I think the only drawback will be only allowing carry-on luggage to meet weight restrictions. So this also means less security risk. Also means obese customers won't be travelling. Imagine 100 kilo restriction per person.
@@jasongoodacre Weight doesn't matter. This rocket has a payload capacity of 100 tons to LEO. It has enough room to hold a 800 passengers. That's on average 56 tons of humans, which still leaves enough weight margins for facilities. Also don't forget that 100 tons is the figure for LEO. Flights between cities don't reach orbit. The payload capacity is actually way above 100 tons. No concern whatsoever.
It will take 30 something minutes from Hanoi to Los Angeles. Meanwhile it takes 1 hour or so from my house to my school due to Hanoi's traffic. Better start looking for a school in different continent.
Jordan Lewis you sound extremely naive. He said in the full video (41 mins) He was the designer for the falcon 1, because he couldn't hire anyone else. Also he used his own money to make and build SpaceX. If you ask for a link, then go to the top of youtube search bar and simple type in "Elon Musk". The speech just came out. It's not that hard to do your own due diligences, and go research before talking. Do you know of anyone else doing amazing feats like this guy? There isn't many. And for you to belittle him, makes you seem like an idiot. I hope you understand that...
Airplanes make this a dumb idea. Using a rocket is too expensive and dangerous, frankly I though SpaceX was going to go for a space shuttle design or a Hermes design for its mars transport. Need to get away from using rocket boosters
Airplane uses ~ 36000 gallons of kerosene for a 10hr flight. 19hr flight = ~74,100 gallons. Avg cost of kerosene : $2.27 Total cost (10hr) = ~$81,370 Total cost (19hr) = ~$167,207 Rocket fuel used ~ The first stage uses 39,000 US gallons of liquid oxygen and almost 25,000 US gallons of kerosene, while the second stage uses 7,300 US gallons of liquid oxygen and 4,600 US gallons of kerosene. So : Liquid oxygen used - 46,300 gallons Kerosene used - 29,600 gallons Liquid oxygen cost : $0.67 per gallon Kerosene cost : $2.27 per gallon Total cost : 31,020 + 67,192 = $98,212 This is all based off of SpaceX’s Falcon 9. We don’t know the specifics for the BFR. It’s most likely larger. Someone below mentioned they would use methane instead of kerosene. Using the same measurements as before, that brings the price down to: Methane cost: $2.11 Total cost : 31,020 + 62,456 = ~$93,456 This is obviously leaving out a lot of the costs for building a rocket and what not, we also don’t know EXACT measurements for all the distances & how much fuel was used for each distance. I’m also just using prices off of Google, so I don’t know the actual cost, but I found it interesting, so I hope you do too! 😁
gas is short for gasolene, why the hell are you calling kerosene a gas? Also, try comparing it with a 19 hour flight from JFK to SIN that required 222,000 litres of jet fuel.
@@istoleurfaceha3527 lol even ppl in the 1500's knew earths not flat. And now look after centuries of technological advancements and man going to space himself for proof and these ppl stuck as cavemen 😂
The booms would only happen when it slows below the sound barrier. That would happen over the ocean (because laws). As for on board you don’t notice the boom whatsoever.
No sonic booms were heard during sn8 test flight, elon confirmed the vehicle was falling at terminal velocity, this might indicate that the terminal velocity is subsonic and starship won't produce any sonic booms at all
@@90percenthuman39 It will re-enter and be hypersonic at altitude. There will be sonic booms. The velocity will bleed off but i'd imagine it will fall below supersonic at around 15km and big vehicle produces big booms. Also the booster will re-enter supersonic also so there will be sonic booms at launch sites also.
AKlover no no no no. 100-120k fuel; 100-150 passengers * 10-20 trips a day. First class Seattle to Beijing is 12k usd due to one trip at 12 hrs. This will be less.
Optimism and reality seldom match up. Keep in mid all of the shit the FAA will "Require" all of which will add weight, consume more, fuel, and remove passengers/cargo. Uncle sugar's "cut" on top of that. Crony politicians who will try to sandbag Musk to protect their campaign contributors and jobs in their district. If Musk got it down to 5K per seat I'd be impressed.
Ilon Mask is a fucking bullshit and an empty projector. A missile with 31 engines will explode earlier than it will fly to. the same nonsense as American flights to the moon.
@@liyifenn Planes to carry people across the world were ridiculous to people when the Wright brothers made the first plane. History is repeating itself.
I am curious though.. I know the flight time may be just 22 minutes to go from A to B, but how much time is spent actually travelling to the rocket and back to mainland once it lands? How long do we need to sit in the rocket before it actually takes off? What are the weather implications for these types of commercial flights? If winds are too strong all of a sudden, is the flight canceled? I'm sure these are all taken into consideration by the SpaceX team no doubt, but I am just wondering what the answers are. With regards to the time question from above, I guess it's completely inconsequential if we're talking about literal half-ways around the world type of trips which would otherwise take like 15 hours to do by plane.
other side of the world would take about 30 minutes. other side of a continent, lets say north America, would take like a max of about 8 minutes of flight.
I wonder what will happen if you call during the flight. The enormous speed of flight would probably red/blue shift your voice as you speak into the phone.
Itd be awesome to live in america and have to take a rocket to china everytime you go to work. Actually now that i say that it sounds like a nightmare to keep up with the cost
@@baha3alshamari152 it's more like a supersonic jet engine or y'know a rocket, in other words you will have to go through specialized training just to not go unconscious while riding this thing
+nickinthecave But his company is the one making the electric car a mass market one. Tesla is the reason *every* car manufacturer is pushing electric. He had the balls and the brains to know it would be accepted as a product, when other manufacturers had 1 out of their 10 car designs as hybrid not even full electric. In 20 years this will be the other way around. And not because Mercedes, VW, Toyota , BMW, Ford, or any other big established well funded car company did the final push to all electric. They all smirked at Tesla when they started the company. VW managers would still praise Diesel.
asdfasdfasdfasdism There's a stretch of marshy forest right on the border between North and South America that no one wants to build on because of the soft land, drug cartels, and wildlife protection agreements.
Okay first, this does NOT prove the earth is round. Remember that what your seeing is just a cgi video. They didn't even build it. And if you realize traveling around a globe takes a long time. So it doesn't prove anything
These are essentially planes that go in space and are really fast. You can't order pizza to be delivered on a commercial plane. Sorry to burst your bubble, but that can't happen anytime soon.
But soon after this VTOL technologically *takes off* (pun intended) it will be used for more than just commercial transportation. If you can order fresh Japanese Strawberries at the Burj Al Arab in Dubai I'm sure this BFR could deliver fast-food. And if not I could always just go to New York and order food from there directly which is still a win. XD
A few years ago we were skeptical about SpaceX landing a rocket. And then it happened. More recently we were skeptical that the Falcon Heavy would ever become a thing. And then it happened. And now we are skeptical about the BFR ever becoming a real rocket. Only time can tell what SpaceX has in store for the future of space exploration.
I'm not skeptical about the BFR flying, it will fly but maybe not Mars Missions till 2026-2028. I am skeptical about BFR Earth to Earth, because I damn right know it's economically impossible to do.
Spacex are absolutely killing it at the moment. They are currently running 4 programs. Commercial satellites, ISS Supply missions, DearMoon, Mars Program. So this would be a fifth venture for them. The beauty is they all use the same technology developed in-house by Spacex. This is an example of the power of vertical integration which Elon understands. Nasa spends $5 on space contracts for every $1 that Spacex spends. This is why Spacex is the only company that can deliver cost-effective space programs right now.
The 24hour-Starship-challenge : 6:00 AM running in Los Angeles, 9:00 AM breakfast in New York, 1:00 PM lunch in Paris, 4:00 PM snack in Bangkok, 7:00 PM dinner in Hong-Kong, 11:00 PM party on Sydney's beach, 3:00 AM last drink in Cape Town, 6:00 AM back in Los Angeles to sleep.
