turbine powerplant will cost many orders of magnitude more to acquire and maintain than any of it's predecessors just five years ago. Wouldn't it be nice if this were the end of the story, but it's only the beginning. The EPA took special care to ensure that internally-combusted power come at a much steeper price, and that's only step one. Just a fashion of similar fanaticism, our friends at EPA made sure that not only would new petro-chemical powerplants be uber expensive, but that they would also lag far behind the performance parameters we have become accustomed to as a society for sixty years running.
    Put a tad more succinctly, the EPA has launched a full-frontal assault on everything that used to be "sexy" about gas-burning engines. If fast, loud, and powerful are adjectives that hold positive connote with you, then you're in for a big disappointment. The elite intellectuals of the EPA are going to see to it that you, me, and we are all going to "enjoy" jet powered aviation at a much higher cost, with a performance suite that is the rock bottom minimum necessary thrust component to keep us in the air. Sexy IS ain't what sexy WAS. Forty years ago, a typical non-stop 600 mile fliJht was comprised of a 727 which was really fast, really loud, and kicked out a little black exhaust trail behind her. If you went wheels up out of GSP, you'd be touching down in PHL in only slightly more than an hour. Today, hat same non-stop flight takes nearly two hours. Progress? I think not.
    Flying today is akin to animal husbandry. No longer considered to be urbane, or adventurous, it's torturous. We don't make out way to the gate, but rather, we are hearded there. We don't check in anymore, we're "processed," like so many head of cattle. And that big 'ole jet airplane....that Steve Miller sang of in 1974 has been supplanted by fleets of puny, new, slow (barely) jet airplanes. Here's a tip for you frequent flyers spending hundreds of hours vacuum packed in regional jets: there are more than a few single-engine turbo prop air craft in the general aviation/civil aviation world that regularly cruise at speeds considerably higher than the 350 knots cruising speed you'll max out at during your 1-3 hour flight in your CRJ. That's not to say that your CRJ can't outrun the GA turbo-prop, it's just not ALLOWED to, thanks to ATC and the FAA. It's all about traffic management and keeping them separated up there. The only chance you'll get to experience airspeeds of 500+ knots in a regional jet these days is if you're on a non-stopper with a 400+ mile distance spread b/t departure and destination (and if your flight plan takes you over lesser-congested air routes (vis a vis: out west). We are unwilling converts into the cult of man-caused climate change. It was fun while it lasted.

    • @waltonjackson5575
      @waltonjackson5575 10 лет назад +8

      if this is how you spend you free time, do you want come over and help me on some essays?

    • @sfsaviation
      @sfsaviation 6 лет назад

      Walton Jackson same

    • @bmhater1283
      @bmhater1283 4 года назад

      Goddamn, this comment speaks utter bullshit to me, Jesus fucking Christ...

  • @trek2g
    @trek2g 10 лет назад +31

    I watched this video "How a jet engine works" and I still don't know how a jet engine works.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 10 лет назад +11

      Yeah, it's misnamed. It doesn't really explain how jet engines work. A better title would be "How a certain company's new turbofan engines are better than anything that came before."
      (The name of the company of course, is very hard to detect from the video -- you have to look and listen very closely.)

    • @VijayPurbhe
      @VijayPurbhe 10 лет назад

      Captain Quirk The name is very hard to detect from the video? The narrator must have said "GE" at least a 100 times in this video.

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 10 лет назад +2

      Vijay Purbhe: Oh my God, do you not have ANY understanding of sarcasm or irony? Please, get thee to a dictionary -- right now!

    • @VijayPurbhe
      @VijayPurbhe 10 лет назад +1

      My bad, I am usually good at catching sarcasm but I had just finished watching Sheldon on BBT :-)

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 10 лет назад

      Vijay Purbhe Ah, well THERE'S yer problem! His extreme nerdiness is rubbing off on you! ;-)

  • @nelsonianb1289
    @nelsonianb1289 9 лет назад +6

    jet engines are similar to a human eating an xl burrito with lots of chopped up habanero peppers in it. air goes in, its compressed, heat is added for more oomf, propulsion occurs. BOOM

  • @slapnthface
    @slapnthface 10 лет назад +15

    Rolls Royce all the way!

    • @1984revision
      @1984revision 5 лет назад +1

      Yup, you got that right. A guy in airplane equipped with Rolls Royce engine pulls up to another airplane that is also equipped with Rolls Royce engine and said to him, " Excuse me, wouldn't you have a grey poupon?"

  • @fully_retractable
    @fully_retractable 11 лет назад +4

    just imagine what they were able to do with other parts of this amazing new engine

  • @GerardVaughan-qe7ml
    @GerardVaughan-qe7ml 10 лет назад +7

    Hurray ! - 0% bullshit !

