The Right To BEAR Arms
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- The Supreme Court will soon decide whether the government must let residents carry guns.
----
So you don’t miss the weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: johnstossel.ac...
----
I once tried to get a carry permit in NYC. They didn’t make it easy. They required pages and pages of forms, notarization, records of death threats I'd received, and two trips to police headquarters.
The whole process took 8.5 months.
The result: DENIED.
But the Supreme Court will now hear a case brought by two other New Yorkers who couldn't get a permit. Alan Gottlieb, of the 2nd Amendment Foundation, is optimistic that the court will rule in favor of gun rights.
Will that mean more guns on the street, and therefore increase crime?
You can find out more in the video above.
AND, we shouldn't have to pay to get a permit. Our permit IS the 2nd Amendment.
Exactly. What part about "shall not be infringed" do they not understand?
@@stolenhal0 I'd say every word.
If liberals treated the right to keep and bear arms like the right to vote then they would deliver firearms to every person in the country with no identification required.
Always remember that our founding fathers had mortars and cannons and mines and meant for those to be included in the second amendment as well. That's why they said ARMS and not guns. It's the right to bare ARMS not the right to bare rifles! You can go to Boston today and visit the Paul Revere house where they proudly display one of his mortars that he made right next to one of his bells that were made in his same foundry.
@@stolenhal0 yes every person has a right to hang a pair of bear arms on their wall I don’t see how people could misconstrue that 😅
-family guy
“You don’t need 30 rounds to hunt.” True…but our forefathers didn’t write the 2nd Amendment because the deer were coming.
If I recall correctly, the response to that statement was “if you have a problem with citizens having 30 round magazines, you’re a terrible politician”.
I do for hunting hogs. And I do when the angry mob wants to loot my store. If you trust me with 10 rounds, 30 is no different.
You definitely need more than 30 if you're hunting hogs in texas
They also didn't write the First Amendment when there was the internet, radio, television, telephones, even typewriters. Yet free speech extends to all of these. I mean, unless you say or write something that's not woke enough.
That is said by someone who has never had the pleasure of hunting feral hogs from a helicopter (which, by the way, is one of the most American things a person can possibly do).
Of course you are correct - the real reason for high capacity magazines is because Congress has over 300 members (and more than 2 millions bureaucrats on federal payroll).
"Women will be less safe when there are more guns."
Have they tried carrying a gun?
it's the great equalizer. A man doesn't need any weapon to do/take whatever to/from most women. Even the smallest woman can stop the largest man when she has a pistol. Crazy that people wouldn't want their mothers/daughters to be safe
@@MannyDer very well stated. Guns allow women to defend themselves in situations where they would be otherwise helplessly overpowered by larger men.
I see it the opposite way... women will be more safe when carrying a gun. Why do you think it is less safe?
More guns create a bigger safty inequality between those who have them and don't, but still raises the safty of all citizens
! !
! !
That statement assumes that when a law-abiding man decides to carry a gun he also decides to become a rapist.
A smart man said; When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
TJ said
You think the 1tn$/yr military would fear your handgun and your fat belly?
@@d3r4g45 they actually don’t know what we have in our arsenal
@@d3r4g45 fat belly? You know joe personally? You actually have no clue about the MAC
Revolution and marshal law
Saying you cant own a gun because there is police, is like saying you can't own a fire extinguisher because there is a fire department.
When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
@@DianeMerriam I need a T-shirt with this on it.
If someone bursts in your house at 3 am. the police will get there to trace your body in chalk.
Especially when its a High Capacity Fire Extinguisher capable of putting out a RIOT like Wild Fire.
If people are robbing liquor stores and mugging old ladies with fire extinguishers, that would be perfectly reasonable.
If we wanted to be like Europe ... we wouldn't have escaped from Europe.
lol right. Europe has been trying to imitate America for the last century. What happened? why did we switch?
During the middle ages, many of the nobility petitioned for banning of crossbows. Nothing has changed in thousands of years.
Or saved Europe from other Europeans.
Lol I see the protests against Covid1984 in Britain and I ask "hey Brits, *NOW* do you understand why we had a revolution and broke away from you?
Yea Britain, France, Italy, etc made it so hard and impossible to leave
Society is safer when criminals don't know who's armed.
Proven over and over, but the people in bureaucracy don't want safety for citizens they want whatever gets them more power and authority.
I'm 64 and I live in Arizona, and up until everybody and their brother decided to move here we had no gun crime to speak of. Everybody was aware that most folks intend on defending themselves whether with a sidearm or a pocket pistol...don't start no shit, there'll be no shit! Most bars had cubby holes where the bartender would store your sidearm while you were quenching your thirst, upon your exodus it be returned to you and don't dilly dally, pay up and go. Worked for decades, til some leftist liberal from somewhere else wanted to fuck it all up. Used to be the only places you couldn't carry was a bank and a courthouse!
The criminals are, also, the tyrants! Correct!?
Amen
Society is safer, and better off, when liberals aren’t elected. Look at any large city run (ruined) by them.😒
Violent crime actually skyrocketed in brazil when the govt took the arms from the people, I think they forgot that criminals don't get their guns from a store.
Scary to think 5 unelected officials could strip every single American of the right to defend themselves.
You mean privilege? (Owning a gun is a privilege)
@@AlarakTheHighLord yes privilege is the word in the constitution 😑
@Jared - That there is fudd talk.
With how American "democracy" is done is it any different if it elected officials?
@@AlarakTheHighLord It's a right, not a privilege. Driving is a privilege.
The last true journalist left!!!
There's at least one more.. Ben Swann... though I haven't seen much from him lately.
You missed project veritas
One of the few normie journalists left, yeah. Most "real" journalists sadly fall under conspiracy types. The last american vagabond, corbettereport, folk like them report on sht you wont ever hear about
Lol
@@jakek584265 they just expose people mostly. They don't report on stories like this. But I love them too
A person who proclaims they are anti-gun is only telling the world their life is so comfortable, they have never been confronted with violence.
To me John Stossel is one of the most interesting brilliant honest intriguing and fascinating reporter there is.
Except when he’s trying to tell a WWE wrestler that he believes wrestling is fake. Hey may have wished he had a gun that day to protect himself.
