THERE IS LITERALLY NO OFICIAL CITING OF THIS, you were probably just gaslighted into believing that becauae a bunch if people called them that, the jakapil was released to the pubick when the movie was finishing production man cmon. The other wqs originally a trike but because of test screenijg they needed to change the design.
@@Mega-Tales the movie was finishing production when the jakapil was released to the public, when a fossil is discovered they inmediatamently don't release it firn they need to study it to have some sort of form to the animal, the jakapil was released when the movie had only like 3 months to be released.
Agree with the carnivores in the beginning being Indo’s (or Fasolasuchus‘s) babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he hasn’t let her eat him yet.
@@pilkers2 you're stupid, STOP CALLING TROODON A FAKE THING, TROODON IS REAL AND IT ALWAYS WILL BE, TROODON IS A GENUS OF TROODONTIDS AND IT HAVE APPEAR IN ALOT OF MEDIA LIKE DINOSAUR TRAIN,DINO DANA, ICE AGE AND JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!!
It would have been cool to see ‘accurate’ dinosaurs for once. With feathers, some with reeled back lower jaws, and realistic noises. In my opinion, how dinosaurs sound in reality is way scarier than anything the movies have produced. It’s actually terrifying if you haven’t heard it yet.
@chiboz3483 A lot of Paleontology is inference yes. However, that does not mean that we simply have no idea what dinosaurs look like. We can also look at phylogenetics, dinosaurs are reptiles that evolved into birds. Therefore we can look at both modern birds and modern reptiles to get a mental picture of a dinosaur. This film flat out depicts very inaccurate animals, they gave them crocodile like skin. Some of the carnivorous dinosaurs in the movie were quadrupedal, which of course we have no evidence of. I think the reason people are upset at the designs is not necessarily inaccuracy, as we see plenty of that in Jurassic park and the movies remain well liked today. But rather the complete disregard for any semblance of realism. These were not dinosaurs, they were crazy dragon monsters. Which people did not go to see.
Definitely a Faoslasuchus, Why is this so hard to believe?! Spinosaurus Striker, stop getting bosses with the Fasolasuchus in 65, leave people alone with that.
It’s actually a good film me and my family quite enjoyed and we’re scared of it but there some problems like the wish the theropod arrived earlier to have a dinosaur battle with the 2 T. rex and wishing there some sauropods,hardorsaurs ceratopsians and other late Cretaceous Dino’s
We do know where they were. The asteroid hit the Yucatán Peninsula. It hit right where the escape pod launched from. They were in Southern Mexico near the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
actually. i think it hit Wyoming. The geysers, the redwood forests. I'm certain this was where Yellowstone was first formed. it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus
For anyone wondering why people take issue with the dinosaurs of this movie is because they literally made some of them up. The T rex/Ankylosaur combo is the prime example. No bones ever even suggest this kind of composition. Just in case anyone was annoyed with chiboz like i was.
The first time I watched this movies I was high at the AMC and the 5th guy you have up there, "Unknown Dino", legitimately made me piss my pants a little. I did not like the way that monster moved.
Honestly as a paleo enthusiast I loved the unrealistic dinos. Sometimes we just want a thrilling wild time. Not everything needs to be Prehistoric Planet level🤣
@@Mega-Tales here it's 10.5 tonnes & 13.5 meters. Bigger than T rex docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk
@@Mega-Tales here it's 13.5 meters & 10.5 tons , so bigger than T rex docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk
@@Bangladeshstudentleague2310 its a fresh news, but we don't know how big the T-rex was able to become. Seems what we have found until now was just young speciments.
You can get an idea where they are at from the impact which they seemed to be at ground zero so the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico where they found the chicxulub crater. So whatever the continents were then
haven't seen the movie because i saw the trailers and didnt find the dino's realistic or interesting enough to watch. this movie just didnt get my interest at all
One thing I don’t like about the dinosaur community is that you can make some involving dinosaurs and if its not “accurate” dinosaurs they’re going to have a stroke 💀
@@promemerboy1765well none of those things were what you are saying, the jakapil was released to the public when the movie finished production, the supposed falosuchus is just a replacement for the original trike because if the test screenings, and the lagosuchus is just a made up species the (lago attack) name just means lake attack because thats were they come from in the movie.
