ALL THE 'DINOSAURS' OF THE MOVIE 65.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 окт 2024

Комментарии • 278

  • @Mega-Tales
    @Mega-Tales  Год назад +99

    Turns out the 2 weird dinosaurs were indeed real...Fasolasuchus and Jakapil.....

    • @canonbehenna612
      @canonbehenna612 Год назад +12

      Yeah the jakapil could use a more accurate design but the fasolasuchus is prefect the way it is

    • @promemerboy1765
      @promemerboy1765 Год назад +8

      3:36 this creature was confirmed to be Lagosuchus

    • @spinosaurusstriker
      @spinosaurusstriker Год назад +6

      THERE IS LITERALLY NO OFICIAL CITING OF THIS, you were probably just gaslighted into believing that becauae a bunch if people called them that, the jakapil was released to the pubick when the movie was finishing production man cmon. The other wqs originally a trike but because of test screenijg they needed to change the design.

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +3

      @@spinosaurusstriker are you saying the Jakapil was discovered AFTER the movie was made?

    • @spinosaurusstriker
      @spinosaurusstriker Год назад +4

      @@Mega-Tales the movie was finishing production when the jakapil was released to the public, when a fossil is discovered they inmediatamently don't release it firn they need to study it to have some sort of form to the animal, the jakapil was released when the movie had only like 3 months to be released.

  • @dustingeurts7649
    @dustingeurts7649 Год назад +37

    Agree with the carnivores in the beginning being Indo’s (or Fasolasuchus‘s) babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he hasn’t let her eat him yet.

    • @LocalGiganfan1980
      @LocalGiganfan1980 3 месяца назад

      Does the fasolasuchas have a confirm gender or are you speculating, either way makes somewhat sense.

  • @Hexsmasher2099
    @Hexsmasher2099 Год назад +31

    2:36 That’s a Jakapil
    2:42 And those are the real Troodons
    3:35 Lagosuchus

    • @pilkers2
      @pilkers2 Год назад +1

      Troodon isnt real

    • @lootthebluecrayon7729
      @lootthebluecrayon7729 Год назад +1

      @@pilkers2 sir i believe the troodon being fake was debunked a longgggg while ago or am i wrong

    • @pilkers2
      @pilkers2 Год назад +2

      @@lootthebluecrayon7729 I haven’t heard anything about that

    • @Geniusprimate
      @Geniusprimate 6 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@pilkers2 you're stupid, STOP CALLING TROODON A FAKE THING, TROODON IS REAL AND IT ALWAYS WILL BE, TROODON IS A GENUS OF TROODONTIDS AND IT HAVE APPEAR IN ALOT OF MEDIA LIKE DINOSAUR TRAIN,DINO DANA, ICE AGE AND JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!!

    • @JohnSmith-wo2fz
      @JohnSmith-wo2fz 6 месяцев назад

      @@lootthebluecrayon7729 They're all fake. Idiot.

  • @emperorofscelnar8443
    @emperorofscelnar8443 Год назад +8

    We only discovered 1% of the past, 1% of creaures who have lived in the past.

  • @AggroniteTheDarkLord
    @AggroniteTheDarkLord Год назад +19

    Yes I remember that this was a fasolasuchus and I was shocked to learn the real thing isn't far off in size 😮

    • @ZOZObeepboop
      @ZOZObeepboop Год назад +2

      where did you read the size wasn't far off? im seeing size comparisons to humans and the size is wayyyy off

    • @mrdeadlybootz5414
      @mrdeadlybootz5414 Год назад +3

      @@ZOZObeepboop agreed this thing was the size of a damn spino haha

  • @exkobri558
    @exkobri558 Год назад +20

    It would have been cool to see ‘accurate’ dinosaurs for once. With feathers, some with reeled back lower jaws, and realistic noises. In my opinion, how dinosaurs sound in reality is way scarier than anything the movies have produced. It’s actually terrifying if you haven’t heard it yet.