Only thing what he done is returning stage 1 rockets to save some money yey, but... -It's overhype on matter travel to mars, what space exploration needs is space ship construction throwing away limitation of size limit of spaces, as well as moon colony for exact same reason. Ironically enough Russia are only one that thinking of doing so. -Electric cars would exist without him eitherway, but i guess pushing this market is good idea, still it freaking too expensive -He thinks that MagLev in vacuum tube gonna be more efficient way of transport then actual MagLev when countries don't even invest in that -Now he thinks people gonna love rocket takeoff over relaxation in the plane, guess 0 gravity for a moment can make up for it but i'm little sceptical over it. But this can work with cargo i can give him that.... but that what the whole point of returning stage 1 was about, but i guess land on land transportation is good idea too. So far i think Steve Jobs (or should a say Apple) impacted world more then Elon Musk did so far.... I would say there more companies that are way powerful or alteast impacful to our realities then him like social media companies, i really don't understand why there so hype over him. My best guess is some group of interest wants to make him president of US
“Anywhere on Earth in under an hour.” Not quite. 30 mins to board ferry 40 mins ferry transport (optimistic) 30 mins to exit ferry 30 mins security 30 mins to board rocket 30 minute flight time 30 mins to exit rocket 30 mins to board ferry 40 mins ferry transport (optimistic) 30 mins to exit ferry Total: 5 hours 20 mins (optimistic) Other things to consider: 1. The weather requirements for a rocket to land are extremely strict when compared to commercial airlines. This will lead to unimaginable delays. 2. The fuel requirement per passenger will be at least 5-10 times greater. This means 5-10 times greater fuel cost and 5-10 times greater emissions. 3. The risk of death is 54,000 times higher. (1 in 100 rockets will explode vs 1 in 5,400,000 commercial planes that will crash). (3a. Rocket science is a mature field. The first rocket was built only 7 years after the first working plane. This risk factor will not magically change.) 4. All passengers must undergo minimum of 3-6 months of training to withstand the 3g's of force that a rocket will apply to their body. 5. The Concorde could fly the same '30 minute' distance in about 2 hours, and still failed commercially. TL;DR - Elon Musk is selling you hype to inflate the value of his stock.
There's security delays and transport delays to airports already. Speeding up getting to the Starship is a problem but solvable. We don't know how safe Starship will be because there hasn't been a fully reusable rocket design before. It's possible with enough testing it will be reliable. I'll give you the weather, that is a limiting factor
First passengers are Billionaires and millionaires. 50 successful flights later, it will be in the $100,000-$50,000 range, then 50 successful flights later, it will be ~$1000 per flight.
They can throttle down the engines to reduce g-forces. Blue Origin passengers can withstand the g-forces of acceleration and deceleration, but that’s suborbital.
Jackson, that launchpad looks to be less than a kilometre from the shoreline. I think we have the patience to survive such a **long** (sarcasm) journey.
@@mateomartinezhernandez832 I mean, currently when you get to an airport there's already hours of waiting, this could be similar; it's also possible that they could do customs preps and checks while on the boat (don't ask me how they'd organise that)
@@dsdy1205 Even then the increased price and the 1/100 chance of death wouldn't make it worth the hassle, also enduring up to 3gs would make it unusable by anyone who isn't healthy.
Angi 196 guess what? The first commercial airlines were only used by rich people. Cars were first used by rich people, even phones were first used by rich people. Any transportation either on land, air, rail and water (titanic for example, anyone can go on any cruise ship they wish now) were used by rich people. So in the near future, this transportation will be cheap enough for every working man or woman, and replace long distance travel. Yes the rich will enjoy this for now like any other time they have in history.
Man who wouldn't want to be strapped to intercontinental ballistic missiles while experiencing 3gs (enough is enough to make you collapse), probably will cost tens of thousands of dollars per flight, has a very high chance of exploding and also has the added bonus of producing significantly more CO2 than a plane which can carry far more people.
What is more polluting and consumes more fuel than an airplane is a hoax repeated a thousand times. Starship uses Hidrogen(Zero Emissions), Super Heavy uses Methane, it is 6 to 20 times cleaner than the kerosene used by airplanes and falcon 9, (Methane only has one carbon chain, kerosene can have 6 to 20 carbon chains), SuperHeavy uses 59,000 US gallons of fuel, that is, less than a 747-8 that uses 63,000 US gallons. The liquid oxygen used as an oxidant and Hidrogen/Methane are renewable sources, to be zero emissions you will have to be careful to use renewable energy for the entire process.
It will take 30 something minutes from Jakarta to Los Angeles. Meanwhile it takes 1 hour or so from my house to my school due to Jakarta's traffic. Better start looking for a school in different continent.
Well you still need transport to the boat in city traffic, then from the boat out to the launch platform Then repeat that trip once you arrived. So itll still be a 3 hour trip (1.5 hour on each end, getting through traffic to the boat terminal, boarding the boat and going out to the launch platform, boarding the rocket and waiting for countdown etc)
lmao love how all the people who replied are immediately doing the maths. unless you're a 1%er, travel like this is never ideal unless it's a career demand
Once the rocket is out of the atmosphere there is no drag, which means no fuel consumption (unless you want to keep accelerating). Not sure how this balances with the fuel efficiency while in the atmosphere though...
Assuming A380 flys on the same route carrying same 850 passengers (unlikely on BFR) it only uses 200t of fuel compared to about 800t in the rocket. Plus all that remaining 3200t of liquid oxygen...
Xiran Wang I think of Omni magazine when I see Musk's announcements! He makes the fanciful predictions of the 70s and 80s look like they could be done next week.
I love listening to this during takeoff: 0:00 Taxi to Runway and Hold 0:19 Engines throttle up 0:24 Full Power 0:35 V1 achieved 0:39 Rotation & Take off 0:55 Flight Gives me chills
Tech Showdown Tbh I don't agree. Concord was a problem because its sonic boom covers wherever it flies over, so it could only fly supersonic over uninhabited areas. But space vihecles only create loud noises at two points: launch site and landing site but not anywhere inbetween. So as long as those sites are well chosen I don't think there's going to be many noise complaints
A ship will take the passengers to a launchpad away from the cities into the sea. I doubt noise will be an issue. Plus, I think people would be astounded by the fact a rocket is launching daily and they get to witness it.
So what are you doing today? *[Me in Sydney]* Well, I got the afternoon off and its Independence Day in America So I might go grab a few drinks and celebrate with the Yanks for a few hours. Dont worry Ill be back in time for you're birthday dinner, mate!
Curiously, this animation seems to skip the most harrowing and dangerous part of the trip. The re-entry burn. You know.. the part where a giant spaceship full of human beings turns into a blowtorch? Hope those tiles stay glued on!
Here before it's trending. xD I can't wait to see this fly, with all the new info, I'm even more pumped!! Mars 2024! And the sped up part near the end gave me chills.
He's aimed for a lot of things lately, most of which have been delayed. For instance we have yet to see a Falcon Heavy launch, which he aimed to launch first in 2013..
Ehm Falcon Heavy launch maybe in some point was in 2013, but not in 2016 presentation. And making close deadline you not make yourself lazy. I prefer it, then sure deadline in so far future.
whyfahad How can anyone be critical of Elon Musk? I don't see anyone else attempting the shit he's doing. Even if his space businesses aren't profitable now (Even "tech" companies like RUclips/Twitter aren't profitable after years in business) and he relies heavily on government grants, it seems like he's contributing actual tecnnological progress. I'd like to see you land 2 booster rockets side by side simultaneously at the same time.
Its cause they are short sighted and have lost hope in humanity and only care bout their social security as if it was the only thing that mattered in life.
dont act childish, elon musk is the ceo of tech company nothing more, nothing less. he isnt an engineer nor is he physicist. also, space x hasn't done anything that groundbreaking or incredible in my opinion... yet
You have a 5% chance of dying in a single rocket trip. When was the last time you had a 5% chance of dying in a single trip traveling by car? Why is it even necessary to explain this?