  • @coastermania17
    @coastermania17 10 лет назад +3

    now imagine what they were able to do with other parts of this amazing new engine

  • @ashutoshsharma4797
    @ashutoshsharma4797 3 года назад +2

    Are these engines donot have pistons( or piston engines) which rotates the fans????
    Or how this engine start??? Is it just by burning fuel ????? Is no piston engine required to rotate the shaft???🤔🤔🤔🤔

    • @Grouuumpf
      @Grouuumpf 3 года назад +1

      on start up, you use an external power source like compressed air to spin the shaft. Once the air is flowing, you inject fuel and burn it, it expands fast and that drives the turbines (like a windmill) which drives the shafts on which the compressor and fan are attached

  • @holeskoj
    @holeskoj 10 лет назад +23

    This is just a long commercial.

    • @davidvance6367
      @davidvance6367 4 года назад

      holeskoj didn't tell me anything about jet propulsion

    • @vincef.8261
      @vincef.8261 4 года назад

      @@davidvance6367 it wasn't suppose to stupid!

  • @RCcrAzY1234
    @RCcrAzY1234 10 лет назад +15

    but NOBODY has ever explained why the fan spins....

    • @767Captain
      @767Captain 10 лет назад +6

      LOL!! Really?
      Assuming this wasn't just a joke....OK, look at the video again. at 0:55. See that the Fan ('N1') and the LPC (Low Pressure compressor) are attached to the same shaft? Then, farther back in the engine (at 1:55) is the LPT (Low pressure Turbine). These components are connected together front to back, and rotate together.
      The center components (HPC and HPT), where the higher compression takes place, and the hottest and most pressure of combustion, these are turning together, on concentric shafts.
      BTW, the engine is started by turning the "center" part (the 'N2'), and this has been done traditionally by compressed air (although the Boeing 787 uses an electric starter). As the N2 section begins to turn, the airflow it produces then causes N1 to turn...and the Fan of course.

    • @RCcrAzY1234
      @RCcrAzY1234 10 лет назад +4

      767Captain I still don't understand, are you saying the starter spins the main? shaft which spins the fans to pressurize the air and then that pressure keeps it going?

    • @dominik10007
      @dominik10007 10 лет назад +5

      RCcrAzY1234
      To start the process, an electric motor (starter) spins the blades, so the compressor starts to compress the air into the combustion chamber (compressed air is hot) where you add fuel. The mix ignites and the propulsion spins the turbine blades while exiting. Because turbine blades are conected to the compressor blades by a shaft, the propulsion turning the turbine is now turing the compressor as well. At that stage the electric motor is turned of and the jet engine is turning on its own.
      note: the compressore blades are in the front, turbine is in the back. But all are on the same shaft. The propulsion that spins the blades is pushing the engine forward when it exits in the back so it has two jobs, turning the engine and pushing the plane forward. Hope it helped.

    • @TheDustysix
      @TheDustysix 10 лет назад +1

      The spin is to inhale anyone who ignore's the danger. I was in an Intruder squadron with the P&W J-52-P8A/B. There is a fascinating video here that shows a Navy crewman getting too close. He was very lucky.

    • @TheDustysix
      @TheDustysix 10 лет назад +1

      TheDustysix A reciprocating engine uses mechanical energy that goes up and down and converts it to a rotating shaft. A turbine is already spinning, therefore no silly up and down. The whole jet engine theory, in the US, was when one looked at the schematics for the Lockheed P-38 and the Republic P-47, with there superchargers, turbochargers and intercoolers. The reciprocating engine merely got in the way. It is not necessary. In aviation, it gets tossed.

  • @quietwyatt2004
    @quietwyatt2004 8 лет назад +14

    Great so the cost of my airfare will also be reduced???

  • @sycx1
    @sycx1 10 лет назад +1

    I have never been able to afford the cars they show in commercials on T.V...
    But I'll take two of these engines. I have a shopping cart they might fit on.

  • @Ted-Striker
    @Ted-Striker 10 лет назад +10

    What Engine is it !? GE ?

    • @Milesco
      @Milesco 10 лет назад +1

      It's hard to tell from the video.

    • @byrysh
      @byrysh 7 лет назад

      they were being sarcastic.

    • @airplane3359
      @airplane3359 5 лет назад

      I love your movies ted striker

  • @rickbailey189
    @rickbailey189 2 года назад +1

    My challenge to the commercial airline engine manufacturers is this: to create a very powerful jet turbine engine which can easily and SAFELY break right through the sound barrier with as low friction and shaking as possible. Once this can be achieved Mach 1 or 2 and perhaps 3 could dramatically reduce travel time globally(internationally). The problem may then be the massive heat produced by the engine at speeds above Mach 1 or greater. Can the engine be cooled within the casing thus preventing overheating? How much bigger would the turbine need to be including the casing? Velocities which can top the speed of 1 time zone per hour would be great and closing in on 2 time zones per hour would be astoundingly amazing. Crossing the Atlantic Ocean bound for Europe in 2 hours from NYC or WDC to London or Paris would be quite an aviation feat. Indeed. SF or LAX to Tokyo in 5 or 6 hours would be fantastic.