In a way, John Stossel is continuing the work of economist Milton Friedman, who, together with his wife, Rose, wrote a book "Free to Choose" and hosted a series of TV programs of the same name, shown on PBS. There is an excellent opportunity for a new group of politicians to adopt concepts expressed in the Stossel series, slash the cost of government and make our country a better place to live.
Government programs always have some goal to improve the social good. The first thing we learn is that making a law prohibiting something doesn't stop people from doing it. This video is on guns but the concept also applies to illegal drugs, covered in a different video. Prohibition didn't stop consumption of alcohol. So, the bad thing still goes on but now it is a crime and we have all the problems caused by criminal activity. Then we have government officials whose livelihood depends on enforcing the laws. If the laws are abolished, they will have to find new jobs. So, they promise to work hard to win the "war on drugs", knowing full well that they would be out of work if they could win, but also knowing that they aren't going to win. The free market is just too powerful and will function even if the activity must be concealed from law enforcement.
As long as there is no punishment for crime u need more guns the government lunatics cause their own problems
"It's a big club and you ain't in it"
George Carlin
Same in NJ but even worse than NYC, unless you are a politician, or very connected with them, you aren't getting one. Even worse the police don't get to decide, it is up to the county judge. BTW the judges in NJ are cart blanche in terms of carry ability. It is also illegal to publish the address of a judge, cop, or politician in the state (how is this not a 1st amendment violation? not that NJ has ever cared about that) , however no issue to do the same for any other public or private person.
A quote from Carlin that I quite like is
"It's all bullshit folks"
I never understood the "big" part. The club is demonstrably small in numbers, which is the natural way I read that.
Carlin also refers to gun enthusiasts as wiener-less lunatics...so yeah I highly doubt he'd be on your side
"A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." -George Washington
the first step to creating a tyrannical government is to disarm the populace.
@@tannerrich2388 just look at Canada for proof.
Under the Geneva convention: it is an act of war to disarm a populace.
Do you have documentation for that quote?
@@erickolb8581 is it really? GOOGLE TIME
If you lose your right to bear arms, you have lost America to tyranny. I'm an Indian and I want to have the right to bear arms
Today, the supreme court overturned that NY BS 👍
"There are no dangerous weapons, only dangerous men." - Robert A. Heinlein
"Guns don't kill people, the government does." -Dale Gribble from King of the Hill
"The only good bug, is a dead bug."
Gottlieb's comment that an armed society is a polite society was also a Robert Heinlein quote.
"Guns don't kell people, I do."
- Earl Ramsey
Quote is from Starship Troopers, btw. It's what Sergeant Zim says to Hendrick when he asks why he and the other recruits need to learn hand-to-hand combat when they have "dangerous weapons" like nukes and machine guns they can use instead.
Shall NOT be infringed yet arguably the most important amendment is infringed routinely.
In California they make you take a test before you can own a gun. My wife and I got tired of the DNCCP and moved away. If you like slavery folks, vote for the party that fought and died to preserve it.
Without the 2nd ammendment all other rights will fall.
Only because we DONT FIGHT BACK AGAINST CRIMINAL TYRANTS IN BLUE!
Always remember that our founding fathers had mortars and cannons and mines and meant for those to be included in the second amendment as well. That's why they said ARMS and not guns. It's the right to bare ARMS not the right to bare rifles! You can go to Boston today and visit the Paul Revere house where they proudly display one of his mortars that he made right next to one of his bells that were made in his same foundry.
@@davidscott5903 👍💘🇺🇲💘👍
If handguns made you less safe, then the military and police wouldn't have them.
Strange how that works, right?
Most military bases are gun free zones to my knowledge
Neither would anti-gun politicians and their bodyguards.
@@kevinclause4p55p5 And that worked really well in cases like Fort Hood in 2009...I mean for the killer.
@First Last The police in Australia and the UK do carry guns. At least since they started handing out fines for not wearing masks.
The military is the first line of defense, The people's second line. This is America.
the citizen was the military, and the first line of defense. Founders didnt want us to have to pay for a standing military in the first place, thus the national guard was established way before the armed forces.
That depends on the enemy ... when the enemy is a tyrannical government, the military may be the offense, making the citizen, the first line of defense.
It's not exactly more guns, it's more guns in law-abiding hands. They say they want to reduce guns but with laws they won't reduce guns in criminal hands.
The media is a big problem. Notice they don’t report on the use of illegal guns for crimes in this country. People are so brainwashed these days that they actually give up their rights to this greedy, murderous, corrupt government. Even when Trump was in office (the one they called literally Hitler) they wanted to get rid of guns. I don’t understand it. 🤷🏻♀️
The fact that you people keep bringing up this criminal crap is how the guns are being restricted. This nation was founded by criminals and that is exactly who the 2nd meant to protect from losing access to guns.
@@chasthanhburns123 When a government goes off the rails, all freedom-loving people become criminals. So yeah.
It’s a God-Given Constitutionally protected right, not a privilege, every law-abiding American citizen has a right and duty to be armed at all times.
The founding fathers made their intent for the 2nd Amendment very clear, not only through the Amendment itself but also through statements they made before the constitution was ratified.
America, don’t make the same mistake my nation and so many others have, don’t ever let them take your rights away!
Thanks brother. It seems only those who know our history know the real danger of gun laws.
There's a country in Europe where everyone is given a rifle by the gov. Not sure if it's Sweden or Switzerland.
@@leapfrog4561 Switzerland
They aren't taking a damn thing from us.
Lmao. We have so many more useful rights than Americans. Like the right to paid holiday (vacation), paid medical care, paid maternity and paternity, pension contributions from employers, paid sick days, etc, etc. I never needed or will ever need a gun. I'd rather have rights that benefit me and my family, and we have plenty more of those than Americans.
I've always felt gun knowledge and safety should be part of EVERY school curriculum starting at a young age. It builds respect and kids know not to ever point a gun at another human or creature. My dad taught me gun safety at age 8 and let me shoot a single shot 22 at that age. KNOWLEDGE SAVES LIVES
Dude...I was hunting deer with a 20ga shotgun at age 8!!!! I killed my first deer at 5. My son killed his first one at age 6. My kids can put a full 8 rounds in a target at 21 feet with a 380 pistol and they aren't even in middle school yet! My house is littered with guns, yet no one has ever been hurt by one!
Gun education is KEY to preventing accidents. I have always been around guns, and so have my kids. There is no temptation to fool around with them because they have shot every single one of them and know what they do.