@@goldenthroat8683 That's because at the moment there are only a few launches per year and if one fails, the percentage of fails increases drastically, but in the future there will be dozens of launches all over the world every day.
people in the comments really think strapping people to an ICBM is the future of travel? really? even if this does come to fruition it’s not going to be earth to earth
They are going to use methalox, which you can get from earths atmosphere, so it will actually be carbon neutral. It uses methane and oxygen. And it has a max G force of 2.4 when it will make these round trips, and 3g when it is going on a trip around the moon for example. And lets say they can get that 150 metric tones and expand the habitat volume to 2,000 meters squared, in that case they can take 1,000 people, but if it is a suborbital trajectory then they can decrease the tank size on the ship and increase the habitat volume to 4,000 meters squared, then they can take 2,000 people. or potentialy more depending on how much the expand the payload fairing. And if the fuel and matinance cost 2 million per flight (and add on a extra million for profit margin) then each passenger would pay 1,500, and if they chose not to have a profit margin on a flight then each person would pay 1,000, which would actually be less than a flight half way around the world on a airplane. And if they can manufacture a starship for lets say 40,000,000-20,000,000 there profit margin would be minimal. And each flight would only last up to 50 minutes, compared to a plane which would take 51 hours to go half way around the world (including stops).
@@HarrisonAdAstra, yes that's nice and all, still haven't answered the stuff I was mainly talking about. 1. countries are not going to allow ICBMs to land anywhere near their major cities, not to mention the sheer amount of noise it would make. imagine the number of times it would be mistaken for an ICBM. hell, even planes get misidentified as ICBMs sometimes. 2. quite frankly, not many people are going to be using starship, most are probably going to go on it for the thrill. the need to travel halfway around the world is becoming less and less each year. 3. rockets get delayed. a lot. sometimes even up to multiple days. more so than airliners I doubt that starship would be used to transport people to other places on earth, maybe it would be used as a form of tourism, but E2E? no. or it's just going to be used in the military.
yep, he will debunk the rocket based on the cost because of fuel. The cost of fuel to get 400k feet. in any direction and get to the speed needed to stay in enough of an orbit will never be lower than flying at 50k feet in a large plane going 500knph
GeneralCookie I’m talking about the rocket in general lol. It’s too loud and would be way to risky of a business decision to try launching people around earth on it, supersonic airliners will be co ing by the time this would be considered safe enough for that, but this rocket or a similar version will absolutely fly, probably by 2025 and mars around 2030 though.
This is really aging well. Christ, the guy is worth that much and still only puts out CG from 20 years ago. Like most things Musk, this is a stupid idea that he is trying to oversell to push his stock.
Everything on this channel is bs made up to boost the stock market. Spacex doesn't make a profit, instead its stock value increases. And although none of the CGI that they pulled up have actually been implemented people are still investing in it. Just blows my mind how people cannot see the obvious bs evidence.
Sure, if he can pay billions and billions of dollars for the development costs...unless the US government pays for it of course. In that case, anything seems "realistic". Secondly, this is not very practical method of travel = each passenger goes to zero-G and back every trip ? The loads are usually = "Astronauts normally experience a maximum g-force of around 3gs" during a rocket launch.
Faith alone does not overcome physical realities and engineering challenges, to say the least. What you have faith in is not relevant. Hype-a-loop is simply put: an engineering nightmare. Have you ever worked with vacuum (or very low pressure environment) ? By "vacuum" I don't mean "vacuum cleaner". Well, anybody who works with pressure and vacuum knows how bloody difficult is to continuosly maintain the environment at that low pressure. And, quite frankly, everything leaks...sooner or later. People like you = and most of the people = don't realize the pressure difference and what actually "vacuum" means in reality...that is, within conditions on Earth.
'we have gone to the moon like 48 years ago' - you mean we faked going to the moon. P.S that's not to say we can't get there , but back then they definitely faked it.
Not really, if needed you could land on any open space that is strong enough (let's say an airport). The only problem would be you wouldn't be able to fly out of there again (which isn't that bad if we are talking about helping people survive a disaster).
Наука
![Tee Grizzley - Robbery 8 [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/34_vkNV6wrU/mqdefault.jpg)
this would bring jetlag to a whole new level. rocketlag
Would have more protection for shit like that 😂
hahaha made my DAY!
What about the environment? CO2 into the atmosphere causing global warming to increase?
@@foobarmaximus3506 Remember, "evolving out of that" usually involves multiple generations getting sick and dying.
Rocket lag... lol
Girl:Come over.
Elon:I can't I live in Australia.
Girl:My parents aren't home.
Elon:
(-1)²
@@kokoszanelinio 1?
@@aalim7481 +1
@@kokoszanelinio sqrt(-1)
falafel dürüm i
Still will take you 4 hours to get through security
I think the only drawback will be only allowing carry-on luggage to meet weight restrictions. So this also means less security risk. Also means obese customers won't be travelling. Imagine 100 kilo restriction per person.
@@jasongoodacre This rocket can hold 100 tons... Weight wont matter
@@crimtek I disagree. It feels like trillion tons of weight when a fat guy is sitting next to you. Weight matters.
@@jasongoodacre Weight doesn't matter. This rocket has a payload capacity of 100 tons to LEO. It has enough room to hold a 800 passengers. That's on average 56 tons of humans, which still leaves enough weight margins for facilities. Also don't forget that 100 tons is the figure for LEO. Flights between cities don't reach orbit. The payload capacity is actually way above 100 tons. No concern whatsoever.
@@spidermain100 passengers, not 800
X Æ A-12: I want Chinese food!
Grimes: I'll order from the local-
Elon: Hold my beer
Hold my booster
@@odyseuszkoskiniotis6266 Hold my Starship
@@anshuman7169 Hold my planet
Amberlewis Gaming
Hold my Mars
Asif Iqbal hold my solar system
It will take 30 something minutes from Hanoi to Los Angeles. Meanwhile it takes 1 hour or so from my house to my school due to Hanoi's traffic. Better start looking for a school in different continent.
You are obviously not using enough rockets.
wait for the boring company, theyre onto traffic
Tin Tức Nóng Nhất you can come in my school at least I'll get a reason to go everyday🤣🤣
...same!
One of the best RUclips comment I've ever read!
Born too late to explore the Earth, Born too early to explore the stars, *born just in time to explore dank memes.*
ProXima and fortnite
@@justanotherasian4395 fortnite is cancer
shadow Tornado777 yes.
Copied from sciencephile
@@omgmaster9985 who
I'm so glad Elon exists. He continues to push the boundaries of what's possible.
Hes not actually a designer or anything, I hope you understand that.
Jordan Lewis you mean Elon Musk, CEO and LEAD DESIGNER @ SpaceX right?
Jordan Lewis you sound extremely naive. He said in the full video (41 mins) He was the designer for the falcon 1, because he couldn't hire anyone else. Also he used his own money to make and build SpaceX. If you ask for a link, then go to the top of youtube search bar and simple type in "Elon Musk". The speech just came out. It's not that hard to do your own due diligences, and go research before talking.
Do you know of anyone else doing amazing feats like this guy? There isn't many. And for you to belittle him, makes you seem like an idiot. I hope you understand that...
Toast his parents. They clearly did something right.
Kinda breaks all the boundaries
Airlplanes: *Exists*
SpaceX starship: I'm about to end this man's whole career.
Genius🤣🤣
Not even funny please stop these stupid jokes
But I'm not an airplane company......
Airplanes make this a dumb idea. Using a rocket is too expensive and dangerous, frankly I though SpaceX was going to go for a space shuttle design or a Hermes design for its mars transport. Need to get away from using rocket boosters
@@NarasimhaDiyasena i dont think it will be allowed to fly passengers anytime soon. Instead it might be used for cargo.