Normally I am reluctant to compare two films because I believe that each film is a closed universe in itself. But back in 1993 there was this little-known trash B-movie called "Jurassic Park" made by an equally unknown amateur filmmaker named Steven Spielberg (whoever that is 😉). 65 was released in 2023, I repeat: 2023. I don't know about you all, but in the 42 years of my life so far, I have always been an avid fan of anything even remotely related to dinosaurs . So now I have a question: Why is it that a brand new film from this year seems so incredibly shabby when you compare it to a film that is almost 30 years old? Filmmakers today have tools at their disposal that were still in their infancy in 1993. But back then they created something that film fans in general and dinosaur fans in particular are still talking about today. So if a filmmaker today can't do better than something like this with all these technical possibilities, then for me the real weak point is the lack of creative motivation. In short: you filmmakers today can bring to life anything you want, so damn it, work harder!
You're absolutely correct. I'll add that JP was a compelling story. 65 was just wanting to make a movie with CGI dinosaurs. Regular humans on another planet 65 million years ago? Gimme a break. The whole premise was poorly conceived.
I honestly could give a hoot if the dinosaurs where real. Decent story, made my kids n wife jump. I liked all the dinosaurs depicted and the group of “small” quadrupeds where kinda freaky in their role. Liked it enough I bought the DVD. Will definitely watch it from time to time. Hope we get more not Jurassic Park/World movies that are this decent.
No hate to the Jurassic Park franchise but it's probably the reason why people saw the dinosaurs as "unrealistic" granted that Jurassic Park dinosaurs were based with scientific research, but even then those research was purely a theory. We don't really know how they looked and sound like. I encourage every writer out there when writing a dinosaur themed movie to try not replicate the look of Jurassic Park dinosaurs. Go bat-shit crazy with their design and sounds!
Don't have issues with those inaccurate terrible designs but atleast they should had been shown like actual animals and not some mindless screaming killing machines. There was also barely any herbivore shown in there. What did those "monsters" ate? Each other? And that stupidity where the armoured dino got instantly hunted by those skinny raptors though. That's like showing a cheetah easily hunted down a Juvenile 400kg Rhino.
The “Atrociraptor” you claim it is, looks more like Dromaeosaurus. Atrociraptor is a lot bigger than that. The “Tyrankylosaurus” you also claim it is, is actually a Jakapil. It’s no made up dinosaur they put in this movie. The Compsognathus was actually Troodon, look up the wiki! These quadrupedal reptiles are called Lagosuchus. The “Indo-Rex” is actually a large Triassic crocodilian called Fasolasuchus. It was based off of Jurassic World’s Indominus Rex, Indoraptor and the Giganotosaurus.
I will go as far as adding, although opinionated, that the smaller carnivores in the beginning were the Fasolasuchus‘s babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he has let her eat him yet.
Is there an official source like the film makers in an interview, that states the names of these animals? There is a lot of creative liberty in their design so it is impossible to pinpoint an exact species name for any of the creatures. Like the video creator says, there are thousands of raptor species and the film makers clearly didnt care about accuracy, so the only way to name any of the animals for certain is if one the film makers officially states it.
Ngl people are sorry idiots. This is cool. The different designs are awesome, and on my opinion much better. Obviously dinosaurs are taken from real life. But since at this point they are fiction, it's not a problem to make their designs different for the sake of making a movie SCARY. For the same reason the new jurassic world movie will be 10tix better than the originals, because it shows the actual dark side to dinosaurs. I'm tired of the regular predator like action from the dinosaurs. This is refreshing.