    • @yxx_chris_xxy
      @yxx_chris_xxy Год назад +2

      Are you talking of pigeons? I dislike their sound too...

    • @FOAB-Carlos
      @FOAB-Carlos Год назад +2

      It's a movie.

  • @chiboz3483
    @chiboz3483 Год назад +141

    I don’t know why people are getting mad at the way the Dino’s look when we don’t even know what they actually looked like

    • @crazymonkey1218
      @crazymonkey1218 Год назад +61

      Except we DO know enough about how they looked to debunk pretty much all of these.

    • @chiboz3483
      @chiboz3483 Год назад +6

      @@crazymonkey1218 not exactly

    • @Lxcifery_
      @Lxcifery_ Год назад

      one of the dumbest comments i've read

    • @787entertainment4
      @787entertainment4 Год назад +28

      @chiboz3483 A lot of Paleontology is inference yes. However, that does not mean that we simply have no idea what dinosaurs look like. We can also look at phylogenetics, dinosaurs are reptiles that evolved into birds. Therefore we can look at both modern birds and modern reptiles to get a mental picture of a dinosaur. This film flat out depicts very inaccurate animals, they gave them crocodile like skin. Some of the carnivorous dinosaurs in the movie were quadrupedal, which of course we have no evidence of. I think the reason people are upset at the designs is not necessarily inaccuracy, as we see plenty of that in Jurassic park and the movies remain well liked today. But rather the complete disregard for any semblance of realism. These were not dinosaurs, they were crazy dragon monsters. Which people did not go to see.

    • @Captianmex1C0
      @Captianmex1C0 Год назад +27

      We do know what they looked liked lmao, the dinosaurs in 65 are even more outdated in design than the first Jurassic park movie

  • @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1
    @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 Год назад +45

    Actually a decent movie and interesting to see a dinosaur take that has no connection to the Jurassic series
    7/10

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +2

      Yeah I'm surprised they don't make more dinosaur movies, considering they make so much money. Plus no one owns the rights to the T. rex.

    • @kai6xx
      @kai6xx Год назад

      Agreed

    • @brianshepherd9927
      @brianshepherd9927 Год назад

      Same!

  • @patrickpet7905
    @patrickpet7905 Год назад +28

    The movie was incredible, and I loved it.

  • @justsomeguywithawhitebeard5639
    @justsomeguywithawhitebeard5639 10 месяцев назад +4

    The last one is supposed to be a fasolasuchus, even though it lived way earlier in the upper triassic.

  • @alimhaider8680
    @alimhaider8680 Год назад +8

    Brilliant movie should of been a bigger hit will be huge on streaming

    • @LocalGiganfan1980
      @LocalGiganfan1980 3 месяца назад

      Exactly, I loved the movie when it released.

  • @OneAndOnlyCreedOfGhost
    @OneAndOnlyCreedOfGhost Год назад +8

    The Crawler dinosaur whatever it is looks very similar to Indominus Rex for JW and the sounds are basically identical

  • @lawrencelow949
    @lawrencelow949 Год назад +9

    #4 AnKYLOsaurus 🤣🤣🤣 what a tribute

  • @josephgratzer
    @josephgratzer Год назад +16

    The so-called T-Rex somewhat looks like a Triassic 4-legged archosaur called Postosuchus

    • @ZOZObeepboop
      @ZOZObeepboop Год назад

      that's what i was thinking too
      it's just a kinda shrink wrapped and fucking huge postosuchus

    • @axelerater
      @axelerater Год назад

      There is something larger than them

    • @Morrison-saber-tooth
      @Morrison-saber-tooth Год назад

      @@axelerater its not postosuchus, it was fictonial theropod

    • @axelerater
      @axelerater Год назад

      @@Morrison-saber-tooth thats exactly what i said

    • @Morrison-saber-tooth
      @Morrison-saber-tooth Год назад +1

      @@axelerater oh sorry, thought you was talking about fasolasuchus or prestosuchus

  • @mateussousa1236
    @mateussousa1236 Год назад +6

    4:52 10 is a Fasolasuchus, it's huge, it's similar to Postosuchus, but it's much bigger!

