Garrett Lisi - Which Laws of Nature are Fundamental?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 дек 2020
- Why is there a world that works so well? How does the cosmos generate diversity and opportunity? A major reason is innumerable regularities, which we call laws of nature, make things happen. But which of these laws are 'fundamental' in the sense that they are the most basic? We search for the deep building blocks of the world.
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Watch more interviews on fundamental physics: bit.ly/36Dl8G4
Antony Garrett Lisi is an American theoretical physicist and adventure sports enthusiast.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
Hurray for Garrett Lisi, glad he's still learning!
Hopefully Garrett will one day figure out the nature of the relationship between dynamical symmetry breaking, physical particles and triality partners--this could help clear the way for gravity to be unified with the other three fundamental forces of nature, thus advancing a unified theory/theory of everything.
So glad for this channel, thanks, and I hope you keep the videos coming for a long time!
Loving it, keep bringing the excitement!
I intuitively understood geometry in my math classes growing up, and I've always been drawn to the beauty and communication of nature's geometric order... for me, any path closer to a more fundamental understanding of nature has to be through the imaging/visualization of geometry. "In the beginning... the torus was formless... and I said let there be 'spin'... and there were bundles of spinning knots and tori great and small." - God probably
Great work 🙏
Fascinating
My question: “Garret, were you by any chance on a large dose of LSD when you thought this theory up?”
That's some complex mathematics in the e8 theory, would be an intimidating task to perform while under the effects of LSD...
he did it, the madlad did it. All particles are merely manifestations of spinning spacetime or the vacuum spinning which proves the vacuum is not empty, it's full because you can't spin nothing, there has to be some intrinsic substrata of potential energy there for it to spin and manifest into all the particles in the known universe.
Thanks
Dr. Garret Lisi describes this E8 Theory of reality more and better in the RUclips video below. He also shows some pictures there:
ruclips.net/video/TN7aI4DsFOM/видео.html&ab_channel=FathomBeyond
This theory involves 8 dimensions. Which makes it hard to understand intuitively for people who are used to thinking in 3 dimensions only. And this theory makes some predictions about additional forces and particles that haven't yet been discovered. So, this is a testable theory that some day might be shown either right or wrong.
Garrett Lisi, the E8 lead group and Surfer, literally.. Lenny Susskind referred to him, when someone posed a question to Lenny, "is this the stuff from the Surfer Dude?" With out saying it, Susskind blew it off as (my term,. Crazy 8's). Needless to say, the guy never got any traction with his theory in the physics or mathematics community whatsoever, since the 10 years or so ago he came up with this idea. I'm certainly not qualified to understand why. Ask Ed Witten.
Hi, it's a great show. I wonder if you can Tell me about this Guy suffer things. It Will be awsome. Thank you very mutch for your insigh. Philippe Martin sincères amitiés.. 😎🎶
"Distler and Garibaldi published a critical paper arguing that Lisi's theory cannot work. They offer a direct proof that it is impossible to embed all three generations of fermions in E8."
I have not worked with Lie groups but that does not sound good! Too bad; Lisi looks like a nice guy and sounds smart and confident.
Is "there are no contradictions" the most fundamental law?
No direct contradictions. There may be indirect contradictions that make sense. Like the feeling of freedom in a determined universe, or the feeling of depression in a happy place.
Isolated rotation of rings of containment
Had the same theory when I was 16
This really cries out for a 3D animation. Obviously, everyone in the comments is clueless.
ruclips.net/video/aR88KR4sg-w/видео.html
Like a shadow of a 3d object on a wall. (Now imagine higher dimensions projected as a shadow in 3d).
You're in the comments.
Everyone is clueless.
Wondering if he has any associations with Klee Irwin ?
Does this sound similar to Bret Wienstines geometric unity theory that no one pays attention to or is it just
Me
Yeah science bruh!
Come again!
The laws are fundamental = laws is integrated in the phenomena.
Are elementtary charges energy?
“The circles are outside space time so they don’t have a length or size” hmm I don’t understand how they can be called circles then?
A single continuous parameter (phase/angle) where the beginning and end are the same point.
Law of Karma
I never heard anyone say gravity is caused by spin, is this a common idea in physics?