Can I have a window seat please?
please i want one too :p
No
ok sir, that would be only 500 thousand dollars
Good thing I live in LA, cuz Elon seems to love that place
Day one Pre-Order!
Airplane uses ~ 36000 gallons of kerosene for a 10hr flight. 19hr flight = ~74,100 gallons.
Avg cost of kerosene : $2.27
Total cost (10hr) = ~$81,370
Total cost (19hr) = ~$167,207
Rocket fuel used ~ The first stage uses 39,000 US gallons of liquid oxygen and almost 25,000 US gallons of kerosene, while the second stage uses 7,300 US gallons of liquid oxygen and 4,600 US gallons of kerosene.
So :
Liquid oxygen used - 46,300 gallons
Kerosene used - 29,600 gallons
Liquid oxygen cost : $0.67 per gallon
Kerosene cost : $2.27 per gallon
Total cost : 31,020 + 67,192 = $98,212
This is all based off of SpaceX’s Falcon 9. We don’t know the specifics for the BFR. It’s most likely larger.
Someone below mentioned they would use methane instead of kerosene. Using the same measurements as before, that brings the price down to:
Methane cost: $2.11
Total cost : 31,020 + 62,456 = ~$93,456
This is obviously leaving out a lot of the costs for building a rocket and what not, we also don’t know EXACT measurements for all the distances & how much fuel was used for each distance. I’m also just using prices off of Google, so I don’t know the actual cost, but I found it interesting, so I hope you do too! 😁
Jared Davidson thank you sir
Ben Schofield My pleasure. ‘Twas fun figuring this all out. 👍
So for 40 passenger flights, that cost would be ~100k/40 = ~$2500?
That's starting to sound promising.
clayton schinzing Oh didn’t realize this. Was just calculating off of Space X’s current rocket.
gas is short for gasolene, why the hell are you calling kerosene a gas?
Also, try comparing it with a 19 hour flight from JFK to SIN that required 222,000 litres of jet fuel.
The worst nightmare of the flatearthers!!!!
Nah dude, moon truthers are gonna be pissed when this bad boy comes out (jacksfilms wya).
Hahahahahaha
What are you talking about? Everyone knows that not only is the Earth flat, it's also a square!
Hahahahahah everyone knows the reality: Is a irregular multidimensional esferic cube :v
You're implying that this sideshow will even be a thing. It's a PR Stunt done mostly for FaceBook karma.
Commercial spaceflight for transporting people
Flat earthers: yikes
Flat earthers will be stuck in the 2000’s while everyone else is in 2050 lmao
@@istoleurfaceha3527 lol even ppl in the 1500's knew earths not flat. And now look after centuries of technological advancements and man going to space himself for proof and these ppl stuck as cavemen 😂
I wonder if they will ever move on
Flat earthers: who's gonna give us money
@Eli Snyder just drop a starship on them
Passengers gonna love that pleasant g force ;p
and a beautiful view :)
I just noticed that
My thoughts exactly. Wonder how that trip would work for people with different health conditions, elderly or babies
5gs I think
Brian Michael Finn You are sooooooo funny .-.
Ok because I need to get to school and it usually takes me 30 min.
it will become less than a second after this
We need teleportation.
doing Home → Jupiter → school may not be necessary
Maybe it would take you less time if you wouldn't ride your tricycle to school.
Hyperloop doesn't have shit on this
Love this new Pixar film!
Looks promising.
WALL-E already exists
Just lol!!
Yeah I heard the title is REAL LIFE
They plan on building these rockets in like 9 months, just in case you missed it...
I'd love to know how they're going to build the rocket in 9 months, given that they don't actually have a full-scale Raptor engine yet.
Imagine the sonic booms you will be hearing when it re enters earths atmosphere
The booms would only happen when it slows below the sound barrier. That would happen over the ocean (because laws). As for on board you don’t notice the boom whatsoever.
No sonic booms were heard during sn8 test flight, elon confirmed the vehicle was falling at terminal velocity, this might indicate that the terminal velocity is subsonic and starship won't produce any sonic booms at all
@@90percenthuman39 It will re-enter and be hypersonic at altitude. There will be sonic booms. The velocity will bleed off but i'd imagine it will fall below supersonic at around 15km and big vehicle produces big booms.
Also the booster will re-enter supersonic also so there will be sonic booms at launch sites also.
Imagine hearing at least 20 sonic booms every day.
Grandma knitting the sweater
*Hears a loud boom*
"Oh , Amanda's back , let me see if cookies are ready yet"
Babe: My parents ain’t home.
Me: but you live around the worl-
...Ah wait nvm.
Long distance relationships finally work!!
Think Concorde times 3 ticket prices. Notice the hubs they listed? These will not be landing in Duluth or Cedar Rapids or Tallahassee.
AKlover no no no no. 100-120k fuel; 100-150 passengers * 10-20 trips a day. First class Seattle to Beijing is 12k usd due to one trip at 12 hrs. This will be less.
Optimism and reality seldom match up. Keep in mid all of the shit the FAA will "Require" all of which will add weight, consume more, fuel, and remove passengers/cargo. Uncle sugar's "cut" on top of that. Crony politicians who will try to sandbag Musk to protect their campaign contributors and jobs in their district. If Musk got it down to 5K per seat I'd be impressed.
Space Marines (The new US Space Force is going to need a lot of these)
Tears in my eyes!
This is the kinda stuff I only could imagine in my head as a kid and now look it it!
Thank you SpaceX
Are you acoustic??
Do you understand the fuel consumption for a spaceship??
I only have an electric but maybe one day i'll get an acoustic.
ArcPlays Nice comeback
You're looking at a CGI spacebus and have tears in your eyes. Quite stupid.
What did we ever do to deserve you Elon... You're out of this world !
He was sent by God
AkilisMusic He is a Martian though, explains his needs to get on Mars
Yes, he is very good at making sci-fi movies.
In a couple of years he will be literally
Ilon Mask is a fucking bullshit and an empty projector. A missile with 31 engines will explode earlier than it will fly to. the same nonsense as American flights to the moon.
“Anywhere on Earth in under an hour.” I really feel the future.
Yesss, i can finally go to Earth!
This idea is fucking ridiculous lol
@@liyifenn Planes to carry people across the world were ridiculous to people when the Wright brothers made the first plane. History is repeating itself.
I am curious though.. I know the flight time may be just 22 minutes to go from A to B, but how much time is spent actually travelling to the rocket and back to mainland once it lands? How long do we need to sit in the rocket before it actually takes off? What are the weather implications for these types of commercial flights? If winds are too strong all of a sudden, is the flight canceled? I'm sure these are all taken into consideration by the SpaceX team no doubt, but I am just wondering what the answers are.
With regards to the time question from above, I guess it's completely inconsequential if we're talking about literal half-ways around the world type of trips which would otherwise take like 15 hours to do by plane.
@@FreedomOfTħought I know. But all of that will still be less time than a plane. Of course, planes will still be used.
when u hungry for Chinese food
For real Chinese food.
japzone I believe they just call it food there
TARS We call your food Western food.
Shocker.
not really,
@Harold Pescuela Oh yea we do, and we keep turkeys as real pet
I thought the boat was going to take off lol
You're not alone there. Now you've said it, watch Elon make it happen...
Scooby Dooby doo oh it is, it's all apart of Elon's mars colonization plan
I honestly did too. I thought we were going to get a SSTO cruise ship...
Scooby Dooby doo me too! Was thinking of a high speed boat hitting gnarly waves.
Haha same
face calling your relative from the other side of continent..
Me: I'll see you in half an hour
*other side of the world
other side of the world would take about 30 minutes. other side of a continent, lets say north America, would take like a max of about 8 minutes of flight.
I wonder what will happen if you call during the flight. The enormous speed of flight would probably red/blue shift your voice as you speak into the phone.
And the relative would be like:
"what?"