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад

      omg ur right

    • @spinosaurusstriker
      @spinosaurusstriker Год назад +1

      Its literally not

    • @Mr.HeisenbergTheCook
      @Mr.HeisenbergTheCook Год назад +1

      That thing is easily as big as T-Rex and supposed to be from the late cretaceous, so I assume it's just a fully made up species 😄

    • @thejoker15678
      @thejoker15678 Год назад

      Definitely a Faoslasuchus, Why is this so hard to believe?!
      Spinosaurus Striker, stop getting bosses with the Fasolasuchus in 65, leave people alone with that.

  • @kolette5
    @kolette5 Год назад +5

    The tyrankolosaurus part was funny😂😂

  • @SuperSaiyan_Anjanath
    @SuperSaiyan_Anjanath 4 месяца назад +3

    The movie was good. However, I really wish that we could've seen more herbivores and pterosaurs....

    • @jamesporter571
      @jamesporter571 Месяц назад +1

      A Triceratops and 3 legged Ankylosaurus were supposed to be part of the film but were cut due to studio differences

  • @canonbehenna612
    @canonbehenna612 Год назад +6

    It’s actually a good film me and my family quite enjoyed and we’re scared of it but there some problems like the wish the theropod arrived earlier to have a dinosaur battle with the 2 T. rex and wishing there some sauropods,hardorsaurs ceratopsians and other late Cretaceous Dino’s

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +1

      they had a very low budget. 'only' 44 mil

  • @Baseqq
    @Baseqq Год назад +6

    I liked The movie much more than 2 last jurasic Worlds. Ppl only complain.... should be happy we got Good Dino movie since years

  • @yxx_chris_xxy
    @yxx_chris_xxy Год назад +2

    "We don't know which continent this plays on" -- we do, the chicxulub asteroid crashes down right next to them, so they are in Mexico.

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      It looks more like Wyoming to me. Like Yellowstone. Geysers, redwood forests. I think it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus

  • @nitrokid
    @nitrokid 3 месяца назад +1

    People sometimes forgot that this is a fictional movie. A sci-fi, not a documentary.

  • @clintonturner5545
    @clintonturner5545 9 месяцев назад +1

    The creepy one was a Doratodon, but starving. Skinny.

  • @timeflies5778
    @timeflies5778 9 месяцев назад +1

    We do know where they were. The asteroid hit the Yucatán Peninsula. It hit right where the escape pod launched from. They were in Southern Mexico near the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea.

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      actually. i think it hit Wyoming. The geysers, the redwood forests. I'm certain this was where Yellowstone was first formed. it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus

  • @-RandoBando-
    @-RandoBando- Месяц назад +2

    This was an awesome movie but Dino’s dont looked like that

  • @DeadScot194
    @DeadScot194 8 месяцев назад +1

    For anyone wondering why people take issue with the dinosaurs of this movie is because they literally made some of them up. The T rex/Ankylosaur combo is the prime example. No bones ever even suggest this kind of composition. Just in case anyone was annoyed with chiboz like i was.

  • @pilkers2
    @pilkers2 Год назад +3

    Probably still better than 4/6 of the Jurassic park movies

  • @lavinaacrux1831
    @lavinaacrux1831 5 месяцев назад

    The first time I watched this movies I was high at the AMC and the 5th guy you have up there, "Unknown Dino", legitimately made me piss my pants a little. I did not like the way that monster moved.

  • @thefatraptor4424
    @thefatraptor4424 10 месяцев назад +5

    Not trynna be that one nerd, but troodon isn’t a valid species anymore.

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      actually its both

    • @thefatraptor4424
      @thefatraptor4424 2 месяца назад +1

      @@James.Oakleaf wdym both

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад

      @@thefatraptor4424 its a common species, but it is also the genus and group name

    • @thefatraptor4424
      @thefatraptor4424 2 месяца назад +1

      @@James.Oakleaf i know that there are troodontids, but troodon, the single animal is no longer valid. you can even search it up, or read an article.