The dinosaur at the climax of the movie that walked on all 4 legs looks like Postosuchus depicted in the beginning of the 1999 TV series Walking with Dinosaurs only scaled up to gigantic proportions which was the apex predator on Earth before other large bipedal dinosaurs evolved, I found this movie to be very disappointing, not only were the creatures of low quality special effects but the story line was corny and unrealistic
I think the skeleton was not a T-Rex it didn't match the size so I think it was a Tarbosaurus the died cuz the atrociraptor nearby and killed off the Tarbosaurus
@@Mega-Tales essentially the paleontological community got tired of trying to identify a dinosaur they only had a tooth of so they just decided it was no longer canon
![Amazing Dinoworld [2019] - Troodon Screen Time](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7vP8D_UQlpc/mqdefault.jpg)
Turns out the 2 weird dinosaurs were indeed real...Fasolasuchus and Jakapil.....
Yeah the jakapil could use a more accurate design but the fasolasuchus is prefect the way it is
3:36 this creature was confirmed to be Lagosuchus
THERE IS LITERALLY NO OFICIAL CITING OF THIS, you were probably just gaslighted into believing that becauae a bunch if people called them that, the jakapil was released to the pubick when the movie was finishing production man cmon. The other wqs originally a trike but because of test screenijg they needed to change the design.
@@spinosaurusstriker are you saying the Jakapil was discovered AFTER the movie was made?
@@Mega-Tales the movie was finishing production when the jakapil was released to the public, when a fossil is discovered they inmediatamently don't release it firn they need to study it to have some sort of form to the animal, the jakapil was released when the movie had only like 3 months to be released.
Agree with the carnivores in the beginning being Indo’s (or Fasolasuchus‘s) babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he hasn’t let her eat him yet.
Does the fasolasuchas have a confirm gender or are you speculating, either way makes somewhat sense.
2:36 That’s a Jakapil
2:42 And those are the real Troodons
3:35 Lagosuchus
Troodon isnt real
@@pilkers2 sir i believe the troodon being fake was debunked a longgggg while ago or am i wrong
@@lootthebluecrayon7729 I haven’t heard anything about that
@@pilkers2 you're stupid, STOP CALLING TROODON A FAKE THING, TROODON IS REAL AND IT ALWAYS WILL BE, TROODON IS A GENUS OF TROODONTIDS AND IT HAVE APPEAR IN ALOT OF MEDIA LIKE DINOSAUR TRAIN,DINO DANA, ICE AGE AND JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!!
@@lootthebluecrayon7729 They're all fake. Idiot.
We only discovered 1% of the past, 1% of creaures who have lived in the past.
Yes I remember that this was a fasolasuchus and I was shocked to learn the real thing isn't far off in size 😮
where did you read the size wasn't far off? im seeing size comparisons to humans and the size is wayyyy off
@@ZOZObeepboop agreed this thing was the size of a damn spino haha
It would have been cool to see ‘accurate’ dinosaurs for once. With feathers, some with reeled back lower jaws, and realistic noises. In my opinion, how dinosaurs sound in reality is way scarier than anything the movies have produced. It’s actually terrifying if you haven’t heard it yet.
Are you talking of pigeons? I dislike their sound too...
It's a movie.
I don’t know why people are getting mad at the way the Dino’s look when we don’t even know what they actually looked like
Except we DO know enough about how they looked to debunk pretty much all of these.
@@crazymonkey1218 not exactly
one of the dumbest comments i've read
@chiboz3483 A lot of Paleontology is inference yes. However, that does not mean that we simply have no idea what dinosaurs look like. We can also look at phylogenetics, dinosaurs are reptiles that evolved into birds. Therefore we can look at both modern birds and modern reptiles to get a mental picture of a dinosaur. This film flat out depicts very inaccurate animals, they gave them crocodile like skin. Some of the carnivorous dinosaurs in the movie were quadrupedal, which of course we have no evidence of. I think the reason people are upset at the designs is not necessarily inaccuracy, as we see plenty of that in Jurassic park and the movies remain well liked today. But rather the complete disregard for any semblance of realism. These were not dinosaurs, they were crazy dragon monsters. Which people did not go to see.