For the price of $400
1872: Around the world in 80 days
1972: Around the world in 1 week
2072: Around the world in 1 hour
2172: Around the world in 10 minutes
2372 breakfast on earth, lunch on mars
More like 2030: Around the world in under 1 hour
bruh you do know that aircraft excised in the 70's right you could be pretty much anywhere in the world within a day or so lmao
*gets late to work*
Boss: why are you late?
Me: sorry, missed my rocket
Šnek Underrated comment
Itd be awesome to live in america and have to take a rocket to china everytime you go to work. Actually now that i say that it sounds like a nightmare to keep up with the cost
Šnek lol
When her parents aren't home
Stop please
J-HOPE AKA THE ONE WHO HAD NO LINES IN SPRING DAY yo name
ImKidBuu lol
And you're on vacation on the other side of the world.
i dont get it? is he refering to MOAB and FOAB?
Man's a total legend
VÂIBH! With out a question
Man's not hot
PERSPERATION TING LYNX EFFECT
Who? Elon Musk?
You guys know Elon musk did jack shit. You don't expect to do everything do you ?
Oh Lord, please let me ride on this transport before I die. Frickin' awesome!
Can you handle an amusement park roller coaster because it feels similar to that
As long as you aren't old or pregnant you should be able to ride soon
yes,,,,in the name of Jesus!
@@baha3alshamari152 it's more like a supersonic jet engine or y'know a rocket, in other words you will have to go through specialized training just to not go unconscious while riding this thing
Just as long you don't mind a 1/100 chance of blowing up, just take a plane dude.
BFR stands for Big F#*king Rocket. 😏
More like Big Falcon Rocket😎
Lmao thanks
No
Big
Friendly
Rocket 🙂
You win the internets for the day...
is the real name of the rocket
In Elon We Trust
Akash Mishra in Elon we Musk
He needs his own religion for people who care
Akasha Mishra He the real rocket man
Why isn't Elon waiting to see if B.o.B. proves the earth is flat before announcing this??!!
Carl Frances who the fuck is that??
Elon the new Da Vinci.
yeah indeed the new da vinci full with inventions that will never see daylight because they aren't that fuckin great and overhyped as fuck
More like the Henry Ford of the 21st century; taking what is currently high-tech and bringing it to the common person!
nickinthecave How is Tesla "overhyped?"
I didnt say Tesla was overhyped, electric cars are not his invention.
+nickinthecave
But his company is the one making the electric car a mass market one. Tesla is the reason *every* car manufacturer is pushing electric.
He had the balls and the brains to know it would be accepted as a product, when other manufacturers had 1 out of their 10 car designs as hybrid not even full electric.
In 20 years this will be the other way around. And not because Mercedes, VW, Toyota , BMW, Ford, or any other big established well funded car company did the final push to all electric. They all smirked at Tesla when they started the company. VW managers would still praise Diesel.
Imagine strapping people into a intercontinental ballistic missile
into an intercontinental ballistic missile**
the new Civilization trailer looks cool
Federico Santamorena ikr
Elon Musk always makes me question what i'm doing with my life
MR. RK you are not alone
SAME.
:)
That's why get out in the world and start doing something amazing today! 🙌
Same here, I wanna join in and help if it even means cleaning the rockets!
When we can travel between the opposite sides of the world in under 30 minutes but we still can't cross from North to South America by road
Samovar maker Dorien rules. I kind of like it, we still have this respect for nature.
I thought is was Russian's problem only. Couldn't imagine USA has the same
asdfasdfasdfasdism There's a stretch of marshy forest right on the border between North and South America that no one wants to build on because of the soft land, drug cartels, and wildlife protection agreements.
he is talking about continents, not about USA
Trust me brother, you don't want to drive through south america...
Who is here after SN8 disassembly?
I hope the nose cone will one day be in the entrance hall to SpaceX museum.
@@emperorsascharoni9577 wdym
Here after sn9 disassembly 😂
Here after SN10 landing (WOOHOOO!) and RUD
Here after SN11 RUD, wish I could see that turbopump failure!!!
#RIP flat earthers
Divyank Diwakar on the future when this is possible
If you gave them a ride in BFR they would still tell you that the windows create fisheye effect.
How do you figure that, this is all CGI and someone's wet dream...
Okay first, this does NOT prove the earth is round. Remember that what your seeing is just a cgi video. They didn't even build it. And if you realize traveling around a globe takes a long time. So it doesn't prove anything
Ruth e You, obviously missed the Falcon Heavy Space X test flight. You were born with a brain, don't waste it.
Yeah, I live in Hong Kong and I ordered a pizza... *from New York!*
Might be the future
These are essentially planes that go in space and are really fast. You can't order pizza to be delivered on a commercial plane. Sorry to burst your bubble, but that can't happen anytime soon.
But soon after this VTOL technologically *takes off* (pun intended) it will be used for more than just commercial transportation. If you can order fresh Japanese Strawberries at the Burj Al Arab in Dubai I'm sure this BFR could deliver fast-food. And if not I could always just go to New York and order food from there directly which is still a win. XD
想要條女from NY
Should be free if it doesn't arrive in an hour...
A few years ago we were skeptical about SpaceX landing a rocket. And then it happened.
More recently we were skeptical that the Falcon Heavy would ever become a thing. And then it happened.
And now we are skeptical about the BFR ever becoming a real rocket.
Only time can tell what SpaceX has in store for the future of space exploration.
Wait for the ITS... the BIG BFR !!
And after that... SpaceX will build the USS Enterprise in orbit.
Elon Musk is here for the win !
I'm not skeptical about the BFR flying, it will fly but maybe not Mars Missions till 2026-2028. I am skeptical about BFR Earth to Earth, because I damn right know it's economically impossible to do.
Now there’s a private contract for a billionaire to have a fly by around the moon!
You mean Starship?
Spacex are absolutely killing it at the moment. They are currently running 4 programs. Commercial satellites, ISS Supply missions, DearMoon, Mars Program. So this would be a fifth venture for them. The beauty is they all use the same technology developed in-house by Spacex. This is an example of the power of vertical integration which Elon understands. Nasa spends $5 on space contracts for every $1 that Spacex spends. This is why Spacex is the only company that can deliver cost-effective space programs right now.
_This should be a Spacex Airlines Ad_
Spacelines
The 24hour-Starship-challenge : 6:00 AM running in Los Angeles, 9:00 AM breakfast in New York, 1:00 PM lunch in Paris, 4:00 PM snack in Bangkok, 7:00 PM dinner in Hong-Kong, 11:00 PM party on Sydney's beach, 3:00 AM last drink in Cape Town, 6:00 AM back in Los Angeles to sleep.
That will gonna cost u a lot of money ¥$₩£€￠
@@ywl5292 It is not an issue of technologies, It is your task. To have a many. )
Ud be a millionaire before 6am but at the end of the day u gonna be a homeless man
@@justenlim3149 rofl
@@justenlim3149 it would cost him about 7000$. The idea is for a ticket to cost as much as a plane ticket.
Elon Musk will go down as one of the biggest figures in history - no doubts
He's already done enough for that, even if he stops today.
Lol you are blind sheep if you believe everything he "envisions" will be truth... this is just fantasy
nixxxon18 if his business has gotten where it is today, why not?
Only thing what he done is returning stage 1 rockets to save some money yey, but...
-It's overhype on matter travel to mars, what space exploration needs is space ship construction throwing away limitation of size limit of spaces, as well as moon colony for exact same reason. Ironically enough Russia are only one that thinking of doing so.
-Electric cars would exist without him eitherway, but i guess pushing this market is good idea, still it freaking too expensive
-He thinks that MagLev in vacuum tube gonna be more efficient way of transport then actual MagLev when countries don't even invest in that
-Now he thinks people gonna love rocket takeoff over relaxation in the plane, guess 0 gravity for a moment can make up for it but i'm little sceptical over it. But this can work with cargo i can give him that.... but that what the whole point of returning stage 1 was about, but i guess land on land transportation is good idea too.