  • @tigana
    @tigana 7 месяцев назад +1

    Honestly as a paleo enthusiast I loved the unrealistic dinos. Sometimes we just want a thrilling wild time. Not everything needs to be Prehistoric Planet level🤣

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  7 месяцев назад +1

      just curiuous, which would you say was the closest to a real dinosaur, and which one was miles off?

  • @BobRyan-te6ej
    @BobRyan-te6ej 3 месяца назад +1

    It's a jakapil

  • @cloverfield911
    @cloverfield911 Год назад +2

    Amazing how they NEVER met one herbivorous dinosaur!!! All meat eaters from the get-go!!

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      actually. Jakapil is an herbivore

  • @Bangladeshstudentleague2310
    @Bangladeshstudentleague2310 Год назад +5

    Have to inform Giganotosaurus carolini is huge now with the size of 10.5 tons & 45 feet long 😊

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +2

      what's the new information? I had it at 7 tons and 13 meters

    • @Bangladeshstudentleague2310
      @Bangladeshstudentleague2310 Год назад

      @@Mega-Tales here it's 10.5 tonnes & 13.5 meters.
      Bigger than T rex
      docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk

    • @Bangladeshstudentleague2310
      @Bangladeshstudentleague2310 Год назад +1

      @@Mega-Tales here it's 13.5 meters & 10.5 tons , so bigger than T rex
      docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk

    • @110demon
      @110demon Год назад

      @@Bangladeshstudentleague2310 Nope this source is unreliable

    • @danielefabbro822
      @danielefabbro822 Год назад

      ​@@Bangladeshstudentleague2310 its a fresh news, but we don't know how big the T-rex was able to become.
      Seems what we have found until now was just young speciments.

  • @lilvicky635
    @lilvicky635 6 месяцев назад

    I wished 65 used Siats as one of the appearing dinosaur instead of always sticking with a T-Rex

  • @kellyhoffman3565
    @kellyhoffman3565 Год назад +3

    The mystery rapter is actually a Velocirapter!!

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      no. its an atrociraptor. The head shape and the long legs fits the description of an Atrociraptor.

  • @majinvegeta9280
    @majinvegeta9280 Год назад +2

    You can get an idea where they are at from the impact which they seemed to be at ground zero so the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico where they found the chicxulub crater. So whatever the continents were then

  • @DJDeezyThaTruth
    @DJDeezyThaTruth Год назад +1

    - 2:40 😆🤣 “This Sorry Little Son-Of-Beetch” …Hard On Em. It Did Walk Away Like “Poor Me”
    OAN: A Bullet Woulda Saved It 🥺

  • @Huy-G-Le
    @Huy-G-Le 10 месяцев назад +1

    3:40 Average days in Mid-period Triassic Florida my man.
    Just another Pseudosuchia, hunting for prey near the beach, Floridan most natural habitat.

  • @joeayala6141
    @joeayala6141 Год назад +1

    haven't seen the movie because i saw the trailers and didnt find the dino's realistic or interesting enough to watch. this movie just didnt get my interest at all

    • @joeayala6141
      @joeayala6141 Год назад

      Took me a while to except some dinosaurs, especially the smaller ones, to have feathers. Didn’t see any from the trailer

  • @LionelBeckles-vu2zm
    @LionelBeckles-vu2zm Год назад +1

    Good video 👍

  • @KlivchevskiyVadim
    @KlivchevskiyVadim Год назад +2

    MEGA DINOSAURS TOP.

  • @poorsoul8492
    @poorsoul8492 Год назад +1

    they were all meat eaters? what a waste

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      no. Jakapil is an herbivore.

  • @CroczillaYT
    @CroczillaYT Год назад +3

    One thing I don’t like about the dinosaur community is that you can make some involving dinosaurs and if its not “accurate” dinosaurs they’re going to have a stroke 💀

  • @xenotundra3346
    @xenotundra3346 Год назад +1

    Were there no herbivores???