Around my area, we buy our kids guns and knives for Christmas presents!!!
Exactly well and get informed about guns and talk to people those that grew up shooting and those that never seen a gun except in movie or on cops hip. The amount of ignorance and misinformation they have is appalling. I grew up in little rural town shooting was the normal. 2-3 trucks with gun rack and a gun or two at school. Our version of ditching to go to mall was ditching and going shooting. Then I moved to California for job and friends there were freaked out.
Topic came up they found out I had guns in gun safe in house. And the shit they believed was appalling like when they found out it was semi auto they thought that mean't I had machine gun and all sorts of stuff. Convinced them to just go to gun range taught them basics. Every single one did 180 on policy/feelings toward guns there was 5 and 3 went from against guns to getting own 2 went from against guns to ok with them.
To them since they were so taboo scary thought guns would just start gunning people down on own. And its as stossel said simply having gun is a deterrent had several of friends never have to fire. But defend themselves not counted in defense statistics like one was brothers wife jogging. Had creeper try to actually grab her was following her then hid in bushes jumped out and had a gun in his face. It was dark and dude ran so fast she had zero information so what is she going to do call cops a person I think a guy in hoodie unknown race and height jumped me. Risk getting shot by cops perhaps have them find fault in defense use charge her with something definitely confiscate gun for a while.
Meanwhile they are excluding not only self defense like this but animals are not included which rural this is much more prevalent especially herd farmers. Of course police or security not included. All sorts of loopholes to under represent it.
Then you look at gun deaths in anti gun states they include fucking soldiers killed overseas. Criminals shot by cops even instances of self defense. Then use that to claim need for more gun control. Yet when questioned about why their state has higher gun crimes they say its other states fault. While glossing over things like some of biggest claims are illegal like most states wont sell to out of state person. The ole gunshow loophole you can find liberal and conservatives "try" to use it and surprise surprise they won't sell without background check. Even see attempted private sellers kicked out as these events are ran by licensed dealers that don't want to lose license. Shit go to regular gun store and you see them at leas 2-3 times a day outright refuse to sell to people giving bad vibe. Background check be damned.
But yeah they will never start shooting class again at schools because it would normalize guns make them a less scary boogeyman. Despite probably lowering gun deaths simply by preventing untrained people encountering firearms at home or friends home. Because while they claim its about lives saved it is ANYTHING BUT lifes that matter to them. In a world where most countrys made it illegal and its "scary thing" to the uninitiated. It serves multiple purposes makes us look bad it attacks portion of political opponents funding. And serves to create unending agenda. Seriously if you piecemeal it like this its easy. Hell look at new york and magazine capacity at first it was 10 round then 7 then pushed for 5 before supreme court rolled it back to 10. Then all other various there will always be things to add to background checks more barriers to get license etc.
No. It's the PARENTS job to teach children gun control. Stop asking the government to raise the children.
Utah just passed a law this year allowing Gun Safety classes to be part of the school curriculum.
@@jackieblue787 Its not about "raising them" . Its ensuring every kid has opportunity to learn in spite of parents. And to teach what parents can't more parents are qualified to teach about english/math than guns. Hell half likely haven't seen one in person. And as libbys say all the time "if it only saves one life".
"Shall not be infringed", yet there's been countless infringements during my lifetime alone...
"We are the laughing stock of the world"
Why should we care about that?
The governments ridicule, their people crave our freedom, or at least the idea of the freedom we are promised, but struggling to regain.
Yet so many risk their lives every year to come here.
The only people in other countries who are laughing are the 🐑 who already lost their rights to their government.
It’s sad really, they know no better.
“We are the laughing stock of the world”
It’s like one of those moments when you are in the right but everyone else is siding with the wrong person and they all gang up on you. I laugh at Sweden because they are the rape and shooting capital of Europe despite having strict gun laws. I also laugh at China where the people have 0 rights and are treated as property of the state and then fed propaganda that says otherwise. I think it’s pathetic to not be willing to fight for your rights
@@KalonOrdona2 I think people laugh is because exactly people like you who thinks people craving for American freedom ( which shit) you have more nonsense law then anyone other country. People who like America are mostly because of fantasy idea of it. America has good in many aspects but people laughing as flaw not perfection. And yes you have gun control problem, as stossal already said nobody made one good gun law.also you already have gun control. You have two party one bent against free owner ship and other bent on uncheck owner ship.
The next topic should be why gun-free zones are a paradise for mass shootings.
I live in mexico guns are ilegal and cartels members are the masters of the country they do what ever they whant and they have no fear because the police and we the citizens are harmless sheeps just hoping we dont get in their way
@@54321steel I wish every (US) American could hear you say that before they give their rights away. Thanks for the insight.
@@54321steel Yeah doesn't help that those cartels get most of their weapons from a certain gun loving neighbor country.
@@IagoGaraitz Weapons that are "outlawed" to cross the border fyi ;)
It's not because of fhe gun free zones themselves though. It's because those areas have a high density of people
The same party that says "Guns are useless against the government who has tanks and fighters" also raised a shitfit because an unarmed mob nearly overthrew them on January 6th.
Well, they are being dramatic and _acting_ as if an unarmed mob almost over threw them. All the mob did was interrupt them for a little while.
In all honesty, if the mob hadn't gone away, Capitol Police and DC National Guard would have eventually been used to put an end to it.
@@THall-vi8cp But not before they killed AOC and paraded her head around on a pike.
@@briant7265 Yeah, that was never even close to happening.
This is true a "mob" of armed but largely peaceful "protesters" has been destroying Portland OR, economically and politically, for over a year but you have to watch guys like Tim Poole and Andy Gno to find out about that.
@@steelheron1309 Is reality really that fucked up? That was sarcasm dude.
3:13 I'm from Australia, and I am one of those people who wishes I had the same self-defence rights as Americans.
I know of at least one case here where someone was arrested for having a water pistol in the back seat of his car, because he'd stuck an under-barrel light on it. Made it too "tactical".
It's nuts here, but when the laws are written by people who are both completely ignorant and completely paranoid about a subject, what else would you expect?
Come to America 😂 we will welcome you
In Australia, those without pistols are called victims
@@M8Military If i may add to that, not just in Australia, that's true anywhere in the world, anywhere.