So far i think Steve Jobs (or should a say Apple) impacted world more then Elon Musk did so far.... I would say there more companies that are way powerful or alteast impacful to our realities then him like social media companies, i really don't understand why there so hype over him. My best guess is some group of interest wants to make him president of US
lol get real this wont happen! What has he done so far? He has only produced other peoples ideas.
He a business man.
Julies Verne : I'll go around the world in 80 days😏😏
ELON MUSK: I'll do it in an hour😎😎!!
I'd would be 2 hours
Why does this not have more likes?
@@hellohello-jw7fj this comment is a year ago, why are u guys still here?
I'll like... its VERY clever.
@@onemore7108 why are you hear?
“Anywhere on Earth in under an hour.” Not quite.
30 mins to board ferry
40 mins ferry transport (optimistic)
30 mins to exit ferry
30 mins security
30 mins to board rocket
30 minute flight time
30 mins to exit rocket
30 mins to board ferry
40 mins ferry transport (optimistic)
30 mins to exit ferry
Total: 5 hours 20 mins (optimistic)
Other things to consider:
1. The weather requirements for a rocket to land are extremely strict when compared to commercial airlines. This will lead to unimaginable delays.
2. The fuel requirement per passenger will be at least 5-10 times greater. This means 5-10 times greater fuel cost and 5-10 times greater emissions.
3. The risk of death is 54,000 times higher. (1 in 100 rockets will explode vs 1 in 5,400,000 commercial planes that will crash).
(3a. Rocket science is a mature field. The first rocket was built only 7 years after the first working plane. This risk factor will not magically change.)
4. All passengers must undergo minimum of 3-6 months of training to withstand the 3g's of force that a rocket will apply to their body.
5. The Concorde could fly the same '30 minute' distance in about 2 hours, and still failed commercially.
TL;DR - Elon Musk is selling you hype to inflate the value of his stock.
There's security delays and transport delays to airports already. Speeding up getting to the Starship is a problem but solvable.
We don't know how safe Starship will be because there hasn't been a fully reusable rocket design before. It's possible with enough testing it will be reliable.
I'll give you the weather, that is a limiting factor
@@oliverford5367 do t ignore the training. That's 3 months of your life.
@@oliverford5367 and g forces too
Damn... you must never have dreams huh?
@@zamardii12 and you dream too much
The first city on Mars shall be named Elon
shafthespaceegg I've been saying it for years. The second will be called Zubrin.
Mars should be named Elon land
Mustafa Hasan I was just going to say the same thing! Too slow!
What other name could we possibly give it?
Elonopolis I like it
Less than 30 minutes and zero gravity!
This is amazing!
I can't wait for it
Don't think that you will feel zero gravity. It will be few G most time of the flight...
it goes to low earth orbit
It doesn't accelerate the entire trip, and you would only feel G forces if it did.
The captain has turned off the Fasten Seatbelt light, you may now float around the cabin.
may the babies cries and contagion begin
Starship: exists
Flat earthers: i will choose the slower solution. (planes)
Starship: exists
Common sense: I’ll take the safer and more environmentally friendly solution (planes)
I'll take the 30,000 times safer option: planes
Thank you for travelling with space X airlines, that will be $250,000. Have a nice day
You could probably add a couple of zero's to that.
First passengers are Billionaires and millionaires. 50 successful flights later, it will be in the $100,000-$50,000 range, then 50 successful flights later, it will be ~$1000 per flight.
Assuming the spacecraft is at maximum capacity of people
They can throttle down the engines to reduce g-forces. Blue Origin passengers can withstand the g-forces of acceleration and deceleration, but that’s suborbital.
*Wyatt B* , this won’t be the reality till we’re all dead and gone so who cares lol
Just wanted to say that I was alive and here when this was announced.
Here with you, brother.
Glad to be here.
We are on the same boat, but generally speaking if SpaceX makes an announcement, they will make it possible... soon or later.
So were 7,570,667,232 people today..
But most "oh, yeah, yeah, I must think which clouts I use today", so not so much have idea how it may change world.
39 minutes? At least double that time in order to get through the TSA.
No one wan't to visit the US any more since you elected a maniac into office, customs ain't as bad in other countries
Because burning more rocket fuel of methane and kerosene are just what we need for Earth’s atmosphere!
They should hyperloop from the city to the launch pad instead of a boat
Why stop there ? Hyperloop all the way to europe and asia .
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
twitter.com/elonmusk/status/996691566851801088
Just use spirit of Australia!The the speed of the boat is 511.11km/h.
@Ojakokko the track could be under the water. That is what they already use to stop exhaust damage.
Jackson, that launchpad looks to be less than a kilometre from the shoreline. I think we have the patience to survive such a **long** (sarcasm) journey.
Time spent boarding .. 13 hours .. 😂
i would take 13 hrs of boarding time over being on a plane for 13hrs..i get sick in air over long periods
Keith W. I believe this would make me hurl even more. I'm still in!
lmaooooo for real !!
Lol the 13 hour time difference is because of time zones
You sure that rocket takeoff won't make you sick more? :p
Elon Musk is gonna make "2001 a Space" Odyssey a fact!
RC DemonDriver I'm sorry elon I'm afraid I can't let you do that
No Elon Musk has ever made a mistake or distorted information. We are all, by any practical definition of the words, foolproof and incapable of error.
Ricardo F I completely agree. Elon totally isn't ripping off near future sci fi ideas and selling them to the infallible and well educated public.
RC DemonDriver No...he gonna make it look really ANCIENT! Where's his ideal for a space hotel!?
Having 2001 in real life would be worse than you think
Now just imagine living right next to the launch pad and sleeping and this big f**king rocket launch and you wake up and can’t go back to sleep.
That is one of the many problems. It can't be near a city. People would go nuts.
@@lockbert99 Looks like the current plan is offshore landing platforms
@@dsdy1205 Elon said 20 miles wich is so ridicusly far away from shore it'd take hours alone to get to the launch pad.
@@mateomartinezhernandez832 I mean, currently when you get to an airport there's already hours of waiting, this could be similar; it's also possible that they could do customs preps and checks while on the boat (don't ask me how they'd organise that)
@@dsdy1205 Even then the increased price and the 1/100 chance of death wouldn't make it worth the hassle, also enduring up to 3gs would make it unusable by anyone who isn't healthy.
This will truly connect the world, not Mark Zuckerberg
cmon don't discredit Zuckerberg that much! We all know the world hates him, but he's not that bad, well at least not in the beginning.
@@AlexAlcyone Z U C C
Well said 👏🏽
Yes f you mark😅
Poor Mark, getting all this hate bruh 😂
Finally! I can catch all of the regional exclusives in Pokemon Go in just one day. Thank you Elon
OnlineSkunk OOF
Pokemon Go is dead. It died the second Sun and Moon came out.
And people still fighting about who better ios or android
LMAO ..And Apple just introduced Face ID ...
That what i m talking about! People still having this discussion who is better and others want to replace air planes with rockets.
XDDDDD
But the sad thing is that if they come out they will be used only for rich people
Angi 196 guess what? The first commercial airlines were only used by rich people. Cars were first used by rich people, even phones were first used by rich people. Any transportation either on land, air, rail and water (titanic for example, anyone can go on any cruise ship they wish now) were used by rich people. So in the near future, this transportation will be cheap enough for every working man or woman, and replace long distance travel. Yes the rich will enjoy this for now like any other time they have in history.
Man who wouldn't want to be strapped to intercontinental ballistic missiles while experiencing 3gs (enough is enough to make you collapse), probably will cost tens of thousands of dollars per flight, has a very high chance of exploding and also has the added bonus of producing significantly more CO2 than a plane which can carry far more people.
So basically you just copied that from 'Adam Something' LOL
What is more polluting and consumes more fuel than an airplane is a hoax repeated a thousand times.