  • @Rexred09
    @Rexred09 Год назад +4

    The Trankylosaurus is actually a Jakapil

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад

      omg ur right

    • @Rexred09
      @Rexred09 Год назад +1

      @mysticdragonboythehelpful1459It is Jakapil

    • @promemerboy1765
      @promemerboy1765 Год назад

      If there is a giant fasolasuchus and a massively oversized Lagosuchus, then that’s a jakapil

    • @spinosaurusstriker
      @spinosaurusstriker Год назад +2

      ​@@promemerboy1765well none of those things were what you are saying, the jakapil was released to the public when the movie finished production, the supposed falosuchus is just a replacement for the original trike because if the test screenings, and the lagosuchus is just a made up species the (lago attack) name just means lake attack because thats were they come from in the movie.

    • @thejoker15678
      @thejoker15678 Год назад +1

      The Lago Attack music tells me that these were Lagosuchus.
      And actually, Lagosuchus is a real species.

  • @meti326
    @meti326 Год назад +3

    You missed the Waterdino in the beginning:)

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +1

      did we see it?

    • @jordantucker9799
      @jordantucker9799 Год назад +1

      Seems more likely to be a giant eel.

    • @nickymejias5763
      @nickymejias5763 Год назад

      yeah it might of have number 10.

    • @enzoli23
      @enzoli23 Год назад

      @@Mega-Tales you missed the dino which came through the "curtain" of water at the cave - or was that just a plain old T-Rex?

  • @NickSibz
    @NickSibz Год назад +3

    I honestly liked the movie. Was a different take and a really cool idea IMO.

  • @The1Dino
    @The1Dino 8 месяцев назад +1

    And they’ve mixed them with actual dinosaurs

  • @Proteus2905
    @Proteus2905 11 месяцев назад +1

    Normally I am reluctant to compare two films because I believe that each film is a closed universe in itself. But back in 1993 there was this little-known trash B-movie called "Jurassic Park" made by an equally unknown amateur filmmaker named Steven Spielberg (whoever that is 😉). 65 was released in 2023, I repeat: 2023. I don't know about you all, but in the 42 years of my life so far, I have always been an avid fan of anything even remotely related to dinosaurs . So now I have a question: Why is it that a brand new film from this year seems so incredibly shabby when you compare it to a film that is almost 30 years old? Filmmakers today have tools at their disposal that were still in their infancy in 1993. But back then they created something that film fans in general and dinosaur fans in particular are still talking about today. So if a filmmaker today can't do better than something like this with all these technical possibilities, then for me the real weak point is the lack of creative motivation. In short: you filmmakers today can bring to life anything you want, so damn it, work harder!

    • @timeflies5778
      @timeflies5778 9 месяцев назад

      You're absolutely correct. I'll add that JP was a compelling story. 65 was just wanting to make a movie with CGI dinosaurs. Regular humans on another planet 65 million years ago? Gimme a break. The whole premise was poorly conceived.

  • @ZOZObeepboop
    @ZOZObeepboop Год назад +1

    even if it is a jakapil, the head shape is still way off - it's clearly a trex or tyrannosaur inspired skull
    (i mean, ik it is just a movie tho)

  • @lawrencelow949
    @lawrencelow949 Год назад +3

    #10 almost Gorgonopsid, but nah, too scaly & too big. Also no Orcsy tusks.

    • @emperorofscelnar8443
      @emperorofscelnar8443 Год назад +2

      Gorgonopsid would be a Permian creature and a Synapsid not a Dinosaur.

    • @lawrencelow949
      @lawrencelow949 Год назад +2

      @@emperorofscelnar8443 Yes I know that. And a lot more mammal than reptile.