The anti-gun people should post a "Gun Free Zone" sign on the outside of their homes
I saw that one time where two next-door neighbors were feuding over this issue. The gun owner posted a huge sign in his yard pointing next door telling everyone his neighbor didn't believe in gun ownership. Nice move!
@@PrinceRN I'm going to start an Anti-Gun youtube channel. I'm going to sell a bunch of merch, like like giant yard signs saying that they believe no one should be allowed to own a gun and shirts saying concealed carry should be illegal. I guarantee you that the survivors will change their mind about gun ownership.
Good idea. Just to let everyone know their stance on the issue. Lol
Also bumperstickers on their Prius.
I have a problem saying "government let the people". The government is supposed to be the people. When did we become a dictatorship?
I would have said 2008 when the first Ammendment died, although you could make an argument that it died when the NFA was passed.
@Arsh K you're off by a few years, that pos Woodrow Wilson takes that prize.
1861, worst president in history was elected by a people who forgot the type of government we fought against in 1776
Protect yourself. Learn responsible gun safety and carry a weapon.
Leave my arms alone
Let's remember, the people we don't want carrying guns already carry them. It's the good guys who don't get to carry.
"..., The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." - The 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This has to be as unambiguous as any other statement ever printed!
Founding Fathers: There's no way anyone could misinterpret this
Impractical Jokers: WWWWEEEELLLLLLLLLLL
The government could restrict each household to 1 rifle and 1 handgun 10 round max.... and not break the 2nd ammendment. Stop crying.
@@zuzupetals4794 Actually, it’s still an infringement since the government is setting a limit on the number of firearms and ammunition a citizen could own.
@@zuzupetals4794 everyone one of those is breaking the 2nd, "shall not be infringed" each one is infringing on my right so your wrong
@@willcruz943 .. no, you do not have the right to an arsenal... 1 hunting gun ,1 sidearm... that covers 2a.... we are petitioning for this exact law.
When everyone is armed, we are all equal. They scream for equality, well there you go!
"God made man; Mr. Colt made them equal."
@@Devastish Colonel Colt. He was made a Colonel in the Connecticut Volunteers in 1861 although he had just sold a large number of revolvers to the Confederacy.
And when being armed is illegal, only criminals are armed
Some are more equal than others . . .
When seconds count the police are minutes away.
30+ minutes away.
The statistics are undeniable. The incidence of violent crime in the US is much higher in heavily gun controlled cities.
I don't think that's due to the gun laws, but it does show that they're not really effective. What would really decrease gun violence is legalizing drugs, ending poverty, and universal healthcare.
@@austinhernandez2716 - It's not "gun violence". It's violence. Ban guns and another tool is used to commit violence. The UK banned guns and now they've banned knives and people are throwing acid in other people's faces, or smashing a pint of Guineas and attacking people with the broken glass. "Gun violence" is a term used by those with a politically driven agenda to disarm citizens so only the government has guns.
Most assault occurs using hands, feet, or blunt objects but we seldom hear "hand violence" or "foot violence" or "hammer violence" or "pipe violence". Control how people talk and you control how they think... and that controls how they vote.
Urban crime is much more complicated than guns, or gun control laws. However, it's important to realize that the politicians pushing gun control are the ones whose policies cause the violence, so their policies should be rejected as possible solutions. Their policies cause crime, then they exploit the crime they caused to disarm citizens which increases the crime, so they're able to push more gun control. It's time to emulate political systems that produce less poverty and less crime, and those are the places with no gun control laws.
@@Liberty4Ever I know that... I never advocated for gun control.
@@austinhernandez2716
Allow people to carry a gun and loosen the laws, and actually FUND the police.
Then you'll see crime shrink
@@CraftyMiscreant Sorry but that's not true at all. That has nothing to do with gun violence. The states with the loosest gun laws are also the states with the highest rate of gun crime. You are factually incorrect.
“An armed society is a polite society.” Certainly lots of truth in that statement.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life." -Robert A. Heinlein
America is a well armed society and isn't any more polite than anywhere else. LOL
Canada is not armed (anywhere like the USA) and we're arguably one of the politest societies on earth.
@@JJs_playground I lived in Montreal one summer and NEVER even saw anybody get into an argument, much less a fight.
@@SenorJuan2023
True. Way too many DemocRATs running around...
This is sick, we need more John Stossels, and may god help us.
Always remember that our founding fathers had mortars and cannons and mines and meant for those to be included in the second amendment as well. That's why they said ARMS and not guns. It's the right to bare ARMS not the right to bare rifles! You can go to Boston today and visit the Paul Revere house where they proudly display one of his mortars that he made right next to one of his bells that were made in his same foundry.
@fosterpainter
I know you are but what am I!
I just like pretending to be a liberal sometimes. 🤣🤣🤣
Have a fine day sir!
@fosterpainter If you think that, then you don't understand the issue. There was never a constitutional right to arms as you're defining it. Private citizens were never allowed to have mortars or cannons and other such weapons. The restrictions were pretty much immediate.
Loved the dude drawing down on those perps with his AR!
Is that the "AR14" joe Biden was talking about? 🤔
Ironically the parkland shooter that everyone blamed like the media and hoggins that guns are the problem, yet the kid goes savage in prison and attacks a security gaurd no gun needed. Soooooo
Armed citizens remain free citizens.
Armed citizens don't willingly march into railbox cars and into concentration camps.
They do if you promise them free tee shirts.
Boom I think Hitler had to take up the guns due to public safety huh sounds familiar
@@jamescrawford5567 well not really, alot of brainwashed people just freely handed over their guns..
@@GCEXTREMEMN you should only hand over your guns bullets first
@@jamescrawford5567 of course. Theyll never take my guns or mags
People that are afraid of law abiding citizens with guns must be thinking of doing something criminal to someone!
Those mom's against guns raised their little shits so bad their kids got shot acting gangsta and now they blame the tool, not the kids or themselves for being shit parents.
Or they could be afraid, that like most human beings, gun owners will get lazy. They could be afraid of how humans often jump to conclusions, and side with their precious little feelings, and how deadly that is with a person who's armed. But that's some nice ass generalization to justify your stance. You should definitely be a gun owner.
SIGH Fuckin SIGH!! We will never evolve. We will never fucking grow. Same stupidity over and over.