He sounds like Mark tegmark
Watching this reminds me of the film Pi.
Startitb / To me it reminds of foam pee. 😂
To quote Lisi himself, "Without fully describing how the three generations of fermions work, [my] theory and all predictions from it remain tenuous."
Tom Jones / To quite Lisa herself : "Without fully describing how tree generations fermented worms, my theory and all prescriptions from it remain tenebrous." 🤣
@@mikel4879 i dont know whats goin on in your brain but i like it
The most precious ability of the Eternal Life, is Motion,
there fore the Law of Motion is very fundamental,
so this was a recap of three years of academic fundamental physics learning
Led to plenty of more questions one is we look across something same as you turn on light and it's almost immediately everywhere it's possible our constituents are able to as how light is to be across every bit of distance
I guess, we need an infographic to show the consolidation of all of the fundamental particles into an atom, and from atoms to the forces it react to. Something like a tree. I believe every thing that is explained by cause and effect can be and must be represented by a tree.
Imagine, the seasons of the year’s, started with spring! Means , the seasons of rebirth to our nature’s, before the spring it was a , winter ! Just , compare that , to the beginning of the creation in spaces , what’s coming in your mind!!!!
Poor guy, he's definitely not used to describing these concepts to non physicists/mathematicians 🤣
I would sure like to hear Sabine Hossenfelder respond to this. I believe this is theoretical and she stays pretty grounded. I don’t understand 90% of what he’s saying. Maybe less.
"You’re theories are great, I hope they will succeed. But please, don’t send them to me." -Sabine
@@timjohnson3913 Sounds about right
I wonder if this partially fueled her rant on beauty in physics
I believe Conscious Agent Theory is 'closer to truth'. Consciousness, not spacetime, is the fundamental property of reality.
But is consciousness available for study like spacetime. Although time does not exist as a directly observable phenomenon scientists substitute clocks for it. Is there a physical contraption that can be substituted for consciousness or aspects of consciousness?
I love that! "i had this and that so, i went looking for those and; i found them!"
That's what i did with "the Christ event". Found Judas and Mar Thoma Church and the electrotonic pseudoparticle.
Good stuff! So cool. "Yeah."
Jeff L / 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Where is his conviction about the graviton and gravity charge (first time hearing the spin as a gravity charge) coming from? Wishful thinking at best
Lisi may need to add loop quantum gravity to his equation.
Still, no accounting for time. Mathematic models of our cosmos should not be time reversible. No such thing has ever been observed.
E8 lead (lie) groups? Are all theories derivable from one another? Geometry reducible to algebra? Quantum computing numbers reducible to real numbers? Pictographs reducible to alphabets?Or is there some gap? A gap not made of the inventory of either theory, but of syntax or grammar? And is this way of "reading" each theory fundamentally ineluctable?
Obviously we can translate French into Japanese, have we ever reconciled Christianity with Hinduism? Each one has its own "beauty". It seems to me that science is trying to describe or explain everything using one thing, while at the same time not acknowledging their own role, as scientists (humans), as the source of varied perspective.
Humans exist in a living, unfolding, world as part of it. No one theory can hope to encompass all the possibilities of consciousness or experience. Unless you make no room for new possibilities or experience.
Where science does well however is by ignoring this advice. Let them continue to make progress thinking they've found the answer in all their courageous and autistic happiness. Like all artists they encourage the rest of us by their flattery.
Virtually budding unicorn wannabes exist, too.
P.S. Sadly, it ain’t that ‘simple’ after all. There is no way that an E8 theory could contain a ‘Theory of Everything’. Jacques Distler and Skip Garibaldi have practically proved that fact in their 2009 paper.
This is the worst and most nonsensical one yet. He looks and sounds like an auto mechanic.
Math bs. You have no idea.
all that went right over my head...i found him totally boring...
It is so annoying how people go "rightT?" After saying statements. It's the new "umm".
Hello Garrett 🌞, EMFSYSTEMS. Is the shite my friend. Gravity is not a force. It's local to an atmosphere environment. It wasn't there at the beginning, so it's not there now. Peace ✌️ 😎. It's not quantum it's weighted mass in an atmosphere environment. Just sayin 🤷.