    • @promemerboy1765
      @promemerboy1765 Год назад

      It’s a fasolasuchus

  • @leonelgalan9431
    @leonelgalan9431 Год назад +1

    Number 6 and 10 are relatives forget the names 10 fasolasuchus and 6 something-suchus. I believe they are part of a terrestrial crocodilian species.

  • @demosuarusyt3227
    @demosuarusyt3227 8 месяцев назад

    Being mad a Sci-fi movies for historical innacuracys is beyond me

  • @Omn1Hero
    @Omn1Hero 2 месяца назад

    1:38 The dinosaurs that attacked them weren't Atrociraptors they were Velciraptors and the unknown raptor is still a Velciraptor.

  • @OataTheSymbol
    @OataTheSymbol Год назад +1

    I think trankylosaurus is one of my cousins?

  • @kalkulator291
    @kalkulator291 Год назад

    Movie as the Dinos in it, good 👍

  • @R3DØUTOFFICIAL
    @R3DØUTOFFICIAL Месяц назад

    Dromeasaurus, xuanhanosaurus (all fours theory version), jakapil, tyrannosaurus, troodon, velociraptor, fasolasuchus

  • @MikedaddyO
    @MikedaddyO Год назад

    You missed the first one in the water

  • @archosaur_enjoyer824
    @archosaur_enjoyer824 Год назад +1

    The oviraptor might of had teeth in the movie 💀

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      it did. Similar design to the therizinosaurus

  • @fenggula7890
    @fenggula7890 Год назад +2

    I saw the movie today and it was MID at best… 6/10. Boring AF.

  • @nathancomixproductions466
    @nathancomixproductions466 Год назад

    Maybe this "Indo-Rex" might be a Nathanosaur. Look below:
    Dinosauria --> Saurischia --> Theropoda --> Tetanurae --> Carnosauria --> Nathanosauroidea
    Nathanosauroidea
    - Deinoscincidae
    -- Deinoscincus prima
    -- Tasmaniasaurus australis
    - Nathanosauridae
    -- Gallisaurus micronyx
    -- Nathanosaurinae
    --- Nathanosaurus pingasorensis
    --- Carnovenatonax tauroceras
    --- Elasmovenator natospinax
    --- Masiakatyrannus trachelopteryx
    -- Ceratolophosaurinae
    --- Ceratolophosaurus mongoliensis
    -- Tarbosuchinae
    --- Tarbosuchus nigerensis
    --- Alectrosuchus guillermoi
    --- Gigantosuchus longicaudi
    - Ichthyoraptoridae
    -- Ichthyoraptorinae
    --- Ichthyoraptor alticristatus
    --- Saurotitan carnodens
    --- Stenocheirosaurus brachyonyx
    -- Daspletovenatorinae
    --- Daspletovenator lophorhinus
    --- Postosuchomimus canadensis
    -- Dracosaurodocinae
    --- Dracosaurodocus islandensis

  • @daanvos194
    @daanvos194 Месяц назад

    The tetrap9d was probably an archosauromorpha

  • @gojifanis0n543
    @gojifanis0n543 Год назад +2

    #6 is a Lagosuchus
    #10 is a Fasolasuchus

  • @Gggh-g9s
    @Gggh-g9s 10 месяцев назад +1

    It’s called a fasolophusucas

  • @EJHeavey
    @EJHeavey Год назад +5

    I honestly could give a hoot if the dinosaurs where real. Decent story, made my kids n wife jump. I liked all the dinosaurs depicted and the group of “small” quadrupeds where kinda freaky in their role. Liked it enough I bought the DVD. Will definitely watch it from time to time. Hope we get more not Jurassic Park/World movies that are this decent.

  • @jasonsantos3037
    @jasonsantos3037 Год назад +1

    A lot of interesting dinosaurs in this movie.