We do know what they looked liked lmao, the dinosaurs in 65 are even more outdated in design than the first Jurassic park movie
Actually a decent movie and interesting to see a dinosaur take that has no connection to the Jurassic series
7/10
Yeah I'm surprised they don't make more dinosaur movies, considering they make so much money. Plus no one owns the rights to the T. rex.
Agreed
Same!
The movie was incredible, and I loved it.
Same
The last one is supposed to be a fasolasuchus, even though it lived way earlier in the upper triassic.
Brilliant movie should of been a bigger hit will be huge on streaming
Exactly, I loved the movie when it released.
The Crawler dinosaur whatever it is looks very similar to Indominus Rex for JW and the sounds are basically identical
#4 AnKYLOsaurus 🤣🤣🤣 what a tribute
The so-called T-Rex somewhat looks like a Triassic 4-legged archosaur called Postosuchus
that's what i was thinking too
it's just a kinda shrink wrapped and fucking huge postosuchus
There is something larger than them
@@axelerater its not postosuchus, it was fictonial theropod
@@Morrison-saber-tooth thats exactly what i said
@@axelerater oh sorry, thought you was talking about fasolasuchus or prestosuchus
4:52 10 is a Fasolasuchus, it's huge, it's similar to Postosuchus, but it's much bigger!
omg ur right
Its literally not
That thing is easily as big as T-Rex and supposed to be from the late cretaceous, so I assume it's just a fully made up species 😄
Definitely a Faoslasuchus, Why is this so hard to believe?!
Spinosaurus Striker, stop getting bosses with the Fasolasuchus in 65, leave people alone with that.
The tyrankolosaurus part was funny😂😂
Jakapil
The movie was good. However, I really wish that we could've seen more herbivores and pterosaurs....
A Triceratops and 3 legged Ankylosaurus were supposed to be part of the film but were cut due to studio differences
It’s actually a good film me and my family quite enjoyed and we’re scared of it but there some problems like the wish the theropod arrived earlier to have a dinosaur battle with the 2 T. rex and wishing there some sauropods,hardorsaurs ceratopsians and other late Cretaceous Dino’s
they had a very low budget. 'only' 44 mil
I liked The movie much more than 2 last jurasic Worlds. Ppl only complain.... should be happy we got Good Dino movie since years
"We don't know which continent this plays on" -- we do, the chicxulub asteroid crashes down right next to them, so they are in Mexico.
It looks more like Wyoming to me. Like Yellowstone. Geysers, redwood forests. I think it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus
People sometimes forgot that this is a fictional movie. A sci-fi, not a documentary.
The creepy one was a Doratodon, but starving. Skinny.
Lagosuchus
We do know where they were. The asteroid hit the Yucatán Peninsula. It hit right where the escape pod launched from. They were in Southern Mexico near the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
actually. i think it hit Wyoming. The geysers, the redwood forests. I'm certain this was where Yellowstone was first formed. it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus
This was an awesome movie but Dino’s dont looked like that
For anyone wondering why people take issue with the dinosaurs of this movie is because they literally made some of them up. The T rex/Ankylosaur combo is the prime example. No bones ever even suggest this kind of composition. Just in case anyone was annoyed with chiboz like i was.
Probably still better than 4/6 of the Jurassic park movies
No it's actually 1/6
The first time I watched this movies I was high at the AMC and the 5th guy you have up there, "Unknown Dino", legitimately made me piss my pants a little. I did not like the way that monster moved.
Not trynna be that one nerd, but troodon isn’t a valid species anymore.
actually its both
@@James.Oakleaf wdym both
@@thefatraptor4424 its a common species, but it is also the genus and group name
@@James.Oakleaf i know that there are troodontids, but troodon, the single animal is no longer valid. you can even search it up, or read an article.
Honestly as a paleo enthusiast I loved the unrealistic dinos. Sometimes we just want a thrilling wild time. Not everything needs to be Prehistoric Planet level🤣
just curiuous, which would you say was the closest to a real dinosaur, and which one was miles off?