  • @jette2001
    @jette2001 10 лет назад +10

    we're perfecting traveling in our own atmosphere. i wish i to be alive when we perfect space travel.

  • @sk88boarding
    @sk88boarding 9 лет назад +3

    what a waste of 3rd rendering i learned nothing

  • @mightymagnus
    @mightymagnus 10 лет назад +1

    Maybe it should be in the title that this is a sales commercial for GEnx rather than an educational movie... Btw, is it not the GEnx that stops working during thunderstorms? Think I prefer RR Trent XWB in that case (anybody that knows how this one is performing compare to GEnx in other ways?)

  • @timothyjohns3561
    @timothyjohns3561 11 лет назад +8

    "Imagine how much we've improved the REST of the engine.."
    Dude... stop saying that.... I don't have to imagine... you're about to tell me.

  • @BaghdadSon78
    @BaghdadSon78 10 лет назад +5

    They only thing one remember after this film is the "GE"....

  • @coorvahmuch
    @coorvahmuch 10 лет назад +7

    Not JET but TURBO FAN engine

    • @henryilagan7703
      @henryilagan7703 5 лет назад

      turbofans are jet engines

    • @vasiliostheodorou4849
      @vasiliostheodorou4849 5 лет назад +1

      Older model jet engines relied heavily on exhaust propulsion system (waste of fuel energy) instead an ergonomic design of higher bypass fan blade ratio, smooth lines, exhaust gasses elliptic motion and preferably cryogenic air cooling system. Definitely the lesser in number slower moving wider 3D S shaped fan blades is the ultimate in efficiency. Added with a silence system necessary to the majority of large jet engines. Excellent achievement enhanced by the new age materials and manufacturing techniques. Definitely a safer, eco friendly, reliable, economic, and quieter way to fly.

    • @daffidavit
      @daffidavit 5 лет назад

      @@vasiliostheodorou4849 Yep I agree. I even left my humble opinion "upstairs" before I read yours. It's the design of composite materials combined with large fan blades that simulate a propeller that has a special "three gear gizmo" that allows the energy to be safely transferred from the jet portion to the fanjet portion. The guy who designed the "transmission" should receive a Nobel prize, IMHO

  • @barlart
    @barlart 8 лет назад +12

    This isn't how a jet engine works, it's an ad. Rolls Royce are better in any event.

    • @nickmagee-brown739
      @nickmagee-brown739 8 лет назад

      lol. rolls royce. Their engines are terrible. GE or pratt and whitney arw far superior. Besides rolls royce are predicted to go out of business ince chinese perfect manufacturing as their engines are of such poor comparitive quality

    • @barlart
      @barlart 8 лет назад

      Nick Magee - Brown Laughs ;-) Are you a propagandist for the Chinese?

    • @snowballs442
      @snowballs442 8 лет назад

      Not on this side on the pond...GE works better

    • @nickmagee-brown739
      @nickmagee-brown739 8 лет назад

      ***** no need to worry. Rolls Royce are a tiny company and their engines will never see an american plane.

    • @jamesweigand7524
      @jamesweigand7524 8 лет назад

      suck squeeze bang blow. what makes you think Rolls Royce is better ? can you give us some time on wing or cycles between overhaul . what are you basing it on ? we have some pretty smart people HERE in US. and it is how one works(simplified for the public)

  • @calmingsxnity
    @calmingsxnity 11 лет назад +8

    Just wasted 13 minutes and 40 seconds of my life

  • @LateNightCable
    @LateNightCable 12 лет назад +1

    Correction. General Electric is the leading manufacturer of aircraft engines ( Rolls-Royce is second ) and dwarfs RR in every other way. GE also holds the record for world's most powerful commercial engine ( GE90-115B ), and the B747 utilizes engines not only from RR, but also Pratt & Whitney and GE, including the latest GEnx.

  • @Noble909
    @Noble909 11 лет назад +5

    This isn't how a jet engine works! It's a business presentation to persuade air line companies to purchase GE's new engine. ". . .your enginess?"

  • @maaadskills
    @maaadskills 10 лет назад +11

    this is a advert not how it works ???

    • @nemaikadil8
      @nemaikadil8 5 лет назад +1

      Exactly. I'm not going to buy one.

  • @dandee6894
    @dandee6894 10 лет назад +4

    This sounds like a prepaid commercial, but for who, us? Ok I will order a couple of these engines for my bike.