Starship uses Hidrogen(Zero Emissions), Super Heavy uses Methane, it is 6 to 20 times cleaner than the kerosene used by airplanes and falcon 9, (Methane only has one carbon chain, kerosene can have 6 to 20 carbon chains), SuperHeavy uses 59,000 US gallons of fuel, that is, less than a 747-8 that uses 63,000 US gallons. The liquid oxygen used as an oxidant and Hidrogen/Methane are renewable sources, to be zero emissions you will have to be careful to use renewable energy for the entire process.
intrseting, sounds like u never heard of a plane. This is the exact thing people said in 50's for planes
It will take 30 something minutes from Jakarta to Los Angeles. Meanwhile it takes 1 hour or so from my house to my school due to Jakarta's traffic. Better start looking for a school in different continent.
Bad joke, local traffic is still a problem. From LAX to your new school would be 1 hr. Plus, your home to the Jakarta airport would be bad too, right?
Well you still need transport to the boat in city traffic, then from the boat out to the launch platform
Then repeat that trip once you arrived. So itll still be a 3 hour trip (1.5 hour on each end, getting through traffic to the boat terminal, boarding the boat and going out to the launch platform, boarding the rocket and waiting for countdown etc)
lmao love how all the people who replied are immediately doing the maths. unless you're a 1%er, travel like this is never ideal unless it's a career demand
That's what The Boring Company is trying to fix - another one of Elon's projects
Jakarta traffic is terrible. Transportation at both levels needs addressing
THIS IS AWESOME!
Elon sure is inspiring. I've got goosebumps...
Inspiring? sure.
I just hope he doesn't sull the funding to make something like this.... it's a REALLY BAD IDEA...
Everyone: "Aviation industry is dead"
Elon: * Space*
How is aviation industry dead?
Boeing and Airbus team will be like we were told to increase fuel efficiency... wtf is this?
manu P lol if spaceX can develop this new BFR in time Boeing stocks will be crushed
manu P yup bye crappie companies.
Julien-Robert Lecadou Airbus ain't crappy.
Once the rocket is out of the atmosphere there is no drag, which means no fuel consumption (unless you want to keep accelerating). Not sure how this balances with the fuel efficiency while in the atmosphere though...
Assuming A380 flys on the same route carrying same 850 passengers (unlikely on BFR) it only uses 200t of fuel compared to about 800t in the rocket. Plus all that remaining 3200t of liquid oxygen...
Seeing this idea taking shape makes me feel like I'm living in a sci-fi book.
Absolutely incredible.
Xiran Wang I think of Omni magazine when I see Musk's announcements! He makes the fanciful predictions of the 70s and 80s look like they could be done next week.
S P A C E X L I N E S !
I love listening to this during takeoff:
0:00 Taxi to Runway and Hold
0:19 Engines throttle up
0:24 Full Power
0:35 V1 achieved
0:39 Rotation & Take off
0:55 Flight
Gives me chills
Yo i didn’t even have the audio on. You just changed my word lollll
You mean:
0:00 Start
0:19 Sailing
0:24 Reached launch pad
0:35 Boarding
0:39 Launch
0:55 Passed Karman line
@@andreizadasilvapereira5312r/whooosh🤓
Wow. The new Civilization game looks great.
I wonder how much it gonna coast if it's well over 20k then I'm just gonna stick with paddling across the oceans.
If you cross the International Date Line ... You really can be there "yesterday".
I slogan for the Concorde was "Arrive before you leave."
"Aight bro I'm coming over I'll see ya yesterday"
BRUH
Tenet be like
“I was just there tomorrow”
At the beginning I was like "Is that boat going to liftoff from the water or what???" and then I just saw the BFR and it was quite a relief.
Michal Málek yhea, in the livestreamed i assumed
A) the boat had Raptor engines
B) That the BFR would have a submersible water launch
me too captain :v
Yeah, was wondering but then saw drone ship and said duh to myself
Same. I honestly wouldn't have been surprised if Musk pulled out plans for flying rocket boats.
It would have been really cool if the BFR had just suddenly emerged from the water like the aliens in "Battleship"
In Microsoft Flight Sim 2030, I want a starship option
Lol if I was flying in that I would want it to be more than 30mins 😂
But what if there was NOTHING.
30 minutes of floating around inside a metal cylinder.
SIGN ME UP, _PLEASE!_
Lol, go to Mars then. It takes 3-6 months and either way is on the same ship
So true! “I’m boring, so I’m taking my time on my ride”
New York to L.A. please, nonstop, just go around earth 3 times, I'll pay extra.
If people complained about noise with the Concord then they will absolutely lose it with a rocket lmao
no noise in space
Tech Showdown Tbh I don't agree. Concord was a problem because its sonic boom covers wherever it flies over, so it could only fly supersonic over uninhabited areas. But space vihecles only create loud noises at two points: launch site and landing site but not anywhere inbetween. So as long as those sites are well chosen I don't think there's going to be many noise complaints
Take-off and landing is not happening in the space. Again, "no noise in space"..
A ship will take the passengers to a launchpad away from the cities into the sea. I doubt noise will be an issue. Plus, I think people would be astounded by the fact a rocket is launching daily and they get to witness it.
in space nobody can hear your complaints :)
So what are you doing today?
*[Me in Sydney]* Well, I got the afternoon off and its Independence Day in America So I might go grab a few drinks and celebrate with the Yanks for a few hours. Dont worry Ill be back in time for you're birthday dinner, mate!
Not only is that feasible, it's quite accurate!
Curiously, this animation seems to skip the most harrowing and dangerous part of the trip. The re-entry burn. You know.. the part where a giant spaceship full of human beings turns into a blowtorch?
Hope those tiles stay glued on!
Here before it's trending. xD
I can't wait to see this fly, with all the new info, I'm even more pumped!! Mars 2024!
And the sped up part near the end gave me chills.
Mars 2024 is not happening, lol
Well, if you watched his presentation today he's aiming for Mars 2022 and a crewed mission in 2024
Mhmm, and Falcon Heavy is launching in November too. Very accurate.
He's aimed for a lot of things lately, most of which have been delayed. For instance we have yet to see a Falcon Heavy launch, which he aimed to launch first in 2013..
Ehm Falcon Heavy launch maybe in some point was in 2013, but not in 2016 presentation.
And making close deadline you not make yourself lazy. I prefer it, then sure deadline in so far future.
Elon musk and everyone working in spaceX are real life heroes, thank you for your contribution.
whyfahad How can anyone be critical of Elon Musk? I don't see anyone else attempting the shit he's doing. Even if his space businesses aren't profitable now (Even "tech" companies like RUclips/Twitter aren't profitable after years in business) and he relies heavily on government grants, it seems like he's contributing actual tecnnological progress. I'd like to see you land 2 booster rockets side by side simultaneously at the same time.
Its cause they are short sighted and have lost hope in humanity and only care bout their social security as if it was the only thing that mattered in life.
no hes not. its a cool company but they aren't the saviors of humanity.
dont act childish, elon musk is the ceo of tech company nothing more, nothing less. he isnt an engineer nor is he physicist. also, space x hasn't done anything that groundbreaking or incredible in my opinion... yet
Musk haters aren't that intelligent.
I cant wait until I can regularly hear the magnificent boom of re-entry.
Or twice thrust of Moon Rocket
Ok boomer.
There’s a reason the pad is on the ocean
Or the boom of the rockets exploding. That'd happen alot
@@emmerad They are trying to make it safe so it doesn't do that
"I'll never ride in anything that has crashed so many times during testing"
Ever driven a car?
You have a 5% chance of dying in a single rocket trip. When was the last time you had a 5% chance of dying in a single trip traveling by car? Why is it even necessary to explain this?