It's a jakapil
Amazing how they NEVER met one herbivorous dinosaur!!! All meat eaters from the get-go!!
actually. Jakapil is an herbivore
Have to inform Giganotosaurus carolini is huge now with the size of 10.5 tons & 45 feet long 😊
what's the new information? I had it at 7 tons and 13 meters
@@Mega-Tales here it's 10.5 tonnes & 13.5 meters.
Bigger than T rex
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk
@@Mega-Tales here it's 13.5 meters & 10.5 tons , so bigger than T rex
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk
@@Bangladeshstudentleague2310 Nope this source is unreliable
@@Bangladeshstudentleague2310 its a fresh news, but we don't know how big the T-rex was able to become.
Seems what we have found until now was just young speciments.
I wished 65 used Siats as one of the appearing dinosaur instead of always sticking with a T-Rex
The mystery rapter is actually a Velocirapter!!
no. its an atrociraptor. The head shape and the long legs fits the description of an Atrociraptor.
You can get an idea where they are at from the impact which they seemed to be at ground zero so the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico where they found the chicxulub crater. So whatever the continents were then
- 2:40 😆🤣 “This Sorry Little Son-Of-Beetch” …Hard On Em. It Did Walk Away Like “Poor Me”
OAN: A Bullet Woulda Saved It 🥺
3:40 Average days in Mid-period Triassic Florida my man.
Just another Pseudosuchia, hunting for prey near the beach, Floridan most natural habitat.
haven't seen the movie because i saw the trailers and didnt find the dino's realistic or interesting enough to watch. this movie just didnt get my interest at all
Took me a while to except some dinosaurs, especially the smaller ones, to have feathers. Didn’t see any from the trailer
Good video 👍
MEGA DINOSAURS TOP.
they were all meat eaters? what a waste
no. Jakapil is an herbivore.
One thing I don’t like about the dinosaur community is that you can make some involving dinosaurs and if its not “accurate” dinosaurs they’re going to have a stroke 💀
Were there no herbivores???
Jakapil is an herbivore
Jakapil is an herbivore
The Trankylosaurus is actually a Jakapil
omg ur right
@mysticdragonboythehelpful1459It is Jakapil
If there is a giant fasolasuchus and a massively oversized Lagosuchus, then that’s a jakapil
@@promemerboy1765well none of those things were what you are saying, the jakapil was released to the public when the movie finished production, the supposed falosuchus is just a replacement for the original trike because if the test screenings, and the lagosuchus is just a made up species the (lago attack) name just means lake attack because thats were they come from in the movie.
The Lago Attack music tells me that these were Lagosuchus.
And actually, Lagosuchus is a real species.
You missed the Waterdino in the beginning:)
did we see it?
Seems more likely to be a giant eel.
yeah it might of have number 10.
@@Mega-Tales you missed the dino which came through the "curtain" of water at the cave - or was that just a plain old T-Rex?
I honestly liked the movie. Was a different take and a really cool idea IMO.
And they’ve mixed them with actual dinosaurs
Normally I am reluctant to compare two films because I believe that each film is a closed universe in itself. But back in 1993 there was this little-known trash B-movie called "Jurassic Park" made by an equally unknown amateur filmmaker named Steven Spielberg (whoever that is 😉). 65 was released in 2023, I repeat: 2023. I don't know about you all, but in the 42 years of my life so far, I have always been an avid fan of anything even remotely related to dinosaurs . So now I have a question: Why is it that a brand new film from this year seems so incredibly shabby when you compare it to a film that is almost 30 years old? Filmmakers today have tools at their disposal that were still in their infancy in 1993. But back then they created something that film fans in general and dinosaur fans in particular are still talking about today. So if a filmmaker today can't do better than something like this with all these technical possibilities, then for me the real weak point is the lack of creative motivation. In short: you filmmakers today can bring to life anything you want, so damn it, work harder!