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +1

      Yeah at first I was angry like "what is this made up crap?"...turns out they were legit...sizes exaggerated but whatever

    • @spinosaurusstriker
      @spinosaurusstriker Год назад

      ​@@Mega-TalesThey were not dude, the people who told you that are full of bs, their sources are literally (a youtuber told me to)

  • @antstudios167
    @antstudios167 8 месяцев назад

    Cool movie tbh

  • @nc9735
    @nc9735 Год назад

    It was a cousin to the Carnotaurus Anna had Osseo Derms running along its back

  • @charmedtommo8995
    @charmedtommo8995 2 месяца назад

    The one you called an Indorex is actually a Fasolasuchus. You’re really gonna make up names when they literally tell you what they are?

  • @얼린쿠크다스
    @얼린쿠크다스 Год назад +1

    I love it!

  • @GoGoBean34
    @GoGoBean34 Месяц назад

    Pro tip there's like 4

  • @someonethatmakesedits
    @someonethatmakesedits Год назад +1

    Number 4 THAT IS A JAKAPIL

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  Год назад +1

      apparently not...this is a theropod

    • @thejoker15678
      @thejoker15678 Год назад +1

      @@Mega-Tales It’s a Thyreophoran, so it’s a Jakapil.

    • @yxx_chris_xxy
      @yxx_chris_xxy Год назад +1

      @@thejoker15678 Looks like it.

  • @RittoMoreno
    @RittoMoreno 11 месяцев назад +1

    ahh you missed the bugs (fuck the bugs) lmao

  • @GabsARV
    @GabsARV 9 месяцев назад

    No hate to the Jurassic Park franchise but it's probably the reason why people saw the dinosaurs as "unrealistic" granted that Jurassic Park dinosaurs were based with scientific research, but even then those research was purely a theory. We don't really know how they looked and sound like.
    I encourage every writer out there when writing a dinosaur themed movie to try not replicate the look of Jurassic Park dinosaurs. Go bat-shit crazy with their design and sounds!

  • @HeiseiSolosGenshinW
    @HeiseiSolosGenshinW Год назад +1

    The number six of that creature is not nothosaurus its Lagosuchus

  • @nc9735
    @nc9735 Год назад

    Probably the small tyrannosaur morose intrepidus

  • @wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457
    @wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457 4 месяца назад

    Don't have issues with those inaccurate terrible designs but atleast they should had been shown like actual animals and not some mindless screaming killing machines. There was also barely any herbivore shown in there. What did those "monsters" ate? Each other? And that stupidity where the armoured dino got instantly hunted by those skinny raptors though. That's like showing a cheetah easily hunted down a Juvenile 400kg Rhino.

  • @pamelachilds1449
    @pamelachilds1449 Год назад +2

    The “Atrociraptor” you claim it is, looks more like Dromaeosaurus. Atrociraptor is a lot bigger than that. The “Tyrankylosaurus” you also claim it is, is actually a Jakapil. It’s no made up dinosaur they put in this movie. The Compsognathus was actually Troodon, look up the wiki! These quadrupedal reptiles are called Lagosuchus. The “Indo-Rex” is actually a large Triassic crocodilian called Fasolasuchus. It was based off of Jurassic World’s Indominus Rex, Indoraptor and the Giganotosaurus.

    • @dustingeurts7649
      @dustingeurts7649 Год назад

      I will go as far as adding, although opinionated, that the smaller carnivores in the beginning were the Fasolasuchus‘s babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he has let her eat him yet.

    • @thecomradered
      @thecomradered 9 месяцев назад

      Is there an official source like the film makers in an interview, that states the names of these animals? There is a lot of creative liberty in their design so it is impossible to pinpoint an exact species name for any of the creatures. Like the video creator says, there are thousands of raptor species and the film makers clearly didnt care about accuracy, so the only way to name any of the animals for certain is if one the film makers officially states it.

  • @김민우-i3h
    @김민우-i3h Год назад +1

    Continent back then might be connected of china and north america to be one whole continent.