I can tell every car ride could possibly be more dangerous
*During testing*. That's what tests are for
@@goldenthroat8683 Even the space shuttle wasn't that dangerous when it was retired for safety, the heck u talkin about
@@goldenthroat8683 That's because at the moment there are only a few launches per year and if one fails, the percentage of fails increases drastically, but in the future there will be dozens of launches all over the world every day.
Well this is new..
Uriah Siner not new at all. Someone finally figured out how to put people instead of astronauts or nuclear warhead.
Wonder how serious it is...
Meanwhile North Korea is struggling with their rocket program.
Uriah Siner BFR, Big Fat Rocket
At most like in Quake BFG ;)
Elon Musk shitting on the transport industry without even trying. What a legend
He is legendary, yes
He's offering an alternative. The existing industry is completely unaffected.
It's because he is afraid of trains
This will not affect any industry at all. The rocket plan will not work.
Elon Musk is fucking insane, and I love it
Or possibly the only sane person in a sea of insanity.
+Greg Knight no, his outlandish ideas is what most people need.
I am now convinced that Elon Musk is God incarnate.
I love Elon too
people in the comments really think strapping people to an ICBM is the future of travel? really? even if this does come to fruition it’s not going to be earth to earth
They are going to use methalox, which you can get from earths atmosphere, so it will actually be carbon neutral.
It uses methane and oxygen.
And it has a max G force of 2.4 when it will make these round trips, and 3g when it is going on a trip around the moon for example.
And lets say they can get that 150 metric tones and expand the habitat volume to 2,000 meters squared, in that case they can take 1,000 people, but if it is a suborbital trajectory then they can decrease the tank size on the ship and increase the habitat volume to 4,000 meters squared, then they can take 2,000 people. or potentialy more depending on how much the expand the payload fairing. And if the fuel and matinance cost 2 million per flight (and add on a extra million for profit margin) then each passenger would pay 1,500, and if they chose not to have a profit margin on a flight then each person would pay 1,000, which would actually be less than a flight half way around the world on a airplane. And if they can manufacture a starship for lets say 40,000,000-20,000,000 there profit margin would be minimal. And each flight would only last up to 50 minutes, compared to a plane which would take 51 hours to go half way around the world (including stops).
@@HarrisonAdAstra, yes that's nice and all, still haven't answered the stuff I was mainly talking about.
1. countries are not going to allow ICBMs to land anywhere near their major cities, not to mention the sheer amount of noise it would make. imagine the number of times it would be mistaken for an ICBM. hell, even planes get misidentified as ICBMs sometimes.
2. quite frankly, not many people are going to be using starship, most are probably going to go on it for the thrill. the need to travel halfway around the world is becoming less and less each year.
3. rockets get delayed. a lot. sometimes even up to multiple days. more so than airliners
I doubt that starship would be used to transport people to other places on earth, maybe it would be used as a form of tourism, but E2E? no. or it's just going to be used in the military.
Exciting!
Curious Elephant hope your vid on it is already in production :D
You Bet I am! Very tired now!
Hello I'm a curious subscriber 👍
This would change the world...so much
Give it some time. the Devs are still fixing this rising earth heating thing.
Can't wait to hear Scott Manley talk about it.
Edit: I'm done waiting, he uploaded his video :)
Or DasValdez
yes xD
Going to watch next stream. He may calculate the cost of the tickets.
I'm also looking forward for the video from wendover productions
yep, he will debunk the rocket based on the cost because of fuel. The cost of fuel to get 400k feet. in any direction and get to the speed needed to stay in enough of an orbit will never be lower than flying at 50k feet in a large plane going 500knph
Damn I hope I live long enough for this to be real and a common/accessible form of travel
"Have goals so big, that you get uncomfortable telling small-minded people."
That moment you realize that right now is the "Future"...
I believe in present. This is our reality. I want my future to be more advance.
I dream of the day I might see this
GeneralCookie I’m talking about the rocket in general lol. It’s too loud and would be way to risky of a business decision to try launching people around earth on it, supersonic airliners will be co ing by the time this would be considered safe enough for that, but this rocket or a similar version will absolutely fly, probably by 2025 and mars around 2030 though.
naive dreams.
@@Jacobsmith-tj9oj They thought the Same thing about the first planes..... This is future
Supersonic airliners exist, but they are SOOO inefficient. Probably won’t be in the future tho
6 weeks later...
This is really aging well. Christ, the guy is worth that much and still only puts out CG from 20 years ago.
Like most things Musk, this is a stupid idea that he is trying to oversell to push his stock.
Everything on this channel is bs made up to boost the stock market. Spacex doesn't make a profit, instead its stock value increases. And although none of the CGI that they pulled up have actually been implemented people are still investing in it. Just blows my mind how people cannot see the obvious bs evidence.
ELON MUSK is rocket man, not kim jong un
ed tyler
Agreed! No way we should waste an Elton John song on that spoiled kid!
Mile high club has nothing on space sex
Three dolphin club.
Look it up in incognito mode.
About 30 minutes or less, I don't think you'll have time. Besides, I don't think they'll have restrooms on those passenger rockets.
Space X. Space Sex. Ahh?? Ahhh?? Lmao
Until you yawn and get a guys load I your mouth
Thanks for the visual....
Elon continues to amaze.
It's only an animation, merely artistic conception. Are you aware of this ?
At least this looks more feasible to accomplish than Hype-a-loop.
sir Pulsinger it's a animation of something that has a quite realistic look into what we can do
I have more faith in Hyperloop. The fuel consumption for a vehicle like this is ludicrous
Sure, if he can pay billions and billions of dollars for the development costs...unless the US government pays for it of course. In that case, anything seems "realistic".
Secondly, this is not very practical method of travel = each passenger goes to zero-G and back every trip ? The loads are usually = "Astronauts normally experience a maximum g-force of around 3gs" during a rocket launch.
Faith alone does not overcome physical realities and engineering challenges, to say the least. What you have faith in is not relevant. Hype-a-loop is simply put: an engineering nightmare.
Have you ever worked with vacuum (or very low pressure environment) ? By "vacuum" I don't mean "vacuum cleaner". Well, anybody who works with pressure and vacuum knows how bloody difficult is to continuosly maintain the environment at that low pressure. And, quite frankly, everything leaks...sooner or later.
People like you = and most of the people = don't realize the pressure difference and what actually "vacuum" means in reality...that is, within conditions on Earth.
Job Seeker : I can't work overseas because of several reasons
Interviewer : Take the Starships, kid...
It's crazy that we'll soon be traveling to other continents in less than an hr. What a time to be alive
When you live in the US but commute to Hong Kong daily for work or studies.
Only if you have around $15k daily for the ticket.
Isn't it supposed to be as expensive as normal airplanes ?
probably gonna be a bit more but if it were around 5-6k I would buy one for sure.
And them will appear RyanRocket a Ryanair company with tickets at 10$ hehehe
but with a 50-50 chance of dying and no legspace
we have gone to the moon like 48 years ago, and we still haven't frequented space travel...
until now. Thanks Elon!
'we have gone to the moon like 48 years ago' - you mean we faked going to the moon. P.S that's not to say we can't get there , but back then they definitely faked it.
bladebison
Proof?
fuckoff
bladebison oh you're one of those tin foil hat idiots
bladebison You only believe that, because you want to be "smart" and act like you know this big "secret" that nobody knows.
Imagine how fast disaster relief supplies could be delivered.
That would also be the highest cost disaster relief ever.
only to places with pre-built landing spaces though, which would be high-tech metropolises, not Sudan or Haiti
Not really, if needed you could land on any open space that is strong enough (let's say an airport). The only problem would be you wouldn't be able to fly out of there again (which isn't that bad if we are talking about helping people survive a disaster).
My3dviews high tech? High tech cement?
Aerik Forager Right. The government has no excuse now.
I would absolutely pay extra to ride a starship.
SpaceX never fails to amuse me.
Thats right
Darban this is legit tho. Elon pioneering this futuristic shit bruh
StephonVowz This will never happen.