You're absolutely correct. I'll add that JP was a compelling story. 65 was just wanting to make a movie with CGI dinosaurs. Regular humans on another planet 65 million years ago? Gimme a break. The whole premise was poorly conceived.
even if it is a jakapil, the head shape is still way off - it's clearly a trex or tyrannosaur inspired skull
(i mean, ik it is just a movie tho)
#10 almost Gorgonopsid, but nah, too scaly & too big. Also no Orcsy tusks.
Gorgonopsid would be a Permian creature and a Synapsid not a Dinosaur.
@@emperorofscelnar8443 Yes I know that. And a lot more mammal than reptile.
It’s a fasolasuchus
Number 6 and 10 are relatives forget the names 10 fasolasuchus and 6 something-suchus. I believe they are part of a terrestrial crocodilian species.
Lagosuchus
Being mad a Sci-fi movies for historical innacuracys is beyond me
1:38 The dinosaurs that attacked them weren't Atrociraptors they were Velciraptors and the unknown raptor is still a Velciraptor.
I think trankylosaurus is one of my cousins?
Jakapil
Movie as the Dinos in it, good 👍
Dromeasaurus, xuanhanosaurus (all fours theory version), jakapil, tyrannosaurus, troodon, velociraptor, fasolasuchus
You missed the first one in the water
The oviraptor might of had teeth in the movie 💀
it did. Similar design to the therizinosaurus
I saw the movie today and it was MID at best… 6/10. Boring AF.
yup, agreed
Maybe this "Indo-Rex" might be a Nathanosaur. Look below:
Dinosauria --> Saurischia --> Theropoda --> Tetanurae --> Carnosauria --> Nathanosauroidea
Nathanosauroidea
- Deinoscincidae
-- Deinoscincus prima
-- Tasmaniasaurus australis
- Nathanosauridae
-- Gallisaurus micronyx
-- Nathanosaurinae
--- Nathanosaurus pingasorensis
--- Carnovenatonax tauroceras
--- Elasmovenator natospinax
--- Masiakatyrannus trachelopteryx
-- Ceratolophosaurinae
--- Ceratolophosaurus mongoliensis
-- Tarbosuchinae
--- Tarbosuchus nigerensis
--- Alectrosuchus guillermoi
--- Gigantosuchus longicaudi
- Ichthyoraptoridae
-- Ichthyoraptorinae
--- Ichthyoraptor alticristatus
--- Saurotitan carnodens
--- Stenocheirosaurus brachyonyx
-- Daspletovenatorinae
--- Daspletovenator lophorhinus
--- Postosuchomimus canadensis
-- Dracosaurodocinae
--- Dracosaurodocus islandensis
The tetrap9d was probably an archosauromorpha
#6 is a Lagosuchus
#10 is a Fasolasuchus
#4 is a jakapil
#5 is a troodontid
@@promemerboy1765 #5 Pectinodon
It’s called a fasolophusucas
I honestly could give a hoot if the dinosaurs where real. Decent story, made my kids n wife jump. I liked all the dinosaurs depicted and the group of “small” quadrupeds where kinda freaky in their role. Liked it enough I bought the DVD. Will definitely watch it from time to time. Hope we get more not Jurassic Park/World movies that are this decent.
A lot of interesting dinosaurs in this movie.
Yeah at first I was angry like "what is this made up crap?"...turns out they were legit...sizes exaggerated but whatever
@@Mega-TalesThey were not dude, the people who told you that are full of bs, their sources are literally (a youtuber told me to)
Cool movie tbh
It was a cousin to the Carnotaurus Anna had Osseo Derms running along its back
The one you called an Indorex is actually a Fasolasuchus. You’re really gonna make up names when they literally tell you what they are?
I love it!
thanks
Pro tip there's like 4
Number 4 THAT IS A JAKAPIL
apparently not...this is a theropod
@@Mega-Tales It’s a Thyreophoran, so it’s a Jakapil.
@@thejoker15678 Looks like it.
ahh you missed the bugs (fuck the bugs) lmao
No hate to the Jurassic Park franchise but it's probably the reason why people saw the dinosaurs as "unrealistic" granted that Jurassic Park dinosaurs were based with scientific research, but even then those research was purely a theory. We don't really know how they looked and sound like.