@@MjolnirsPower yeah tragedies will occur, bad people will get guns and commit evil acts, but I'd rather a 5'0" girl be able to defend herself with a gun than go toe to toe with a 6'4" grown man trying to rape her and she's only got a purse because someone took her constitutional right to a gun away. I'm willing to bet way more rapes occur than psychos commit mass shootings? So the greater good is to arm good people, not disarm them... Especially now that we're defunding the police and releasing rapists into the streets with no bail because bail and jail are racist? Just let them grape?
@@alphaspartan What if scenarios are always a fail means of arguing, there's always a counter what if, that takes these things into silly directions. For example.... How about the 5' girl is drunk off her head, and the 6'4 is just trying to help her up and into a cab, in her drunken stupor she thinks wrong and he ends up dead for trying to help her. What's that, a "tragedy that occurred"? Painting a scenario just so you can argue for it doesn't work
@@MjolnirsPower yes that would be a tragedy and I stand by my comments that it's much more likely someone will be the victim of rape than an accident like that occur or a psycho snap and kill indiscriminately. I have heard numbers like 1/2 of women are sexually assaulted? Would that same woman be assaulted if the perp was worried about getting his balls blown off? I doubt it. In fact there's a very strong correlation between violent crime dropping dramatically and gun rights expanding.
I taught 25 years at a private bilingual school which has grown enormous over the years. Not one child has ever been shot. As a teacher, I had one scholarship so both our children studied there and two of our grandsons do now so I drove past many armed guards and still do. I never saw one of those guards draw his gun. The school I mention is in El Salvador, which may have just lost its recognition as the most violent country in the world. Even during twelve years of what I call Civil War, I don’t think there was even one school shooting. Most schools, especially “escuelas” in poor neighborhoods, have walls and just one entrance. I bought my house during the war years and it has a terrific wall my brother in law built.
Tennessee started with you going down to DMV and filling out the proper paperwork, paying the fee, and taking a class, then it went to just filling out a form online, and now we're a constitutional carry state. I love Tennessee.
I've been thinking of moving there. Problem is, everybody else in the country seems to want to move there too, housing prices keep going up in the cities I'm looking at (Chattanooga and Knoxville).
@@nothanks3236I agree. I'm originally from about 20 minutes outside Nashville. The housing market and traffic has just gotten ridiculous these past few years.
The parliament of the Czech Republic is close to elevating right to carry and defend with a gun from a law to a constitutional human right.
Awesome.
And still the Czechs won’t be armed. I haven’t been around the entire world yet, but the Czechs are the most gun adverse I’ve met so far. Not much danger to find in CZ in order to need a gun, or a hunting culture which habituates children to gun safety. All of my Czech friends are very much anti gun, never even touched one, let alone shot one.
@@kasisoot
It's unfortunate that they don't understand how gun ownership can protect you.
Awesome; I wonder what’s the violent crime rate there?
@@SuperMixedd Violent crime in CZ is one of the lowest in the world, comparable to Switzerland or Norway. Homicide rate is half compared to Denmark, for example.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes."
- Cesare Beccaria
Wow, that is a fantastic quote. Thank you.
The criminal fears not the police,judge,or jury. So what they must be made to fear is their victim.
@@scottfeltner6066 Fantastic quote! I found the original source.
"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - Lt. Col. Jeff Cooper, USMC
Great reporting as usual. This helps non-2a people understand the plight that gun owners endure when debating gun control. The restrictions are never applied unilaterally. It always hurts the average law abiding citizen the hardest. And of course it usually doesn’t do anything to stop criminals who would never follow these restrictions.
I can’t comprehend why local governments are allowed to have a take in the 2nd amendment. You shouldn’t even be required to carry a permit to carry a pistol.
Presumably to add another layer of government protection. Imagine if your state ignored the 2nd and outright banned firearms. but your city said "no" and allowed it through local authorities? The opposite may also be true, but local levels of government should have more power, not less.
@WorldFlex the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Apparently, you don't know the definition of infringed, but don't feel bad, politicians and Supreme Court Justices don't either.
I looked it up for you. Here's the definition.
1. the action of breaking the terms of a law, agreement, etc.; violation.
2. act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on
Any gun law or regulation is by definition an infringement and a violation of the 2nd amendment (unconstitutional).
The constitution is the law of the land for the whole country (it supercedes any local law or state constitution) and the 2nd amendment has not been amended to allow for the implementation of gun laws and regulations.
Well, yeah it is. You like to twist the meaning of words to fit your preferences, you should look into a career in politics.
Move to a state that respects your right to carry a pistol. It’s literally in your best interest.
"Whether the government must let residents carry a handgun in public." Is the same as "whether the government must allow citizens 'the right to bear arms' in public." The answer is yes, very clearly yes.
Always remember that our founding fathers had mortars and cannons and mines and meant for those to be included in the second amendment as well. That's why they said ARMS and not guns. It's the right to bare ARMS not the right to bare rifles! You can go to Boston today and visit the Paul Revere house where they proudly display one of his mortars that he made right next to one of his bells that were made in his same foundry.
You should rephrase that, "The Government" was expressly FORBIDDEN any say in the matter and in reality is incapable of preventing "the people" from keeping and bearing arms. Don't believe it? Look at the news, how many violent criminals or lunatics has their denying them "permission" to have the guns that they use on a daily basis prevented them from having those guns? They may arrest them after the fact but are totally incapable of stopping them.
this never had been an issue untel modern time back in the 1800s everyone walked around with a gun
and don't ever forget, when someone is threating your life and every second counts the police are only minutes away
@@punker4Real A mere hundred years ago getting dressed to go out on a Saturday night involved putting a handkerchief in your breast pocket and a gun in your hip pocket. Not to look for trouble but to be able to respond to trouble. More civilized times in the Roaring 20's.
"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." More guns, less crime. "An armed society is a polite society."
All three statements are wrong.
@@userhome3601 Wrong.
@@userhome3601 Prove it!
@@userhome3601 I just want a fair explaination. No judgement. Just a reason why you feel that way.
I feel there's a reason these mass shooters target "gun free" zones. I believe having armed teachers would protect our children. We protect our banks, stores, government facilities and high profile people with firearms but fail to protect our children in the same manner.