    • @James.Oakleaf
      @James.Oakleaf 2 месяца назад +1

      Wyoming. Yellowstone. Geysers and redwoods. Old Faithful killed the Fasalosuchus

  • @ggamesplay1571
    @ggamesplay1571 Месяц назад

    Ngl people are sorry idiots. This is cool. The different designs are awesome, and on my opinion much better. Obviously dinosaurs are taken from real life. But since at this point they are fiction, it's not a problem to make their designs different for the sake of making a movie SCARY. For the same reason the new jurassic world movie will be 10tix better than the originals, because it shows the actual dark side to dinosaurs. I'm tired of the regular predator like action from the dinosaurs. This is refreshing.

  • @andresardon841
    @andresardon841 Год назад

    I wont even bother to identify The species shown un this movie.

  • @nc9735
    @nc9735 Год назад

    Possibly a puso succus

  • @Velocir4ptor875
    @Velocir4ptor875 6 месяцев назад

    5:03 it’s a fasolasuchus

  • @lawrencelow949
    @lawrencelow949 Год назад

    Dino spring & autumn fashion show

  • @bluemouse5039
    @bluemouse5039 6 месяцев назад

    The dinosaur at the climax of the movie that walked on all 4 legs looks like Postosuchus depicted in the beginning of the 1999 TV series Walking with Dinosaurs only scaled up to gigantic proportions which was the apex predator on Earth before other large bipedal dinosaurs evolved, I found this movie to be very disappointing, not only were the creatures of low quality special effects but the story line was corny and unrealistic

  • @nc9735
    @nc9735 Год назад

    I think the skeleton was not a T-Rex it didn't match the size so I think it was a Tarbosaurus the died cuz the atrociraptor nearby and killed off the Tarbosaurus

  • @lawrencelow949
    @lawrencelow949 Год назад +2

    #6 : Creature from "The Mist" 🤭

  • @obrikidivine7973
    @obrikidivine7973 Год назад

    I’m confused like it’s fiction why it’s getting backlash lol

  • @shanethomas6208
    @shanethomas6208 Год назад +1

    My man, Learn pronunciations! Good vid.

  • @edgarteano8995
    @edgarteano8995 2 месяца назад

    The fasolasuchus death is by burning him

  • @JohnJ-p7o
    @JohnJ-p7o 2 месяца назад

    Movie been criticised because of the era were living in. The age of complaints

  • @muhamadaiman8683
    @muhamadaiman8683 Год назад

    No brachiosaurus 🥺😔 🦕

    • @yxx_chris_xxy
      @yxx_chris_xxy Год назад

      They were extinct for nearly 100 million years at that time.

  • @shawmiserix404
    @shawmiserix404 7 месяцев назад

    troodon was discontinued as an existing species

    • @Mega-Tales
      @Mega-Tales  7 месяцев назад

      discontinued?

    • @shawmiserix404
      @shawmiserix404 7 месяцев назад

      @@Mega-Tales essentially the paleontological community got tired of trying to identify a dinosaur they only had a tooth of so they just decided it was no longer canon

    • @shawmiserix404
      @shawmiserix404 7 месяцев назад

      @@Mega-Tales there are still troodontids but troodon itself is no longer a valid taxa

  • @RomeBernstein
    @RomeBernstein Год назад

    These "dinosaurs" remind me of something of turok

  • @B.E.K.R_Productions
    @B.E.K.R_Productions 5 месяцев назад

    4:50 that’s a Fasolasuchus, which is not a dinosaur

  • @trilobite3120
    @trilobite3120 Год назад

    Compies are Jurassic, not Cretaceous.

  • @TheMeanMugginMusician
    @TheMeanMugginMusician Год назад

    What is the name of the gun?

  • @thehyperverse
    @thehyperverse Год назад

    dude you hardly got most of the names right

  • @nickymejias5763
    @nickymejias5763 Год назад +1

    compys that wasn't it something else Jurassic wasn't in 65 so that was troodons.

  • @wiggydiggyfilms7271
    @wiggydiggyfilms7271 9 месяцев назад

    yes he will always be kylo ren

  • @DinoRaptor_PL
    @DinoRaptor_PL 3 месяца назад

    4:49 its a fasolosuchus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!