I encourage every writer out there when writing a dinosaur themed movie to try not replicate the look of Jurassic Park dinosaurs. Go bat-shit crazy with their design and sounds!
The number six of that creature is not nothosaurus its Lagosuchus
why not Fasolasuchus?
@@Mega-Tales yes the number ten is fasolasuchus too i know
Probably the small tyrannosaur morose intrepidus
Don't have issues with those inaccurate terrible designs but atleast they should had been shown like actual animals and not some mindless screaming killing machines. There was also barely any herbivore shown in there. What did those "monsters" ate? Each other? And that stupidity where the armoured dino got instantly hunted by those skinny raptors though. That's like showing a cheetah easily hunted down a Juvenile 400kg Rhino.
The “Atrociraptor” you claim it is, looks more like Dromaeosaurus. Atrociraptor is a lot bigger than that. The “Tyrankylosaurus” you also claim it is, is actually a Jakapil. It’s no made up dinosaur they put in this movie. The Compsognathus was actually Troodon, look up the wiki! These quadrupedal reptiles are called Lagosuchus. The “Indo-Rex” is actually a large Triassic crocodilian called Fasolasuchus. It was based off of Jurassic World’s Indominus Rex, Indoraptor and the Giganotosaurus.
I will go as far as adding, although opinionated, that the smaller carnivores in the beginning were the Fasolasuchus‘s babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he has let her eat him yet.
Is there an official source like the film makers in an interview, that states the names of these animals? There is a lot of creative liberty in their design so it is impossible to pinpoint an exact species name for any of the creatures. Like the video creator says, there are thousands of raptor species and the film makers clearly didnt care about accuracy, so the only way to name any of the animals for certain is if one the film makers officially states it.
Continent back then might be connected of china and north america to be one whole continent.
Wyoming. Yellowstone. Geysers and redwoods. Old Faithful killed the Fasalosuchus
Ngl people are sorry idiots. This is cool. The different designs are awesome, and on my opinion much better. Obviously dinosaurs are taken from real life. But since at this point they are fiction, it's not a problem to make their designs different for the sake of making a movie SCARY. For the same reason the new jurassic world movie will be 10tix better than the originals, because it shows the actual dark side to dinosaurs. I'm tired of the regular predator like action from the dinosaurs. This is refreshing.
I wont even bother to identify The species shown un this movie.
Possibly a puso succus
5:03 it’s a fasolasuchus
Dino spring & autumn fashion show
The dinosaur at the climax of the movie that walked on all 4 legs looks like Postosuchus depicted in the beginning of the 1999 TV series Walking with Dinosaurs only scaled up to gigantic proportions which was the apex predator on Earth before other large bipedal dinosaurs evolved, I found this movie to be very disappointing, not only were the creatures of low quality special effects but the story line was corny and unrealistic
I think the skeleton was not a T-Rex it didn't match the size so I think it was a Tarbosaurus the died cuz the atrociraptor nearby and killed off the Tarbosaurus
#6 : Creature from "The Mist" 🤭
I’m confused like it’s fiction why it’s getting backlash lol
My man, Learn pronunciations! Good vid.
The fasolasuchus death is by burning him
Movie been criticised because of the era were living in. The age of complaints
No brachiosaurus 🥺😔 🦕
They were extinct for nearly 100 million years at that time.
troodon was discontinued as an existing species
discontinued?
@@Mega-Tales essentially the paleontological community got tired of trying to identify a dinosaur they only had a tooth of so they just decided it was no longer canon
@@Mega-Tales there are still troodontids but troodon itself is no longer a valid taxa
These "dinosaurs" remind me of something of turok
4:50 that’s a Fasolasuchus, which is not a dinosaur
Compies are Jurassic, not Cretaceous.
What is the name of the gun?
dude you hardly got most of the names right
compys that wasn't it something else Jurassic wasn't in 65 so that was troodons.
Pectinodons
yes he will always be kylo ren
4:49 its a fasolosuchus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!