Always remember that our founding fathers had mortars and cannons and mines and meant for those to be included in the second amendment as well. That's why they said ARMS and not guns. It's the right to bare ARMS not the right to bare rifles! You can go to Boston today and visit the Paul Revere house where they proudly display one of his mortars that he made right next to one of his bells that were made in his same foundry. Our founding fathers were not hypocrites that demanded one type of Armament for themselves and a lesser type for the peasants!
"An armed society is a polite society."
Robert A. Heinlein
Use the whole quote, it makes a difference.
“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.”
The difference is....
“A community where everyone is a ruthless murderer, with handy access to death-dealing devices, is a very polite community.”
@@ocelblack9823 Ah, another Heinlein fan.
"Never depend on a man's better angels, he may not have any."
AMEN - a lot more self reflection before getting shitty with a stranger .... personally im all for it
Chicago and other big cities should lift their bans on guns, encourage citizens begin to protect themselves, and watch crime rates drop.
Ya. I think allowing citizens where police failed. Good idea but I think cop might start shooting more "some people" because they might be carrying gun.
The fact that the second amendment is subject to unconstitutional fees (akin to voter suppression via a poll tax) is EXTREMELY infuriating.
Gun taxation and fees are a violation of the 9th amendment.
Just remember everyone, the Police are under no obligation to protect you.
True!
See Warren v. District of Columbia
The most common jobs for police are to write tickets and to write reports for insurance purposes.
@@cynthiaellis5716 the job of the police is to apprehend suspects. There's nothing they can do before a crime is committed. Up until then no law has been broken. After that we have victims and perpetrators though. Personally I don't want to be either.
@@1pcfred now if we could only get prosecutors to do their jobs. That might incentivise the police to apprehend suspects. As it stands in my neck of the woods, police do less than they used to because the criminals don't get punished. Catch and release is a bad way to fish for someone who hasn't eaten in days.
"No more silence, end gun violence."
Well, I welcome you to move to Latin America where there are the strictest gun laws and TONS of gun violence.
I'm from Chile, a country with very strict gun control laws and yet way less murders and violent crimes than the US.
2 years ago one of your countrymen feel theatened by a group of protesters and decided to get off his car and shoot at them. He though he had a right to do that even when there's no such thing as concealed carry here and he wasn't in a any real danger. He was rightfully condemned as a muderous psycopath and is now in jail.
@@tranzilla213 gun crimes in the US are 90% drug/gang related. And you're too poor to even buy one, so stfu.
@@tranzilla213 Chile is also a country which was also under the control of an insane dictator for years. Maybe there wouldn't have been so many helicopter rides if the Chilean people had the right to keep and bear arms
@@seangilbert7365 a dictatorship supported by the US, but let's not get too political, shall we?
@@tranzilla213
So the US government tried to overthrow a democratically elected leader to instill a tyrannical government, so the US citezens font need guns anymore to fight a tyrannical government? Most US citezens want to defund the military, fyi. There are over 50 million gun owners, so who's the military for?
I know I feel safer with my concealed carry. The world can laugh all they want, I’m not going to be a victim.
Practice, practice , practice. And maintain situational awareness at ALL times. From leaving your house to pumping gas.
Be alert, be ready and God bless.
🍺
On occasion, I have been known to carry 3 concealed pistols.
@@bungholeshagnasty Do you wear a belt and suspenders too? D'ah!
The world won't always see it that way
“There’s no shame in deterrence having a weapon is very different than actually using it”
- Ghandi
Ok? Lol great job sounding edgy lady
There's no point in having a weapon if you aren't willing to use it.
@@jamescollier9196 That was not point of the quote.
@@jamescollier9196 Difference in willing and actually using. What Ghandis point was is there is nothing wrong in having a weapon which will deter people from attacking you. And that the ownership of a weapon is very different from actually using the weapon, somthing lost on modern lefties who think you own a gun your a violent psychopath.
In armed self defense, it is usually the POTENTIAL of firing the gun which ends the threat. So I'd say that that person has used his weapon, without firing a shot. Obviously though, if your attacker charges down the barrel of a gun, you had better be willing to follow through.
I guess “shall not be infringed” is a bit hard for some people to understand…
Stossel should have atleast 10 million subs.
Im so sick and tired of members of the political duopoly, being clueless of the world around them.
"the right of the people to KEEP and BEAR arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." seems pretty unequivocal.
But we will run out of keep and Bears. They don't reproduce that often
I was talking to a lawyer about that. He said the phrase "shall not" is not definitive. I was stunned. They need to teach the constitution and the english language in law school.
@@nooneyouknowhere6148 well, lawyers are known to engage in interesting mental gymnastics in pursuit of their goals.
Left out the part....well regulated
@@armanddefrank7984 well regulated means: equipped and proficient in the use of your equipment. All men in this country are expected to have a military grade weapon and ammunition, be proficient in its use, and ready to go if called upon to form the militia.
Wow. A true journalist that does research and follows the data, not trying to advocate their own prejudice.
George Washington and Thomas Jefferson got pistol permits. They didn't want to offend the King
Yeah and the guys at Lexington and Concord too.
George Washington didn’t need a permit. He was a colonel in the British Army. He had to be armed because it was his job.
"It should be easier to Vote than to get a gun."
Have they tried before saying that?
Yeah, voting doesn’t require your height, weight, sex, date of birth, country of origin, that you haven’t been in a mental hospital, haven’t committed domestic violence, don’t use illegal drugs, have never renounced your citizenship, and a number of other things I forget. They have no idea.
Our Founding Fathers Were Wise.
Second amendment will stay.
I once lived in an unsafe place where only criminals had guns (Chicago). I now live in a much safer place where the guns outnumber the people and we all carry (Indiana).
Yah in LA county it's almost impossible, thats why as of July 24th I will be a resident of TN. Escrow closes 20th and I am done with CA. Soo long
Congratulations on your dscape.
Just please don't vote progressive policies into TN. Keep it conservative up in this bizich.
@@alphaspartan As a refugee from LA, I can honestly say, those of us who CHOOSE to de-ass Kommiefornia are not your problem. Beware the blue scum who follow the job when their corporate bean counters move the business and tell the workers to move it or lose it. That's where your traitors are found.
Good for you. I'm heading to the same region in a couple of years. Maybe I'll see you at the range! 😂
That's great man do me a favor take some homeless people if you
"Shall not be infringed." The Bill of Rights was very specific for a reason. Unfortunately, politicians and their stooges continue to ignore the Bill of Rights and have not been held accountable.
Only the 2A doesn't say "Shall not be infringed". It doesn't say that it any way. The Framers wrote the 2A as one complete sentence, and they intended for it to be regarded as one complete sentence. Therefore, any citation of the 2A that does NOT included the crucial explanatory beginning ("A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State...") is not actually quoting the 2A at all. The amendment was intended only to prevent the federal government from disarming the state militias. That was it, that was all.
@@beagle123ist so the 2A is only meant for state level military and not all citizens?
@@beagle123ist
Did you even look up what the definition is for militia vs military?
A well regulated (well maintained) society (a civilian population) who are armed with weapons that are common to all and self-supplied who able to rise up in times of need for protection against those who would do them hurt.
In the 2A it clearly says, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Why... "necessary to the security of a free state." Maybe because criminals and arbitrary people will try to overrun the general population for sinister reasons.
@@itzcaseykc The term "to bear arms" meant "to serve as an armed combatant in a theater of war". Did not mean to physically carry a weapon in one's hands.
The problem is that western govts are ignoring their nations Constitution.
I don’t care what the “government” says, I carry my gun with me everywhere I go hoping I’ll never use it, but always ready to defend my life, my wife’s life, and my daughters life at the drop of a hat. When there are no more bad people in the world, I’ll give up my guns, which is never
Hear, hear!
I agree, the problem is, you get pulled over with that gun not secured and loaded, you'll be in jail and not able to defend your family.
@@leetjohnson there will be a civil war before it ever got to the point where I can’t carry in my car, at least in my state
@@Daveyboy28 That's awesome! I live in commifornia, unfortunately. Stay safe and carry on!
@@leetjohnson But they would need to show probable cause to initiate any search- person or property. We're all playing the odds here, including the law enforcement officials.
Move to Iowa. As of July 1, every law-abiding Iowan can do concealed carry without a permit.
"Is this Heaven?"
"No, it's Iowa"
-Field of Dreams
Montana as well.
YA BABY! got mine today. Didnt see that coming but AMEN FOR IT... never cared for Kim but now im starting to rethink my position
Same here in Texas, starting Sept 1st
I bet crime won't go up either !!!
If everyone had a weapon, the criminals would be the ones in fear, not us - the good sane moral citizens.
I appreciate your screen name.
good sane moral citizens?
you cannot be living in the usa...
@@janvanruth3485
You must live in a demilitarized zone (city) 😂
"Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely"
Simple to carry under the Constitution, impossible under tyranny.
It's a natural law to want to carry self defense weapons.
If you are for gun control. Stand up for what you believe and put this sign on your front door.
"NO GUNS IN THIS HOUSE"
Also, remove your front door.
@@RickyJr46 Also these same people for gun control need to call the cops and tell them not to come to their house because "black lives matter" and "acab" 😂
It's a safe bet that a house with a "Hate has no home here" sign has no guns.
A gun does not mean "hate" I have been around guns all my life (60 years), Most everyone i know owns at least one gun most own multiple guns and non of us "hate" by the way some of those i know who own guns are democrats that believe strongly about the 2nd amendment.
If you don't like guns i support your 1st amendment right to say so.
They should also get a bumper sticker that says, "My home is a gun free zone."
Trying to figure out if it’s the criminals, the politicians or just idiots who disliked this video, or did I repeat myself?
The NYTs should be required to apply for a permit to publish...and then be denied.
Cant pick and choose amendments.
@@techhelpportal7778
Democrats apparently think you can
Imagine having to pay a $43 fee to ask the government for permission to vote.
@@poodlescone9700
If the other rights were burdened to the extent that the second is, this would be a completely different nation.
@@techhelpportal7778 he's demonstrating the absurdity of 2A infringements.
The banned weapons like ‘kung fu star’ and ‘metal knuckle knife’ always crack me up. People get beaten to death with regular hand tools a million times more than they die to ‘kung fu stars’.
More Americans are beaten to death by unarmed assailants than are shot to death by rifles each year but the leftist media never mentions it... or calls the attackers "assault people".
I believe kitchen knives are some of the most dangerous instruments out there and yet there is no regulation on sales. Children can buy and use them freely. Banning weapons should include, by logic, the banishment of kitchen knives, or at least controlled to the point that only those who graduate from culinary schools may have possession of them.
And many more are killed by a few fist blows to the head and falling too hard on the ground.
@@rynohorn3819, I've had multiple concussions and a skull fracture. It pisses me off that Hollyweird acts like being knocked unconscious is just like taking a nap and that head injuries are are comedic material, but the mere presence of a gun will eventually somehow magically kill someone.
@@LWLProductions, a "kung fu star" is obviously a type of bayonet you attach to "the thing on the side that goes up" on your "AR-14" to turn it into an "assault weapon" that holds a "100 round clip" that shoots "30mm rounds" at "100 rounds a second" that are "armor piercing" in fully semi-automatic.
Duh.
"More guns less crime"
Dr. John R. Lott
Given the existence of the 2nd amendment, I am at a loss as to how or why any branch of the 'government' imagines it has the authority to 'license' permission to carry. Absurd to the extreme.
Ikr crazy
The whole reason I don't sign up for a conceal carry permit is exactly this, they put you on a government list. I shouldn't have to show a reason to carry, concealed or otherwise.
There are a lot of benefits to getting a concealed carry, even in constitutional carry states. It's a huge boon to legal defense if you are forced to use a weapon in self-defense. Also, it lets you purchase weapons without doing a full federal check every time, letting you walk out of a store with a weapon. Said store will then only keep records of your purchase for 90 days, letting you own weapons that people won't necessarily know about. If the feds look you up, they'll know you purchased a weapon, but not what. So, no ATF looking for specific things.
All I did in Ohio was take the 8 hour course take my certificate pay a small fee of like 50 bucks, finger print and got my license to carry before I walked out the door
I have two of them so I can legally carry in other states. I don't need one in my state
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what they are going to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” Ben Franklin
@Arsh K Haters gonna hate! 👍
the sobs
@@fuzzresponder2225 and police will continue violating free men and women’s rights by asserting jurisdiction over people they have no jurisdiction over. policies, statutes, codes are all enforced upon corporations. Free men and women aren’t corporations so the only thing they can be charged with is a crime, meaning there’s another party who has had the crime committed upon them. Supposed “crimes” where there is no victim, the police continue to enforce though it is not their constitutional duty to do so and it may open them up to lawsuits if the public wises up and asserts their rights. They know not what they do.
@@Syzygy77 Noted, and Thank you for enlighten me with those sovereign citizen beliefs! 👍
While I agree with the sentiment, Franklin never said that.
That part about America being a "laughing stock" is quite inaccurate. I'm in the UK and I wish I had a second ammendment!
Always room for people like you here. I’m sorry that your police unironically confiscate butter knives and gloat about it on facebook, it is quite embarrassing.
HELL, YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE A 1ST AMENDMENT.....SO SHUT UP....LOL..
Yeah don't the radicals tend to chop people's heads off there for lack of guns?
Leftists exist in echo chambers and think if they repeat something enough it becomes a fact.
@@CheaddakerT.Snodgrass no but a lot of gangsters show off door hangers which is hilarious asf
“An armed society is a polite society”. Couldn’t agree more, kind people of the inter web.
The lower courts can’t just ignore a Supreme Court ruling.
Some judges need to face consequences.
They only answer to their peers, and we see how well that's working.
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958) The states are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court and cannot choose to ignore them.
Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. 506 (1859) State courts cannot issue rulings that contradict the decisions of federal courts.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816) Federal courts may review state court decisions when they rest on federal law or the federal Constitution. This decision provides for the uniform interpretation of federal law throughout the states
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) State laws in opposition to national laws are void. The U.S. Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction for any U.S. case and final say.
"Shall not be infringed.." How hard is that to understand?
The RIGHT to bear arms period. That’s all the reason you should need.
You are correct. Always remember that our founding fathers had mortars and cannons and mines and meant for those to be included in the second amendment as well. That's why they said ARMS and not guns. It's the right to bare ARMS not the right to bare rifles! You can go to Boston today and visit the Paul Revere house where they proudly display one of his mortars that he made right next to one of his bells that were made in his same foundry. Our founding fathers were not hypocrites that demanded one type of Armament for themselves and a lesser type for the peasants!
If it is a RIGHT embodied in the constitution of a nation, one shouldn't need any sort of "permit" to exercise that right.
Making it onerous to exercise a right is denying that right. There's no way that thousand-page test, $480 fee, year-long approval garbage would survive a challenge in a high court.
John Stossel is the GOAT when it comes to real journalism 👍🏼
This blows my mind, that in America there are places where you cannot get a firearm.
Defend the 2A
@aquartz121 1 woah that's bananas
That short end scene of the robbers breaking in to face someone armed with an AR-15!!! PRICELESS!
They always fall back on the "Do it for the children" and I say, to hell with your kids, not my concern.
I have a gun to protect my kids from yours--whom you let be raised as violent thugs.
Why do we need to hear about the Christians and their kid's all day long
i mean, your kids will be safer too but, i also agree with you
It's always about we need to cut all the taxes for the rich people
in recent times its the kids im having to defend myself against!
"A Smith & Wesson beats four aces" - - Murphy's Law
LOL! Absolutely, John! Calamity Jane from Deadwood is the proof...
Deadwood and also the Ray Wylie Hubbard song Mississippi Flush.
The right to bear arms includes, but is not limited to:
Knifes, Handguns, Assault Rifles, Katanas, Throwing Hatchets, Daggers, Grenade Launchers, Flamethrowers, and Fists.
You can take away some, but undue bans, limits, etc on armaments impedes your right to bear arms. Doing so kills any chances of self-defense, and deterence.
No, not grenade launchers. That's waay too dangerous and flame throwers too. NOT everything should be allowed....
@@boredfangerrude Everything except nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons should be legal to own.
assault rifles?
@@lukutiss1324 Why? Do you really think anyone with the money to buy or build a nuclear weapon is going to be stopped by a law from making one and using it? North Korea an entire country doesn't have the gdp to even fund research into making one. Bezos does though.
@@boredfangerrude in the event of repelling the tyrannical government you'd be wishing for grenade launchers, go fight an M1 Abrams with a Glock and see how far you get.
Just like in the County of Santa Clara where Sheriff only allows permits for campaign donors. Big Donors.
GREAT JOB! John Stossel! Please do more on GUN RIGHTS. WE LOVE YOU! RC from Houston!
Many states are "open carry" and issue standard and enhanced CCW permits. Even allow concealed carry without a permit. Look at their stats, the rates are down below the national average for violent crime. An armed society is a peaceful society. If North Korea had a 2nd amendment or the citizens allowed firearms, there would be no King Kim....
We have the 2nd amendment and our president/country is far more harmful to the world than Kim ever was.
@@henlofren7321 You are right, "to the world" but not right about his own people. Well, at least the people that are not in his 1%.
@@henlofren7321
Literally in no way is it
55% gun ownership here in south dakota. I get pulled over about once a year and ive never done that hands on the wheel thing and ive never been asked to. Cops just are not afraid of people and people are not afraid of cops.
@@henlofren7321 lmao our country has done far more good for the world than any other in history. Stop believing this stupid narrative that America is evil. We literally secure shipping routes around the world with our navy, created the internet, developed vaccines for deadly diseases, gave us gps, prevented multiple genocides, trillions donated in food and medical aid around the world, leading the world in cancer research, WW2, Korean war, countless inventions, etc. the list is laughably long. Yes we have done some bad stuff but without America the world would have experienced far more harm.
It's a right, No government or man should be able to tell you you cannot protect yourself.
They can't remove a right that isn't theirs to hinder. Period. My protection is my right (health wise, financially, family wise, speech, AND right to bear arms). Libertarians know the deal. As a female, hell no do I give up rights because people who live in bubbles believe their bubble is best. Those bubbled citizens can move to New Zealand then.
No use arguing semantics, the government removes your rights daily, whether you believe they're theirs to hinder or not.
@@spec24 They can do whatever they are clearly going to do in VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL, GOD GIVEN, UNALIENABLE AND COMMON LAW......BUT my responsibility to maintain my stance on freedom which won't change, my action of reminding people of their rights won't change, and the right to defend/protect myself and others against those trying to do harm against us won't change either. So I guess we're at an impasse.
Was unsubscribed from this channel. Not surprised.
Thank you Mr. Stossel for keeping us informed.